分类: politics

  • Around 1,500 soldiers on standby for deployment to Minneapolis, officials say

    Around 1,500 soldiers on standby for deployment to Minneapolis, officials say

    Approximately 1,500 soldiers from the 11th Airborne Division stationed at Fort Wainwright, Alaska, remain on high alert for potential deployment to Minneapolis, according to a U.S. defense official. This military contingency plan comes as ongoing demonstrations against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations continue to unfold throughout the city.

    The possible activation of active duty personnel represents one of several options available to the administration should civil unrest escalate. No final decision regarding troop deployment has been made at this time.

    These developments follow the fatal shooting of U.S. citizen Renee Good by an ICE agent earlier this month. Good was reportedly acting as a legal observer monitoring ICE activities at the time of the incident. While protest organizers have characterized her as a civilian observer, federal authorities have controversially labeled her a “domestic terrorist.”

    In response to the escalating situation, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has already mobilized the state’s National Guard and deployed additional law enforcement personnel to maintain order during protests. Simultaneously, the judicial branch has intervened through a federal court order issued by Judge Katherine Menendez. The ruling explicitly prohibits ICE agents from employing certain crowd control measures—including arrests and pepper spray—against peaceful demonstrators and observers.

    City officials have repeatedly urged protesters to maintain orderly and peaceful conduct during demonstrations, which have spread beyond Minneapolis with signs demanding “Justice for Renee” appearing at rallies nationwide. The ongoing tensions reflect deepening national divisions regarding immigration enforcement policies and practices.

  • Faisal Islam: Trump’s Greenland threats to allies are without parallel

    Faisal Islam: Trump’s Greenland threats to allies are without parallel

    A unprecedented diplomatic crisis has emerged following U.S. President Donald Trump’s coercive threat to Western allies regarding Greenland’s potential annexation. The administration’s ultimatum—either support the proposed territorial acquisition or face intensified trade restrictions—represents an extraordinary escalation in economic diplomacy that experts describe as without historical parallel.

    The threat, delivered through presidential social media channels, has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles. Officials from affected nations have expressed both bewilderment and deep concern about the implications for NATO and Western alliance structures. The move targets longstanding partners with minimal warning, fundamentally challenging the principles of international cooperation that have underpinned transatlantic relations for decades.

    Economic analysts note that while allies have previously adapted to Trump’s trade policies, this particular threat enters qualitatively different territory. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent strategic pivot illustrates alternative approaches emerging among affected nations. During his China visit this week, Carney actively promoted “a new world order” in trade relationships, achieving a 14% surge in Canada’s non-U.S. trade that compensates for losses in American commerce.

    The timing of Trump’s intervention coincides with his scheduled appearance at the World Economic Forum, where he is expected to meet with leaders of the very nations whose economies he has threatened. Diplomatic experts question the feasibility of such a territorial acquisition, noting that no modern precedent exists for compelling allies to surrender sovereign territory through economic coercion.

    International observers have drawn disturbing comparisons, questioning how the global community would respond if China or Russia issued similar threats to their allies. The fundamental rationale behind the threat—public coercion of strategic partners—has raised profound concerns about the stability of international norms and the functioning of American decision-making processes.

    As protests supporting Greenland’s position emerge in Denmark, the international community largely hopes this unprecedented situation will resolve before causing permanent damage to alliance structures that have maintained global stability for generations.

  • Portugal’s presidential election may deliver another gain for populists in Europe

    Portugal’s presidential election may deliver another gain for populists in Europe

    LISBON, Portugal — Portugal’s presidential election on Sunday features an unprecedented field of 11 candidates, setting the stage for a potential political milestone as far-right populist André Ventura emerges as a formidable contender. This development signals a possible breakthrough for Europe’s expanding far-right movement within a nation traditionally resistant to such politics.

    The crowded ballot virtually guarantees no single candidate will secure the required 50% majority, necessitating a runoff election next month between the top two vote-getters. Nearly 11 million registered voters will determine the successor to President Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, who concludes his constitutionally limited two-term tenure.

    André Ventura, leader of the populist Chega (Enough) party, ranks among the front-runners according to recent polling. His party’s remarkable ascent has transformed it into Portugal’s second-largest parliamentary faction within just six years of establishment. Ventura’s campaign prominently targets immigration, with provocative billboards proclaiming ‘This isn’t Bangladesh’ and opposing welfare benefits for immigrants—rhetoric previously considered unthinkable in Portuguese political discourse.

    Other prominent candidates represent Portugal’s establishment parties: Luís Marques Mendes from the governing center-right Social Democratic Party and António José Seguro of the center-left Socialist Party. Retired Rear Admiral Henrique Gouveia e Melo, acclaimed for his efficient management of Portugal’s COVID-19 vaccination campaign, presents a strong independent challenge.

    The election occurs amid Portugal’s most severe political instability in decades, following three general elections within three years. While Ventura emphasizes immigration, voters express greater concern about housing affordability and living costs. The next president will also face constitutional decisions regarding euthanasia legislation approved by parliament in 2022.

    Though largely ceremonial, the Portuguese presidency wields significant influence through mediation powers, legislative veto authority, and the crucial ability to dissolve parliament—a tool known locally as the ‘atomic bomb.’ The election’s outcome will determine leadership at Lisbon’s distinctive riverside ‘pink palace’ for a five-year term, with a potential runoff scheduled for February 8 should no candidate achieve immediate victory.

  • Taiwanese reporter accused of bribing military officers to leak information to China

    Taiwanese reporter accused of bribing military officers to leak information to China

    TAIPEI, Taiwan — Taiwanese authorities have taken decisive action against an alleged espionage operation, detaining a television journalist alongside five current and former military officers on Saturday. The case centers on accusations that the journalist bribed military personnel to obtain sensitive defense information for individuals from mainland China.

    The Qiaotou District Prosecutors Office confirmed that a district court ordered the detention of the individuals, identifying the journalist only by the surname Lin. CTi TV, the employer of reporter Lin Chen-you, acknowledged his detention while emphasizing their lack of case details and calling for a fair judicial process. The news organization concluded its statement with the phrase “God bless Taiwan.

    This development occurs amid heightened tensions between Taiwan and China. Beijing consistently claims Taiwan as part of its territory and has intensified military activities around the island. Last month, China conducted large-scale military exercises following Washington’s announcement of significant arms sales to Taiwan.

    According to prosecutors, Lin allegedly provided payments ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands of Taiwan dollars (equivalent to tens to hundreds of U.S. dollars) to active military personnel in exchange for sensitive information. The prosecution did not specify whether the Chinese recipients had direct ties to the Chinese government.

    Authorities executed raids on Friday targeting the journalist’s premises and nine current and retired military personnel as part of an investigation into potential violations of national security laws, anti-corruption statutes, and the unauthorized disclosure of classified information. CTi TV confirmed that their corporate offices were not subject to these raids.

    Lin’s professional background, as indicated on his Facebook profile, includes serving as a political reporter and anchor covering Taiwan’s legislative affairs.

    The case represents an unusual intersection of journalism and national security concerns in Taiwan, where espionage investigations typically focus on government and military personnel rather than media representatives. CTi News has operated as an online news outlet since 2020, when Taiwan’s National Communications Commission declined to review its cable television license due to repeated violations and increasing complaints. Although a court later overturned this decision, the legal dispute continues through the appeals process.

  • New York pension fund may invest in Israel despite Gaza genocide, defying Mamdani

    New York pension fund may invest in Israel despite Gaza genocide, defying Mamdani

    New York City’s pension system is contemplating a controversial return to investing in Israeli government bonds, potentially reversing a recent divestment policy despite ongoing international condemnation of Israel’s military operations in Gaza. This financial deliberation pits fiduciary responsibilities against ethical considerations in a heated municipal debate.

    The Financial Times reported that city officials are evaluating reinvestment options even as Mayor Zohran Mamdani maintains public support for divesting from Israel due to its conduct in Palestinian territories. The discussion highlights the complex intersection of municipal finance and international human rights concerns.

    City Comptroller Mark Levine emphasized his fiduciary obligation to pension beneficiaries, noting to the FT that “Israel bonds have performed very well and they continue to be investment grade rated.” Israeli bonds function as direct loans to the state treasury, providing investors with consistent interest payments while funding government operations.

    Opponents argue that such investments effectively subsidize Israel’s settlement expansion in occupied territories, displacement of Palestinian communities, and civilian casualties in Gaza. The potential policy reversal has intensified tensions within City Hall since Mamdani took office on January 1 and immediately revoked an executive order that had prohibited city agencies from boycotting or divesting from Israel.

    The mayor, a longstanding critic of Israel’s military campaigns, previously stated that New York “should not have a fund that is invested in the violation of international law.” Comptroller Levine, while acknowledging personal ties to Israel through family and cultural connections, maintains that investment decisions should prioritize financial metrics over political considerations.

    This reevaluation occurs despite warnings from credit rating agencies like Moody’s that categorize Israeli bonds as “increasingly risky investments.” The debate marks a significant departure from decades of routine pension investments in Israeli debt, a practice that ended in 2023 when the city allowed its $39 million bond holdings to mature without reinvestment.

    Former Comptroller Brad Lander, who initiated the divestment, framed the 2023 decision as part of a broader strategy to avoid foreign sovereign debt rather than singling out Israel for special treatment. The current reconsideration revives fundamental questions about whether public pension funds should finance governments accused of violating international law.

  • Trump says US to impose tariffs on 8 European nations over Greenland

    Trump says US to impose tariffs on 8 European nations over Greenland

    In a significant escalation of diplomatic tensions, former U.S. President Donald Trump declared on Saturday that the United States would implement sweeping tariffs against eight European nations in retaliation for their opposition to American ambitions regarding Greenland. The targeted countries include Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, Britain, the Netherlands, and Finland.

    According to Trump’s social media announcement, a 10% tariff on all goods from these nations will take effect on February 1, 2026. These levies are scheduled to increase dramatically to 25% by June 1 unless an agreement is reached for the United States to acquire the Arctic territory of Greenland.

    The tariff threat follows reports that several NATO members, including Britain, France, and Germany, deployed military assets and diplomatic personnel to Greenland this week in apparent opposition to U.S. territorial aspirations. Trump framed these actions as a ‘very dangerous game’ that created an unacceptable level of risk.

    ‘Therefore, it is imperative that, in order to protect Global Peace and Security, strong measures be taken so that this potentially perilous situation ends quickly, and without question,’ Trump stated in his post.

    The former president justified the proposed acquisition on national security grounds, asserting that American control of Greenland is necessary to protect U.S. interests. He simultaneously offered negotiations with Denmark ‘and/or any of these Countries that have put so much at risk, despite all that we have done for them.’

    Greenland, while self-governing, remains part of the Kingdom of Denmark, which maintains authority over its defense and foreign policy. The United States already operates a strategic military base on the island. Since returning to office in 2025, Trump has repeatedly expressed interest in obtaining Greenland, recently intensifying his rhetoric.

    The announcement sparked immediate public backlash, with thousands of protesters gathering in Copenhagen on Saturday chanting slogans such as ‘Greenland is not for sale,’ demonstrating widespread European opposition to the proposition.

  • UAE welcomes phase two of Gaza peace plan, formation of National Committee

    UAE welcomes phase two of Gaza peace plan, formation of National Committee

    The United Arab Emirates has formally endorsed the commencement of Phase Two of the comprehensive Gaza peace proposal and the establishment of the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), a transitional governance body. Reem bint Ebrahim Al Hashimy, Minister of State for International Cooperation, expressed strong support for these developments while also acknowledging the creation of the ‘Board of Peace’ framework announced by US President Donald Trump.

    In her official statement, Minister Al Hashimy praised the diplomatic leadership demonstrated by President Trump and recognized the sustained efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and Türkiye in advancing regional stability. She characterized these multilateral initiatives as crucial frameworks for consolidating security measures and revitalizing the political negotiation process.

    Minister Al Hashimy expressed particular honor regarding her appointment to the Gaza Executive Board, interpreting this designation as international recognition of the UAE’s constructive role in conflict resolution. She emphasized that the UAE remains committed to transforming humanitarian challenges into sustainable opportunities for the Palestinian population and broader Middle Eastern communities.

    The Minister articulated the UAE’s firm conviction that achieving durable peace necessitates coordinated international collaboration and effective administrative governance in Gaza. Such governance must guarantee the legitimate rights and aspirations of the Palestinian people while contributing to regional stability and fostering prosperous development.

    Al Hashimy further stressed the critical importance of building upon existing progress within the peace framework. She advocated for diligent efforts to reinstate a comprehensive political process oriented toward a two-state solution, ultimately aiming for an equitable and permanent resolution to the conflict.

  • UAE minister Reem Al Hashimy appointed to White House’s Gaza Executive Board

    UAE minister Reem Al Hashimy appointed to White House’s Gaza Executive Board

    In a significant diplomatic development, the White House has established a National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG) as part of implementing phase two of President Donald Trump’s ‘Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict.’ This 20-point roadmap aims to establish lasting peace, stability, reconstruction, and prosperity in the region.

    The newly formed Gaza Executive Board will operate in support of the Office of the High Representative and the NCAG. The Board’s primary mission involves supporting effective governance and delivering superior services that advance peace, stability, and prosperity for Gaza’s population.

    Notable appointments include UAE Minister of State for International Cooperation Reem Al Hashimy, who joins the Executive Board. Simultaneously, Nikolay Mladenov, Director General of the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy in Abu Dhabi, assumes the critical role of High Representative for Gaza. Mladenov will serve as the essential on-the-ground liaison between the Board of Peace and the NCAG, supporting oversight of Gaza’s governance, reconstruction, and development while ensuring coordination across civilian and security sectors.

    This executive board formation coincides with the creation of a ‘Board of Peace’ to supervise Gaza’s temporary governance. The territory has maintained a fragile ceasefire since October. The supervisory board includes prominent figures such as US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, President Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff, former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, with President Trump serving as chair.

  • Iran’s supreme leader says ‘thousands killed’ in unrest, blames Trump and Israel

    Iran’s supreme leader says ‘thousands killed’ in unrest, blames Trump and Israel

    In an unprecedented public statement, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has formally acknowledged that “several thousand” people lost their lives during recent nationwide protests, marking the first official recognition of the substantial death toll from the unrest. The comments, delivered on Saturday, represent a significant departure from previous government statements regarding the scale of the casualties.

    Khamenei directly attributed responsibility for the violence to United States President Donald Trump, asserting that Washington bore culpability for the widespread casualties, destruction, and social turmoil experienced across Iran. “We consider the US president criminal for the casualties, damages and slander he inflicted on the Iranian nation,” Khamenei declared through state media channels, emphasizing that the latest anti-government demonstrations differed from previous incidents due to Trump’s personal involvement.

    The protests initially erupted on December 28th, primarily driven by economic grievances, but rapidly evolved into the most severe civil unrest witnessed in Iran in recent years. Khamenei further accused Iran’s longstanding adversaries, the United States and Israel, of orchestrating the violence, claiming that “those linked to Israel and the US caused massive damage and killed several thousand” through arson attacks, destruction of public property, and deliberate efforts to incite chaos.

    Despite Trump’s repeated warnings against using capital punishment against protesters—including threats of “very strong action” if executions proceeded—and his Friday social media claim that Iranian authorities had halted mass hangings, Tehran promptly rejected this assertion, stating there was “no plan to hang people.”

    In remarks widely interpreted as a response to Washington, Khamenei asserted Iran would not be provoked into armed conflict while vowing that “we will not let domestic or international criminals go unpunished.”

    Independent verification of casualties remains challenging due to extensive internet restrictions. The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency has documented at least 3,090 verified deaths, including 2,885 protesters, alongside more than 22,000 arrests since the unrest began. Internet monitoring group NetBlocks reported connectivity had slightly improved after exceeding 200 hours of near-total shutdown but remained at approximately two percent of normal levels.

    Iranian state media has reported the arrest of thousands described as “rioters and terrorists,” including individuals allegedly connected to foreign-based opposition groups seeking to overthrow the Islamic Republic. Meanwhile, Israeli officials have publicly expressed support for exiled opposition figures, with Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu recently claiming Israel maintained operatives “on the ground” in Iran aimed at weakening Tehran’s capabilities, though denying direct involvement in attempts to topple the leadership.

  • From surge in patriotism to fewer US trips – Trump’s impact on Canada

    From surge in patriotism to fewer US trips – Trump’s impact on Canada

    The first year of Donald Trump’s second presidential term has catalyzed a profound transformation in Canada’s domestic policies and international positioning, marking a significant departure from historical bilateral norms. As the United States’ northern neighbor, Canada has experienced substantial shifts across economic, political, and social dimensions under the new administration’s policies.

    Trade relations have undergone particularly dramatic changes. The imposition of tariffs on key Canadian sectors prompted immediate retaliatory measures, most notably in alcohol trade where American spirits faced provincial boycotts. Data reveals a staggering decline in US liquor imports from $63.1 billion in late 2024 to approximately $9.5 billion by late 2025. This economic reorientation extends beyond beverages, with Mexican vehicle imports surpassing American counterparts for the first time in history according to Statistics Canada.

    Public sentiment has mirrored these structural shifts. Pew Research Center findings indicate 64% of Canadians now hold negative views toward the United States—the highest negative perception recorded in over two decades. Approximately 77% express limited confidence in President Trump’s leadership, with overwhelming majorities characterizing him as ‘arrogant’ (90%) and ‘dangerous’ (75%). Notably, nearly half (46%) now advocate for treating the US as either an ‘enemy or potential threat’ according to Angus Reid polling.

    Tourism patterns have reflected this cooling relationship. Cross-border travel to the United States declined by over 25%, resulting in an estimated $5.7 billion loss for American tourism. Canadians have redirected their travel spending domestically, generating record-breaking C$59 billion in tourism revenue from May to August, while Mexican destinations experienced a 12% surge in Canadian visitors.

    Politically, the Trump effect triggered unexpected realignments. Justin Trudeau’s resignation—accelerated by ministerial protests over his handling of US relations—paved the way for Mark Carney’s ascent. The former central banker leveraged economic credentials and a staunch sovereignty platform to achieve an improbable Liberal victory in April’s election, reversing what had appeared to be certain Conservative dominance.

    In response to North American uncertainty, Canada has embarked on strategic diversification of international partnerships. Prime Minister Carney’s recent China visit—the first by a Canadian leader since 2017—produced tariff-reduction agreements and market access expansions, despite previous campaign rhetoric labeling China a security threat. Similar diplomatic thaws are anticipated with India following years of tension over extraterritorial allegations, alongside strengthened ties with Gulf states and European nations.

    This comprehensive recalibration represents Canada’s most significant foreign policy reorientation in modern history, balancing economic pragmatism against sovereignty concerns while navigating an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape.