Greenland’s harsh environment and lack of infrastructure have prevented rare earth mining

The Trump administration’s controversial proposition to acquire Greenland faces monumental geological and infrastructural obstacles that transcend political ambition. Despite the president’s assertion that “We are going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not,” experts confirm that the island’s rare earth mineral deposits remain largely inaccessible due to extreme environmental conditions and technological limitations.

Greenland’s formidable challenges include its remote Arctic location, complete absence of transportation infrastructure, complex mineralogy, and fragile ecosystem. The rare earth elements—crucial for manufacturing high-tech products ranging from electric vehicles to military equipment—are encased within a particularly stubborn rock formation called eudialyte, from which no commercially viable extraction method has been developed.

Industry analysts suggest geopolitical positioning rather than practical resource acquisition drives the administration’s interest. “The fixation on Greenland has always been more about geopolitical posturing—a military-strategic interest and stock-promotion narrative—than a realistic supply solution for the tech sector,” stated Tracy Hughes of the Critical Minerals Institute.

The timeline for potential production stretches years into the future, with current exploration activities remaining in preliminary stages. Even the most advanced projects would require hundreds of millions in additional funding and technological breakthroughs to become operational.

Environmental concerns present additional complications, as the toxic chemicals necessary for mineral separation could damage Greenland’s burgeoning tourism industry and fragile Arctic ecosystems. The frequent presence of radioactive uranium alongside rare earth deposits further complicates extraction prospects.

Alternative solutions are emerging elsewhere, with established mining operations in the United States, Australia, and other accessible locations offering more immediate potential to reduce dependence on Chinese rare earth exports, which currently dominate over 90% of global supply.