In a significant development following months of international pressure, Israeli authorities have partially reactivated the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt, though initial operations remain strictly limited to pedestrian transit. This cautiously orchestrated reopening occurs against a backdrop of persistent violence, with Gaza’s civil defence agency reporting numerous casualties from Israeli military actions just one day prior, despite an officially declared ceasefire.
The Rafah crossing represents a critical humanitarian corridor for both civilian movement and aid distribution, yet had remained shuttered since Israeli forces assumed control in May 2024 during hostilities with Hamas, excepting a brief operational window in early 2025. COGAT, Israel’s defence coordination unit for Palestinian civilian affairs, characterized Sunday’s activation as “an initial pilot phase” conducted in coordination with European Union monitoring, emphasizing that full bidirectional passenger movement would commence upon completion of preliminary preparations.
The reopening follows Israel’s recovery of Ran Gvili’s remains—the final Israeli hostage held in Gaza—whose repatriation had been stipulated as a precondition for border access. Meanwhile, approximately 200 medically vulnerable patients await evacuation authorization, with Gaza’s health ministry confirming their urgent need for overseas treatment. Concurrently, a 40-member Palestinian Authority contingent has positioned itself on the Egyptian border awaiting entry permission to initiate administrative functions.
While a broader reopening is anticipated Monday, sources indicate no consensus has been reached regarding transit quotas. Egyptian officials have committed to admitting all Israel-approved departures. The crossing’s operationalization is expected to facilitate the entry of the newly established National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG)—a 15-member technocratic body tasked with governing the territory’s 2.2 million residents under US-supervised ceasefire provisions, though committee members confirm no immediate entry timeline has been established.