Iran will respond to US-Israeli strikes as existential threats

In a dramatic escalation of Middle East tensions, US and Israeli forces launched unprecedented coordinated strikes against multiple Iranian targets on February 28, 2026. Dubbed “Operation Epic Fury” by the Pentagon, the massive missile offensive represents a fundamental shift in the longstanding conflict between Tehran and Western powers.

The operation targeted Iran’s ballistic missile infrastructure, including production facilities, storage sites, and launch capabilities—a clear attempt to degrade Tehran’s primary regional deterrent. Unlike previous limited strikes, including the 2025 nuclear site attacks that prompted measured Iranian responses, this campaign appears designed to fundamentally alter Iran’s military and political landscape.

Notably, strikes hit a compound housing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with Israeli officials confirming the 86-year-old leader was specifically targeted. President Trump simultaneously addressed Iranians directly via video message, urging them to “take over your government” in what experts interpret as an explicit regime change objective.

This military action follows months of diplomatic efforts in Oman and Geneva that ultimately failed to bridge differences over Iran’s ballistic missile program and support for regional proxy groups. Tehran had consistently rejected limitations on its missile capabilities, considering them vital to national security doctrine.

Iran has promised “crushing” retaliation, though its conventional capabilities have been significantly degraded by the strikes. Regional security analysts warn that Tehran may leverage unconventional capabilities through proxy forces including Hezbollah, Iraqi Shia militias, and Yemen’s Houthis, potentially increasing terrorism risks globally.

The operation proceeds without congressional authorization, relying instead on presidential Article 2 powers. Under the War Powers Act, the administration has 60 days to conclude operations or seek formal congressional approval, creating a political timer on military actions.

With both sides facing existential stakes and no clear diplomatic off-ramp, the region braces for potentially prolonged conflict that could redefine Middle East power dynamics for generations.