分类: politics

  • US action in Venezuela not legal, senior Labour MP says

    US action in Venezuela not legal, senior Labour MP says

    A significant political confrontation has emerged within the UK Parliament regarding the recent US military intervention in Venezuela, with senior figures condemning the operation as a violation of international law. Dame Emily Thornberry, Chair of the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, has emerged as the most prominent Labour MP to criticize President Donald Trump’s strikes that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife.

    In a forceful statement on BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour, Thornberry declared the military action ‘not a legal action’ and stated she ‘cannot think of anything that could be a proper justification.’ She urged the UK and its allies to collectively reject what she termed ‘the law of the jungle,’ drawing parallels to Russian and Chinese expansionist policies. ‘We condemn Putin for doing it. We need to make clear that Donald Trump shouldn’t be doing it either,’ Thornberry emphasized, warning that the precedent could embolden claims over Ukraine and Taiwan.

    The UK government has maintained a cautious stance, with Home Office Minister Mike Tapp declining to explicitly classify the operation as illegal during a BBC Breakfast interview. While characterizing Maduro as ‘an evil, illegitimate dictator who tortured people,’ Tapp emphasized the complexity of international legal determinations and stated the UK would consult with allies before reaching conclusions. The government reiterated its commitment to always ‘abide by international law as a nation.’

    Opposition parties have united in their criticism, with Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, Green Party leader Zack Polanski, and SNP’s John Swinney all condemning the operation’s legality. Conversely, Conservative shadow minister Alex Burghart expressed understanding for US actions against Venezuela’s strongman leadership, while Reform UK’s Nigel Farage acknowledged the operation was ‘unorthodox and contrary to international law’ but potentially beneficial if it deterred adversaries.

    The developments occur as Maduro and his wife face weapon and drug charges in New York federal court, accused of profiting from cocaine smuggling operations. With Venezuela’s Vice-President Delcy Rodríguez preparing to assume interim leadership, the UN Security Council—where the UK holds permanent membership—is scheduled to convene and discuss the escalating situation.

  • Role of Global South in bolstering unity stressed

    Role of Global South in bolstering unity stressed

    The year 2025 has witnessed mounting strain on global governance systems due to escalating geopolitical tensions, institutional inertia, and widening development disparities. Against this backdrop, the Global South is increasingly positioned to strengthen solidarity among developing nations, with China poised to play a pivotal role in advancing inclusive development, people-centered governance, and a more equitable international framework, according to expert analyses.

    The foundation for this transformation was significantly reinforced during the 3rd Voice of Global South Summit in 2024, which convened 134 member states of the Group of 77 plus China, representing approximately 80% of the world’s population. Under the guiding principle of ‘leaving no one behind,’ participants acknowledged the distinctive requirements and capabilities of developing nations while emphasizing enhanced South-South cooperation across critical domains including industrialization, trade, investment, climate action, poverty reduction, and digital transformation.

    A May 2025 report from the United Nations Office for South-South Cooperation documented the Global South’s pursuit of viable solutions within an increasingly complex landscape characterized by shifting geopolitical dynamics, economic volatility, and environmental challenges. Despite economic growth in certain developing regions, persistent debt vulnerabilities, trade disruptions, and inflationary pressures continue to impede progress toward Sustainable Development Goals.

    Professor Evandro Menezes de Carvalho of Brazil’s Fluminense Federal University noted that the Global South’s growing influence is helping rebalance the historical dominance of Western powers within institutions like the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. ‘Many Global South countries are experiencing rapid economic growth, broadening global economic leadership beyond traditional Western economies,’ Carvalho stated, highlighting how initiatives such as BRICS and the New Development Bank are reducing reliance on Western-dominated financial systems.

    Professor Mammo Muchie of South Africa’s Tshwane University of Technology emphasized that global governance stands at a historic turning point where multilateral cooperation and shared development have become more urgent than ever. ‘Since the Cold War’s conclusion, deepening globalization and the collective rise of emerging market economies have gradually reshaped the international balance of power,’ Muchie observed, noting that developing countries have gained substantial influence in global affairs while new mechanisms including BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and ASEAN continue gaining prominence.

  • Pakistan and China call for ‘visible and verifiable’ steps against Afghan-based terror groups

    Pakistan and China call for ‘visible and verifiable’ steps against Afghan-based terror groups

    In a significant diplomatic development, Pakistan and China have jointly called for concrete, demonstrable measures to eradicate terrorist networks operating from Afghan territory. This demand was formalized in a joint statement released following high-level talks between Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing on December 4.

    The bilateral statement emphasized that terrorist organizations based in Afghanistan continue to represent a severe threat to regional and global security. Both nations stressed the critical importance of preventing Afghan soil from being utilized as a launchpad for militant activities against other countries.

    China specifically commended Pakistan’s comprehensive counterterrorism efforts, particularly highlighting the protection of Chinese citizens and infrastructure associated with the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). This massive infrastructure project, part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, employs thousands of Chinese workers and engineers developing transportation links between China’s Xinjiang region and Pakistan’s Gwadar port.

    The diplomatic pressure follows increased regional tensions, including a suicide car bombing in 2024 that killed five Chinese nationals in northwest Pakistan. Pakistan has consistently accused Afghanistan’s Taliban government of providing sanctuary to the banned Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which has been responsible for escalating attacks within Pakistan since 2021.

    Despite the Taliban’s assurances that Afghan territory isn’t used for cross-border attacks, tensions peaked in early October when Pakistan conducted airstrikes against alleged TTP hideouts in Afghanistan, resulting in dozens of casualties. Afghanistan retaliated with attacks on Pakistani military positions, leading to significant casualties on both sides. While Qatar brokered a temporary ceasefire in Doha, subsequent talks in Istanbul failed to produce substantial diplomatic breakthroughs.

  • Trump says US needs Greenland ‘for defense’ following strikes on Venezuela

    Trump says US needs Greenland ‘for defense’ following strikes on Venezuela

    President Donald Trump has reignited controversy by asserting the United States’ strategic need for Greenland’s territory for national defense purposes. The declaration came during a telephone interview with The Atlantic magazine on Sunday, shortly after U.S. forces conducted a military operation in Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.

    “We do need Greenland, absolutely,” Trump stated, connecting the Arctic territory’s strategic importance to broader national security concerns. When questioned about potential implications of the Venezuela intervention on Greenland’s status, Trump responded: “It was up to others to decide what the large-scale US strike against Venezuela means to Greenland. They are going to have to view it themselves.”

    The remarks prompted an immediate and forceful response from Danish leadership. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen issued a direct rebuke, declaring that “the United States has no right to annex” any part of the Danish Realm, which includes Denmark, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands.

    “I have to say it very directly to the United States,” Frederiksen stated, urging Washington to cease making threats against a close ally and the Greenlandic people. This diplomatic tension marks the latest chapter in a recurring pattern of territorial interest expressed by the Trump administration throughout the previous year.

    The White House has consistently justified its Greenland aspirations by citing national security imperatives, Arctic strategy considerations, and the territory’s potential wealth of critical minerals and natural resources. Meanwhile, the international community continues to express profound alarm over the Venezuela operation, with multiple nations condemning what they characterize as blatant use of force against a sovereign state.

  • Venezuela’s acting president convenes first cabinet meeting since Maduro’s capture

    Venezuela’s acting president convenes first cabinet meeting since Maduro’s capture

    Venezuela’s political landscape entered a critical phase as Acting President Delcy Rodriguez presided over an emergency cabinet assembly on Sunday, marking the first such gathering since the dramatic capture of President Nicolas Maduro by United States authorities. The high-stakes meeting, convened merely one day after the nation’s Supreme Tribunal formally mandated Rodriguez to assume interim presidential duties, represents a pivotal moment in Venezuela’s ongoing political crisis.

    Official state television broadcasts depicted Rodriguez flanked by key governmental figures including Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino Lopez and Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello during the council of ministers meeting at the Vice Presidency headquarters in Caracas. The visual symbolism of unity among Maduro’s closest allies served as a powerful message to both domestic and international observers.

    The administration characterized the emergency session as addressing “strategic lines framed in the ‘state of external commotion’”—a special decree previously enacted by the Venezuelan government to respond to extraordinary circumstances. This legal framework provides the interim government with expanded authority to navigate the complex geopolitical situation arising from Maduro’s detention.

    In a parallel development demonstrating the government’s coordinated response, Rodriguez announced the establishment of a specialized committee dedicated exclusively to securing Maduro’s release. This move signals Caracas’ intention to pursue diplomatic and legal channels to challenge what Venezuelan officials have characterized as an unlawful international intervention in their sovereign affairs.

    The convergence of military, judicial, and political leadership surrounding Rodriguez suggests a consolidation of power within Maduro’s political circle, aimed at projecting stability and continuity despite the unprecedented challenge to Venezuela’s leadership structure.

  • Maduro is taken to a US courthouse for his first appearance on drug trafficking charges

    Maduro is taken to a US courthouse for his first appearance on drug trafficking charges

    In an unprecedented legal confrontation, deposed Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores appeared Monday in a Manhattan federal courtroom to face narco-terrorism charges—marking the first time a former head of state has been brought to the United States under such circumstances since Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega in 1990.

    The couple, transported under heavy armed guard from Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, arrived via a meticulously coordinated operation involving motorcades and helicopter transfer across New York Harbor. Their appearance initiates what legal experts anticipate will be protracted proceedings challenging U.S. jurisdiction over a sovereign leader.

    Maduro’s defense team is expected to mount a vigorous challenge based on head-of-state immunity, despite the U.S. government’s position that his disputed 2024 reelection lacks legitimacy. The case presents complex diplomatic implications as Venezuela’s interim president Delcy Rodríguez has demanded Maduro’s return while simultaneously extending an olive branch for ‘respectful relations’ with the Trump administration.

    The 25-page indictment unsealed Saturday alleges Maduro and associates collaborated with drug cartels to facilitate thousands of tons of cocaine shipments into the United States, while further accusing the couple of ordering kidnappings, beatings, and murders related to drug debts. These charges carry potential life sentences if convicted.

    President Trump’s remarks aboard Air Force One signaled broader regional ambitions, notably threatening Colombian President Gustavo Petro over drug production and demanding ‘total access’ to Venezuela. The administration has clarified it will not govern Venezuela day-to-day but will enforce existing oil quarantine measures.

    Notably, an April U.S. intelligence assessment contradicted portions of the indictment, finding no coordination between the Venezuelan government and the Tren de Aragua criminal organization mentioned in the charges.

  • India’s top court denies bail to 2 Muslim activists after 5 years in jail without trial

    India’s top court denies bail to 2 Muslim activists after 5 years in jail without trial

    India’s Supreme Court has upheld the continued detention of two prominent Muslim student activists, Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, rejecting their bail applications in a controversial conspiracy case connected to the nation’s deadliest religious violence outbreak in decades. The justices determined that both individuals occupied a “qualitatively different footing” compared to other defendants in the same investigation, citing their alleged central involvement in orchestrating the February 2020 Delhi riots that resulted in 53 fatalities, predominantly within the Muslim community.

    The court acknowledged the significant delay in trial proceedings but maintained that this circumstance alone did not justify granting pretrial release. The violence erupted during extensive protests against the Citizenship Amendment Act of 2019, legislation widely criticized for its perceived discriminatory provisions against Muslims. Khalid and Imam emerged as leading voices in these demonstrations, which represented one of the most substantial challenges to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist administration.

    Their continued incarceration under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act—a stringent anti-terrorism statute increasingly deployed against government critics—has drawn international condemnation. Recent expressions of concern from eight U.S. lawmakers joined previous criticisms from human rights organizations alleging systematic suppression of dissent. Amnesty International characterized Khalid’s imprisonment as emblematic of justice system derailment and a broader pattern of repressing freedom of expression.

    Notably, the prosecution argued that the defendants deliberately engineered violence to damage India’s global reputation, while defense attorneys maintained the complete absence of credible evidence connecting their clients to the riots. This case occurs alongside numerous similar prosecutions of Muslim individuals following the Delhi violence, some of which have collapsed due to insufficient evidence.

  • Trump declares US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela and Maduro goes to court

    Trump declares US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela and Maduro goes to court

    In a dramatic escalation of geopolitical tensions, former President Donald Trump has declared the United States to be ‘in charge’ of Venezuela, following a military operation that resulted in the capture of the nation’s deposed leader, Nicolás Maduro. The 63-year-old leftist strongman, along with his wife, was apprehended in a surprise assault involving commandos, aerial bombardment, and significant naval deployment off Venezuela’s coast. He now faces narcotrafficking charges in a New York courtroom.

    The operation has triggered international outcry, prompting the UN Security Council to convene an emergency session at Venezuela’s request. Nations including China, Russia, and Iran condemned the action as a breach of international law, while some US allies expressed deep concern over the unilateral move. Chinese officials demanded Maduro’s immediate release, and Colombian President Gustavo Petro labeled the intervention an ‘assault on the sovereignty’ of Latin America, warning of potential humanitarian consequences.

    In a surprising diplomatic shift, Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s successor and interim leader, softened her initial defiant stance and extended an offer of cooperation to the Trump administration. This conciliatory gesture came mere hours after Trump issued a stark warning, threatening that she would face a ‘very big price, probably bigger than Maduro’ if she resisted US demands. Trump explicitly stated that Washington requires ‘total access’ to Venezuela’s vast oil reserves and other resources, framing it as essential for rebuilding the nation.

    The White House has clarified that its objective is not wholesale regime change but rather the installation of a compliant government, even if it includes former associates of Maduro. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized that the US seeks a pragmatic assessment of the new leadership’s actions rather than an immediate return to democracy. This stance has left the Venezuelan opposition, which claims it was robbed of electoral victory, in a precarious position, with key figures stating that US intervention alone is insufficient without the release of political prisoners and recognition of their electoral win.

    Despite the withdrawal of ground forces, a formidable US naval presence, including an aircraft carrier, remains stationed near Venezuela. The Trump administration asserts that it maintains powerful economic leverage through an oil tanker blockade and has threatened further military action if necessary. The event has sparked domestic concern in the US, with Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer noting that Americans were left ‘scratching their heads in wonderment and in fear’ over the administration’s strategy.

  • Thirty-two Cubans killed during US attack on Venezuela

    Thirty-two Cubans killed during US attack on Venezuela

    The Cuban government has confirmed the deaths of 32 nationals during a U.S. military operation targeting Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro’s compound in Caracas. According to official statements, the deceased were members of Cuba’s armed forces and intelligence agencies who had been providing security protection to Maduro and his wife at Venezuela’s request. The Cuban presidency described the fatalities as occurring ‘after fierce resistance’ during direct combat with American forces or resulting from aerial bombardments.

    While Venezuela has not released official casualty figures, unnamed sources cited by The New York Times suggest the death toll may reach 80 with numbers potentially rising. The operation, which resulted in Maduro’s capture on Saturday, has triggered two days of national mourning in Cuba and raised questions about potential U.S. actions against other adversarial nations.

    In response to developments, President Donald Trump indicated military action against Cuba would be unnecessary, stating the country appeared ‘ready to fall’ without intervention. Secretary of State Marco Rubio meanwhile characterized Cuba’s leadership as ‘incompetent, senile men’ and suggested government officials in Havana should be concerned.

    This incident occurs against the backdrop of tightened U.S. restrictions on Cuba, with Trump having signed a memorandum in July reversing earlier policies that eased pressure on the Caribbean nation. The current administration has maintained economic practices that specifically target Cuban government, military, and intelligence agencies while strengthening enforcement of travel restrictions for American citizens.

    The longstanding U.S. embargo on Cuba, initially imposed in 1962 and continuously maintained despite United Nations calls for its termination, continues to shape bilateral relations between the two nations.

  • Initiative sets clear course for Yangtze

    Initiative sets clear course for Yangtze

    A profound ecological transformation is underway along China’s Yangtze River, where former fishermen have become guardians of the nation’s ‘mother river.’ In Hukou county, Jiangxi province, a 16-member patrol team led by 58-year-old Shu Yin’an vigilantly monitors the confluence of the Yangtze and Poyang Lake, protecting endangered finless porpoises and combating illegal fishing activities.

    Shu’s personal journey mirrors the river’s remarkable turnaround. ‘My family relied on fishing for generations,’ he recalled, ‘but overfishing devastated the ecosystem until we could scarcely survive.’ His concern that future generations might never witness fish in the Yangtze prompted him to join the patrol team when it formed in 2017.

    This transformation stems from President Xi Jinping’s strategic vision initiated at the first Yangtze River Economic Belt symposium in Chongqing on January 5, 2016. Xi established a groundbreaking principle: ‘Restoring the ecological environment of the Yangtze River should be an overriding priority. We must focus on joint protection and avoid excessive development.’

    The implementation of this vision has been systematic and comprehensive. In 2020, a decade-long fishing ban took effect in key waters, transitioning over 230,000 fishermen like Shu to new livelihoods with government support. The 2016 master plan formally embedded ‘ecological priority, green development’ as foundational principles, marking a fundamental shift from industrial expansion at environmental expense.

    Tangible results emerge across the river basin. Chongqing’s Guangyang Isle, once threatened by massive real estate projects covering 3 million square meters, has undergone comprehensive ecological restoration since 2017. The island now welcomes returning residents and tourists alike, demonstrating successful environmental rehabilitation.

    Chemical pollution, which President Xi described as leaving the river ‘seriously ill’ in 2018, has been systematically addressed. One notable case involved a major chemical company fined 27 million yuan ($3.86 million) in 2016—the largest environmental penalty in the basin’s history. The company subsequently invested 100 million yuan in advanced pollution control facilities, achieving both environmental remediation and industrial upgrading.

    Over the past decade, President Xi has conducted approximately 30 inspection tours along the Yangtze and chaired four pivotal symposiums to steer the economic belt’s development. The strategy has evolved into a multidimensional framework encompassing high-quality development, innovation-driven growth, and regional coordination.

    During the 14th Five-Year Plan period (2021-25), the Yangtze River Economic Belt—contributing nearly half of China’s GDP and hosting over 40% of its population—has emerged as a national model for high-quality development. The region has strengthened its technological innovation capabilities, established 196 national smart manufacturing demonstration factories, and nurtured 1,738 innovative ‘little giant’ enterprises.

    Experts envision a ‘colorful’ development pathway during the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-30), driven by innovation and consumption rather than traditional factors. This comprehensive approach demonstrates China’s successful integration of ecological conservation with sustainable economic advancement along its most vital waterway.