A significant internal rupture has emerged at Human Rights Watch (HRW) following the resignation of its former Israel-Palestine director, Omar Shakir. In a damning resignation letter, Shakir accused the organization’s senior leadership, specifically new Executive Director Philippe Bolopion, of deliberately suppressing a fully-vetted report that concluded Israel is committing crimes against humanity by denying Palestinians their right of return.
The report, titled “‘Our Souls Are in the Homes We Left’: Israel’s Denial of Palestinians’ Right to Return and Crimes Against Humanity,” was allegedly blocked from publication in late November despite having completed the standard review process. Shakir revealed that the report was so near to release that donors had been briefed, it was coded into HRW’s website, and an embargoed press link was prepared.
Shakir stated that Bolopion justified halting publication over concerns that detractors would misinterpret it as HRW endorsing a call to ‘demographically extinguish the Jewishness of the Israeli state.’ Shakir condemned this reasoning as ‘cooking the books’ and allowing ‘pragmatism’ to dictate legal findings—a approach he characterized as more typical of politics than principled human rights advocacy. He cited this decision as a fundamental compromise of HRW’s commitment to fact-based reporting and consistent application of international law, which ultimately led to his resignation.
The right of return is a principle codified in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which HRW itself has upheld in other contexts, such as a 2023 report on the Chagos Islands. The historical context traces back to the 1948 Nakba, where Palestinians were expelled following Israel’s establishment, and further displacements occurred after the 1967 war.
Shakir also acknowledged the intense scrutiny he faced in his role, particularly following the October 7th attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza, which has resulted in over 71,800 Palestinian deaths and has been deemed a genocide by numerous UN experts and institutions. He contrasted the suppression of the right-of-return report with the publication of HRW’s 2024 report on the October 7th attacks, which drew backlash from Palestinians but was published because it was ‘the principled thing to do.’
HRW did not respond to requests for comment on these allegations by the time of publication.