分类: entertainment

  • Blood, Sweat & Tears rocker David Clayton-Thomas dies at 84

    Blood, Sweat & Tears rocker David Clayton-Thomas dies at 84

    The world of music is mourning the loss of one of jazz-rock’s most influential voices: David Clayton-Thomas, the Canadian lead singer of Blood, Sweat & Tears, has passed away at the age of 84. His publicist Eric Alper confirmed that Clayton-Thomas died peacefully on Wednesday at a hospital in Toronto, with no immediate cause of death released to the public.

    A inductee of the Canadian Music Hall of Fame, Clayton-Thomas leaves behind an unparalleled artistic legacy defined by chart-topping hits and a genre-bending sound that redefined 1960s popular music. Best known for his soulful, powerhouse vocals on era-defining tracks including *You’ve Made Me So Very Happy* and *Spinning Wheel*, the singer-songwriter amassed global record sales exceeding 40 million across his decades-long career. His journey from street performing in Toronto to headlining iconic festivals like Woodstock cemented his status as a transformative figure in the fusion of jazz and rock.

    Clayton-Thomas’s early life was marked by hardship that ultimately forged his artistic path. As a teenager, he experienced homelessness and spent time in a series of correctional facilities and youth detention centers, where he taught himself to play guitar and discovered his love of music through performances for fellow inmates. It was not until 1968 that he joined Blood, Sweat & Tears, stepping into the role of lead vocalist and quickly becoming the creative backbone of what would emerge as one of the decade’s most commercially successful and critically acclaimed groups.

    The same year he joined the band, their self-titled second album made industry history: it sold 10 million copies globally, held the number one spot on the Billboard 200 album chart for seven consecutive weeks, and took home five Grammy Awards, including the coveted Album of the Year—beating The Beatles’ legendary *Abbey Road* for the honor. The record spawned three top-charting singles that all reached number two on the Billboard Hot 100: *You’ve Made Me So Very Happy*, *And When I Die*, and *Spinning Wheel*, a track written by Clayton-Thomas himself.

    In 1970, the band made political as well as musical history, becoming the first rock act to tour behind the Iron Curtain in Eastern Europe at the invitation of the U.S. State Department. A 2023 documentary titled *What the Hell Happened to Blood, Sweat & Tears?* later revealed that the Nixon administration had issued an ultimatum to Clayton-Thomas, who was a Canadian citizen living in the U.S.: complete the tour in exchange for permanent residency, or face deportation. The collaboration with the Nixon administration drew significant backlash at the time, particularly from anti-Vietnam War activists who criticized the band’s ties to the government.

    Clayton-Thomas departed Blood, Sweat & Tears in 1972, citing physical and mental exhaustion from years of non-stop global touring. He went on to build a successful solo career, releasing more than 12 independent albums and headlining his own tours across North America, before rejoining the iconic group in the early 1980s.

    He is survived by his two daughters, Ashleigh Clayton-Thomas and Christine Graham. Per a statement from his publicist, a memorial concert honoring Clayton-Thomas’s life and decades of musical contributions will be held at a future date, with all proceeds going to Peacebuilders Canada—a peace organization Clayton-Thomas supported deeply.

  • Could a Madison Square Garden wedding be the Love Story of Taylor Swift’s Wildest Dreams?

    Could a Madison Square Garden wedding be the Love Story of Taylor Swift’s Wildest Dreams?

    Speculation about the upcoming wedding of global pop superstar Taylor Swift and NFL star Travis Kelce has reached a fever pitch this week, after New York City officials confirmed a permit application has been filed to close streets surrounding Midtown Manhattan’s iconic Madison Square Garden over the Fourth of July holiday weekend.

    Dora Pekec, a communications representative for the New York City Mayor’s Office, confirmed to the BBC that the permit request was submitted in early June, requesting road closures around the arena from July 2 through July 4. The permit was first uncovered by *The New York Times*, which also reported that multiple players from Kelce’s Kansas City Chiefs have secured nearby hotel reservations for the same weekend. Since the couple announced their engagement last August, fans across the world have been combing social media and public records for any hint of the wedding’s location and timing, turning the search for details into a widespread cultural pastime.

    Crucially, city officials have not confirmed who submitted the permit application, and CNN reports that neither Swift’s nor Kelce’s name appears on the public filing. Still, *The New York Times* has outlined multiple unconfirmed indicators that point to a MSG nuptial, including reports that Amtrak police — who handle security at Penn Station, the major transit hub located directly beneath the arena — have been notified to prepare for a Swift wedding over the busy holiday weekend. The outlet also claims the couple plans to host a small, private gathering for 100 close guests on July 2, followed by a larger celebratory event on July 3 that may include surprise performances from famous guests.

    The potential venue choice has split Swift’s dedicated fanbase, with many expressing confusion over the selection of the 19,500-seat indoor arena over the scenic, outdoor location many predicted. Most fans had expected the couple to wed near Swift’s oceanside estate in Rhode Island, a guess backed by the couple’s engagement photos, which showed Kelce proposing in a lush, flower-filled garden setting. In contrast, Madison Square Garden is a windowless indoor venue in the heart of Manhattan, with no natural light and no panoramic scenic views.

    Molly Gaffney, a self-identified Swiftie from Albany, New York, called the rumored location baffling. “Her getting married in Manhattan at all, let alone during the Fourth of July during America 250, plus the World Cup, is insanity,” she said, referencing the simultaneous 250th anniversary of U.S. independence and 2026 FIFA World Cup that will draw hundreds of thousands of extra visitors to the city that weekend. “This dark, industrial location as her wedding venue couldn’t be more perplexing.” Some fans have even theorized that the permit is a deliberate decoy to distract media and fans from the couple’s actual, private wedding location — though Gaffney noted that staging such an elaborate decoy would require far more effort than it would be worth.

    But other long-time Swift fans argue the venue is a surprisingly perfect fit for the high-profile couple, who span two of the world’s biggest industries: music and professional sports. Nicki Vleisides, a New York City resident who co-hosts a popular podcast focused on Swift’s career and personal life, pointed to MSG’s unique status as a global landmark for both industries. “MSG is where music and sports come together at the most famous venue in the world,” she explained. “The more I’ve thought about it, it kind of seems like the perfect choice for both Taylor and Travis and their respective industries.”

    Vleisides’ co-host Andie Furber added that the arena also offers unbeatable security benefits for a celebrity wedding of this scale. “No drones or paparazzi can get in or out, and Taylor, Travis and guests can enter underground from blocks away with no chance of getting photographed,” she said. MSG is equipped with a private off-street entrance and underground access ramp that allows A-list guests to enter and exit completely out of public view, a feature that has made it a favorite for high-profile private events. The arena already proved its ability to handle massive security operations earlier this month, when it hosted former U.S. President Donald Trump during the 2026 NBA Finals between the New York Knicks and San Antonio Spurs.

  • Prosecutors drop outstanding rape case against Harvey Weinstein

    Prosecutors drop outstanding rape case against Harvey Weinstein

    More than seven years after the #MeToo movement first brought widespread attention to sexual misconduct allegations against disgraced Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein, Manhattan prosecutors have announced they will not move forward with a fourth rape trial against the fallen media mogul. This unresolved case, which has already cycled through three court proceedings, will be closed permanently, according to a formal statement from the office of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg Jr. released Thursday. The case related to accusations from Jessica Mann, a former hair stylist and actor who alleged Weinstein raped her more than a decade ago. Previous attempts to prosecute the claim have ended in procedural deadlock: one jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict in 2020, a second mistrial was declared after another hung jury in a 2022 retrial, and a 2023 conviction was later thrown out on appeal. In his statement, Bragg emphasized that his office remained fully confident in Mann’s account of the incident and her standing as a credible witness. Following in-depth consultations with the accuser, prosecutors made the decision to drop the charge after Mann confirmed she did not want to endure the emotional and logistical strain of a fourth trial, Bragg added. It is important to note that the dismissal of this case does not impact Weinstein’s other existing sexual assault convictions. The former producer remains incarcerated for a separate sexual felony conviction out of New York, as well as additional convictions for sexual misconduct handed down by a California court in 2022. The case stands as one of the most high-profile legal outcomes of the global #MeToo movement, which broke into the mainstream in 2017 after hundreds of women came forward with abuse allegations against Weinstein, sparking a nationwide reckoning over sexual harassment and assault in workplaces across every industry.

  • Top Australian TV star to leave job after Tommy Robinson interview, reports say

    Top Australian TV star to leave job after Tommy Robinson interview, reports say

    One of Australia’s most recognizable and highest-paid television personalities is on the brink of departing his long-running role at a major national broadcaster, following intense public and industry backlash over a controversial podcast interview with a British far-right extremist. For nearly 20 years, Karl Stefanovic has been the face of Nine Entertainment’s flagship morning breakfast program *Today*, becoming a household name across the country and building a reputation as a working-class, larrikin-style media figure. Now, multiple local Australian outlets have confirmed that network executives are in active negotiations to end Stefanovic’s contract months before it was set to expire at the end of 2025.

    The catalyst for the current crisis came in early June 2025, when Stefanovic released a new episode of his self-produced independent podcast featuring an interview with Tommy Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a far-right British activist with a long history of anti-Muslim rhetoric and criminal convictions. Within hours of the episode going live, it was pulled offline after a wave of public outrage and threats from advertisers to pull spending from Nine’s platforms. The episode drew particular condemnation after promotional clips emerged showing Stefanovic praising Robinson’s “tenacity” and “courage” for his political views, and using a crude, offensive slur to describe outgoing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer while posing with Robinson.

    Nine Entertainment, one of Australia’s two largest commercial broadcasting groups, moved quickly to separate itself from Stefanovic’s project this week. In an official statement to the BBC, a network spokesperson emphasized that *The Karl Stefanovic Show* podcast is a fully independent venture with no network involvement in guest selection, editorial decisions, or production. “Nine has no involvement, including in the guest selection and other editorial processes. However, Nine is taking this matter seriously,” the spokesperson said.

    This is not the first time Stefanovic has weathered scandal during his decades-long tenure at Nine. The 51-year-old presenter has previously made headlines for public missteps: he once appeared visibly intoxicated on air following an industry awards ceremony, and was forced to apologize on-air after a private conversation in an Uber was leaked, in which he insulted his *Today* co-host. He stepped down temporarily from the role in 2018 amid falling ratings and intense tabloid scrutiny of his personal life, but returned to the hosting chair just 12 months later. He won Australia’s most prestigious television honor, the Gold Logie Award for Most Popular Presenter, in 2011, capping his rise to become the country’s highest-paid news anchor.

    In the months since he launched the independent podcast in January 2025, pressure has been building on both Stefanovic and Nine. The podcast has featured a string of controversial guests from across the political spectrum, and Stefanovic’s own comments on divisive issues including alleged Australian war crimes in Afghanistan, so-called “woke” culture, and COVID-19 vaccination policies have drawn ongoing criticism. Internal tensions at Nine have also grown, with multiple network journalists raising concerns that Stefanovic’s podcast was damaging Nine’s reputation as a credible news organization. By mid-week, multiple major advertisers had publicly expressed their displeasure with the interview, pushing network leadership to move toward a negotiated exit.

    As of Wednesday, Stefanovic remains on leave and is currently in London, and his representatives have not yet responded to requests for comment on the impending departure. The Sydney Morning Herald, a Nine-owned masthead, confirmed the negotiations following the initial report from *The Australian*, marking a swift end to one of the longest and most high-profile careers in modern Australian television.

  • Palace in the Mist: The inside story of the 1908 Young Turk revolution

    Palace in the Mist: The inside story of the 1908 Young Turk revolution

    For history enthusiasts and casual readers alike, few experiences match the excitement of gaining exclusive, behind-the-scenes access to the hidden inner workings of one of humanity’s most influential imperial dynasties. That rare opportunity has arrived with the July 3 release of *Palace in the Mist*, a new work by Ayse Osmanoglu — a professional writer, and a direct member of the House of Osman, the ruling family of the Ottoman Empire.

    Osmanoglu, who currently resides in England, carries unmatched ancestral context for this project: she is a direct descendant of two Ottoman sultans, Murad V and Mehmed Resad, and her grandfather was an imperial prince forced into exile from Istanbul in 1924, when Turkish Republic founder Mustafa Kemal Ataturk formally abolished the Ottoman caliphate. This unique lineage puts her in an unparalleled position to chronicle the final, turbulent era of the Ottoman Empire.

    Set against the transformative upheaval of the 1908 Young Turk Revolution, *Palace in the Mist* tells the deeply personal story of Osmanoglu’s own ancestors within the imperial palaces of Istanbul. The work occupies a rare middle ground between narrative fiction and rigorous academic history: every central figure in the book is a real historical person, and Osmanoglu went to extraordinary lengths to ensure all portrayals adhere strictly to the historical record. While this commitment to avoiding unsubstantiated embellishment occasionally leaves supporting characters feeling less developed than they might be in a conventional novel, critics note this small trade-off is more than justified by the book’s extraordinary accuracy and authentic voice.

    Osmanoglu draws on one-of-a-kind source material that no outside scholar could easily access: obscure contemporary memoirs written by people who lived through the era, plus oral histories of the imperial family passed down directly to her through generations. In the book’s opening, she explains that during her childhood, her paternal grandparents and great-aunts and uncles shared countless stories of the dynasty’s final decades, and she committed these intimate anecdotes to memory to preserve them for future readers. “They gave me a precious insight into what life was like for the people who lived in the Ottoman palaces at the turn of the 20th century,” she writes.

    To ground the narrative, Osmanoglu begins by recapping the decades of political tension that led to the revolution: In 1876, a reformist faction called the Young Ottomans launched a coup against Sultan Abdulaziz, deposing him and installing his liberal nephew Prince Murad — Osmanoglu’s direct ancestor — as the new sultan. Plagued by paranoia that others would accuse him of conspiring against Abdulaziz, Murad suffered a severe nervous breakdown, was deemed unfit to rule, and was replaced by his younger brother, who took the throne as Sultan Abdulhamid II in September 1876.

    Though Abdulhamid initially accepted a constitution and established a parliament, he soon grew authoritarian, dissolved the legislative body, arrested political dissenters, and even imprisoned members of his own family who he saw as threats. That included Murad and his son Prince Mehmed Selahaddin, who were confined to the so-called “gilded cage” of Istanbul’s Ciragan Palace for 28 years.

    *Palace in the Mist* picks up its narrative in the final years of Abdulhamid’s iron-fisted rule, with Osmanoglu reconstructing this history through vivid prose and meticulous attention to sensory detail. She paints a clear portrait of the sultan, noting his “crisp white linen shirt and navy-blue trousers” and the gold buttons of his custom jacket, and captures his growing paranoia in a small, revealing moment: “The world moves against me,” he whispers, waving a pistol through an empty room.

    Betrayal and popular revolt stand as the book’s central themes. Young Turk revolutionaries, including key protagonist Captain Hafiz Ismail Hakki, grapple with the moral weight of betraying the sitting sultan to build a democratic constitutional monarchy. Political intrigue permeates every chapter, seen in one iconic scene where masked rebels gather around a table holding “the Qu’ran and the revolver, gleaming ominously in the golden light.”

    Beyond high politics, Osmanoglu devotes significant attention to the often-overlooked private lives of women in the Ottoman imperial family, many of whom lived in forced confinement. Readers meet Princess Rukiye, Murad’s granddaughter, who secretly reads the Sherlock Holmes novels that Arthur Conan Doyle gifted to Abdulhamid, and the tragic Princess Hadice, Murad’s daughter, whose illicit romantic correspondence with a young officer named Kemaleddin Pasha leads to her public disgrace and his exile; when he finally returns to Istanbul decades later, she refuses to meet him.

    Osmanoglu also brings the opulence of late imperial palace life to life, describing glittering parties held under high ceilings where “chandeliers dripped with countless crystals.” In this rarefied, privileged world, “the scent of oud and musk clung to the tailored frock coats” of princes and politicians sipping sherbet and “cardamom-scented coffee,” all to the accompaniment of the “soft melodies of the Imperial orchestra.”

    The book’s turning point arrives in July 1908, when Young Turk forces compel Abdulhamid to reinstate the 1876 constitution and reconvene parliament. At the most critical moment, the empire’s highest religious authority, the sheikh-ul-islam, sides with the revolutionaries. When asked to issue a religious ruling declaring the insurgency illegal, he tells a stunned Abdulhamid that “the Constitution accords with Sharia… To refuse it would be to defy Divine law.” With that ruling, the sultan’s absolute power is broken, and parliament gains the authority to hold the monarchy accountable.

    The political shift frees Murad’s imprisoned family from their long confinement, but the new era of reform proves short-lived. Osmanoglu introduces readers to Ali Kemal, a liberal journalist and ancestor of former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who declares boldly, “They may silence a man, but never an idea. If ink is treason, let the gallows be our pressroom.”

    Many leading Young Turks, however, favored a centralized, bureaucratic state over the decentralized model reformers had initially promised. Prince Sabahaddin, the revolutionary son of Abdulhamid’s sister, argued unsuccessfully that “it is essential that the provinces be given autonomy if the Empire is to survive,” and lost the internal debate. Ultimately, the revolution is betrayed from all sides: an uprising led by disgruntled soldiers and madrasa students erupts, the Young Turk leadership consolidates power into a new authoritarian regime and crushes the rebellion, and Abdulhamid is accused of appeasing the mutineers, deposed, and exiled from Istanbul. “Allah and history will bear witness that I have served the State faithfully,” he insists before leaving. Osmanoglu’s ancestor, Mehmed Resad, is installed as the new sultan, with far more chaos and bloodshed still waiting for the empire in the years ahead.

    Critically, the work is widely praised as beautifully written and carefully constructed, moving seamlessly between high-stakes imperial politics and intimate family drama to create an extraordinary literary achievement. Osmanoglu has delivered a truly insider account of the dynasty’s final years, and the work is considered essential reading for anyone with an interest in Ottoman history. *Palace in the Mist: The Ottoman Dynasty Chronicles* by Ayse Osmanoglu is available in both paperback and hardcover editions starting July 3.

  • Dior moves Paris men’s show earlier as heat wave grips city

    Dior moves Paris men’s show earlier as heat wave grips city

    A record-breaking heatwave sweeping across large swathes of Western Europe has forced iconic luxury fashion house Dior to make an unusual last-minute adjustment to its Paris Fashion Week men’s show, rescheduling the event to an unprecedented 9 a.m. start time on Wednesday. Even the early-morning kickoff, however, was not enough to escape the soaring temperatures that have gripped the French capital this week. When invited guests began filing into the event venue, the historic Musée Nissim de Camondo, organizers had prepped small cooling comforts: cold damp towels, fresh strawberries, and portable parasols were distributed to attendees at the entrance to help beat the heat. Inside the stately 18th-century-inspired mansion, temperatures climbed steadily as the show got underway, leaving some guests visibly uncomfortable amid sweltering conditions, with potable water in short supply for the crowd. Despite the oppressive heat, the front row held true to Fashion Week tradition, boasting a star-studded guest list that included actor LaKeith Stanfield, musician Little Simz, actor James Marsden, Outerbanks star Drew Starkey, actor Mike Faist, rapper 070 Shake, actor Alexander Ludwig, and actor Sam Nivola. Northern Irish designer Jonathan Anderson, the creative lead for Dior Men, unveiled his latest ready-to-wear collection centered around a deliberate core concept: traditional high fashion formality unspooling and relaxing into something more casual and lived-in. Dior’s creative team framed the collection’s mood as “a soiree turning into a house party,” while Anderson himself described it as “something quite formal becoming undone.” The overarching narrative of the line was that the modern Dior man does not just arrive at an elite event; he stays from the night before through the messy, joyful aftermath of the morning after. Anderson opened the presentation with tailored suiting, a Dior staple, but reimagined it to feel lighter and less rigid than traditional formalwear. Classic suiting patterns including pinstripes and houndstooth were printed onto lightweight silk chiffon instead of being woven into heavy wool, creating a silhouette that retained the structure of formal wear while feeling ethereal and semi-transparent. The collection pushed Dior’s long-established brand codes into a grittier, more approachable territory. Sequined tailoring was shaped to resemble casual denim jeans, while ripped denim pieces were finished with delicate silver chain details. Traditional tuxedos were re-cut in loose, relaxed fits, and soft pink denim shorts were layered underneath structured formal outerwear. Standout accessories included crystalline statement sunglasses, sparkling disco-ball inspired boots, and patchworked shirts crafted from upcycled Japanese denim. The strongest pieces in the collection successfully balanced respect for Dior’s iconic heritage with intentional creative disruption. A recurring scarf motif was pulled directly from a 1979 Dior haute couture design, while fine silver embroidery took inspiration from the ornate detailing on 18th-century gentlemen’s formal coats. The collection’s disco boots were intentionally crafted to look slightly disheveled, decorated with tiny embroidered ladybird motifs scattered across the material. Far from rejecting Dior’s century-long legacy, the reworking of classic design elements was framed as a way to make heritage feel dynamic and relevant for a new generation. The choice of the Musée Nissim de Camondo as the event venue added unexpected depth and context to the collection. The mansion, which is currently closed to the public for major restoration work, was originally built to house Moïse de Camondo’s extensive collection of 18th-century French decorative arts — the same design era that deeply inspired Dior founder Christian Dior. Anderson’s exploration of loosened formality played perfectly against the space’s own “in-between” state of preservation and ongoing repair, a tension that Dior’s own show notes highlighted as core to the collection’s theme of beauty found in imperfection. The venue also carries a somber historical weight: Camondo’s only son died in combat during World War I, and multiple remaining members of the Camondo family were deported and murdered during the Holocaust. Today, the mansion operates both as a decorative arts museum and a quiet memorial to the family’s loss. Against this layered backdrop of history and change, the collection’s playful reimagining of classic Dior created a striking creative tension. Anderson pulled the house’s most recognizable signatures — the tuxedo, the iconic Bar jacket silhouette, couture hand embroidery, 18th-century decorative references — and recontextualized them into a younger, less polished aesthetic. The resulting presentation is widely regarded as one of Anderson’s clearest, most cohesive outings for Dior Men to date.

  • Two men make $50k to watch the World Cup, with nowhere to hide

    Two men make $50k to watch the World Cup, with nowhere to hide

    In a bold, eye-catching marketing stunt that blends sports fandom with public spectacle, two lucky individuals have landed a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity: they will earn a combined $50,000 (£44,000) to watch every match of the FIFA World Cup, all while confined to a transparent glass living room installed right in the heart of New York City’s iconic Times Square.

    Unlike typical World Cup viewing parties that unfold in private homes, crowded sports bars or public fan zones, this gig offers zero privacy for the two participants. Surrounded by thousands of passing tourists and locals every day, their every reaction—from last-minute goal celebrations to tense penalty shootout nerves—will be on full display for anyone wandering through the busy crossroads of Manhattan. The glass enclosure is fully set up as a comfortable living space, with all the amenities needed to accommodate the pair through the entire tournament, but their lack of seclusion is the defining quirk of the unusual role.

    The stunt, designed to draw massive public attention to a brand aligned with the World Cup, taps into the global frenzy surrounding soccer’s biggest international tournament. Times Square, already one of the most visited and photographed locations in the United States, provides the perfect stage to amplify the experience, turning two ordinary fans’ World Cup journey into a public attraction all its own. For the two men, the gig combines three of life’s great pleasures—watching world-class soccer, being in the middle of one of the world’s most famous cities, and walking away with a generous paycheck that most people would need months to earn—all in one unusual package.

  • Vatican begins 5-year restoration of Raphael Loggia, used by popes and presidents

    Vatican begins 5-year restoration of Raphael Loggia, used by popes and presidents

    Nestled in the most restricted inner corridors of the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace, a Renaissance masterpiece unseen by nearly all the visiting public is set to receive its first comprehensive conservation effort in more than five centuries. The Raphael Loggia, a 65-meter-long, 4-meter-wide corridor walked exclusively by popes, heads of state, and privileged invited guests, was designed by the iconic Renaissance master Raphael, and Vatican Museums officially launched the five-year, $5.5 million restoration project at a press conference Wednesday.

    Widely regarded as one of the pinnacles of Renaissance figurative art, the loggia occupies a sunlit second-floor space overlooking the Apostolic Palace’s San Damaso courtyard. Closed to general tourists, the corridor treats only the lucky few granted audiences with the pope or the Secretariat of State to its sprawling decorative scheme: vivid scenes from both the Old and New Testaments, intricate botanical motifs rendered in vibrant paint and textured stucco, spread across 12 distinct arched bays. Its artistic influence extended far beyond Vatican walls, with full-scale replicas produced by cultural institutions around the world, including a prominent full-scale copy at St. Petersburg’s State Hermitage Museum.

    Completed between 1517 and 1519, the loggia stands as one of Raphael’s final commissions for Pope Leo X, a companion project to his better-known, publicly accessible works that draw millions of visitors to the Vatican Museums each year — the Raphael Rooms and his celebrated tapestry series, both of which have been the subject of previous major restoration work. Today, current Pope Leo XIV, who returned to full-time residence in the Apostolic Palace after his predecessor Pope Francis chose to stay elsewhere, traverses the loggia regularly on his way to public and private audiences, with his private apartments located just upstairs from the corridor.

    Centuries of neglect and environmental damage have left the masterpiece in a fragile state, restoration leaders explained. Until 1813, the corridor remained open to the elements, leaving the paintings and stucco exposed to rain, wind, and extreme temperature shifts that caused gradual but irreversible decay. Even after windows were installed to close off the space, the enclosed structure trapped heat and humidity, creating conditions that accelerated degradation of the water-soluble pigments Raphael used.

    To avoid damaging the fragile artwork, restorers will abandon traditional wet cleaning and chemical solvent methods in favor of a precision-based approach: hand-held lasers will gently clean grime from the stucco and painted surfaces without compromising the original pigments. The project is a collaboration between the Vatican Museums and the New York-based World Monuments Fund, with full financing coming from the Stephen A. Schwarzman Foundation. In total, the foundation is committing more than $14 million to the broader initiative: $5.5 million for the core restoration work, with the remaining funds allocated to digitizing high-resolution images of the loggia to make the hidden masterpiece accessible to the global public, producing a feature documentary following the restoration process, and endowing a permanent art restoration training program at a Swiss university.

    In addition to conserving the existing artwork, the Vatican will also replace the loggia’s current arched windows with specialized protective glass that filters out harmful ultraviolet solar radiation, preventing future fading and environmental damage. The Associated Press’ religion coverage, which produced this report, receives support through a collaboration with The Conversation U.S. via funding from the Lilly Endowment Inc., with the AP retaining full editorial responsibility for all content.

  • Pharrell sends Vuitton surfing as Jeremy Allen White, Missy Elliott and Victor Wembanyama look on

    Pharrell sends Vuitton surfing as Jeremy Allen White, Missy Elliott and Victor Wembanyama look on

    PARIS – On the opening night of Paris Fashion Week’s menswear season Tuesday, Pharrell Williams delivered a dramatic yet grounded debut for Louis Vuitton’s Spring-Summer 2027 men’s collection, framing a surf-inspired narrative that prioritized design over flashy spectacle to close out the first day of shows.

    Against a sandy outdoor set built along the Seine, Williams constructed a production that felt both cinematic and intentional: a 20-foot towering curling wave structure that could swallow the entire runway in its barrel, mist spraying into the cool Paris evening; a projected full moon rising over the dunes, with artificial stars twinkling above the catwalk; and a sleek glass-walled silver camper van parked between sand dunes, a subtle nod to Louis Vuitton’s origins as a luxury trunk and travel brand. The star-studded front row drew A-list names from across entertainment and sports, including Jeremy Allen White, Charles Melton, rapper Future, hip-hop legend Missy Elliott, NBA rookie Victor Wembanyama, K-pop stars Jackson Wang and BamBam, and singers Lola Young and Coco Jones, among other notable guests.

    When the lights dimmed and the show began, models emerged one by one from the hollow of the giant wave, embodying what Williams calls the “dandy surfer”: a figure equally at home on the boardwalk after a morning of catching waves and in a downtown boardroom for a midday meeting. Blending the laid-back practicality of surf culture with the refined elegance that has defined Williams’ tenure at Louis Vuitton, the collection pulled core motifs from ocean life, reinterpreting them for high-fashion menswear.

    Wetsuit technical fabrics were merged with traditional suiting material, emblazoned with the brand’s iconic monogram for a functional yet luxurious twist. Outerwear featured lived-in, weathered finishes that mimicked the effect of sun and salt water on fabric; hoodies came sun-faded and soft, accented with gilded LV monogram drawstrings. Denim and wool coats boasted hand-dyed shibori-style indigo gradients that evoked the gradient of the ocean, while statement bomber jackets were covered in intricate dense beadwork for texture and visual weight. Williams also brought back his signature trompe l’oeil techniques, with fabric surfaces printed and shaped to mimic entirely different materials, revealing intricate handcraft on close inspection.

    Post-surf comfort shaped a range of relaxed layering pieces, including robe-like overcoats and soft unstructured jackets designed to feel as cozy as a cotton towel thrown over damp, cold shoulders after a session. The collection also circled back to Williams’ creative roots with a new line of flat-soled skate shoes, a nod to his early days in skate culture and his founding of streetwear labels Billionaire Boys Club and Ice Cream, in collaboration with Japanese designer Nigo. This cross-pollination of subcultures gave the surf theme a sharper, more accessible edge, positioning the line for strong commercial performance.

    Throughout his leadership at Louis Vuitton, Williams has become known for over-the-top, viral-worthy show productions: his debut collection turned Paris’ historic Pont Neuf bridge into a gilded Damier-patterned runway, while past shows have featured full orchestras, interactive game sets, custom built cottages and camera-ready front rows designed for social media virality. Tuesday’s show retained the high production value audiences have come to expect, opening with a cinematic short film starring pro surfers Mikey February and Julian Wilson, and featuring a curated soundtrack from Quavo, Williams and Angélique Kidjo, paired with live performances from the L’Orchestre du Pont Neuf and the Voices of Fire choir. But unlike past spectacles that sometimes overshadowed the clothing, the massive wave set served as a backdrop, not the main event—allowing the collection to hold its own against the dramatic staging.

    In a nod to the collection’s ocean theme, Louis Vuitton also announced a partnership with marine conservation non-profit Coral Gardeners. The luxury brand will fund the out-planting of 1,000 new coral colonies and the restoration of 250 square meters of damaged reef habitat in French Polynesia, scheduled for completion in 2026.

    As Williams took his final bow at the end of the show, the towering wave still loomed behind him. For the first time in his Vuitton tenure, the headline-making set did not overshadow the design: this time, the clothes were not swept away by spectacle.

  • Guinness crowns Canberra town crier as the world’s loudest person at 122.4 decibels

    Guinness crowns Canberra town crier as the world’s loudest person at 122.4 decibels

    MELBOURNE, Australia — An unlikely Australian record-breaker has secured his place in the Guinness World Records history books, dethroning a 30-year standing mark to earn the title of the world’s loudest male individual. Joseph McGrail-Bateup, a 58-year-old Canberra resident who works full-time as an air conditioner cleaner and serves as an honorary official town crier, earned the global recognition last week after delivering a shout that clocked in at 122.4 decibels.

    His thunderous yell of the word “now” surpasses the previous 121.7 decibel record set back in 1994 by Annalisa Flanagan, a Northern Irish schoolteacher who famously shouted the word “quiet” to claim her mark. To put McGrail-Bateup’s achievement in perspective, his shout falls into the same noise intensity category as a running chainsaw, a departing jet aircraft heard at close range, and a blaring ambulance siren right beside the listener.

    In an interview this week, McGrail-Bateup explained that the extreme nature of the feat meant no structured training or practice could prepare him for the record attempt. “There’s no way that you can actually practice for it. You have to just keep it for the day, especially with the world record attempt,” he said. “It took me seven attempts just to nail one word, which was ‘now,’ and my voice was completely gone for the next couple of days. It was husky and terrible, so you really can’t practice for it. But even so, it’s a lot of fun when you’re doing it.”

    Unlike the previous all-gender record, no prior mark for the loudest male shout existed, so McGrail-Bateup said he is comfortable framing himself as the world’s loudest man, while Flanagan retains her title as the world’s loudest woman. “I’m pleased that she gets to keep her record. So she’s still the loudest woman in the world and I’m the loudest male in the world,” he explained.

    The accidental challenge came about when McGrail-Bateup was searching the Guinness World Records database for existing town crier-related feats, and stumbled across Flanagan’s long-standing shouting record instead. His path to competitive volume began in 2017, when he was appointed Canberra’s honorary official town crier — a part-time, unpaid ceremonial role created by the local government that he describes as “a bit of fun.” He goes by the ceremonial title Lord Joseph, and makes public announcements at local community gatherings, school fairs, and car shows across the region. The role also granted him membership to the Ancient and Honorable Guild of Australian Town Criers, a national organization that works to preserve the historic ceremonial tradition and hosts competitive events for its members.

    Earlier this year, McGrail-Bateup took home first place in the guild’s 2024 national competition, delivering the traditional town crier opening call “Oyez, Oyez, Oyez” at 98 decibels to claim the win for loudest call. Ahead of his world record attempt, he tested out a range of different words to find which one delivered the maximum volume, before ultimately settling on the short, punchy single syllable of “now.”

    The official record measurement took place on May 2 in a Canberra radio studio, with a professional acoustic engineer on hand to capture the reading and independent witnesses present to verify the attempt. The verified measurement files were submitted to Guinness World Records, which made the official announcement of the new record last Friday.

    This is not McGrail-Bateup’s first experience breaking a global Guinness record. Back in 2019, he claimed a speed record for fastest archer to shoot 10 arrows, finishing the feat in 60.03 seconds and shaving a tiny fraction of a second off a mark that had stood unbroken since 2015. Just nine months later, however, a 7-year-old child shattered his archery record by an impressive 11.4 seconds.

    Today, McGrail-Bateup says he has no interest in reclaiming the archery title, nor does he worry about someone eventually beating his new shouting record. “If someone beats me, that’s fantastic,” he said. “After all, records are meant to be broken.”