分类: society

  • How Gloria Steinem changed the lives of generations of women

    How Gloria Steinem changed the lives of generations of women

    As one of the most recognizable and consequential figures of 20th-century American feminism, Gloria Steinem has spent nearly 90 years reshaping the global conversation around gender equality, turning personal experience into mass movement that has improved the lives of generations of women. Born in Toledo, Ohio on March 25, 1934, Steinem’s path to advocacy was forged in early hardship that taught her resilience long before she stepped into the national spotlight.

    Steinem’s childhood was far from conventional. Raised in a traveling caravan with her salesman father, mentally ill mother, and older sister, her life shifted dramatically when her father abandoned the family for California when she was just 10 years old. Left to care for her mother, who struggled with debilitating hallucinations, Steinem did not attend full-time school until she turned 12. She later reflected on this period, noting that she never desired children of her own because she had already raised her mother.

    In the late 1950s, a research scholarship took Steinem to India, where she spent two years supporting rural village women in organizing nonviolent protests against unjust government policies. This experience ignited her lifelong commitment to grassroots activism, a foundation she would bring to her work in the United States. Returning home in the early 1960s, she settled in New York City to build a career as a freelance writer, entering a media landscape dominated entirely by men that routinely shut women out of hard-hitting reporting.

    Steinem’s career breakthrough came in 1963, when she went undercover under the pseudonym Marie as a Playboy Bunny cocktail waitress to investigate working conditions at Hugh Hefner’s iconic brand. Her resulting exposé, *A Bunny’s Tale*, pulled back the curtain on the underpaid, exploitative, and deeply misogynistic reality of the job, detailing the physical toll of hours spent in tight corsets and towering high heels and the constant objectification Bunny workers faced. While the story made her name, it also branded her for life; even decades later, critics referenced her Bunny experience to dismiss her work. Still, she noted, the exposé led to tangible improvements in working conditions for the women employed by Playboy.

    Despite her early success, male editors continued to relegate Steinem to trivial “women’s topics” like fashion and beauty, rather than the social justice reporting she wanted to pursue. Undeterred, she landed a columnist position at *New York Magazine* in 1968, where she focused on progressive social change and women’s rights. Her 1969 essay *After Black Power, Women’s Liberation* catapulted her to national fame, cementing her status as the public face of the emerging second-wave feminist movement.

    The turning point for Steinem’s advocacy came at a 1969 abortion awareness rally, where she shared her own experience terminating an illegal pregnancy seven years earlier in London. At the time, abortion was only permitted in the UK if a woman’s physical or mental health was at risk, and the doctor who treated her extracted two promises: never reveal his name, and go on to live the life she wanted. Nearly 60 years later, she broke that promise to dedicate her memoir *My Life On The Road* to Dr. John Sharpe. The rally was a “light bulb moment” for Steinem, pushing her to become a vocal crusader for reproductive freedom, a phrase she coined that remains central to abortion rights debates around the world.

    In 1972, Steinem co-founded *Ms.* magazine alongside a collective of fellow feminist activists, the first women-founded and women-run national magazine focused on feminist issues, rather than the housekeeping and fashion content that dominated mainstream women’s publications. Male critics dismissed the publication out of hand, with one prominent news commentator predicting it would fold within six months. Instead, the first issue sold out in a week and attracted more than 26,000 initial subscribers, and the magazine remains in publication today. One of Steinem’s most famous essays for the magazine, 1978’s *If Men Could Menstruate*, remains a staple of gender studies discourse, using sharp satire to unpack how patriarchal power structures would reshape if men experienced the monthly cycle long used to marginalize women.

    Over the decades that followed, Steinem remained at the forefront of the movement for gender equality. After the Equal Rights Amendment failed to pass through Congress in 1970, she co-founded the National Women’s Political Caucus, an organization dedicated to expanding women’s representation in all areas of political and public life. She testified before the all-male Senate ERA hearings, telling lawmakers: “I have been refused service in public restaurants, ordered out of public gathering places and turned away from apartment rentals all for the clearly stated, sole reason that I am a woman.”

    Steinem’s high profile made her a target of harsh criticism and violent harassment from across the political spectrum. Critics on the right attacked her goals, while even fellow feminist leaders, including *The Feminine Mystique* author Betty Friedan, resented her rise as the face of the movement, accusing her of prioritizing celebrity and personal profit over collective action. Richard Nixon raged against her in secret White House recordings, to which she quipped back that he was one of the most sexually insecure presidents in American history. Adult magazine publisher Al Goldstein waged a vicious harassment campaign against her, publishing her private phone number and displaying a graphic nude centerfold of a Steinem look-alike outside her office that she was forced to see daily. Even into later life, she faced regular hostile confrontations in public, but she never shied away from open debate; in 2020, she was a signatory to an open letter denouncing cancel culture, arguing that respectful dialogue, not punishment, is the only way to advance social change.

    Steinem’s personal life also drew criticism from detractors and surprise from allies. Long known for rejecting marriage, once joking “I can’t mate in captivity,” she dated a series of high-profile public figures over the decades, leading critics to accuse her of using men and being too promiscuous. At 66, in 2000, she married South African environmental entrepreneur David Bale, father of actor Christian Bale, a choice that surprised many of her fellow feminists who had followed her decades of criticism of unequal marriage laws. She explained that changing legal rights had made equal marriage possible, and admitted the union also helped Bale secure a green card – though emphasized the couple shared a deep love regardless. Bale died three years later from brain lymphoma, and Steinem has lived alone in New York since.

    Over her long career, Steinem has been recognized with countless honors for her work, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom – the United States’ highest civilian honor – awarded to her in 2013 by President Barack Obama, who praised her for opening doors of opportunity and respect for millions of women. In 2024, Steinem celebrated her 90th birthday, reflecting on a legacy that transformed the landscape of American women’s rights. When asked what she hoped her impact would be, she told the BBC she hoped her work “might help individual people… to become more the unique, valuable, loved and lovable person that they want to be.”

    Today, Steinem’s legacy endures not just through the still-publishing *Ms.* magazine and the policy wins she helped secure, but through the way she redefined what women could demand and achieve. By amplifying voices that mainstream media refused to platform, she changed not just the laws, but the language of gender equality in America, leaving a blueprint for activists that continues to guide movements today.

  • Watch: US man struck by lightning describes ‘horrific’ experience

    Watch: US man struck by lightning describes ‘horrific’ experience

    A near-death experience with a sudden lightning strike has left one American man sharing his harrowing story to warn others of the unpredictable danger of severe weather. Thomas Fahmy, the survivor, recently opened up about the split-second incident that changed a normal moment into a life-altering brush with death. In an interview detailing the event, Fahmy explained that the attack happened without significant warning, ending with a blinding bright white flash that overwhelmed his senses immediately. The jolt of the strike was so powerful that he collapsed to the ground the very instant the lightning made contact, leaving him disoriented and stunned by the sheer force of the natural phenomenon. Fahmy described the entire encounter as “horrific”, highlighting the overwhelming shock and terror that came with being hit by one of nature’s most powerful forces. His firsthand account offers a rare, unfiltered look at what it is like to survive a direct lightning strike, underscoring the importance of taking proper safety precautions during thunderstorms. While Fahmy survived the incident, his description of the experience illustrates just how quickly danger can strike even when people may not expect it.

  • ‘Catch me if you can’: Runaway emu sparks Australian police chase

    ‘Catch me if you can’: Runaway emu sparks Australian police chase

    In a delightfully absurd incident that has taken social media by storm, a young Australian police officer’s foot chase after a runaway emu on a regional country road has captured global attention — and New South Wales Police are turning the viral moment into an unlikely recruitment draw. The commotion began when locals in Nashdale, a small community located roughly 270 kilometers west of Sydney, alerted authorities to the large flightless bird, which had wandered onto a main public road. Left unaddressed, the emu posed a clear hazard to passing motorists and its own safety, prompting a quick response from local law enforcement.

    When the young officer arrived on scene, he quickly launched into a foot pursuit to corral the wayless emu, picking up speed in an attempt to corner the notoriously fast bird. Despite his best efforts, the emu outpaced him every step of the way, a hilarious back-and-forth that was caught on camera. Police shared the clip to their Facebook page this Tuesday, framing the encounter as a light-hearted example of the unpredictable nature of regional policing.

    In their post, the department noted that after a quick round of the wild game of “catch me if you can”, the officer ultimately succeeded in herding the emu away from the pavement before any collisions or major disruptions could occur. “It’s not every day you find yourself conducting traffic management for an emu, but that’s policing,” the post read. They added that for anyone seeking a career where “every day brings something new”, a role as an officer in regional Australia delivers exactly that kind of unpredictable adventure.

    Speaking to local media, Chief Inspector David Abercrombie of the Central West Police District shared that the rookie officer at the center of the chase is enjoying his 15 minutes of viral fame, with the footage racking up nearly 90,000 views in just a few days. Abercrombie joked that he was grateful the unusual call did not land on his roster, quipping: “If anyone asked me to chase an emu, it’d be more like watching a startled gazelle on Prozac. My speed would not be up to scratch.” He added that while regional officers are regularly called out to remove animals from roadways, most incidents involve livestock or kangaroos — emu encounters are far from the norm. “It’s the trials and tribulations of the life of a country cop,” he said.

    Since being posted online, the clip has sparked a wave of playful reactions from social media users, who have shared dozens of witty observations and jokes. One commenter compared the chase to classic Looney Tunes, writing: “Look, it’s the road runner, but that’s not the coyote behind him”. Another joked: “Wait until it turns around and chases him. Then we’ll see how fast he can run,” while a third quipped “At least that bird wasn’t a flight risk.” One user even referenced one of Australia’s most bizarre historical events, commenting “Emu wars revisited” — a nod to the failed 1932 Emu War, when the Australian military was called in to cull a population of emus destroying farm crops, only to end the operation with far fewer birds culled than targeted.

  • Hundreds of North Sea workers too heavy for new helicopter rules

    Hundreds of North Sea workers too heavy for new helicopter rules

    With just two months remaining before life jacket new weight restrictions for offshore helicopter travel take full effect, hundreds of North Sea energy workers still fail to meet the new safety threshold, BBC Scotland has confirmed. The updated regulations, set to come into force on November 1, will require all offshore workers to weigh no more than 124.7kg (19st 7lb) when fully dressed in work clothing and footwear — a restriction designed to ensure that emergency winch rescues can be carried out safely during critical offshore incidents.

    The weight cap was first announced by industry representative body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) in 2023, when initial assessments found more than 2,200 active workers exceeded the proposed limit. The most recent data, collected from more than 35,000 offshore worker records between April and August 2026, shows that while hundreds of workers have successfully reduced their weight to meet the threshold, between 500 and 800 workers remain above the cap, equal to approximately 3.4% of the total offshore workforce. That marks a notable drop from the 2022 estimate of 4.7%, but progress still leaves hundreds of workers at risk of being locked out of their jobs when the rule becomes mandatory.

    The policy was developed after a years-long industry review, prompted by a formal warning from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) that the standard winch systems fitted to UK Coastguard rescue helicopters have a hard total maximum capacity of 249kg (39st). This total capacity must account for not just the stranded worker, but also the 90.3kg (14st) rescue technician, a 29kg (4st 7lb) emergency stretcher, and 3kg (7lb) of rescue equipment. When broken down, this leaves just 124.7kg as the maximum safe clothed weight for a rescued worker. OEUK data also shows the average weight of North Sea offshore workers has risen by 10kg (1st 7lb) since 2008, creating a growing safety gap that the new rule aims to address.

    This is not the first size-based safety regulation for offshore helicopter travel: several years ago, shoulder width restrictions were introduced, requiring workers with shoulder measurements of 56cm (22in) or more to be seated adjacent to an extra-large helicopter exit to facilitate emergency evacuation. The new weight rule expands these existing safety protocols to address life jacket rescue risks.

    For workers unable to meet the deadline, the policy carries tangible employment consequences. Anyone over the weight limit will not be issued the mandatory medical fitness certification required to work offshore, meaning they will be barred from boarding transport helicopters at heliports starting November 1. Some workers have already opted to leave the industry entirely rather than pursue weight loss, according to occupational health professionals working with the workforce.

    Aberdeen-based occupational health physician Dr Niyi Adeleke, who conducts fitness assessments for offshore workers, told BBC Scotland the regulation has been a major source of stress across the sector since it was announced. “The reaction has been varied, some people are really stressed, asking ‘what can I do?’” he said. Many workers have pursued aggressive weight loss strategies, including turning to weight loss injections and extended fasting, though Dr Adeleke noted that extreme fasting is rarely sustainable long-term. He added that while a small number of workers have chosen to leave the sector entirely or transfer to onshore or international roles, the vast majority are actively working to meet the new limit. “There are solutions which are sustainable, there is help, and please do not lose hope,” he said.

    Employment law experts note that employers have a responsibility to explore alternative roles before dismissing workers who cannot meet the weight cap. Will Rollinson, an employment specialist with Scottish law firm Brodies, said employers are required to evaluate what steps a worker has taken to lose weight, what barriers are preventing progress, and whether onshore roles can be offered to displaced workers.”Some operators would have much more scope for offering alternative roles,” Rollinson explained. “Ultimately though, if an employee whose role is offshore is unable to get below the safe weight limit, and an employer has followed a full proper process, it may be that job termination is a possibility.” He added that the remaining two-month window gives both employers and workers time to find solutions that avoid layoffs.

    OEUK health, safety and security manager Graham Skinner said the falling number of workers above the limit shows the efforts of the workforce are paying off. “It’s significantly less than when we started and that’s a great sign,” he said. “But we recognise there’s going to be some hard work to be done to continue to reduce that number in time. On 1 November, if a worker turns up at the heliport over 124kg, they will not be able to go to work.”

    Skinner emphasized that the rule was rooted in core safety priorities for the entire offshore workforce. “We identified that there’s a significant risk due to workers’ weight. That affects all aspects of their offshore work from getting on the helicopter and travelling offshore to working around confined space, working at height, but also in terms of how we might rescue them using the winch on helicopters,” he said. “When we looked at all of the risks, we felt it was important to make sure that we didn’t have workers who we wouldn’t be able to rescue if the worst thing happened to them.”

    For workers who have not yet started making changes, Skinner’s message is clear: the deadline is non-negotiable, but progress is still possible in the remaining eight weeks. “I think the message here is for people who haven’t started yet, who think this isn’t going to happen or it’s going to go away, you really have to start now because with eight weeks to go it will still be possible,” he said. “It will be hard, but we’d like to have you as part of our workforce.”

  • Sydney police investigate second possible mistaken identity killing in two days

    Sydney police investigate second possible mistaken identity killing in two days

    Sydney, Australia’s largest city, has been shaken by two consecutive fatal shootings in less than two days, with law enforcement confirming both incidents are likely the result of organized crime groups targeting the wrong people. The violence has sparked renewed public concern over the spread of gang-related violence and its risk to innocent civilians.

    The first tragedy unfolded just before 4 a.m. local time on Tuesday in Glen Alpine, a suburban area in southwest Sydney. During a home invasion, a 20-something university student identified as Marco Tapia was shot and killed at the scene. Investigators have confirmed Tapia had no connections to organized crime, with only a prior minor traffic offense on his record. New South Wales Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon labeled the killing “completely unacceptable”, emphasizing that no community should accept the unnecessary death of an innocent person at the hands of gang violence.

    Less than 48 hours later, at around 3:15 p.m. on Wednesday, emergency responders were called to a residential property in Merrylands West following reports of a drive-by shooting. A man in his 40s was shot dead in the doorway of the home just moments after he arrived at the address. Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Detective Superintendent Simon Glasser explained that while the permanent residents of the property have well-documented ties to organized crime and are well known to police, the victim only had loose connections to those residents as a business associate. “Tragically, that is a possibility that the wrong person has been shot by these offenders,” Glasser told media, adding that investigators are working off the lead of mistaken identity.

    In a striking twist that corroborates police suspicions, a known organized crime figure posted a candid admission on social media shortly after Tuesday’s shooting: “popped the wrong person, didn’t even get the right house”.

    These two recent killings are not isolated incidents. Earlier this year, 85-year-old grandfather Chris Baghsarian was abducted from his home in a pre-dawn raid and later found murdered near a local golf course, in what investigators also deemed a mistaken identity attack. Multiple suspects have been arrested and charged in connection with Baghsarian’s death. In 2025, a local plumber was also shot dead outside his family home in a case that police similarly classified as a case of mistaken identity by organized crime groups.

    Commissioner Lanyon reiterated that law enforcement will not tolerate organized crime spilling over to harm innocent residents. “I don’t want any innocent member of the community to be impacted by organised crime. We will not tolerate it,” he said, as investigators continue to pursue leads and track down the offenders responsible for the two latest fatal attacks.

  • Watch: What happens now after Lindsay Clancy trial jurors deadlocked again?

    Watch: What happens now after Lindsay Clancy trial jurors deadlocked again?

    For the second time in the high-profile Lindsay Clancy trial, jurors have failed to reach a unanimous verdict, leaving the future of the proceedings hanging in the balance. Legal observers and family members of those involved are now closely watching to see whether a mistrial will be officially called by the presiding judge. BBC correspondent Ana Faguy, who has covered the trial from inside the court room, broke down the next steps that could unfold in the wake of this latest deadlock. A jury deadlock occurs when jurors cannot agree on a guilty or not guilty verdict after an extended period of deliberation, forcing the court to weigh its options for moving forward. A second deadlock significantly increases the likelihood of a mistrial being declared, which would result in the entire case being scrapped and leave prosecutors to decide whether to pursue a new trial at a later date. Faguy’s on-the-ground reporting from the court outlines the procedural rules that will guide the judge’s decision, as well as the broader implications of either proceeding with a new panel of jurors or dismissing the case entirely. Stakeholders on both sides of the case are now in a holding pattern, waiting for official confirmation of the court’s next move as the legal process plays out.

  • Watch: Jury still unable to reach unanimous decision in Lindsay Clancy case

    Watch: Jury still unable to reach unanimous decision in Lindsay Clancy case

    The high-profile murder trial of Lindsay Clancy has hit another procedural snag, as the jury deliberating the case announced for the second time in as many days that it remains unable to reach a unanimous verdict.

    Deadlocked juries are not an uncommon outcome in high-stakes criminal cases, where jurors are required to weigh evidence, testimony, and legal instructions to reach a collective decision. In this instance, after two full days of closed-door deliberations, the panel delivered the update of their continued division directly to the presiding judge. The announcement leaves the case in limbo, with no clear path forward for a final ruling at this stage. Legal observers note that a deadlocked jury can lead to a number of outcomes, from the judge giving an ‘Allen charge’ to encourage further deliberations, to the prosecution deciding whether to seek a retrial if the case ultimately results in a mistrial.

    As of this update, no new timeline for deliberations has been made public, and court officials have not released any details regarding the nature of the divisions among the jury members.

  • Woman charged with juror intimidation in Lindsay Clancy trial

    Woman charged with juror intimidation in Lindsay Clancy trial

    As one of the most divisive murder trials in recent U.S. history enters its jury deliberation phase, a 56-year-old Massachusetts woman has found herself facing serious criminal charges for allegations related to interfering with the judicial process.

    Dawn Light, a registered nurse with no prior criminal record, was taken into custody this week after authorities accused her of photographing members of the jury seated for the trial of Lindsay Clancy, a 36-year-old woman charged with murdering her three young children. According to official accounts, Light was located in a vehicle parked in a court-ordered restricted zone outside Plymouth District Courthouse on Tuesday. When law enforcement confronted her, she initially denied capturing any video or photos of individuals leaving the building, stating she was simply waiting to catch a glimpse of Clancy. A subsequent review of her mobile phone found deleted photos of jurors exiting the courthouse, leading to her immediate arrest.

    Light was arraigned on a charge of aggravated intimidation of a juror on Wednesday. Entering a plea of not guilty, her defense attorney Jennifer White framed the entire incident as a simple misunderstanding, telling the court that her client only intended to photograph Clancy, not the seated jury. Following the brief court hearing, Light was swarmed by a crowd of reporters gathered outside the courtroom, where she offered only one terse response when asked why she wanted to see Clancy: “Why not?”

    Prosecutors argued that Light’s actions pose a tangible threat to the integrity of the Massachusetts judicial system, which has already gone to extraordinary lengths to protect juror privacy and maintain the sanctity of the ongoing trial. Clancy’s highly publicized case has become a national and international media spectacle, drawing more than 200 registered reporters to the small coastal Massachusetts town and sparking widespread, deeply divided conversation across global social media platforms.

    Judge William Sullivan, who is overseeing the Clancy trial, issued a formal order explicitly banning any photography or filming of deliberating jurors, a restriction put in place to shield jury members from outside pressure and influence. In court, prosecutors described Light’s violation of this order as a severe breach of court rules that undermines the fair trial process. While prosecutors requested $50,000 in cash bail, the judge ultimately denied the request, though imposed a series of strict pre-trial conditions: Light is barred from entering court grounds, prohibited from contacting any individual associated with the Clancy trial, and ordered not to reproduce or distribute any juror-related photos that may be stored on her iCloud account.

    The Clancy trial itself has dominated headlines for months, in large part because it has ignited urgent public debates around critical societal issues: mental health access, the clinical impacts of postpartum psychosis, and the complex question of where to draw the line on criminal responsibility for acts committed while a defendant experiences severe acute mental illness. Since Thursday, the 12-member jury has been locked in deliberations to determine whether Clancy is criminally liable for the deaths of her three children. Despite the saturation media coverage surrounding the case, all deliberating jurors are strictly prohibited from consuming any news or social media content related to the trial, and are instructed to reach a verdict based solely on the evidence and testimony presented in the courtroom. Over the past several weeks, a rotating group of Clancy supporters has gathered outside the courthouse to demonstrate, adding another layer of public attention to the already high-stakes proceeding.

  • Tiger Woods in court to reduce DUI charges after plea deal

    Tiger Woods in court to reduce DUI charges after plea deal

    Famous professional golfer Tiger Woods has appeared in a Florida court to finalize a plea deal that lowers his DUI charges, resolving a high-profile legal case that drew widespread public attention. As a core component of the agreement reached with state prosecutors, Woods has agreed to accept two key penalties: a five-year suspension of his driving privileges and a $1,000 monetary fine, which equals approximately £742. The plea negotiation process, which unfolded over recent weeks, concluded with the court formally approving the reduced charges in line with the terms both sides agreed to. The case first made headlines when Woods was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence several months prior, prompting discussions about celebrity accountability and traffic safety regulations. Legal analysts note that the plea deal represents a negotiated resolution that avoids a lengthy public trial, with both prosecutors and the golfer’s defense team agreeing to the proposed penalty structure. While Woods has not publicly commented extensively on the details of the agreement since the court hearing, the resolution closes this chapter of the legal matter that placed the legendary athlete back in the spotlight for non-golf related reasons.

  • ‘It’s hard to balance emotions and professionalism’ says Nepal rescuer

    ‘It’s hard to balance emotions and professionalism’ says Nepal rescuer

    For rescue professionals working in the aftermath of disasters and missing person cases, the line between compassion for desperate families and strict professional detachment often blurs. This struggle is laid bare by Bibek Khadka, a helicopter pilot with years of experience in rescue operations across Nepal’s rugged and often hazardous terrain. In an exclusive interview with the BBC, Khadka shared the constant emotional weight he carries as families of missing loved ones flood his communications with urgent pleas for help.