The decades-long legal saga surrounding Pedro Hernandez, the man convicted of the 1979 murder of six-year-old Etan Patz, has reached a critical juncture. Following a July ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals that overturned Hernandez’s 2017 conviction, Manhattan prosecutors and defense attorneys are now locked in a heated debate over the next steps. The appeals court cited concerns about Hernandez’s police interrogation, his mental health history, and jury instructions as grounds for reconsideration. On Thursday, prosecutors requested 90 days to decide whether to retry Hernandez, while his defense team pushed for a 30-day deadline. U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon is expected to rule on the matter within days. Etan Patz’s disappearance in 1979, while he was walking to school in Manhattan’s SoHo neighborhood, became a national symbol of missing children cases. Despite extensive investigations, Patz was never found. Hernandez, who worked as a shop clerk near the bus stop where Patz vanished, confessed in 2012 to luring the boy into a basement and strangling him. His first trial in 2015 ended in a mistrial, but he was convicted in 2017 of felony murder and kidnapping, though acquitted of intentional murder. Hernandez’s lawyers have argued that the jury instructions during his second trial were prejudicial and inconsistent with legal precedent. Prosecutors, however, maintain that the conviction was just and plan to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Hernandez’s legal team is pushing for his immediate release, claiming an innocent man is being wrongfully imprisoned.
Prosecutors in New York seek time to consider third trial in Etan Patz murder
