LONDON — Long before her decades-long reign as Britain’s sovereign, Queen Elizabeth II understood a core truth of constitutional monarchy: for the public to trust their monarch, they first needed to see her. Even when Britain’s notoriously unpredictable rainy weather threatened to block public view, she broke new ground by adopting a clear plastic raincoat, rather than hiding behind a thick dark umbrella that would have kept her obscured from crowds. That iconic raincoat now takes its place among nearly 300 garments and fashion artifacts opening to the public Friday at Buckingham Palace’s King’s Gallery, in the most complete exhibition of Queen Elizabeth II’s sartorial choices ever assembled. Tied to the upcoming centenary of her birth, the show traces her life from childhood to her decades on the throne, while unpacking her lasting impact on British fashion and public diplomacy.\n\nCurator Caroline de Guitaut, who organized the exhibition, notes that the late monarch had a sharp, intentional sense of what looked and felt appropriate for her role. “She absolutely knew how she wanted to appear,” de Guitaut explains.\n\nAs one of the most photographed public figures in modern history, many of the queen’s pieces are instantly recognizable to audiences around the world — but seeing her signature tweed suits, ball gowns, and patterned headscarves displayed on museum mannequins still offers a new, striking perspective for visitors. Among the collection are truly one-of-a-kind pieces with fascinating backstories, including two matching dresses crafted for the 2012 London Olympic Games opening ceremony. When the 86-year-old queen filmed her iconic skit alongside Daniel Craig’s James Bond, appearing to parachute into the Olympic stadium, a stunt double wore one version of the design — complete with matching bloomers and a large back zipper to fit a parachute harness. Moments after the stunt, the queen herself appeared in the stadium stands in an identical second dress, both created by her long-time personal dressmaker Angela Kelly. Now, the two garments are displayed side-by-side for exhibition guests.\n\nDrawn from a personal collection of more than 4,000 items once owned by the queen, the exhibition explores how the late monarch turned fashion into one of her most effective tools for public engagement and diplomacy, as she grew from a young princess into Britain’s longest-serving ruler. A perfect example of this intentional sartorial diplomacy is the green and white Norman Hartnell ball gown she wore to a 1961 state banquet during an official visit to Pakistan: she chose the design specifically to match the host nation’s colors, extending a gesture of respect before she ever spoke a word.\n\n“The queen had an intimate understanding of how fashion could lend itself to diplomacy, a trait which, while its origins certainly lay in earlier reigns, the queen developed into nothing short of an art form,” de Guitaut says. “Color or embellishment communicated messages of respect to her host nation before she had even uttered a word in her speech.”\n\nLater in her reign, she intentionally chose bright, eye-catching hues for large public gatherings, making it easy for crowds to spot her, fulfilling her core belief that the monarch had to be seen to connect with the public. The exhibition also devotes space to the queen’s off-duty wardrobe, showcasing the tweed suits she wore while staying at Balmoral Castle, the royal family’s Scottish summer retreat, alongside riding gear, hiking clothing, and outdoor apparel. Pieces range from a thick wool coat designed by Kelly to designs by iconic British brands Burberry and Hardy Amies.\n\nMany of the exhibition’s most meaningful pieces are tied to the defining milestones of the queen’s 96 years of life, stretching from a christening robe first commissioned by Queen Victoria for the baptism of King Edward VII, to the gowns she wore for her 1947 wedding and 1953 coronation. Curators have also included original design sketches and handwritten notes that reveal how closely involved the queen was in every step of creating her wardrobe.\n\nNaomi Pike, commissioning editor for Elle UK, notes that the exhibition finally gives the queen long-overdue recognition as a bona fide fashion icon, a title that was often granted to other high-profile royals during her lifetime — from her younger sister Princess Margaret to her daughter-in-law Princess Diana — while she was overlooked. “I think we’re very quick in this day and age to afford people icon status. … It’s thrown around so easily,” Pike says. “But I think in the case of the queen, she was an icon and so much of that comes down to having a very strong sense of personal style.”\n\nBeyond the iconic formal gowns that draw the largest crowds, the exhibition holds thoughtful small surprises, including a well-worn children’s fairy costume made from a tutu with cloth fairy wings. The piece is a favorite of Cecilia Oliver, a textile conservator at the King’s Gallery who spent months preparing the collection for display, who calls it “the cutest thing in the world.” “I think what I love most about it is that it was bought for Elizabeth as a child, and to think of her as this tiny little girl that then grew up into this magnificent woman with all this weight of responsibility on her shoulders, it just feels very, sort of sentimental,” Oliver says.\n\nOliver spoke of the unique privilege of working so closely with the collection, which gave her an intimate connection to a figure known to billions but understood by very few. “As a conservator, I have a really intimate knowledge of these pieces. I’ve been able to touch them. I’ve been able to smell them. I’ve been able to understand them,” she says. “And through that, I felt really close to her.”\n\nQueen Elizabeth II: Her Life in Style will run at the King’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace, through October 18.
标签: Europe
欧洲
-

Co-leader McIlroy’s golf does the talking after busy Masters build-up
The opening round of the year’s first men’s major championship, the Masters at Augusta National Golf Club, has delivered a stunning statement from defending champion Rory McIlroy, who silenced pre-tournament doubts about his form and focus to climb into a share of the first-round lead alongside American Sam Burns.
In the lead-up to this year’s tournament, most of the media and fan attention surrounding McIlroy centered on the ceremonial duties that come with being the reigning champion – headlining the iconic Champions’ Dinner, participating in pre-tournament traditions, and navigating the packed schedule of engagements that come with wearing the Green Jacket. Far less discussion focused on whether the Northern Irish star would have his game sharp enough to pull off a rare back-to-back Masters victory, a feat only accomplished by Jack Nicklaus, Nick Faldo and Tiger Woods in the tournament’s history.
But when McIlroy stepped between the competition ropes on Thursday, the 36-year-old five-time major winner quickly reminded the golf world that he did not travel to Augusta simply to fulfill ceremonial roles. He came to compete, and he came to win. Carding a five-under-par 67, McIlroy enters the second round tied atop the leaderboard with Burns, waking up any observers who had counted out his chances of repeating last year’s historic win.
McIlroy’s triumph at Augusta last year was particularly meaningful, marking the completion of his career Grand Slam after more than a decade of near-misses and heartbreak at the tournament. In the immediate aftermath of that win, McIlroy said finally claiming the Green Jacket would “free” him from the weight of historical pressure, allowing his mind and body to operate with more autonomy at major championships. That mental liberation did not show up immediately in his results in the months after, however, sparking questions about whether he would be able to hit his stride at his title defense.
Those questions began to get answered early in his opening round. After a tentative start, McIlroy found his rhythm, reeling off five birdies between the 8th and 15th holes, including three consecutive birdies that pushed him up the leaderboard. His 67 marks his lowest opening round at Augusta since 2011, and only the third time in his 18-year Masters career that he has broken 70 on day one.
A testament to McIlroy’s veteran savvy, his opening round was a masterclass in low scoring despite inconsistent ball striking. He only hit five of 14 fairways and 12 of 18 greens in regulation, but he repeatedly recovered from errant tee shots to save or pick up strokes. Critically, he birdied all four of Augusta’s iconic par-fives even without hitting a single fairway on those holes. When he found himself in the trees on three different holes, he avoided reckless gambles, chipped back into position and still walked away with birdies. His only mistake came on the par-four third, where he overcooked his approach shot and carded a bogey after three putts.
Pre-tournament concerns had also centered on whether McIlroy’s packed schedule of defending champion duties – more interviews, more public appearances, more ceremonial obligations – would leave him short on preparation time and drained mentally. But a relaxed McIlroy vowed ahead of the round that he would lock in once the Champions Dinner and Par 3 Contest were in the rearview mirror, and he delivered on that promise on Thursday. While it remains to be seen if the busy schedule will lead to fatigue as the week progresses, McIlroy noted he is already far better positioned than he was 12 months ago, when he started with a 72 and entered the second round seven shots off the pace.
“It’s a great start but there is a long way to go,” McIlroy told reporters after the round. “I still have high expectations of myself, but my expectations are more focused on whether I made good decisions, whether I was committed, whether I trusted my swing. It wasn’t my expectation that I’d go out and shoot 65. I think winning a Masters makes it easier to win your second one. It’s still hard, because there are still shots where you feel a little tight, and you just have to stand up and commit to making a good swing and not worry about where it goes. But it’s easier for me to do that when I know I can go to the champions’ locker room and put on my Green Jacket.”
Just three shots off the lead sits a stacked chasing pack, headlined by England’s Justin Rose and world number one Scottie Scheffler, both of whom carded two-under-par 70. For Rose, the 2024 runner-up who was agonizingly beaten by McIlroy in a playoff last year, a strong opening round keeps alive his quest to finally claim his first Green Jacket, which would make him the second-oldest winner in Masters history at 45. Rose dropped back slightly after bogeys on his final two holes, but he said he was pleased with his start on a tough day for scoring.
“I look at the big picture,” Rose said. “It was a good round of golf on a day which was challenging. Small margins but overall a good start to the tournament and I can build on it.”
Scheffler, the two-time major champion, has struggled with inconsistent form in the weeks leading into the Masters, but he got off to a blistering start with an eagle on the second hole and a birdie on the third. While he could not add any more birdies over the final 16 holes, his signature consistency held up to deliver a solid opening round that keeps him firmly in contention heading into Friday.
Other notable names in the chasing pack include 2024 runner-up Patrick Reed, Australian Jason Day and American Kurt Kitayama, all of whom carded three-under 69 to sit one shot behind the co-leaders. England’s Tommy Fleetwood climbed high on the leaderboard early with four birdies in his first nine holes, but four bogeys on the back nine pulled him back to a one-over 71, leaving him tied for 18th going into round two.
Not all top contenders got off to a strong start. Scotland’s Robert MacIntyre, who was labeled a dark horse contender after top-two finishes in his last two events, carded a disastrous eight-over-par 80 that includes a quadruple-bogey nine on the 15th, where he hit two consecutive tee shots into the water. 2023 champion Jon Rahm of Spain, another pre-tournament favorite, also had a day to forget, shooting a six-over 78 – the worst round of his Masters career. Fellow LIV Golf competitor Bryson DeChambeau carded a four-over 76, with most of his damage coming from a triple-bogey seven on the 11th after he needed three shots to escape a greenside bunker. Defending U.S. Open champion Matt Fitzpatrick of England ended the day at two-over, while last year’s runner-up Ludvig Aberg of Sweden also carded a two-over 74.
Only 16 of the 91-player field finished the opening round under par, with tournament officials expecting conditions to get even firmer and faster over the remaining three days, making low scoring even more of a premium. McIlroy’s five-under opening round gives him an early edge as he chases a rare piece of Masters history, but all eyes will be on whether he can keep his momentum through the weekend as he chases his second consecutive Green Jacket.
-

Russia and Ukraine agree to truce for Orthodox Easter
In the heart of Kyiv’s St. Michael’s Cathedral on April 9, 2026, a solemn yet hopeful ceremony unfolded days before Orthodox Easter. Metropolitan Epiphanius I, the primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, performed a blessing by sprinkling holy water over stacks of Easter cakes, all bound for Ukrainian troops holding defensive positions along the country’s frontlines. This quiet act of spiritual support comes as both Moscow and Kyiv have formally announced a temporary ceasefire set to coincide with the religious holiday, a rare break in a conflict that has stretched on for years.
The path to this truce began with repeated ceasefire appeals from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, all of which were previously rejected by the Kremlin. In an unexpected shift, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced that he had ordered all Russian military forces to hold their fire across the entire frontline from 16:00 local time (14:00 BST) on April 11 through Easter Sunday. Putin added that he expected Ukraine to mirror Russia’s gesture, while also ordering his troops to remain on high alert to respond to any perceived Ukrainian provocations or aggressive actions.
This framing of the truce, which positions Russia as the initiator to seize diplomatic initiative, has historically created friction with Ukrainian officials, but Kyiv moved quickly to confirm its willingness to match the pause. Shortly after Putin’s announcement, Zelensky published a post on X confirming Ukraine would take reciprocal steps. “People need an Easter free from threats and real movement toward peace,” he wrote, adding that Russia had an opportunity to extend the pause beyond the holiday weekend rather than resuming offensive strikes.
Days earlier, Zelensky revealed he had asked the United States to relay his proposal for a holiday truce to Moscow, framing the temporary pause as a small but critical first confidence-building step toward broader peace talks. For frontline soldiers who face constant harassment from Russian attack drones along the hundreds of kilometers of eastern front, any halt to active fighting would bring much-needed relief. The truce would also grant a rare reprieve to civilians across Ukraine, where daily air raid sirens, regular Russian missile and drone strikes have become a normalized part of life, with civilian casualties reported just days before the truce announcement.
Just last week, multiple civilians were killed when a drone struck a passenger bus in Nikopol, a southeastern Ukrainian city near the frontline. In Zhytomyr, a city west of Kyiv, a woman died when a Russian missile landed adjacent to her home in the middle of a weekday morning. Even moments after the truce was publicly announced, air raid sirens blared again across Kyiv, a stark reminder that the conflict remains active. In recent weeks, Ukraine has also ramped up its own cross-border drone campaign against Russia, with strikes focusing heavily on Russian energy export infrastructure, though Moscow claims residential areas have also been hit in the attacks.
Despite the announcement of a temporary pause, many Ukrainians remain deeply skeptical that this truce will hold beyond the holiday weekend. Past Russian-declared ceasefires have been short-lived and marred by violations, reinforcing Kyiv’s distrust of Moscow’s intentions. Earlier this year, Putin announced a so-called “energy truce” that paused Russian strikes on Ukraine’s critical power infrastructure during the coldest months of winter. That pause only lasted long enough for Russia to reposition and rearm for a new wave of large-scale missile attacks. In May 2025, Russia declared a unilateral ceasefire to mark the 80th anniversary of the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany; Ukrainian officials recorded hundreds of Russian ceasefire violations during that planned pause.
For Ukraine, the end goal remains unchanged: Kyiv has repeatedly pushed for a full, permanent ceasefire as the first step toward formal negotiations to end Russia’s full-scale invasion. Moscow, by contrast, has insisted that a final peace agreement be reached before any lasting ceasefire can take effect, a position that has led Kyiv to accuse the Kremlin of acting in bad faith and lacking genuine commitment to ending the war. Multiple rounds of peace talks mediated by the United States have taken place over the course of the conflict, but negotiations have been stalled since the Trump administration redirected its diplomatic focus to the ongoing crisis in the Middle East.
-

Russia’s Putin declares a ceasefire in Ukraine for Orthodox Easter
As Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine enters its fifth year of active conflict, Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered a 32-hour unilateral ceasefire across all front lines to coincide with the Orthodox Easter weekend, a move that follows an earlier holiday truce proposal from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The Kremlin officially published Putin’s decree on Thursday, outlining that the pause in hostilities will begin at 4 p.m. local time on Saturday and extend through the end of Easter Sunday.
Zelenskyy had first floated a limited truce proposal earlier that same week, calling on both Moscow and Kyiv to halt attacks on one another’s energy infrastructure exclusively for the duration of the religious holiday. The Ukrainian leader noted the offer was transmitted through U.S. diplomatic channels, which have served as the main mediating body for discussions between Russian and Ukrainian delegations throughout the ongoing invasion.
As of Thursday evening, Kyiv had not issued an immediate public response to Putin’s broader ceasefire announcement. The Kremlin’s statement accompanying the decree made clear that while Russian forces have been ordered to stop all offensive actions across the entire front line for the truce period, troops remain on high alert. “Troops are to be prepared to counter any possible provocations by the enemy, as well as any aggressive actions,” the document reads, adding that Moscow expects Ukrainian forces to match the ceasefire.
This latest unilateral truce announcement comes against a backdrop of failed past ceasefire efforts. Last Orthodox Easter, Putin declared a 30-hour pause in fighting, but both sides quickly traded accusations of violations that left the truce effectively meaningless. Broader international ceasefire proposals have also stalled: last year, Kyiv and Washington put forward a proposal for a 30-day unconditional truce as a first step toward peace negotiations, but Russia rejected the plan, insisting that any pause must be tied to a comprehensive long-term settlement.
U.S.-mediated talks between the two delegations have failed to deliver tangible progress on core outstanding issues in months. In recent months, U.S. diplomatic and security focus has shifted largely to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, leaving the 1,250-kilometer front line between Russian and Ukrainian forces locked in a costly stalemate of incremental positional battles.
-

UK says Russia ran submarine operation over cables and pipelines
Tensions between the UK and Russia have escalated sharply after UK Defence Secretary John Healey publicly accused three Russian submarines of carrying out a covert surveillance operation targeting critical undersea cables and pipelines in waters north of the British mainland. In a press briefing held at Downing Street on Thursday, Healey said the incident represented a deliberate act of malign activity by Moscow, and confirmed British naval and air assets had been immediately deployed to intercept and monitor the Russian contingent, with no evidence of damage to UK Atlantic infrastructure found to date.
Addressing Russian President Vladimir Putin directly, Healey issued a stark public warning: “We see you. We see your activity over our cables and our pipelines, and you should know that any attempt to damage them will not be tolerated and will have serious consequences.” According to Healey’s account, Russia deployed one Akula-class attack submarine as a diversionary distraction, while two special-purpose spy submarines operated by Russia’s secretive GUGI deep-sea research directorate conducted surveillance of the undersea infrastructure networks. He added that the diversionary attack submarine returned to Russian waters after being tracked by British forces, while the two GUGI vessels remain in the wider region.
Moscow has rejected the UK’s allegations outright. In a report carried by Russia’s state-owned news agency Tass, the Russian Embassy in London stated that Russia “is not threatening underwater infrastructure, which is truly critical to the UK. We are not using aggressive rhetoric in this regard.”
To counter the Russian operation, the Royal Navy deployed the Type 23 frigate HMS St Albans, Royal Fleet Auxiliary fuel tanker RFA Tidespring, and anti-submarine Merlin helicopters to continuously track all three submarines. Norway also joined the monitoring effort, though Healey did not disclose details of contributions from other allied nations. “Our armed forces left [Russia] in no doubt that they were being monitored, that their movements were not covert, as President Putin planned, and that their attempted secret operation had been exposed,” Healey told reporters. “We watched them, we were able to track them, we dropped sonar buoys to demonstrate to them that we were monitoring every hour of their operation.”
Little known to the general public compared to Russia’s iconic KGB or domestic intelligence service FSB, GUGI – the Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research – is one of Moscow’s most formidable and secretive military units. Officially part of the Russian Navy, the agency operates with such a high level of classification that it reports directly to Russia’s defence minister and the president. Headquartered in St. Petersburg on the Baltic coast, GUGI maintains a key Arctic deployment base at Olenya Bay on the Kola Peninsula, which also hosts Russia’s strategic nuclear submarine fleet.
GUGI’s core mandate covers deep-water underwater surveillance, reconnaissance and sabotage operations. Global military analysts note that only the United States matches GUGI’s unique capability to operate advanced military hardware at extreme ocean depths. This hardware includes small uncrewed mini-submarines, which experts believe were the assets deployed by Russia during the recent operation near UK cable routes. These mini-subs can be launched covertly under cover of darkness from larger mother ships such as the Russian spy vessel Yantar, which has previously been spotted operating near critical infrastructure in the English Channel. The systems have the technical capability to cut undersea cables, or tap into them to intercept data traffic passing through the networks.
This type of activity falls under the framework of modern hybrid warfare: hostile acts carried out by a state that fall short of a clearly attributable, lethal attack that would trigger a formal declaration of war. UK and NATO military planners have long raised concerns that widespread covert Russian surveillance of Western undersea infrastructure is intended to give Moscow a strategic advantage in the event of a future open conflict. If hostilities were to break out, the Kremlin could activate pre-positioned devices to sever or disrupt critical data and energy networks, causing widespread disruption to civilian and military operations.
Healey argued that Putin chose to launch the operation at a moment when global attention is heavily focused on the ongoing war in the Middle East, and reaffirmed that Russia remains the “primary threat to UK security.” While acknowledging the persistent threat Moscow poses, Healey expressed confidence in UK forces’ ability to track future Russian activity and expose any covert operations that threaten British national interests.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed Healey’s stance, saying he was “determined to protect the British people from paying the price for Putin’s aggression in their household bills.” He added that the UK would not “shy away from taking action and exposing Russia’s destabilising activity that seeks to test our resolve.”
The incident has quickly become a point of domestic political debate in the UK. Opposition Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch called on Starmer to immediately publish the government’s long-promised Defence Investment Plan, posting on social media platform X that “We stand shoulder to shoulder on Russian aggression. To be strong abroad we need clarity on spending at home. Without the investment plan, Starmer’s strategy is just words.” Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, referencing recent reports of Russian navy vessels escorting Russian oil tankers through the English Channel, claimed “If we have learnt one thing in the last month, it is that we do not have an operational Royal Navy at any level in this country and that for us needs to be a massive wake-up call.”
Some retired defence officials have also questioned the UK’s ability to counter persistent Russian threats. John Foreman, a retired Royal Navy officer and former UK defence attaché to Moscow, told the BBC that “the rhetoric is a bit tired by now. We’re well aware of the Russian threat. The question is whether we’re doing something about it.” Foreman pointed to the recent decommissioning of two Royal Fleet Auxiliary tankers, RFA Wave Knight and RFA Wave Ruler, as evidence that the UK is “hard-pressed” to maintain maritime security. “I don’t know how we are going to dig ourselves out of this nadir of maritime security that we have found ourselves in,” he said.
Undersea cables and pipelines are among the most critical but overlooked pieces of global infrastructure. More than 600 undersea cables crisscross the world’s oceans spanning more than 870,000 miles, carrying global internet traffic and electrical power between continents, with landing points often located in remote, lightly protected coastal areas. For the UK specifically, the infrastructure is existential to daily life: roughly 60 undersea cables come ashore at multiple points along the UK coast, with concentrations in East Anglia and South West England, and more than 90% of the country’s daily internet traffic relies on these systems. The UK also depends on North Sea undersea gas pipelines, most notably the 724-mile Langeled pipeline connecting Norway to the UK, for 77% of its gas imports.
Military analysts say the challenge of countering GUGI operations is significant. Dr Sidharth Kaushal, a sea power researcher at the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI), explained that GUGI’s deep-diving mini-submarines are purpose-built to avoid detection, with engineered reductions in acoustic noise, water displacement and magnetic signature that make them “complex targets” for anti-submarine forces. Kaushal told BBC Verify that it is likely the Russian submarines were still able to gather useful intelligence on the UK’s cable network despite continuous monitoring by the Royal Navy, noting that the UK’s ability to restrict such operations during peacetime is “limited” – particularly as military monitoring activity in international waters is legally permitted. Even so, Kaushal added that the British operation was not without benefit: by tracking the Russian deployment, the Royal Navy likely gathered valuable intelligence on Russian tactics, network mapping priorities, and may even have been able to recover any surveillance equipment left behind by the Russian units.
This incident aligns with a broader pattern of Russian hybrid activity that the BBC first exposed in 2025, when it reported that Russia was waging a campaign of hybrid warfare against the UK and Western Europe intended to pressure Western nations to end their military support for Ukraine.
-

Orbán’s rural base is still behind the Hungarian leader ahead of Sunday’s pivotal vote
As Hungary prepares for one of its most consequential national elections in recent decades on Sunday, long-serving Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who has held power for 16 years and secured four consecutive electoral victories, is facing the most significant challenge to his rule from center-right challenger Péter Magyar, leader of the Tisza party. Magyar has spent months crisscrossing Hungary’s rural regions in a bid to erode Orbán’s traditional stronghold of support, but many small-town and older voters remain unwavering in their loyalty to the incumbent.
While most public opinion polls indicate a growing appetite for change among Hungarian voters, with a significant share having walked away from Orbán’s populist-nationalist Fidesz party, the prime minister retains deep popularity in the country’s smallest settlements and among older demographics. A recent Medián poll underscored this divide: among voters over 65, 47% back Fidesz, compared to just 29% who support Magyar’s Tisza. Support for Orbán also grows consistently as community size shrinks, cementing his rural advantage.
In the small central Hungarian city of Cegléd, 63-year-old local entrepreneur István Vároczi, who runs a market stall selling handbags and other goods, says he dismisses all polls that forecast Orbán could lose. Having backed Orbán for nearly four decades, Vároczi plans to cast his vote for the incumbent once again. “I’ve never been disappointed in him. His biggest strength is that he didn’t forget where he came from — he always remained a normal person,” Vároczi said. “I’m sure he has flaws, but who doesn’t? Fidesz is the only party I trust, and his performance as prime minister is unparalleled.” Even with years of stagnant economic growth, Vároczi blames external pressures rather than government mismanagement, arguing the administration “is doing what it can for us, for the people.”
Similar devotion can be found in Albertirsa, a central Hungarian town of roughly 14,000, where retired pipe fitter János Falajtár grew emotional when describing his support for Orbán. Fighting back tears, Falajtár insisted the prime minister has always “acted for the people.” “The decisions don’t matter. Common sense and heart matter,” he said. For Falajtár, Orbán’s greatest achievement has been advancing unity for Hungarians both within the country’s modern borders and across neighboring regions where millions of ethnic Hungarians reside, following the post-World War I territorial changes that stripped Hungary of nearly 72% of its original land. “We are now beginning to unite the Greater Hungary in Vojvodina, Slovakia, Transcarpathia, Transylvania, and even in Austria,” Falajtár said. “They only took a small piece from us, but it’s still ours.”
Magyar and the Tisza party have seen their support surge in recent years, fueled by widespread public frustration over four years of economic stagnation. Much of that economic strain has been tied to the freezing of billions of euros in European Union development funding, which Brussels halted over ongoing concerns about rule of law breakdowns and systemic corruption under Orbán’s administration.
But Orbán has worked aggressively to shore up support ahead of the vote with targeted pre-election policies tailored to his core base. Backed by Hungary’s continued reliance on discounted Russian oil and gas, the prime minister implemented a widely popular utility bill reduction program that keeps household energy costs far below European averages. He has also expanded pension benefits, adding a mandatory 13th month pension payment for retirees and rolling out a new 14th month supplement ahead of the election. Other popular initiatives for small communities include a nationwide program to renovate aging local pubs and historic churches, alongside the elimination of income tax for young mothers with multiple children.
Beyond policy, Orbán’s enduring political charisma, his consistent focus on protecting Hungarian cultural traditions, and his unapologetic push to bolster national pride resonate more deeply with his base than any specific government program. On the campaign trail, Orbán has also framed the election as a battle for national survival, warning voters that a host of external threats — most notably the ongoing war in neighboring Ukraine, which he claims would drag Hungary into direct conflict and bankrupt the nation — await if he does not win a fifth term. For committed supporters like Vároczi and Falajtár, that message, paired with decades of demonstrated loyalty to their communities, is more than enough to secure their vote once again.
-

Greece moves to protect minors from social media with new ban for kids under 15
ATHENS, Greece – Greece has stepped into a growing pan-European push for minor online protection by becoming the latest European Union member state to announce draft legislation that would fully block access to social media platforms for all users aged 15 and younger. Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis framed the national initiative as a deliberate pressure tactic to push the 27-nation bloc to adopt formal, unified age restrictions across all EU member states.
The proposed rules will apply to all major social media services that allow users to create public or private profiles, engage in cross-user interaction, and share user-generated content – covering industry leaders including Meta-owned Facebook and Instagram, as well as ByteDance-owned TikTok.
Once the bill is enacted into law, the obligation to enforce the restriction will fall directly on social media companies, which will be required to complete a full re-verification of the ages of all existing Greek users to remove anyone under the age of 15 from their platforms. Greek regulatory authorities note that the state will only play an oversight role: it will monitor platform compliance and only intervene when violations are reported. Reports of non-compliance will be forwarded either to the regulatory body in the country where the platform is headquartered or directly to the European Commission, the EU’s executive governing branch. Potential penalties for violators are steep, including maximum fines equal to 6% of a company’s annual global turnover, recurring daily fines until the platform comes into compliance, and even temporary or permanent restrictions on operations within Greek territory.
In a pre-recorded video address posted to his own social media channels Wednesday, Mitsotakis spoke directly to young people to explain the rationale behind the ban. He acknowledged that excessive social media use has been linked to rising rates of stress, anxiety, and sleep disruption among adolescents, noting that both parents and young people have privately shared these concerns with him.
“I know many young people will be angry with this decision. If I were your age, I would probably feel the same way too,” Mitsotakis said in the address. “But our job, my job, is not always to be popular. If something makes us more anxious, makes us feel worse about ourselves, less than we really are, then it is better to put an end to it.”
The prime minister emphasized that the new law is not an attempt to cut young Greeks off from digital technology as a whole. Instead, he argued, the regulation targets the inherently addictive design of many major social platforms, whose business models are built on maximizing screen time – a model that he says robs young people of their childhood innocence and personal freedom.
Under the current legislative timeline, the bill will be formally introduced to Greek parliament this summer, with enforcement scheduled to begin on January 1 of next year. Greece is not the first EU country to take this step: it follows similar legislation passed earlier this year by France that also imposes a national ban on social media use for children 15 and under.
In a formal letter sent to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, Mitsotakis called for the establishment of a unified regulatory framework for minor online protection across the entire European Union by the end of 2024, to complement national-level protection measures that member states have already enacted. His proposal includes an EU-wide ban on social media access for users 15 and younger, a bloc-wide standardized age verification process that requires platforms to re-verify all user ages every two years, and the creation of a joint body made up of representatives from member states and the commission to review compliance incidents and impose penalties rapidly.
-

European leaders urge a negotiated settlement as Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz
As the escalating military confrontation between the U.S., Israel and Iran continues to roil the Middle East, European powers find themselves caught in a precarious diplomatic balancing act this Thursday. While steering clear of direct participation in the conflict, key European leaders and EU institutions are actively pushing diplomatic efforts to solidify a fragile ceasefire, de-escalate deadly fighting in Lebanon, and restore unimpeded access through the strategic Strait of Hormuz.
This conflict has placed Europe in an deeply uncomfortable position. The bloc remains committed to backing the United States, its core NATO ally, but it has faced repeated public criticism from U.S. President Donald Trump over its refusal to join combat operations and its limitations on access to European military bases. European leaders have pushed back on this criticism in increasingly blunt terms: French President Emmanuel Macron noted last week that Washington has no grounds to complain about a lack of European backing for a military operation that the U.S. chose to launch unilaterally, without any prior consultation with allies.
The current ceasefire framework emerged at the eleventh hour on Tuesday, brokered by Pakistan, after Trump issued a dramatic threat that “a whole civilization will die tonight.” The agreement, which initially called for a two-week halt to hostilities, was meant to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — a waterway that carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil supplies, making it critical to global energy security. That fragile truce quickly unraveled, however, after Israel launched a wave of air strikes in Lebanon targeting Iran-backed Hezbollah forces. In response, Iran reclosed the strait, arguing that the ceasefire agreement was supposed to cover all fronts including Lebanon. Both Israel and the U.S. reject this interpretation of the deal.
Iran has also drawn sharp international condemnation over its demand to collect shipping tolls as a precondition for reopening the strategic waterway, a move that has united European leaders in opposition.
### Pushing for a Broad Negotiated Peace
On Wednesday, a large bloc of European nations — including France, Italy, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, the Netherlands, Denmark, Canada, and the European Union collectively — issued a joint statement calling for rapid progress toward a substantive negotiated end to the conflict, a call later joined by leaders from Norway, Sweden, Greece and Finland. The group emphasized that a diplomatic resolution is “crucial to protect the civilian population of Iran and ensure security in the region,” adding that a negotiated settlement “can avert a severe global energy crisis.”Macron, who held separate calls with both Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Trump on Wednesday, reiterated the call for all warring parties to fully uphold the existing ceasefire and open the door to comprehensive negotiations.
### Demand for Ceasefire to Extend to Lebanon
European leaders have uniformly pushed for the truce to be expanded to Lebanon, after the deadliest single day of fighting in the country Wednesday left nearly 200 people dead. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz warned that the intensity of Israel’s military campaign in Lebanon threatens to derail the entire peace process, an outcome that cannot be allowed. British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper told reporters she was “deeply troubled” by Israel’s military onslaught, noting that any ceasefire that excludes Lebanon would risk destabilizing the entire Middle East region. “That escalation that we saw from Israel yesterday, I think, was deeply damaging and we want to see an end to hostilities in Lebanon,” Cooper told Times Radio.Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, who has emerged as Europe’s most outspoken critic of U.S. and Israeli military action in the region, went further, calling on the European Union to suspend its longstanding association agreement with Israel. In a post on X, Sánchez slammed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, writing “His contempt for life and international law is intolerable. The international community must condemn this new violation of international law.”
### Preparing to Secure Free Navigation Through Hormuz
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot confirmed Thursday that European nations and their global partners are finalizing plans to deploy naval vessels to escort commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz once active hostilities cease. Macron confirmed that roughly 15 nations have already committed to participate in the coordinated escort mission.European leaders have unanimously rejected Iran’s demand for shipping tolls, warning that any restriction on free navigation through the strait would carry severe global consequences. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni told parliament that any unilateral imposition of extra duties by Iran would have “unpredictable economic consequences” for the global economy. “Full restoration of freedom of movement in the Strait of Hormuz is needed, and it must not be subject to any restrictions, as appears to have happened in recent hours,” she said. Cooper echoed that sentiment, saying it is “crucial” that Iran not be allowed to impose tolls on shipping passing through the waterway. Merz confirmed that Germany will contribute to the effort to restore free navigation, though German officials have declined to elaborate on what form that contribution will take.
### Navigating Rising Tensions Within NATO
The conflict has exacerbated existing frictions within the NATO alliance, after Trump once again raised the prospect of a U.S. withdrawal from the trans-Atlantic military bloc. Trump has publicly lashed out at European allies for failing to come to Washington’s aid in the conflict, going so far as to label NATO allies “cowards” and dismiss the alliance as a “paper tiger.” After meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte at the White House on Wednesday, Trump reiterated his claim that NATO failed to support the U.S. during this conflict, and would fail to do so again if the U.S. faced a future crisis.Merz framed the current conflict as a critical “trans-Atlantic stress test” for the alliance, saying he is determined to prevent the dispute from further damaging relations between the U.S. and its European NATO partners. “We don’t want, I don’t want a split in NATO,” Merz said. “NATO is a guarantor of our security, also and above all in Europe. We must continue to keep a cool head here.”
Reporting for this article was contributed by Giada Zampano in Rome, Jill Lawless in London, Sylvie Corbet in Paris and Geir Moulson in Berlin.
-

French far-right leader romantically linked to Italian princess
French far-right presidential candidate-in-waiting Jordan Bardella’s romantic relationship with Italian aristocrat and socialite Princess Maria Carolina of Bourbon-Two Sicilies has been formally revealed in a high-profile exclusive by celebrity publication Paris Match, ending months of swirling public speculation about the pairing.
The relationship, which the 30-year-old leader of the Rassemblement National (RN) had long guarded as private, was unveiled on this week’s Paris Match front page. The issue features candid new photos of the couple vacationing together on the French island of Corsica, under the headline “The idyll that no-one expected” — a reveal that many media observers have framed as a calculated, staged announcement rather than an accidental scoop.
Rumors of the romance first emerged back in January, when the pair were spotted attending a Paris event together celebrating the 200th anniversary of French newspaper Le Figaro. For months, Bardella repeatedly declined to answer questions about his personal life, telling reporters that his private affairs remained his “last space of liberty.” The Paris Match exclusive confirms the couple has now made the voluntary decision to go public with their relationship.
Bardella is set to stand as RN’s candidate in the 2027 French presidential election if a July court ruling bars RN’s historic party leader Marine Le Pen from running over her conviction for misappropriation of European Union parliamentary funds. Recent polling indicates that any RN candidate would be a strong contender to win the presidency, making details of Bardella’s personal life a matter of significant political interest.
Political commentators speaking on Thursday noted two core political rationales for the timed announcement. First, they say it is critical for Bardella to enter a potential presidential campaign with full transparency around his personal life, including clarity about who would join him in the Elysée Palace as first lady if he wins. Second, the announcement is seen as a proactive move by RN to defuse potential backlash from working-class and lower-income voters, who may raise questions about the party’s populist positioning amid its leader’s connection to a member of one of Europe’s wealthiest aristocratic families.
At 22 years old, Princess Maria Carolina holds the additional noble titles of Duchess of Calabria and Palermo. She is the daughter of Prince Carlo, Duke of Castro, one of two claimants to the headship of the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies — the royal dynasty that ruled southern Italy and Sicily through much of the 19th century, before the unification of Italy stripped the family of its throne. While her royal title holds no official legal status in the modern Italian Republic, she is a distant direct descendant of King Louis XIV, France’s iconic 17th-century “Sun King.”
According to her official public profile, Maria Carolina grew up across Rome, Monte Carlo and Paris, and currently leads a range of cultural, social and humanitarian initiatives aligned with her family’s historic heritage and values. She also collaborates on creative and philanthropic projects with her sister, Princess Maria Chiara. Fluent in six languages, she has built a social media following of more than 350,000 and maintains a close public connection to the global fashion industry. In a break from centuries of royal tradition, her father abolished the Salic law that restricted succession to male heirs, meaning she is positioned to become the next head of the Bourbon-Two Sicilies royal house.
Paris Match’s coverage has framed the couple as a strikingly unconventional 21st-century pairing, describing them as “reinventing courtly love” for the modern era. The publication notes the stark contrast between their backgrounds: while Maria Carolina was raised in the opulence of elite European capitals, Bardella was born in a public housing flat in the working-class Paris suburb of Saint-Denis, with no inherited aristocratic title, and climbed the political ranks through his own ambition — fitting into France’s long tradition of self-made political leaders. According to the magazine’s reporting, the pair first crossed paths at the Monaco Grand Prix in May of last year, where Bardella had accompanied his father, a lifelong motor racing fan.
It should be noted that Paris Match is owned by Bernard Arnault, the French billionaire who chairs the luxury goods conglomerate LVMH.
-

Irish government to consider Creeslough explosion inquest
Nearly two years after a devastating explosion ripped through a small rural service station in Creeslough, County Donegal, claiming 10 lives, families of the victims are still fighting for clear answers and official accountability — and Irish officials have now signaled a potential path forward. On Thursday, 10 family representatives of those killed traveled to Dublin’s Department of Justice to meet with Justice Minister Jim O’Callaghan for a 90-minute discussion about their long-held demand for a public inquest into the disaster.
The October 7, 2022 blast killed 10 local residents from Creeslough and its surrounding communities, cutting short lives across generations: 5-year-old Shauna Flanagan-Garwe, her 50-year-old father Robert Garwe, 14-year-old Leona Harper, 13-year-old James Monaghan, his mother Catherine O’Donnell, Jessica Gallagher, Martin McGill, James O’Flaherty, Martina Martin, and Hugh Kelly. To date, investigators have not released any official public explanation for what caused the explosion. While multiple arrests have been made in connection with the ongoing investigation, no one has faced criminal charges.
Following the closed-door meeting, O’Callaghan confirmed that he would review the request for a formal inquest, echoing a longstanding government concern that launching an inquest too early could jeopardize the active criminal probe. But legal representatives for the families have pushed back, arguing that preliminary inquest work can proceed in parallel with the criminal investigation without disruption, pointing to the 1981 Stardust fire disaster inquest as a successful model that paired independent judicial review with ongoing criminal processes.
“Two years ago, these families asked for an independent investigation. We are still waiting for a decision,” Darragh Mackin, a solicitor with Phoenix Law representing several families, told reporters outside the department. He added that there is “absolutely no prohibition” on starting preparatory work for the inquest immediately, saying “the ball is now in the minister’s court.”
For the families left behind, the delay has meant being frozen in grief, unable to move forward without clarity about what caused the tragedy that took their loved ones. Donna Harper, whose 14-year-old daughter Leona died in the blast, pointed to the unmarked milestones her daughter will never get to experience — “She should have been 18 in January, she should have been making her prom” — and expressed frustration that almost four years will pass from the date of the explosion by the time any decision may come.
Harper also noted that the disaster, one of the deadliest in modern Irish history, has yet to even receive an official public memorial. “We’re going down there every year, we’re just laying flowers at the side of the road. We’re stuck on the 7th of October 2022. How do you begin to move on when you have all this in front of you? We just need some answers,” she said.
Damien Tierney, another legal representative for the families, said O’Callaghan’s primary concern is that any sworn public inquiry launched before the criminal investigation concludes could lead to injunctions filed by parties connected to the case. Tierney pushed for a timeline, asking “At what point will the government say, enough time has passed? Something now needs to be done.”
Currently, multiple Irish state bodies are conducting overlapping investigations into the explosion. Aine Flanagan, who lost her partner Robert Garwe and daughter Shauna in the blast, confirmed that a completed health and safety investigation file will be sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) this coming July. By standard process, the DPP typically takes between three and six months to make a decision on whether to pursue criminal prosecution after receiving case files.
Anne Marie Boyle, who lost her sister Catherine O’Donnell and 13-year-old nephew James Monaghan in the disaster, said even launching preliminary inquest work now would help bring families closer to closure. “If preliminary work can get under way on the inquest it would speed things up,” she said. After two years of waiting, families remain firm in their demand for transparency, saying nothing less than a full independent inquiry will allow them to begin healing.
