Two decorated military veterans turned outspoken critics of US foreign policy have launched insurgent campaigns for Congress, leveraging their opposition to Israel’s military operations in Gaza as a central platform. Former Army Ranger Greg Stoker and retired Green Beret Anthony Aguilar are mounting third-party challenges in traditionally Republican districts, representing what they describe as a fundamental break from establishment politics.
Stoker, a four-tour Afghanistan veteran turned political podcaster, announced his candidacy for Texas’s 31st Congressional District on January 15th. The anti-war activist framed his campaign as a rejection of corporate influence and culture wars, emphasizing affordability and governmental accountability. Stoker has pledged to refuse donations from political action committees and corporate donors.
Eight days later, Aguilar revealed his bid for North Carolina’s 13th District, bringing a whistleblower’s perspective from his brief tenure with the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. The retired Special Forces soldier has become a prominent voice against what he terms ‘fascist corporatization’ and endless foreign wars, advocating instead for universal healthcare, affordable housing, and living wage policies.
Both candidates have developed substantial digital followings through their critique of US-Israel relations, particularly following Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. Their campaigns represent an unusual fusion of military credibility with anti-establishment messaging, challenging both Republican incumbents and Democratic opposition simultaneously.
The political landscape appears increasingly receptive to unconventional candidates following recent electoral surprises and declining approval ratings for establishment figures. Stoker specifically referenced low voter participation in Texas, suggesting dissatisfaction with traditional options creates opportunity for alternative voices.
While their military backgrounds provide conventional political credibility, their specific anti-Zionist positions and direct criticism of US-Israel relations mark a significant departure from mainstream foreign policy consensus. Both candidates have been embraced by advocacy groups critical of American Middle East policy, though their campaigns face significant challenges in traditionally conservative districts.