In a landmark ruling with profound political implications, Seoul’s Central District Court has sentenced former Interior Minister Lee Sang-min to seven years imprisonment for his instrumental role in facilitating ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol’s controversial 2024 martial law declaration. The verdict arrives just days before a separate judicial panel determines whether Yoon’s actions constituted rebellion—a capital offense for which prosecutors demand the ultimate penalty.
Presiding Judge Ryu Kyung-jin established that Lee, while heading the Ministry of Interior and Safety, actively implemented the martial law directive and transmitted presidential orders to police and fire authorities to sever utility services to news outlets critical of Yoon’s administration. Security footage and corroborative testimony from high-ranking officials, including former National Fire Agency Commissioner General Heo Seok-gon, demonstrated Lee’s central coordination role despite his denial of issuing or receiving such instructions.
The court determined that Lee’s actions represented a systematic attempt to suppress press freedom through coercive measures, though the utility disruption orders were never executed due to the rapid collapse of martial law. Legislators breached military and police barricades at the National Assembly, achieving unanimous consensus to rescind the declaration within hours of its implementation.
While convicting Lee on primary charges, the judiciary acquitted him of ancillary power abuse allegations citing insufficient evidence. The sentenced former minister maintained composure following the verdict, while his legal team deliberates appeal options—contrasting sharply with prosecutors’ initial demand for a 15-year term.
This case marks the second conviction within Yoon’s cabinet concerning the martial law episode, following former Prime Minister Han Duck-soo’s 23-year sentence currently under appeal. Yoon himself, removed from office and incarcerated since July, faces multiple criminal proceedings including the rebellion charge that could potentially carry death penalty consequences. The ex-president continues to defend the martial law declaration as necessary governance against what he characterized as ‘anti-state’ forces obstructing his political agenda.