分类: politics

  • A US senator claims ‘Christian mass murder’ is occurring in Nigeria. The data disagrees

    A US senator claims ‘Christian mass murder’ is occurring in Nigeria. The data disagrees

    U.S. Senator Ted Cruz has ignited a contentious debate by urging Congress to designate Nigeria as a violator of religious freedom, alleging ‘Christian mass murder’ without substantiated evidence. The Nigerian government has firmly dismissed these claims as baseless. Cruz, a Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, introduced a bill last month seeking to label Nigeria a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ due to alleged ‘severe violations’ of religious freedom. Such a designation could lead to U.S. sanctions. However, the bill’s passage remains uncertain as it awaits Senate action. Cruz’s assertions have been echoed by some U.S. celebrities and commentators, with some even alleging a ‘Christian genocide,’ though no evidence has been provided. Cruz’s office has not responded to inquiries about the motivation behind these allegations. Nigeria, with a population of 220 million, is nearly evenly divided between Christians and Muslims. The country has long grappled with insecurity from various groups, including Boko Haram, which targets both Muslims and Christians. Analysts emphasize that the majority of victims in Nigeria’s Muslim-majority north are Muslims, not Christians. While religiously motivated attacks occur, they are part of a broader spectrum of violence, including farmer-herder conflicts and ethnic clashes. Joseph Hayab, a former chairman of the Christian Association of Nigeria, refuted claims of ‘Christian genocide,’ noting that while thousands of Christians have been killed, the situation has improved compared to previous years. Nigeria’s Information Minister, Idris Muhammed, stated that there is no systematic or intentional targeting of any religious group. Nigeria was previously designated a ‘Country of Particular Concern’ by the U.S. in 2020, but this was lifted in 2023 to improve bilateral relations. The Christian Association of Nigeria has acknowledged the persecution of Christians but emphasized that violence affects both religious groups. Data from the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data program shows that between January 2020 and September 2023, 20,409 deaths resulted from 11,862 attacks on civilians in Nigeria, with 317 Christian deaths and 417 Muslim deaths recorded in religion-targeted attacks. Analysts argue that Nigeria’s complex security dynamics do not meet the legal definition of genocide, which requires intent to destroy a specific group. Instead, they describe the violence as mass killings not targeted at any particular group. Experts warn that framing the crisis as genocide could exacerbate tensions and hinder efforts to address the root causes of violence.

  • Ahead of Zelenskyy meeting, Trump shows signs he might not be ready to send Kyiv Tomahawk missiles

    Ahead of Zelenskyy meeting, Trump shows signs he might not be ready to send Kyiv Tomahawk missiles

    President Donald Trump is scheduled to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House on Friday, following a lengthy phone call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. The discussions come amid Ukraine’s urgent request for long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles, which Trump has indicated he is hesitant to provide, citing the need to preserve U.S. military resources. Zelenskyy has argued that these missiles are essential for striking deep into Russian territory and compelling Putin to engage in serious negotiations to end the ongoing conflict. However, Putin has warned that supplying such weapons to Ukraine would severely damage U.S.-Russian relations. This will be the fourth face-to-face meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy since Trump returned to office in January. Trump has also announced plans to meet with Putin in Budapest to discuss potential resolutions to the war, with senior aides from both sides set to convene next week. Despite Trump’s earlier optimism about brokering peace, recent developments suggest that direct talks between Zelenskyy and Putin remain unlikely, as Russia continues its aggressive military actions in Ukraine.

  • A war on drugs or a war on terror? Trump’s military pressure on Venezuela blurs the lines

    A war on drugs or a war on terror? Trump’s military pressure on Venezuela blurs the lines

    The Trump administration’s approach to combating drug cartels in Latin America is drawing parallels to the post-9/11 war on terror, with legal scholars questioning the expansion of military power and its implications for international law. President Donald Trump has authorized military strikes against Venezuelan drug traffickers, relying on the same legal framework that justified lethal force against al-Qaida after the 2001 attacks. However, critics argue that this strategy stretches the boundaries of international law, particularly as the U.S. military targets groups primarily engaged in drug trafficking rather than terrorism. The administration has conducted at least five strikes, killing 27 people, without congressional approval or traditional legal investigations, raising concerns about the justification for these actions and their impact on U.S.-Latin American relations. Trump has also hinted at potential covert operations to oust Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, further escalating tensions. Legal experts, including Claire Finkelstein of the University of Pennsylvania, argue that labeling drug cartels as combatants in an ‘armed conflict’ undermines international law. Meanwhile, the U.S. intelligence community disputes claims that Maduro’s administration is orchestrating drug trafficking and illegal immigration. The administration’s focus on Venezuela overlooks the fact that most fentanyl, responsible for the majority of U.S. overdose deaths, is smuggled from Mexico. Despite calls for transparency, the Trump administration has yet to provide evidence to Congress proving the targeted boats were carrying narcotics. The International Criminal Court could investigate the strikes, but its efforts are hampered by internal issues and U.S. sanctions.

  • Trump gets Gaza ceasefire trophy at beginning of game

    Trump gets Gaza ceasefire trophy at beginning of game

    The fragile ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, brokered by former US President Donald Trump, is under strain as Israel and Hamas accuse each other of violating the agreement. The dispute threatens both the flow of humanitarian aid and the relative calm in the region. Trump’s 20-point peace plan, hailed as “historic,” aimed to end the conflict in Gaza and the broader region. Key goals included a ceasefire, the exchange of prisoners, and the resumption of aid deliveries to Gaza’s 2.3 million residents. While the first two objectives were partially achieved, aid delivery remains inconsistent, with Israel blocking supplies citing Hamas’s failure to return the bodies of 20 deceased citizens. Critics argue that Trump’s plan lacks concrete measures to disarm Hamas, ensure Israeli withdrawal, or establish a sustainable Palestinian government. Skepticism persists, with The Guardian cautiously praising the initiative while emphasizing the need for sustained pressure on both Israel and Hamas. Trump’s unorthodox diplomacy, including his handling of Israel’s missile attack on Qatar, has further complicated the situation. Despite these challenges, Trump remains committed to his vision of lasting peace, though his focus may shift as global priorities evolve.

  • Trump authorises CIA covert operations in Venezuela, as he weighs direct attack

    Trump authorises CIA covert operations in Venezuela, as he weighs direct attack

    In a significant escalation of U.S. involvement in Venezuela, President Donald Trump has authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations aimed at destabilizing the government of leftist President Nicolas Maduro. This move, reminiscent of Cold War-era shadow wars, includes paramilitary actions, economic warfare, and media manipulation. Trump justified the decision by accusing Maduro of facilitating drug trafficking and directing Venezuelan prisoners into the U.S. Meanwhile, the U.S. has amassed a substantial military presence in the Caribbean, deploying guided-missile destroyers, F-35 jet fighters, MQ-9 Reaper drones, and special operations vessels. This buildup, the largest since the 1989 invasion of Panama, includes at least 10,000 troops and vessels capable of launching Tomahawk Cruise missiles. The U.S. has also conducted air strikes off Venezuela’s coast, targeting alleged drug-smuggling ships, which Maduro’s government denies, calling it a pretext for regime change. Trump hinted at potential land-based military action, stating, ‘We’ve almost totally stopped it by sea. Now we’ll stop it by land.’ When questioned about authorizing the CIA to ‘take out’ Maduro, Trump dismissed the query as ‘ridiculous.’ Despite running as a non-interventionist candidate, Trump has shown a willingness to deploy military force, with limited congressional opposition. The administration has invoked wartime powers, labeling Venezuelan drug cartels as ‘terrorist organizations’ and justifying strikes as self-defense. This latest intervention echoes U.S. Cold War tactics in Latin America, including coups in Guatemala and Chile and support for Contra fighters in Nicaragua. Maduro, who has governed since 2013, has ordered military exercises among civilians in anticipation of a potential invasion, vowing to resist U.S.-backed regime change.

  • Death penalty sought for Bangladesh’s ex-leader Sheikh Hasina

    Death penalty sought for Bangladesh’s ex-leader Sheikh Hasina

    Bangladesh’s prosecutors have called for the execution of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who is currently in exile in India, over her alleged role in the violent suppression of student-led protests in 2024. The unrest, which lasted for weeks, resulted in the deaths of up to 1,400 people and ultimately ended Hasina’s 15-year tenure as the country’s leader. This marked the deadliest episode of violence in Bangladesh since its 1971 independence war. Hasina is now on trial for crimes against humanity, with prosecutors accusing her of ordering security forces to use lethal force against demonstrators. A leaked audio recording allegedly captures her issuing the directive, though she denies the charges. Chief prosecutor Tajul Islam argued in court that Hasina’s actions were driven by a desire to maintain power indefinitely for herself and her family, describing her as a “hardened criminal” who shows no remorse. The protests initially began in July 2024 over civil service job quotas for relatives of 1971 war veterans but quickly escalated into a broader movement demanding her ouster. One of the bloodiest incidents occurred on August 5, when police killed at least 52 people in a Dhaka neighborhood, marking one of the worst cases of police violence in the country’s history. Hasina fled by helicopter that day as crowds stormed her residence. She is being tried alongside her former interior minister, Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, and ex-police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun, with prosecutors also seeking the death penalty for Kamal. Chowdhury has pleaded guilty but awaits sentencing. Hasina has already been sentenced to six months for contempt of court and faces separate corruption charges. With Bangladesh’s next elections scheduled for February 2025, Hasina’s party, the Awami League, has been barred from participating, leaving her rival, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), as the frontrunner.

  • Five takeaways from the Mamdani-Cuomo NYC mayoral debate

    Five takeaways from the Mamdani-Cuomo NYC mayoral debate

    The New York City mayoral debate, held at Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, brought together the three leading candidates—Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa—to present their visions for America’s largest city. With early voting set to begin next week, the stakes are high, as the outcome could have significant political implications beyond New York, especially with President Donald Trump’s looming influence. Mamdani, the progressive frontrunner with a 46% lead in recent polls, faced scrutiny over his past statements on Israel and Palestine, while Cuomo, running as an independent, positioned himself as the experienced candidate capable of navigating Trump’s policies. Sliwa, the Republican candidate, emphasized public safety and affordability, key issues resonating with New Yorkers. The debate also highlighted the city’s affordability crisis, with candidates proposing solutions ranging from rent freezes to income limits on rent-stabilized apartments. Cuomo’s controversial tenure as governor, including allegations of sexual harassment and undercounting nursing home deaths during COVID-19, was a focal point of criticism from his opponents. The debate underscored the deep divisions and high stakes in the race to lead New York City.

  • Grocery bills, Trump and Gaza – How NYC mayoral debate unfolded

    Grocery bills, Trump and Gaza – How NYC mayoral debate unfolded

    The first mayoral debate of New York City’s general election saw a dynamic exchange among candidates Zohran Mamdani, Andrew Cuomo, and Curtis Sliwa. The discussion spanned a range of pressing issues, from the rising cost of groceries to the political legacy of former President Donald Trump and the ongoing crisis in Gaza. Each candidate presented their vision for addressing these challenges, highlighting their policy priorities and leadership styles. Mamdani emphasized economic relief for struggling families, while Cuomo focused on restoring trust in government. Sliwa, known for his grassroots activism, advocated for community-driven solutions. The debate underscored the diverse concerns of NYC residents and set the stage for a competitive election season.

  • Putin-Trump call a curveball for Zelensky ahead of White House meeting

    Putin-Trump call a curveball for Zelensky ahead of White House meeting

    In a surprising turn of events, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin have agreed to hold an in-person summit in Hungary, following a two-and-a-half-hour phone call on Thursday. The announcement comes as Ukraine faces relentless attacks from Russia, including missile strikes and drone assaults targeting civilian infrastructure and the gas supply network, exacerbating the country’s already dire situation. The timing of the call, which occurred while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was en route to Washington, has raised concerns in Kyiv, as it appears to overshadow Zelensky’s efforts to secure critical military aid. Zelensky had hoped to persuade Trump to approve the sale of long-range Tomahawk missiles, which could significantly enhance Ukraine’s ability to strike deep into Russian territory. However, Trump’s willingness to provide such weapons remains uncertain, especially after his recent remarks questioning the wisdom of deploying Tomahawks against Russia. The summit announcement has been interpreted by some analysts as a strategic move by Putin to de-escalate tensions while maintaining his position. Meanwhile, Zelensky remains resolute, meeting with U.S. defense representatives to advocate for advanced weaponry. As Ukraine braces for its fourth winter of war, the prospect of a Trump-Putin summit offers little reassurance to a nation weary of conflict and skeptical of diplomatic breakthroughs.

  • Trump threatens to ‘go in and kill’ Hamas if Gaza killings continue

    Trump threatens to ‘go in and kill’ Hamas if Gaza killings continue

    Former US President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to Hamas on Thursday, threatening military intervention if the group continues to target civilians in Gaza. Speaking on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump emphasized that such actions violate the terms of a prior ceasefire agreement with Israel. ‘If Hamas persists in killing people in Gaza, which was not part of the Deal, we will have no choice but to go in and eliminate them,’ he declared. This statement comes amid escalating tensions in the region following recent attacks on Palestinian civilians. Trump’s remarks underscore his hardline stance on foreign policy and his willingness to employ military force to address perceived threats. The situation has drawn global attention, with many nations closely monitoring developments in the volatile Gaza Strip.