分类: society

  • Bangkok’s bar fire is the city’s latest deadly blaze – will anything ever change?

    Bangkok’s bar fire is the city’s latest deadly blaze – will anything ever change?

    On a crowded Sunday night in central Bangkok, chaos unfolded inside Rong Beer Na Ladprao pub when a sudden fire erupted. Panicked partygoers rushed toward the venue’s only narrow main exit, their path blocked by thick, toxic smoke that rapidly filled the space. Bodies of those who had already succumbed to smoke inhalation trapped those still alive behind them, turning a manageable small fire into one of Thailand’s deadliest public venue tragedies in recent years. As of the latest update, 32 people have been confirmed dead, matching the grim pattern of two similar catastrophic nightclub fires that shocked the nation over the past 15 years.

    This is not an unprecedented disaster. In 2009, a New Year’s Eve blaze at Bangkok’s Santika Club claimed 67 lives, and four years ago an inferno at Mountain B, a coastal nightclub in Sattahip, killed 26 people. In each case, experts issued urgent warnings after the tragedy, calling for sweeping safety reforms to prevent identical losses. Now, Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai, a leading expert from the Asian Institute of Technology who called for change after the Mountain B fire, is forced to repeat the same warnings.

    Professor Worsak notes that despite differences in location, timing, and initial cause, all three disasters follow an identical deadly template: multiple fatalities in overcrowded indoor venues, rapid fire spread through ceiling or stage structures, thick smoke that eliminates visibility and blocks access to exits, and most deaths caused by toxic smoke inhalation rather than direct burns. For the recent Rong Beer Na Ladprao fire, he says preliminary evidence points to an electrical fault as the likely ignition source, with fire spreading rapidly through flammable acoustic sound insulation installed inside the venue.

    The dramatic bursts of flame seen roaring out of the front entrance, he explains, were likely fueled by fresh oxygen rushing in once the door was opened by fleeing guests. The intense heat and fire at the main entrance drove many patrons to the back of the pub, where two secondary exits were reportedly partially blocked and became impossible to locate once the fire cut power to the building. Most of the victims’ bodies were recovered from this rear area.

    In the wake of the 2009 Santika Club disaster, Thai authorities introduced sweeping updates to nightclub safety regulations. Starting in 2012, venues were required to use fire-resistant materials for sound insulation, install wider outward-opening exits, maintain backup power for illuminated exit signs, and fit sprinkler systems in any space holding more than 500 guests. However, a critical regulatory loophole leaves most of Thailand’s entertainment venues unprotected by these rules: the stricter standards only apply to establishments located in officially designated entertainment zones.

    Bangkok has just three official entertainment zones, meaning the vast majority of pubs and clubs across the city are registered as “restaurants with live music” to avoid the stricter safety requirements. Both Rong Beer Na Ladprao and Mountain B fell into this unregulated category. The loophole, which has now been linked to more than 50 deaths, has been formally acknowledged by Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt, who revealed the Rong Beer Na Ladprao pub was inspected and declared safe just three months before the fire.

    In response to the tragedy, Governor Chadchart has ordered city officials to begin unannounced random safety inspections of all venues classified as restaurants that operate as de facto pubs or clubs. “From now we will apply the stricter standards to venues like these,” he stated during a recent press briefing. “Even if we do not have full legal powers we will make suggestions. If they don’t follow these, we will try to find ways to stop them from operating. We must be able to shut them down if there’s a risk.”

    Yet serious questions remain about whether the city can follow through on this pledge. There are thousands of unregulated entertainment venues operating across Bangkok, and it remains unclear if the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration has enough trained staff to carry out widespread unannounced inspections. Industry analysts also expect fierce pushback from venue owners if authorities move to close large numbers of non-compliant establishments.

    Compounding these challenges is Thailand’s long-standing open secret of widespread corruption among local officials and police. It is common practice for unregulated entertainment venues to make regular off-the-books payments to law enforcement and inspectors to overlook safety violations. Even if new rules are introduced, experts doubt they will be consistently enforced. This pattern of impunity has played out after previous disasters: after the Mountain B fire, five police officers were suspended on suspicion of turning a blind eye to the venue’s unregulated status, but no further action has been taken against them. The venue owner and three other staff were convicted of safety violations and sentenced to up to 10 years in prison, but they remain free on bail during an appeals process that can take years to resolve in Thailand’s overloaded court system. In the 2009 Santika Club case, the owner and the event organizer convicted of starting the fire remained free on appeal for six years before their sentences were upheld by the Supreme Court, and no public officials have ever been prosecuted for their role in the tragedy.

    This repeated cycle of tragedy, official promises, and little meaningful change extends far beyond public venue safety. Thailand suffers from systemic safety failures across multiple sectors: road fatalities per capita are 10 times higher than in the United Kingdom. In October 2024, a bus fire caused by illegally installed gas canisters killed 23 people, 20 of whom were schoolchildren. Earlier this year, 32 passengers died when an improperly secured construction crane collapsed onto a passing passenger train, and just weeks before the Bangkok pub fire, 10 Buddhist monks were killed by a pickup truck driven by an 11-year-old boy. Every one of these incidents was followed by pledges of reform, yet preventable deaths continue to occur at alarming rates.

  • Idaho mother charged with children’s murder must stay in jail, judge rules

    Idaho mother charged with children’s murder must stay in jail, judge rules

    A 23-year-old Idaho mother accused of murdering her 18-month-old twin sons will remain behind bars after a judge revoked her bail earlier this week, in a high-profile case that has intersected with national anti-vaccine rhetoric. Andrea Shaw, charged with two counts of second-degree murder in the May 2025 deaths of her toddlers Dallas and Tyson, has maintained that the children’s fatal health decline stemmed from routine childhood vaccinations. She has not yet entered a formal plea in the case.

    Shaw’s legal team had petitioned the court to cut her original $2 million bail to just $100,000, arguing that she needed to be released to care for her newborn child, born only days before her arrest in the case. Her attorney, Joseph Filicetti, also noted that Shaw had recently undergone a cesarean section and required recovery time while nursing her infant, framing her as a loving mother who posed no risk to the new baby. The BBC has reached out to Filicetti for additional comment beyond his statements to U.S. media outlets.

    Prosecutors in Payette County pushed back aggressively against the bail reduction request, urging the judge to revoke bond entirely. They argued that Shaw should not be granted any form of release that would put her in proximity to children, including her own newborn. “This is not a vaccine case,” one lead prosecutor stated bluntly. “This is a case where a mother unfortunately has killed her two children.” Prosecutors allege that Shaw suffocated the twins, who were found dead in their cribs at the family’s home.

    The judge ultimately sided with the prosecution, agreeing that Shaw poses a clear threat to her youngest child and revoking bond entirely.

    The case has drawn heightened attention due to Shaw’s ties to Children’s Health Defense, a prominent anti-vaccine organization founded by current U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Months after the twins’ deaths in 2025, Shaw and her husband gave an interview to the group laying out their claim that vaccines caused the children’s deaths. Shaw told the group that the toddlers became ill eight days after receiving routine vaccinations for hepatitis A, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and influenza. She said she sought medical care after they developed symptoms, and that clinicians told her the illness could be a vaccine reaction; the children were prescribed pain medication but died two days later.

    Shaw has claimed that law enforcement immediately pinned blame on her rather than accepting a vaccine-related cause, while investigators say her arrest followed a months-long, exhaustive investigation into the deaths. Full autopsy results from the investigation have not yet been made public.

    Shaw is also a named plaintiff in a lawsuit led by Children’s Health Defense against the American Academy of Pediatrics, challenging the organization’s long-standing childhood vaccination recommendations. Mainstream public health experts and practicing clinicians have repeatedly reaffirmed the well-documented safety of routine childhood vaccines. While minor side effects are possible after vaccination, severe adverse outcomes are extremely rare, and vaccines are credited with preventing millions of life-threatening illnesses globally each year.

  • NYC’s Rikers Island jail hosts World Cup watch party for inmates

    NYC’s Rikers Island jail hosts World Cup watch party for inmates

    NEW YORK – From downtown office break rooms to waterfront public parks and neighborhood sports bars, soccer fans across the city packed viewing gatherings for Wednesday’s World Cup semifinal between England and Argentina. But one watch party unfolded in a location few would expect to host such a communal, lighthearted event: Rikers Island, New York City’s sprawling, controversial correctional complex long plagued by headlines of overcrowding, mismanagement, and systemic failing.

    On this Wednesday afternoon, more than 100 incarcerated people, clad in standard tan correctional uniforms, filled rows of tables facing a large projection screen set up in the main intake center’s gymnasium. Colorful balloon towers, capped with soccer-ball-shaped balloons, framed the screen, transforming the utilitarian space into a makeshift fan zone for the high-stakes match.

    The jail system first launched these organized watch parties when the World Cup tournament kicked off last month, opening access only to incarcerated people who have maintained good behavior, requiring a minimum of 30 days incident-free to participate. The program has already brought more than 90 fan gatherings to the facility, drawing roughly 4,500 participants out of Rikers’ current population of approximately 6,600 incarcerated people.

    Shortly before kickoff, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani arrived to join the event. Ditching his signature dark formal suit jacket, the Democratic mayor rolled up the sleeves of his white dress shirt, took a seat at one of the front tables, and dove straight into casual conversation about the tournament with the incarcerated guests.

    One participant at the mayor’s table shared his prediction: he expected Argentina to defeat England, then go on to face Spain in the final, after Spain’s upset win over France in the earlier semifinal. “You never know,” Mamdani responded, noting he was a vocal supporter of Morocco, which had been eliminated in an earlier round of competition.

    At a neighboring table, another incarcerated person told the mayor he was scheduled to be released from custody later that same day. Mamdani congratulated him warmly, shaking his hand and patting him on the back, saying “That’s amazing.”

    Roughly 20 minutes into the match, the mayor departed the gathering, leaving the crowd of incarcerated fans to enjoy the rest of the game in the transformed gym space. The unusual program marks a rare effort to bring recreational, community-focused activities to a facility that has long been the center of criticism over poor conditions and lack of programming for incarcerated people.

  • Elderly US woman shocked to receive racy new car licence plate

    Elderly US woman shocked to receive racy new car licence plate

    A quirky administrative mix-up has turned a nearly 77-year-old Florida resident into the most talked-about resident of her retirement community, after state vehicle officials accidentally issued her a license plate with a hidden lewd acronym.

    Nancy Dello Stritto, a Pompano Beach local, says she was shocked when she finally looked closely at her replacement plate, which read SQZ A55 — a combination that spells out a crude phrase when read casually. “I went ballistic,” she recalled in an interview with CBS Miami. “I just don’t think a senior who’s almost 77 should be driving around with a plate that says that. How did this even get through the screening process to be issued?”

    Dello Stritto never asked for a custom plate; she was simply waiting for a standard replacement for her old plate when the new one arrived in the mail. She told reporters she did not notice anything off when she first pulled it out of the envelope, and only caught the suggestive wording later.

    Since word spread about the unusual plate, opinions among her inner circle and neighbors have been split. Some friends in her retirement community have urged her to swap it out immediately for a more appropriate combination, while her own sons and other family members have encouraged her to hang onto it.

    After weighing her options, the 76-year-old made a playful decision: she is keeping the plate, just to see how the situation plays out. “I’m resigned to it; maybe it was destined for it to be on my car,” Dello Stritto said. “I can handle it if I get a few honks here and there. Actually, being over 70, I might like a few honks.”

    The background of Florida’s license plate production adds context to the rare error: for close to a century, all state license plates have been manufactured at a state prison in North Florida, before being distributed through official state agencies. Local officials with Broward County confirm that any driver who receives a plate deemed offensive or inappropriate can request a free replacement, meaning Dello Stritto could swap it any time she chooses. For now, though, she is embracing her unexpected local fame.

  • A 12-year-old baseball prodigy trains through tears after Venezuela quakes leave him homeless

    A 12-year-old baseball prodigy trains through tears after Venezuela quakes leave him homeless

    Nestled at the base of the mountain range that divides Venezuela’s coastal communities from the capital city of Caracas, an abandoned baseball stadium sits dust-bitten and quiet. Dirt kicks up in the gusting wind, but for a group of young ball players who have gathered here, the devastation that surrounds them fades into the background the moment they step onto the cracked dirt. Young athletes swap high fives, hugs, and quiet tears—tears for the teammates who can train alongside them today, and for the friends who will never pick up a glove again.

  • French MPs approve assisted dying law with strict rules after years of argument

    French MPs approve assisted dying law with strict rules after years of argument

    After decades of fraught public and political debate and multiple rounds of legislative revisions, France’s lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, has passed a landmark bill establishing a legally protected right to assisted dying, subject to narrow eligibility criteria. The final vote on Wednesday split the chamber sharply, with 299 MPs backing the legislation and 241 opposing it — a result that comes after the country’s upper house, the right-leaning Senate, rejected the bill three consecutive times.

    The legislation sets clear boundaries for access to assisted dying: only adult French residents living with a serious, incurable, life-threatening illness that has reached an advanced or terminal stage qualify. To be eligible, patients must also experience constant, unbearable physical or psychological suffering that cannot be relieved by ongoing treatment.

    Under the bill’s terms, patients must explicitly and voluntarily state their intention to access assisted dying to a treating physician, who is required to conduct internal consultations and issue a decision within 15 days of the request being filed. After receiving approval, patients must complete a 48-hour reflection period before confirming their request, and must self-administer the lethal substance in most cases. If a patient is physically unable to self-administer, a licensed physician or nurse may carry out the step instead, and the patient’s decision must be re-verified by the attending medical professional on the day of the procedure.

    Prior to the bill taking legal effect, Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu has announced he will refer three contentious sections of the legislation to France’s Constitutional Council, the nine-member independent body tasked with reviewing whether new laws comply with the national constitution. The three provisions under review include the 48-hour reflection period, which opponents argue is too short to allow for fully informed decision-making; the rules governing consent for patients placed under legal guardianship due to impaired decision-making capacity; and the role of palliative care-focused healthcare facilities in offering assisted dying services.

    While Macron has long supported end-of-life choice legislation, the process was significantly delayed after he called snap parliamentary elections in 2024, and successive prime ministers have moved cautiously to advance the bill. Lecornu has openly acknowledged holding personal reservations about the legislation’s terms, and his office stated Wednesday that the Senate’s review process failed to adequately address both the hopes of the bill’s supporters and the concerns of its opponents.

    If the Constitutional Council approves the legislation, France will become the latest European nation to decriminalize assisted dying, joining a growing bloc of countries that have formalized end-of-life choice frameworks. The Netherlands and Belgium first legalized physician-administered assisted dying for patients with unbearable incurable suffering in 2002, and multiple other European states have passed similar legislation in the years since. Switzerland has long permitted assisted suicide, provided the person assisting acts without personal motive.

    The debate over assisted dying has similarly divided policymakers in the United Kingdom, where a bill to legalize the practice in England and Wales was put on hold earlier this year and is scheduled to return to parliamentary debate in September.

    In France, the legislation has faced fierce opposition from the Catholic Church and segments of the medical community, and political divisions have kept the bill stalled for years, with the right-wing majority in the Senate blocking it repeatedly. Despite this political opposition, public opinion polling consistently shows a large majority of French citizens support giving terminally ill patients the choice between palliative care and assisted dying, with many critics of the status quo arguing the current system fails to address intolerable end-of-life suffering.

  • Motorists causing ‘chaos’ at Blue Flag beach, says councillor

    Motorists causing ‘chaos’ at Blue Flag beach, says councillor

    As summer tourist season hits the Irish coast, a dramatic crackdown on rogue parking at one of County Donegal’s most scenic Blue Flag beaches has exposed long-simmering infrastructure gaps that have turned a popular leisure spot into a site of daily gridlock.

    Shroove — also spelled Stroove or Shrove — sits along the iconic Wild Atlantic Way on the eastern edge of the Inishowen Peninsula, just across the border from Northern Ireland near the fishing village of Greencastle. Tucked beside the mouth of Lough Foyle and overlooked by a historic lighthouse, this quiet sandy stretch draws thousands of visitors annually, many of whom travel across the border from Northern Irish areas like Derry for a day of swimming, coastal walks and unobstructed views of Ireland’s natural landscape.

    But this summer’s warm weather has brought a surge of visitors that has overwhelmed the area’s limited parking infrastructure, leading to widespread disregard for double yellow line restrictions put in place to ease congestion. The crisis reached a head this week when Irish police (Gardaí) seized two vehicles during targeted enforcement of road traffic laws, a move that local representatives say was long overdue after years of mounting chaos.

    Sinn Féin councillor Terry Crossan, who first highlighted the severity of the problem, described the current situation at the beach as unchecked pandemonium. “The single road in and out of Shroove is already extremely narrow, and when warm weather brings hundreds of visitors from north of the border, it becomes completely gridlocked,” Crossan explained. “Double yellow lines were added to fix the congestion, but visitors have just ignored them and parked haphazardly wherever they can find space. Up until recently, Gardaí hadn’t enforced the rules strictly, and that’s how we ended up with absolute chaos.”

    Beyond the daily inconvenience for visitors and locals, the illegal parking creates a critical public safety risk. Gardaí have officially warned that blocked roads would prevent emergency services from reaching the area in the event of an accident, medical emergency or coastal rescue, putting lives directly in danger. This week, the gridlock became so severe that local bus operators were forced to suspend all services to the Shroove area entirely. The parking crisis is not isolated to Shroove either: just days earlier, Donegal County Council followed Gardaí advice and closed Downings Beach, located roughly 99 kilometers away, after an overwhelming influx of vehicles made the area unsafe.

    Interviews with visitors to Shroove this week reveal a mix of frustration and calls for improved infrastructure to address the root of the problem. Katherine Moloney, a first-time American tourist visiting from Massachusetts who chose to explore Donegal amid a stretch of unseasonably warm weather, said poor signage leaves first-time visitors confused about where legal parking is located. “I’d heard about the parking issues before I arrived, and I can see why it’s a problem,” Moloney said. “There’s very little clear signage marking where you can and cannot park, so tourists who don’t know the area often end up parking in restricted spots without meaning to.”

    Other visitors, who planned ahead to avoid the worst of the gridlock, say the only long-term solution is expanding the area’s legal parking capacity. Sophia Hegarty, who arrived at the beach early in the morning with her grandchildren to secure a spot before afternoon congestion hit, said overcrowding is an unavoidable problem when there is not enough designated parking. “It’s obvious that if we don’t create more legal spaces, people will keep parking on the main road,” Hegarty said. “Right now it’s so overcrowded that emergency vehicles couldn’t get through, and that’s a real worry for everyone.”

    Nicole O’Neill, a visitor from Londonderry who traveled across the border for a family day out with her three-year-old daughter, described the parking experience as a total nightmare. “People park on double yellow lines, block other cars in, and there’s nowhere to pull over to let people pass,” O’Neill said. “It’s incredibly stressful, especially when you have young children in the car. We need a larger car park here, or we need to encourage more people to walk to the beach when they can to cut down on vehicle numbers.”

    As enforcement ramps up, local leaders are now facing growing pressure to address the infrastructure gaps that have turned one of Inishowen’s most beloved natural attractions into a summertime hotspot for gridlock and public safety risk.

  • Heatwave prompts Italy’s delivery riders to strike for extra rights

    Heatwave prompts Italy’s delivery riders to strike for extra rights

    As record-shattering heatwaves push temperatures across Southern Europe above 40°C, delivery gig workers across multiple Italian cities are launching coordinated strike action this Wednesday to demand urgent improvements to exploitative working conditions that put their lives and livelihoods at risk. The industrial action comes on the heels of local regulations that attempt to mitigate heat risk, but fail to address the core economic pressure that forces riders to work through dangerous high temperatures.

  • One dead and three missing after boat sinks near Alcatraz

    One dead and three missing after boat sinks near Alcatraz

    A deadly maritime accident has left one person dead and three others unaccounted for after a multi-deck recreational vessel capsized in rough waters roughly 600 yards off California’s Alcatraz Island on Tuesday, local emergency authorities confirmed.

    San Francisco Fire Department Chief Dean Crispen shared updated details on the incident during a public press briefing, noting that the first emergency call came into local dispatch at 15:37 local time. Initial reports incorrectly referenced a vessel on fire, but when first responders arrived at the scene, they found no evidence of an active blaze. Instead, witness statements and on-site assessments confirmed that choppy bay waters caused the 50-foot three-deck pontoon boat to take on water rapidly before overturning.

    The first marine rescue unit to reach the overturned boat pulled a man in critical distress from the cold bay water and immediately initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Crispen said. Despite emergency intervention, the man was pronounced dead after being brought back to shore.

    All 20 people on board were part of a group of mostly family members who had gathered on the boat to hold a memorial service, according to Crispen. Of the 20 passengers, three injured survivors were transported to a nearby local hospital for treatment, and all three remain in stable condition as of Tuesday evening. Thirteen other passengers were able to get to safety without injury and have returned to shore.

    Two local civilians, longshoreman Justin Marceline and fisherman Mike Montoya, were among the first to jump in to assist with rescue efforts before official emergency teams arrived. Marceline described the scene as total chaos when they arrived, telling Reuters that every passenger pulled from the water was either exhausted from struggling against the current or panicked and flailing in the rough conditions.

    As of Tuesday evening, a joint search and rescue operation is ongoing, led by the San Francisco Fire Department and supported by the U.S. Coast Guard. Rescue teams have committed to continuing the search for the three missing people through the night, leveraging specialized maritime search assets to cover the surrounding bay area.

  • United by grief, mothers in Brazil demand reparations after police killed their sons

    United by grief, mothers in Brazil demand reparations after police killed their sons

    RIO DE JANEIRO — For Ana Paula Oliveira, the 2014 killing of her 19-year-old son Johnatha at the hands of a Rio de Janeiro police officer in the Manguinhos favela felt like an unbearable end. A mother of two, she never imagined she would outlive her child, let alone emerge from crippling grief as a leading activist demanding systemic change. Today, more than a decade later, she credits a collective of other grieving mothers with saving her life — and transforming their shared pain into a nationwide movement for justice.

    “Without any doubt, if I had been alone I wouldn’t have made it here, 12 years later,” Oliveira shared at a recent memorial event held at her son’s former school to mark the anniversary of his death. “We need one another to cry together, to smile together and to fight together.”

    Oliveira is one of dozens of Brazilian mothers who have turned personal loss into political action, pushing back against a rising tide of lethal police violence that has disproportionately impacted young Black men living in the country’s impoverished favela communities. Following the model of Argentina’s iconic Mothers of Plaza de Mayo — the grassroots human rights group founded by women whose children were disappeared during the country’s 1976–1983 military dictatorship — these women organize collectively to attend judicial hearings, lead public protests, host commemorative events, and provide critical mutual psychological support to one another. Their core mission is to ensure their sons are remembered as people, not just statistics in Brazil’s growing crisis of state violence. Now, they are calling on the federal government to enact a landmark national policy that guarantees support for family members of police violence victims, and to allocate public funding to sustain their grassroots work.

    Official and nonprofit data underscores the urgency of their demands. The Brazilian Forum on Public Safety, a leading independent nonprofit, reports that more than 6,000 people have been killed by Brazilian police every year since 2018. In its 2025 annual report on national violence trends, the organization found that 82% of all victims of lethal police violence are Black, and the largest share of victims are young people between the ages of 18 and 24. In Rio de Janeiro alone, the nonprofit Crossfire Institute recorded 460 deaths from police operations last year — the highest annual total since 2016, and a 52% jump from 2023 figures.

    Last year, Rio de Janeiro drew global condemnation for the state’s deadliest single police raid in history, when officers carried out an anti-gang operation targeting the Red Command criminal group in two Rio favelas that left 117 people dead, alongside five fallen police officers. Then-Rio Governor Cláudio Castro, an ally of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, defended the operation, labeling those targeted “narco-terrorists” — language that echoed former U.S. President Donald Trump, who last month formally classified both Red Command and its rival First Command Capital as foreign terrorist organizations. Police reported seizing 118 weapons, more than a ton of drugs, and arresting 113 people during the raid, but the incident renewed widespread international scrutiny of aggressive anti-gang tactics in Rio’s favelas.

    The movement for accountability comes ahead of Brazil’s October general election, where crime and public security have emerged as top voting issues for the electorate. Supporters of presidential hopeful Sen. Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro, argue that police must be given unrestricted support to combat heavily armed gang activity that has long plagued favela communities. But grieving mothers and allied nonprofits counter that Brazilian law enforcement routinely uses excessive, deadly force that disproportionately kills unarmed young Black residents with no links to gang activity.

    Oliveira’s own case illustrates the long, frustrating fight for justice. Johnatha was shot in the back while walking through a Manguinhos street after visiting his grandmother, she says. Police claimed the shooting was carried out to disperse a crowd of protesters, but Oliveira has long pushed for the officer responsible to be convicted of intentional homicide. In 2024, a jury found the officer guilty of manslaughter without intent to kill; prosecutors have since successfully appealed the verdict, but a date for a retrial has not yet been scheduled.

    For many mothers, activism has become a permanent calling rooted in personal loss. Monica Cunha, whose 20-year-old son was killed by police in 2006, went on to become a city councilwoman and will formally launch her pre-candidacy for state legislator in October’s upcoming elections. “I fight for memory, truth, justice, reparations and guarantees of nonrepetition — not only for myself, but so that no other family has to endure this pain,” Cunha wrote in an Instagram post marking the 18th anniversary of her son’s death. “The racism that kills our children and loved ones is not an isolated problem, and it must be confronted through state policies. I will keep going, turning grief into struggle.”

    The movement has already secured small, hard-won victories that have kept other mothers hopeful. Sisters Nadia dos Santos and Glaucia dos Santos have lost three teenage sons between them to police violence: Nadia lost 18-year-old Cleyton in 2015 and 17-year-old Cleyverson in 2022, while Glaucia’s 17-year-old son Fabricio was killed by police in 2014. A large memorial to the three teenagers covers the front wall of the family’s home in Rio’s Chapadao favela complex. The pair founded their own support group and spent years pushing for accountability in Fabricio’s killing; in 2023, the officers responsible were sentenced to nine years in prison, a ruling that the wider movement celebrated as a rare win.

    “We want others to stay alive, so we have to stay upright” despite the crushing weight of grief, Glaucia dos Santos said.

    Last year, the movement traveled to Brazil’s capital Brasilia to meet with leaders from the judiciary, legislative, and executive branches to present their policy proposal, which was developed with support from Raave, a Rio-based network of organizations supporting people impacted by police killings. “Raave is negotiating with the federal government to implement a pilot project … developed by the mothers, so that we can provide care and guarantee the rights of this population,” explained Guilherme Pimental, a Raave coordinator.

    The mothers are clear about what they want: a binding national public policy that provides financial and psychological reparations to families, alongside systemic changes to prevent future killings. Nadia dos Santos, who traveled to Brasilia to advocate for the policy, says the state bears a clear responsibility to support families whose loved ones are killed by state actors. “The state should have the obligation to give us mothers who lose our sons because of the state’s violence reparations. … We fight, we work, but we become ill. We need solutions,” she said.

    Oliveira says reparations can take many forms beyond financial support, including permanent public commemoration of victims by naming schools, hospitals, daycares and other public facilities after them. Most critical, she adds, is policy change that stops the violence from happening to other families. “There are other forms of reparation as well, such as building other public policies of nonrepetition that would help prevent new cases. … Many things need to be done, repaired, so that this barbarity does not continue,” she said.