标签: Europe

欧洲

  • Spain’s Pedro Sánchez hits back at Trump threat to sever trade saying ‘no to war’

    Spain’s Pedro Sánchez hits back at Trump threat to sever trade saying ‘no to war’

    In a resolute televised address from the prime ministerial residence at La Moncloa, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez delivered a robust rebuttal to U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to sever all trade relations with Spain. The confrontation emerged following Madrid’s refusal to permit American military utilization of jointly operated bases at Morón and Rota for potential strikes against Iran.

    Sánchez articulated Spain’s unwavering diplomatic stance during his ten-minute national broadcast, emphasizing that the government’s position could be encapsulated in four definitive words: “No to war.” The Socialist leader drew parallels between current Middle Eastern tensions and historical conflicts, including the Iraq invasion of 2003 which he characterized as having failed its objectives while exacerbating civilian hardships.

    The Prime Minister asserted that one violation of international legality cannot justify another, explicitly referencing what he termed the “breakdown of international law” in contemporary warfare. This statement came shortly after his administration appealed for de-escalation and adherence to established international protocols in the Middle East.

    Trump’s condemnation emerged during discussions with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, where the U.S. president labeled Spain a “terrible partner” within NATO frameworks, citing insufficient defense budget allocations relative to agreed-upon GDP percentages. The American leader threatened comprehensive trade restrictions against Spain in retaliation for base access denial.

    Chancellor Merz subsequently clarified that he explicitly informed Trump that separate agreements excluding Spain were diplomatically untenable for Germany or the European collective. Meanwhile, Sánchez revealed that his government is developing economic countermeasures to shield Spanish citizens from potential conflict-induced repercussions.

    The Spanish leader, known for his vocal criticism of Israel’s military operations in Gaza following 2023 Hamas attacks, positioned current geopolitical tensions within broader historical and ethical contexts. He cautioned that military escalation against Iran could precipitate severe economic consequences affecting millions globally, while condemning the use of “fog of war” rhetoric to obscure policy failures.

    Sánchez concluded with a principled distinction: “The fundamental question isn’t whether we align with ayatollahs—nobody does—but whether we champion peace and international legality.”

  • ‘It’s too warm’: Greenland’s fishermen are under threat from climate change

    ‘It’s too warm’: Greenland’s fishermen are under threat from climate change

    ILULISSAT, Greenland — For Helgi Áargil, a seasoned fisherman navigating Greenland’s majestic fjords, the rhythms of his profession have become increasingly erratic. Accompanied only by his dog Molly and the shimmering northern lights, Áargil now faces unprecedented uncertainty in waters that have sustained generations. His recent experiences encapsulate the broader crisis: last year, his vessel became trapped in dislodged glacial ice; this season, unusually wet conditions have dominated.

    The Arctic region is warming at approximately twice the global average rate, fundamentally transforming the environmental conditions that have long dictated fishing patterns. This semiautonomous Danish territory, which garnered international attention following former U.S. President Donald Trump’s expressed interest in purchasing it, now confronts a more pressing challenge: the climatic disruption of its economic backbone.

    Fishing constitutes up to 95% of Greenland’s exports, with China serving as its primary market alongside the United States, Japan, and European nations. The industry’s future remains uncertain as marine ecosystems undergo rapid transformation.

    The most dramatic changes affect traditional ice fishermen, who represent approximately half of the local industry. Karl Sandgreen, director of the Ilulissat-based Icefjord Center which documents regional climate change, recalls when fishermen worked atop sea ice measuring 1.5 meters thick. That ice began disappearing around 1997, forcing a transition from ice-based to boat-based fishing.

    While boats provide access to larger fishing areas, they introduce new complications including increased operational costs, pollution contributing to further warming, and potential overfishing. Toke Binzer, CEO of Royal Greenland (the territory’s largest employer), describes the current dilemma as balancing between “too much ice to sail, too little to go out on”—a paradox that has already created significant operational challenges.

    The company supports traditional fishermen through boat financing programs, with repayments deducted from future catches. However, ecological shifts are manifesting in concerning ways: halibut are decreasing in size, a classic indicator of overfishing according to marine biodiversity expert Boris Worm of Canada’s Dalhousie University.

    Worm notes that retreating ice could theoretically increase fish stocks by delivering more nutrients through melted ice and rainfall, boosting plankton populations. However, fish behavior is becoming less predictable as species seek new food sources amid disappearing sea ice algae.

    For fishermen like Áargil, the changes are immediately tangible. Warmer waters are driving fish to deeper, colder depths, making traditional catches increasingly elusive. “It’s too warm,” he observes, gazing across the fjord. “I don’t know where the fish is going, but there’s not so much.”

    With limited economic alternatives—tourism remains underdeveloped—and cultural traditions like dog sledding already compromised by absent sea ice, Greenland faces complex challenges. In Nuuk alone, over 1,000 fishing boats crowd the harbor during summer months, highlighting the industry’s centrality for a territory with just over 50,000 inhabitants.

    The transformation of Greenland’s fishing industry represents both an economic recalibration and a cultural watershed, as climatic forces reshape one of the world’s most vulnerable ecosystems.

  • European allies rush to bolster Cyprus defences after drones target British base

    European allies rush to bolster Cyprus defences after drones target British base

    A multinational European security deployment is underway in Cyprus following a drone incursion at the British RAF Akrotiri airbase over the weekend. The Eastern Mediterranean nation has become an unexpected focal point in regional tensions stemming from U.S.-Israeli operations against Iranian interests.

    The United Kingdom has dispatched HMS Dragon, a Type 45 air defense destroyer, alongside helicopters equipped with advanced counter-drone capabilities. French President Emmanuel Macron confirmed the imminent arrival of the frigate Languedoc, while Greece has committed four F-16 fighter jets and two frigates, including the Psara equipped with the specialized Centauros anti-drone system.

    Greek Defense Minister Nikos Dendias, during his visit to Nicosia, emphasized his nation’s commitment: “Greece is present, and will continue to be present to assist in any way in the defence of the Republic of Cyprus.”

    Military analysts note the strategic significance of these deployments. Former strategist Mikey Kay observed that the Type 45 destroyer represents “very expensive equipment” that is “highly capable,” though questions remain about its effectiveness against potential swarm attacks using lower-cost Iranian Shahed 136 drones.

    The incident has triggered operational responses beyond Cyprus. RAF F-35 jets operating over Jordan have engaged and destroyed an Iranian drone, according to UK Ministry of Defence statements. Meanwhile, the drone scare has prompted evacuations of both British military families and local Cypriot residents near the base.

    Cyprus has explicitly distanced itself from the broader Middle East conflict, with government spokesmen criticizing initial ambiguities regarding the base’s usage. The nation emphasized that British installations should serve exclusively humanitarian purposes and reaffirmed that Cyprus itself is not a target in regional tensions.

    The British military presence in Cyprus, covering nearly 3% of the island’s territory, represents a colonial legacy dating to the 1960 independence agreement. This marks the first significant attack on RAF Akrotiri since pro-Libyan militants struck the base in 1986.

  • Irish government to charter flight for citizens stranded in Middle East

    Irish government to charter flight for citizens stranded in Middle East

    The Irish government has initiated emergency evacuation procedures for its citizens stranded in the Middle East following escalating regional conflicts. Foreign Affairs Minister Helen McEntee announced a charter flight operation from Oman with capacity for approximately 280 passengers, prioritizing the most vulnerable Irish nationals currently in the United Arab Emirates.

    The evacuation effort represents the first phase of Ireland’s crisis response, with authorities directly contacting citizens deemed most urgently requiring assistance. Minister McEntee emphasized the selective nature of this initial operation, acknowledging that thousands of registered citizens would necessitate multiple flights. “I appreciate when you talk about the thousands who are there, that is a fraction of the number of people that may want to get home at the same time,” McEntee stated during an interview with Irish broadcaster RTÉ.

    The flight’s departure remains contingent on airspace accessibility and security conditions, with no specific timeline confirmed. The minister urged patience as authorities implement their phased evacuation strategy while maintaining full consular support for all Irish citizens in the region.

    This development occurs against the backdrop of severe aviation disruptions across the Middle East, with thousands of flights canceled since Saturday. The transportation crisis follows recent military actions involving US and Israeli strikes against Iran, which resulted in the death of Iran’s supreme leader and subsequent retaliatory measures throughout the region.

    The Irish evacuation parallels similar efforts by other nations, including the United Kingdom, which announced comparable charter flights from Muscat prioritizing vulnerable British nationals. Both governments have emphasized the challenges of large-scale citizen extraction during active regional conflict and airspace instability.

  • Trump says ‘someone from within’ Iranian regime might be best choice to lead once war ends

    Trump says ‘someone from within’ Iranian regime might be best choice to lead once war ends

    In a significant departure from his previous stance, President Donald Trump indicated on Tuesday that an internal figure from within Iran’s existing power structure might constitute the most suitable leadership option once military operations conclude. This marks a notable evolution from his weekend call for citizens to seize control of their government following the U.S.-Israel campaign that eliminated Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and numerous senior officials.

    Speaking during German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s Oval Office visit—the first foreign leader engagement since hostilities commenced—Trump revealed that most potential successors previously identified by his administration had perished in the ongoing conflict. “Most of the people we had in mind are dead,” the president stated. “Now we have another group, they may be dead also, based on reports. So you have a third wave coming. Pretty soon we’re not going to know anybody.”

    The administration explicitly dismissed Reza Pahlavi, the exiled crown prince seeking to position himself for a potential return, as a serious contender. Instead, Trump suggested that “somebody from within maybe would be more appropriate,” particularly “somebody that’s there, that’s currently popular, if there is such a person.” He emphasized concerns about installing leadership equally problematic as the previous regime, warning against a scenario where “in five years you realize you put somebody in who was no better.”

    Concurrently, the White House intensified efforts to justify its decision to initiate hostilities, revealing through an anonymous senior official that negotiators Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff had believed an enhanced version of the Obama-era nuclear agreement was achievable, though potentially requiring months of additional diplomacy. Despite this assessment, they reportedly advised Trump that Iran remained unwilling to meet U.S. demands satisfactorily.

    The president simultaneously escalated tensions with European allies, threatening to sever all trade with Spain after it denied U.S. access to jointly operated bases for strikes not sanctioned by the UN charter. He additionally criticized British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s initial reluctance to permit base usage, sarcastically noting “this is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with.”

    Trump further contradicted Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s assertion that the U.S. acted preemptively due to anticipated Israeli action, insisting instead that he “might have forced Israel’s hand” based on intelligence suggesting an imminent Iranian attack.

    Chancellor Merz emphasized Germany’s interest in collaborating on a post-conflict strategy, noting the conflict’s damaging impact on global oil prices. Trump acknowledged temporary energy price increases but predicted they would ultimately fall “lower than even before” once hostilities cease.

  • Dior’s Jonathan Anderson finds his stride with a garden of earthly delights at Paris Fashion Week

    Dior’s Jonathan Anderson finds his stride with a garden of earthly delights at Paris Fashion Week

    PARIS — The historic Tuileries Garden served as an illuminated runway on Tuesday as Jonathan Anderson presented his fall-winter 2026 collection for Dior, bathing the designs in a golden light reminiscent of Impressionist masterpieces. The glass-walled catwalk created an immersive experience where Parisian strollers became unintended spectators to fashion’s elite gathering.

    Celebrity attendees including Anya Taylor-Joy, Charlize Theron, Jisoo, Priyanka Chopra, Willow Smith, Emily Ratajkowski, and Macaulay Culkin observed from walkways surrounding the garden’s octagonal basin, artfully decorated with artificial water lilies paying homage to Monet’s iconic works. This setting perfectly complemented Anderson’s floral and aquatic-inspired collection that explored the art of public presentation.

    Anderson revealed his conceptual inspiration stemmed from the tradition of promenade dressing and his perspective as a relative newcomer to Paris. The resulting collection marked his most cohesive women’s offering for Dior to date, featuring deconstructed frock coats, peplum jackets, and bustle skirts rendered in candied almond hues, Chantilly lace, and metallic jacquards.

    The floral theme manifested through sophisticated silhouette manipulation rather than literal applications. Crinkled cardigans evoked flower corollas, while asymmetrically fastened skirts and dresses suggested unfolding petals. Even crystal detailing on embroidered jeans carried subtle botanical references.

    Notable technical achievements included elongated interpretations of Dior’s legendary Bar jacket in Donegal tweed, cloud-like soft pleated fabrics recalling previous couture creations, and trompe-l’oeil techniques that created three-dimensional illusions through houndstooth patterns and hand-pleated elements. The collection also featured unexpected pieces such as ivory hammered silk track pants with bridal buttons and plain robe coats repurposed as dresses.

    The show’s location held historical significance, continuing Dior’s partnership with the Louvre Museum to restore one of Paris’s oldest public gardens—originally commissioned by Queen Catherine de’ Medici and redesigned for Louis XIV as a venue for social spectacle. Anderson’s designs demonstrated his evolving interpretation of this centuries-old tradition of public display, presenting a increasingly clear vision through his fifth collection for the iconic house.

  • Trump threatens to halt trade with Spain over military base access

    Trump threatens to halt trade with Spain over military base access

    President Donald Trump has issued a stark threat to sever all commercial relations with Spain following the European nation’s refusal to permit U.S. military operations against Iran from its strategic bases. During a White House press briefing, the President characterized Spain’s cooperation as “terrible” and declared, “We’re going to cut off all trade. We don’t want anything to do with Spain.”

    The confrontation stems from Madrid’s decision to block American access to Spanish military installations for operations targeting Iran, which Spanish officials contend would violate the United Nations charter. This diplomatic friction compounds existing tensions regarding defense expenditure requirements within NATO alliances, with Trump specifically criticizing Spain’s resistance to increasing military spending to 5% of GDP.

    While Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent asserted the legal authority to implement such an embargo, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer offered more measured responses when consulted about the proposed trade restrictions. The administration’s capacity to enact targeted trade measures against an EU member state remains legally and logistically complex due to the bloc’s integrated market structure.

    Bilateral trade between the nations represents significant economic interests, with 2025 data revealing $26 billion in U.S. exports to Spain and $21 billion in Spanish imports to American markets, including pharmaceuticals and agricultural products such as olive oil.

    The political dimension extends beyond immediate military concerns, as Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez—among Europe’s few remaining left-leaning leaders—publicly condemned U.S. and Israeli military actions against Iran as “unjustified, dangerous intervention” violating international law. While Trump additionally criticized the United Kingdom for insufficient cooperation regarding military base access, no parallel trade threats were directed toward British authorities.

  • Trump threatens to cut off trade with Spain after it disallowed US use of joint bases in Iran war

    Trump threatens to cut off trade with Spain after it disallowed US use of joint bases in Iran war

    In a dramatic escalation of transatlantic tensions, former President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to terminate all trade relations with Spain during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Tuesday. The threat emerged from dual grievances regarding Spain’s refusal to support U.S.-Israeli military actions against Iran and its resistance to meeting NATO’s defense spending targets.

    Trump’s declaration came directly following Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares’ statement that American military bases in southern Spain would not be utilized for strikes unauthorized by the United Nations charter. Albares specifically confirmed that these joint facilities played no role in the recent weekend operations against Iran.

    The feasibility of implementing such a trade cutoff remains legally complex, as Spain operates within the European Union’s unified trade framework. The EU negotiates comprehensive trade agreements collectively for all 27 member states, presenting significant jurisdictional challenges to unilateral action.

    A spokesperson from Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s office responded firmly, emphasizing that any review of trade agreements must respect “the autonomy of private companies, international law, and bilateral agreements between the European Union and the United States.”

    This confrontation represents the latest application of Trump’s trademark economic coercion tactics, occurring shortly after a Supreme Court decision struck down his previous expansive tariff authorities. While the court limited presidential power to impose broad tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, Trump now interprets the ruling as granting him alternative authority to implement full-scale embargoes against selected nations.

    Additional friction points emerged regarding defense expenditures, with Trump criticizing Spain’s withdrawal from NATO’s 5% spending commitment. Spain maintains that allocating 2.1% of GDP sufficiently meets its military capability requirements—a position Trump vehemently rejected. Chancellor Merz acknowledged the spending discrepancy, noting German efforts to persuade Spain that collective security requires full compliance with alliance commitments.

    Spain defended its NATO contributions, asserting its status as “a key member of NATO, fulfilling its commitments and making a significant contribution to the defense of European territory.”

    During the meeting, Trump consulted Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent regarding embargo authority, receiving confirmation that the administration would pursue investigations through the U.S. Trade Representative and Commerce Department. The Treasury Department declined to provide additional commentary to The Associated Press.

    The diplomatic rift extends beyond military matters, with Prime Minister Sánchez’s government condemning the Iran strikes as “unjustifiable” and “dangerous” while demanding immediate de-escalation. Spain’s progressive administration has also been notably critical of Israel’s military operations in Gaza, further distinguishing its foreign policy from Washington’s approach.

    Trump concluded with personal criticism, stating Spain offers “absolutely nothing that we need other than great people,” while denouncing the country’s leadership. This exchange marks the most significant deterioration in U.S.-Spanish relations since Sánchez emerged as Europe’s last major progressive leader.

  • Macron orders France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Mediterranean

    Macron orders France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Mediterranean

    PARIS — In a significant military mobilization, French President Emmanuel Macron has ordered the redeployment of France’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, from the Baltic Sea to the Mediterranean theater. The strategic move aims to bolster allied defense capabilities during escalating tensions in the Middle East conflict.

    During a televised address, Macron confirmed the carrier strike group would be accompanied by its full air wing and escort frigates. This deployment coincides with the recent positioning of Rafale fighter jets, advanced air-defense systems, and airborne radar assets to the region over the past several hours.

    The French leader emphasized the nation’s commitment to sustained operational presence, stating, “We will continue this effort as much as necessary.” He specifically referenced Monday’s attack on a British airbase in Cyprus—an EU member state with which France recently established a strategic partnership—as justification for enhanced defensive measures.

    Additional reinforcements include supplementary air-defense resources and the guided-missile frigate Languedoc, which Macron confirmed would arrive off the Cypriot coast imminently.

    While France, the United Kingdom, and Germany have previously denied direct involvement in strikes against Iran, all three nations have expressed readiness to support proportional defensive operations targeting Iran’s missile and drone capabilities.

    Macron further highlighted France’s existing defense agreements with Qatar, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates, alongside security commitments to Jordan and Iraq. Expressing concern over conflict spillover into Lebanon, the president condemned Hezbollah’s strikes against Israel as “a grave mistake” endangering Lebanese civilians, while simultaneously cautioning against Israeli ground operations.

  • Country by country, here’s how the unfolding war is affecting the Middle East and beyond

    Country by country, here’s how the unfolding war is affecting the Middle East and beyond

    The escalating military confrontation between Iran and Israel has erupted into a full-scale regional crisis, causing catastrophic damage across the Middle East and triggering global economic and humanitarian repercussions. According to verified reports, nearly every nation in the region has sustained direct impacts from missile strikes, drone attacks, or falling debris, resulting in significant civilian casualties and infrastructure destruction.

    The conflict has forced unprecedented international response measures, with numerous governments urgently evacuating their citizens via any available commercial flights. Critical airspaces throughout the Gulf region have been largely closed to civilian traffic, while major shipping lanes including the Strait of Hormuz have become impassable due to security concerns. The United States State Department has confirmed the evacuation of non-essential personnel and diplomatic families from six nations, with travel advisories issued for over a dozen countries.

    Regional impact assessments reveal devastating human costs: Iran reports approximately 1,045 fatalities, including significant civilian casualties from a disputed elementary school strike in Minab. Israel has confirmed eleven civilian deaths from rocket attacks, while Lebanon’s Health Ministry reports 72 fatalities including seven children, with over 84,000 people displaced. Kuwait has suffered eight casualties, including six American soldiers killed at a operations center.

    Critical infrastructure has been systematically targeted, with nuclear facilities, government compounds, and economic assets suffering extensive damage. The United Arab Emirates, previously considered a regional safe haven, has seen its reputation shaken after Iranian drones struck its international airport, coastal hotels, and Amazon data centers. Dubai’s status as a global business hub has been particularly compromised by these attacks.

    Global economic ramifications are already emerging, with Iraq’s Ministry of Oil announcing production halts in key fields due to Strait of Hormuz disruptions, causing worldwide crude oil prices to surge. Egypt’s struggling economy faces further pressure as shipping companies reroute vessels away from the Suez Canal, a vital source of foreign currency.

    The conflict has expanded beyond the Middle East, with a U.S. submarine sinking an Iranian warship off the coast of Sri Lanka, resulting in 87 confirmed fatalities. NATO defense systems in Turkey have intercepted ballistic missiles, while a British air base in Cyprus has come under attack, demonstrating the conflict’s expanding geographical footprint.

    International diplomatic efforts continue amid the chaos, with governments from Russia to Germany and India organizing emergency repatriation flights for their citizens caught in the rapidly deteriorating security situation across the region.