Former senior official of Shenzhen under investigation

In a significant anti-corruption development, Chinese disciplinary authorities have launched a comprehensive investigation into Dai Beifang, the former chairman of Shenzhen’s Political Advisory Body. The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI) and National Supervisory Commission jointly announced on Monday that the 69-year-old veteran official is under scrutiny for suspected severe breaches of Party discipline and national laws.

Dai Beifang, whose entire 52-year career unfolded within Shenzhen’s political apparatus, occupied numerous influential positions throughout his tenure. His extensive portfolio included leadership roles as Secretary of the Shenzhen Municipal Communist Youth League Committee, Party Chief of Yantian District, and membership on the Standing Committee of the CPC Shenzhen Municipal Committee. He further headed several critical municipal departments including Publicity, General Office, and Organization.

The Guangdong native ascended to the position of Shenzhen’s Deputy Party Chief in November 2012 and subsequently chaired the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) Shenzhen Municipal Committee from June 2015 until his retirement in September 2020. Following his departure from official government service, Dai transitioned to a leadership role in the philanthropic sector as president of the Shenzhen Charity Federation.

This investigation represents the latest development in China’s ongoing anti-corruption campaign, particularly highlighting the scrutiny of retired officials who previously held substantial regional power. Dai’s case demonstrates the authorities’ continued commitment to investigating alleged misconduct regardless of an official’s retirement status or previous contributions.

The probe follows established procedures for disciplinary reviews conducted by the CCDI, which typically involve thorough examination of potential ethical and legal violations. Such investigations can lead to various outcomes including internal Party disciplinary measures or formal legal proceedings depending on the severity of findings.