作者: admin

  • Reading Marjane Satrapi’s comic book Persepolis during Iran war

    Reading Marjane Satrapi’s comic book Persepolis during Iran war

    Renowned Iranian-French comic author Marjane Satrapi passed away in Paris last week at the age of 56, mere days before a new wave of conflict erupted between Israel and her native Iran. In death, as in life, Satrapi’s body of work has found renewed, urgent relevance amid the rising regional tensions that trace their roots to the same historical forces she spent decades documenting. Satrapi’s work stands apart in how it masterfully interlaces intimate personal narrative with the sweeping arc of Iran’s modern political and social history, turning centuries of upheaval into a accessible, human story for global audiences.

    One of Satrapi’s most iconic works, the graphic memoir *Persepolis* (later adapted into an acclaimed film), weaves personal coming-of-age with a clear-eyed retelling of Iran’s 20th century power shifts. The work opens with context for the 1979 Islamic Revolution, tracing the lineage of unrest back to 1925, when Iranian military officer Reza Khan overthrew the Qajar dynasty with quiet encouragement from British officials who had already installed sympathetic monarchies in Iraq and Jordan. Instead of backing the secular republic Khan initially sought, British powers pushed him to declare himself shah, founding the Pahlavi dynasty that would rule Iran until it was toppled in the 1979 revolution. Satrapi anchors every major turning point to the lives of ordinary Iranian citizens, whose fates are shifted by foreign interference and political upheaval beyond their control. Rendered in a stark, striking monochrome art style, her work roots the long-simmering Iranian resentment of foreign meddling in personal experience, rather than abstract political rhetoric.

    For all its enduring acclaim, *Persepolis* has long been a source of polarizing debate. Critics have frequently attacked the work for alleged historical inaccuracies, but this critique misses Satrapi’s core purpose: she was not a professional historian, but a storyteller drawing on her own lived experience growing up in Iran and building a life abroad. This controversy has spilled into academic spaces, as the article’s author, historian Ibrahim Al-Marashi, can attest firsthand. In 2007, while teaching a course on Iranian history at Istanbul’s Bogazici University, Al-Marashi assigned *Persepolis* as required reading for the class. Student activists affiliated with the campus Communist party accused him of secretly promoting Western-backed regime change, arguing that the work’s focus on religious oppression under the Islamic Republic amounted to anti-Iranian propaganda.

    Al-Marashi’s intention was far simpler: he assigned the memoir because it offered valuable context, artistic merit, and deep insight into modern Iranian life that could not be found in traditional academic texts. But the protests persisted, growing loud enough that Al-Marashi was ultimately forced to resign his position and leave Turkey.

    *Persepolis* opens in the early days of the 1979 revolution, with Satrapi’s father Ebi explaining to his young daughter why thousands of Iranians had taken to the streets to overthrow the monarchy. He frames the uprising as the culmination of 2,500 years of foreign and domestic tyranny: starting with native emperors, followed by foreign invasions from the west and east, and ending with centuries of modern Western imperial meddling. That “modern imperialism” includes Britain’s role in installing Reza Khan as shah, then removing him in World War II over his pro-German leanings to install his more compliant son Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. When democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh launched a popular internal coup to curb monarchical power in 1953, MI6 and the CIA orchestrated a counter-coup to restore Mohammad Reza to the throne, cementing decades of Western influence over the Iranian state.

    Throughout the Cold War, the U.S. armed the restored shah with advanced military hardware to counter Soviet influence in the region, including top-of-the-line F-14 fighter jets. The constant presence of American military advisors and personnel on Iranian soil fanned the flames of nationalist anger that eventually boiled over into the 1979 revolution, which ousted the monarchy and brought Ruhollah Khomeini’s Islamic Republican faction to power. Like the Russian Revolution, the Iranian Revolution’s path to stable rule was marked by bloodshed and chaos. When Iraqi forces invaded Iran in September 1980, Khomeini’s faction consolidated control by leaning into surging nationalist sentiment, turning the war into a unifying cause for the new republic.

    *Persepolis* captures the quiet human cost of this era through one iconic anecdote centered on Iran’s unofficial nationalist anthem, “Ey Iran.” The track, which predates both the Pahlavi monarchy and the Islamic Republic, was written in the 1940s during the Allied occupation of Iran, after poet Hossein Gol-e-Golab witnessed an American soldier beating an Iranian greengrocer. The anthem’s lyrics declare fierce devotion to the Iranian homeland, ending with the line: “May my life be sacrificed for my pure motherland.” During an early retaliatory raid against Iraq following the bombing of Tehran, the father of one of Satrapi’s schoolmates—one of the pilots flying Iran’s U.S.-built F-14s—died in the mission, fulfilling that oath even as the anthem played on state radio to celebrate the attack. Satrapi does not shy away from the complexity of this moment: her own father, a leftist activist who helped overthrow the shah only to oppose the Islamic Republic, often wept when he heard the song. Decades later, Al-Marashi notes, the track still brings Iranian students to tears, a testament to how deeply personal grief and nationalist pride are intertwined in the country’s modern history.

    Satrapi’s singular genius lay in her ability to synthesize a century of messy, overlapping history, personal memory, political upheaval, and cultural identity into a coherent, deeply human narrative rendered in bold, unforgettable art. As new conflict erupts across the Middle East, her work remains as vital today as it was when it was first published, offering a rare unfiltered window into the historical forces that continue to shape Iran and its relationship with the wider world.

  • Watch: Why is Trump not at the World Cup?

    Watch: Why is Trump not at the World Cup?

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted by three North American nations—the United States, Canada, and Mexico, has drawn global attention from the moment it kicked off its opening matches. However, a noticeable absence has quickly become a hot topic of public discussion: none of the three sitting national leaders were in attendance for the opening fixtures, including U.S. leader Donald Trump. This unexpected empty spot in the stands for top North American political figures has left many sports fans and political observers asking why the key stakeholders in this historic co-hosted tournament chose not to be present for the game’s biggest opening moment. As the first World Cup to be jointly hosted by three countries across North America, the event was widely expected to feature a strong show of political presence from each host nation to celebrate the shared milestone of hosting the world’s most-watched sporting event. Leaders from participating and competing nations around the globe often use high-profile international sporting events like the World Cup as an opportunity to engage in soft diplomacy, connect with global audiences, and show national pride in hosting a major global competition. The shared absence of all three host country leaders runs counter to these common expectations, leading to widespread speculation across social media and political circles. For Trump specifically, questions about his absence have risen to particular prominence given the United States’ role as the primary co-host of the majority of the tournament’s matches. As of the opening week of the tournament, no official statement from the White House or Trump’s official team has offered a clear, detailed explanation for his decision to skip the opening matches. Unnamed sources close to the administration have hinted at scheduling conflicts unrelated to the tournament, but these unconfirmed claims have done little to quash public curiosity. Beyond Trump, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador also confirmed in advance that they would not attend the opening matches, each citing their own separate domestic priorities that required their presence in their national capitals rather than at the tournament venues. Political analysts note that while absences of sitting leaders from major sporting events are not entirely unprecedented, the collective absence of all three leaders from a co-hosted World Cup is a rare occurrence that has drawn extra attention. Many sports fans across North America have expressed disappointment that their national leaders were not on hand to welcome the world to the opening of the historic tournament, while some political commentators have pointed out that the absence avoids any potential politicization of the global sporting event. Regardless of the individual reasons for each leader’s absence, the gap in high-level political representation at the opening matches has become one of the most talked-about non-sporting storylines of the opening days of the 2026 World Cup.

  • Popular US movie critic Gene Shalit dies aged 100

    Popular US movie critic Gene Shalit dies aged 100

    Beloved American film critic and broadcast personality Gene Shalit, whose signature wit and iconic style made him a staple of U.S. morning television for four decades, has passed away at the age of 100. His family confirmed the news to NBC, Shalit’s longtime broadcast home, announcing that he died peacefully after a century of a remarkable life. No official cause of death has been released to the public.

    From the 1970s until his retirement from the network in 2010, Shalit anchored the popular Critics Corner segment on NBC’s flagship morning program *Today*, becoming a familiar, welcome presence in millions of American living rooms each week. Immediately recognizable by his bushy handlebar moustache, thick-framed eyeglasses, polka-dot bow ties and unruly curly hair, Shalit carved out a unique niche in entertainment journalism with his signature pun-heavy wordplay and warm, playful approach to criticism and interviewing.

    Over his 40-year run on *Today*, Shalit sat down with hundreds of the biggest names in Hollywood and global entertainment, from A-list stars to groundbreaking directors. Early this year, ahead of his 100th birthday, the *Today* team put together a retrospective montage of his most memorable interviews, highlighting conversations with icons including Carol Channing, Liza Minnelli, and legendary director Steven Spielberg. Longtime *Today* colleagues recalled that Shalit had a rare gift for drawing out unplanned personal confessions and heartfelt emotional reactions from his guests, turning routine promotional interviews into intimate, memorable moments. One of his most iconic early interviews came at the height of *Star Wars*’ 1970s cultural boom, when he spoke with leads Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, and Mark Hamill about the groundbreaking sci-fi franchise.

    Before making his name on national television, Shalit built his career as a senior film critic for *Look* magazine, and continued contributing regular opinion and culture columns to prominent publications including *The New York Times*, *Ladies’ Home Journal*, and *TV Guide* long after his television debut. In 2002, he published *Great Hollywood Wit*, an anthology of iconic one-liners, quips, zingers, and sharp observations from Hollywood’s biggest stars, advertised on its cover as a “glorious cavalcade of Hollywood wisecracks” featuring a custom caricature of Shalit. According to his official NBC profile, Shalit planned to release a second book titled *Procrastination is a Full Time Job* following his retirement from *Today*, though the project was never completed and published.

  • Survey: China critical for US businesses

    Survey: China critical for US businesses

    Against a backdrop of escalating decoupling rhetoric from hardline U.S. China policy hawks, new industry data confirms that the Chinese market remains an irreplaceable strategic asset for American multinational firms, with the nation’s massive consumer base, evolving status as a global innovation center and robust, resilient supply chains continuing to strengthen U.S. companies’ competitive edge worldwide, according to business leaders and policy experts.

    The findings emerge from the latest annual member survey conducted by the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC), which reveals that a staggering 95 percent of responding U.S. firms rate China as somewhat to very critical to maintaining their global market standing. Summarizing the report, which was published publicly on Wednesday, the USCBC stressed that “For U.S. companies, China is not optional.”

    USCBC President Sean Stein noted that the survey results leave no room for ambiguity: even amid rising geopolitical and economic tensions, gaining a foothold and competing in the Chinese market is a non-negotiable prerequisite for many American firms to succeed on the global stage. The report further underscores that U.S. businesses have no plans to withdraw from China, as the market offers value beyond its sheer size, acting as a multifaceted catalyst that drives global competitiveness for participating companies.

    Nearly half of all survey respondents reported that they adapt operational insights and competitive experience gained from their China-based activities to improve performance in other global markets. The report draws an apt analogy: China has evolved into a “boxing gym” for Western corporations, where head-to-head competition with domestic Chinese firms hones operational skills, sharpens strategic thinking and deepens industry insight.

    In recent weeks, bilateral economic relations between Washington and Beijing have shown encouraging signs of progress. Last month, the two world powers reached an agreement to launch two new intergovernmental cooperation bodies: the China-U.S. Trade Council and the China-U.S. Investment Council. These platforms are designed to resolve commercial disputes before they escalate into larger conflicts, cultivating a more stable, predictable operating environment for businesses in both countries. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce confirmed that the new trade council will discuss targeted tariff reduction initiatives for specific product categories, with the two sides already reaching a preliminary agreement to cut tariffs on reciprocal goods shipments totaling at least $30 billion on each side.

    Liu Ying, a senior researcher at the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, pointed out that while China and the U.S. now compete across a growing range of high-value sectors, this does not rule out productive mutually beneficial cooperation. “It just requires a far more nuanced, sophisticated approach than the straightforward complementary trade model that defined relations in past decades,” she explained.

    Former International Monetary Fund Deputy Managing Director Zhu Min echoed this view, noting that while differences between the two economic giants are unavoidable, deep-seated interdependence makes cooperation equally inevitable. “If both sides adopt a constructive approach, using expanding cooperation to manage existing differences, both nations, their people, and the entire global economy will share in the benefits,” Zhu Min said. “Our priority should be to continuously grow the list of areas where we can collaborate, while shrinking the list of outstanding disputes.”

    The commitment of U.S. firms to engaging with the Chinese market is further illustrated by upcoming industry events. The first week of this month, Beijing will host the second China International Supply Chain Expo, and U.S. companies and industry institutions are on track to be the largest group of foreign exhibitors for the fourth consecutive year, according to the China Council for the Promotion of International Trade. This continued high participation reflects U.S. firms’ ongoing interest in deepening industrial and supply chain collaboration with Chinese partners.

    Henry Ding, president of 3M China, shared the industrial conglomerate’s long-term outlook for the Chinese market. China is 3M’s largest overseas market, and the company remains confident that China’s ongoing high-quality economic development will unlock broad new growth opportunities. In recent years, 3M has accelerated full value chain localization in China, integrating local research and development, product testing, and manufacturing operations into its regional strategy. “Currently, more than 50 percent of the products 3M sells in China are manufactured locally,” Ding said. This year, 3M China will continue expanding local R&D investment, with plans to launch more than 30 percent more new products than it did in 2025, a growth rate that far outpaces the company’s targets for other global markets.

    Even with this widespread optimism and long-term commitment, the USCBC survey does acknowledge the significant headwinds facing U.S. companies operating in China. Fragile bilateral relations, ongoing uncertainty surrounding China’s economic growth trajectory, and long-standing U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports remain the top three most pressing challenges for responding firms. “U.S.-China relations continue to be the single greatest challenge for companies operating in the Chinese market, and even after the recent tariff truce, both governments continue to roll out new economic security policies that create additional uncertainty,” the council noted.

    As Beijing and Washington set working agendas for the newly established trade and investment councils, Stein said the 2026 survey results should act as a clear wake-up call for policymakers on both sides. “This is a tangible opportunity to make meaningful progress that goes far beyond just tariff reductions,” he added, emphasizing that sustained engagement aligned with the clear priorities of the business community on both sides will deliver shared, long-term benefits.

  • Hismile fined $138,600 by consumer watchdog for using staff in fake reviews

    Hismile fined $138,600 by consumer watchdog for using staff in fake reviews

    One of Australia’s most viral social media-first oral healthcare brands has been handed a substantial financial penalty by the national consumer and corporate regulator for deceptive advertising practices that tricked consumers into purchasing misrepresented products. Popular toothpaste and teeth care brand Hismile, whose products are stocked in major Australian supermarket chains Woolworths and Coles, has been ordered to pay $138,600 in total penalties following seven infringement notices issued by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) over false and misleading claims made across its social media channels.

    The ACCC’s investigation uncovered a core deceptive practice at the heart of Hismile’s marketing campaigns: the brand had shared short-form social media videos presenting paid employees as unbiased, random shoppers offering genuine, unsolicited praise for Hismile products. These fake organic testimonials were designed to convince viewers of the brand’s quality through seemingly authentic user experiences, a tactic that has become common in influencer and social media marketing.

    A second deceptive claim was tied to the brand’s now-discontinued Glostik Tooth Gloss product. Marketing videos for the item implied that it permanently removed existing stains from tooth enamel, but the product only delivered temporary cosmetic results that concealed stains rather than eliminating them entirely. The product has been pulled from shelves and Hismile’s product lineup following the regulator’s investigation.

    Hismile has built a massive global social media following, amassing more than 5 million followers on TikTok alone, largely thanks to its viral, unconventional product collaborations — including a widely publicized KFC-flavored toothpaste that generated massive online engagement. That massive reach makes deceptive advertising all the more impactful, ACCC officials noted.

    “Misleading social media advertisements can reach millions of consumers and may impact their purchasing decisions,” ACCC Commissioner Luke Woodward said in a statement following the ruling. “All businesses must ensure they are not making misleading or deceptive claims on social media platforms.”

    Woodward emphasized that the deceptive content led consumers to purchase products that did not deliver the results Hismile advertised, a violation of Australia’s core consumer protection laws. “The ACCC has prioritised consumer and fair-trading issues relating to manipulative or deceptive advertising in the digital economy for several years,” he added.

    Hismile has admitted that its posted content was misleading and violated the Australian Consumer Law. As part of the resolution with the ACCC, the brand has committed to several binding changes to its future marketing practices: it will no longer misrepresent employees as unaffiliated members of the public when sharing product testimonials, reviews or commentary. It will also develop and roll out a formal company-wide compliance program focused on competition and consumer law, and will publish a public notice on its website and social media platforms detailing the ACCC’s enforcement action to inform past and future customers of the issue.

  • US ready for co-hosts’ final World Cup opener against Paraguay before a raucous SoCal crowd

    US ready for co-hosts’ final World Cup opener against Paraguay before a raucous SoCal crowd

    After three decades of waiting, the United States is finally set to step onto its home turf for a World Cup opening match, kicking off their Group Stage campaign against Paraguay on Friday night at Inglewood’s iconic SoFi Stadium. This tournament marks the first time the U.S. has hosted the men’s World Cup since 1994, and the third of three co-hosting nations to get their home opener underway, alongside Mexico and Canada.

    The stage for this historic encounter is nothing short of spectacular: the $5 billion-plus SoFi Stadium, which opened in 2020 as the shared home of the NFL’s Los Angeles Rams and Los Angeles Chargers. While the cutting-edge arena usually plays host to American football on an unpopular artificial turf surface, tournament organizers pulled out all the stops for the global soccer showcase, laying down a fresh natural grass pitch to meet player and competition standards.

    Long before kickoff, the energy in Southern California was electric. Thousands of jubilant fans flocked to the stadium and its surrounding grounds hours early, filling the area with chants, team colors, and creative displays. Supporters clad in red, white and blue US jerseys packed the stands, while many went all out with elaborate costumes ranging from the Statue of Liberty to America’s Founding Fathers, turning the pre-match buildup into a full-blown celebration of the nation’s return to the World Cup host table.

    Headed by star midfielder Christian Pulisic and a core of seasoned veteran players, the USMNT enters the tournament ranked 17th in the world by FIFA, with legitimate on-pitch ambitions. The team is targeting a group stage victory, and if successful, a knockout round win would mark only the second such advance in the program’s entire World Cup history. This opening match is also the first for the USMNT under new head coach Mauricio Pochettino, adding an extra layer of narrative to the historic matchup.

    The 2026 World Cup, the largest edition in the tournament’s history with an expanded 48-team format, kicked off one day earlier with co-host Mexico notching a 2-0 win over South Africa in the tournament’s opening fixture. Earlier on Friday, the third co-host Canada earned a hard-fought 1-1 draw against Bosnia and Herzegovina in their opening match in Toronto.

    For the USMNT’s group stage run, the team will play two of its three preliminary matches right here at SoFi Stadium, with a single away trip to Seattle for the middle group fixture sandwiched in between.

    Much has changed for American soccer since the US last hosted the men’s World Cup back in 1994, when Brazil claimed the tournament title and the US men won just one of their four group matches. In the 32 years since that historic event, soccer has exploded in popularity across the United States: youth participation has surged year over year, and the domestic Major League Soccer, launched just two years after the 1994 World Cup, has grown into a stable, competitive professional league that attracts top talent from across the globe.

  • Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Myanmar’s president to visit China

    Diplomatic relations between China and Myanmar are set for a key milestone this week, as Myanmar President Min Aung Hlaing prepares to embark on a five-day state visit to China starting Monday, according to a recent announcement from China’s Foreign Ministry. This trip marks Min Aung Hlaing’s first official visit to China since he was sworn in as Myanmar’s president in April this year, and is widely expected to strengthen long-standing fraternal ties and expand practical collaboration between the two neighboring nations.

    Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian confirmed on Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping will hold official talks with Min Aung Hlaing during the visit. Separately, Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Zhao Leji, Chairman of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, China’s top legislative body, will also meet with the Myanmar leader.

    In remarks at a regular press briefing, Lin emphasized that China and Myanmar share a deep history as traditional friendly neighbors and have committed to building a bilateral community with a shared future. Over the 75 years since the two countries established formal diplomatic relations, both sides have consistently upheld the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence—a framework they co-initiated. Through decades of standing together through challenges, supporting one another, and advancing collective cooperation, bilateral relations have delivered substantial, mutually beneficial progress.

    “Through this visit, China looks forward to working alongside Myanmar to carry forward the traditional ‘pauk-phaw’ fraternal friendship, deepen the bilateral comprehensive strategic partnership, achieve more tangible outcomes in advancing the China-Myanmar community with a shared future, and bring greater welfare to the people of both countries,” Lin added.

    The upcoming state visit builds on a string of recent high-level diplomatic exchanges between the two countries. Earlier this month, Myanmar Foreign Minister Tin Maung Swe traveled to Beijing for talks, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi paid an official visit to Myanmar back in April.

    Economic ties between the two nations have already shown strong growth in recent years: China has held the position of Myanmar’s largest trading partner for multiple consecutive years, and official Chinese data shows bilateral trade volume hit $19.4 billion in 2025, representing a 19.1% year-on-year increase.

    Just this week, during an appearance at the opening ceremony of 2026 Chinese Film Week in Myanmar’s capital Nay Pyi Taw, Min Aung Hlaing expressed public gratitude to China for its support, per Myanmar’s presidential office. He specifically thanked China for dispatching emergency humanitarian assistance after a recent major earthquake struck Myanmar, as well as for its continued long-term support for Myanmar’s social development across key sectors including education, public health, social welfare, and rural development.

    Zhou Fangyin, a professor specializing in international relations at Sun Yat-sen University based in Guangzhou, Guangdong, noted that the development of China-Myanmar relations has long been rooted in the core principles of mutual respect and mutual benefit. The strong political trust established by both sides over decades has laid a solid, enabling foundation for expanding practical cooperation in all areas moving forward.

  • Blues clues: Mitchell Moses trains with the Blues in huge Origin boost as NSW players support Ashley Klein following gambling report

    Blues clues: Mitchell Moses trains with the Blues in huge Origin boost as NSW players support Ashley Klein following gambling report

    As the NSW Blues finalize preparations for Wednesday’s State of Origin II in Melbourne, the biggest question hanging over the camp all week has centered on five-eighth Mitchell Moses’ fitness – and a pivotal Saturday training session in Gosford has delivered a promising update just hours before the squad’s departure for the game.

    The Eels star’s participation in the full group session has put him firmly on track to reclaim his starting spot for the series-deciding match, marking a positive turnaround after a hamstring injury derailed his Origin I plans. Moses first tore his left hamstring during extra training just 48 hours before the opening game in Sydney, forcing officials to rule him out a day out from kickoff and prompt a last-minute call-up for Canberra Raiders standout Ethan Strange.

    Strange turned in a man-of-the-match caliber debut, partnering with halfback Nathan Cleary to fuel a stunning second-half comeback win for the Blues, and remains the ready-made replacement should Moses suffer a late setback. After training separately from the main squad on Thursday – a development that stoked widespread speculation about his game-day chances – Moses moved without visible limitation during Saturday’s session, quelling many of the lingering concerns about his condition. Blues coach Laurie Daley had flagged earlier in the week that getting through the full Saturday session was a non-negotiable milestone for Moses to be named in the side, and the playmaker has now cleared that key hurdle.

    Blues players have remained uniformly confident that Moses will be fit to take the field, even as he completes a modified, restricted training program this week. Hooker Reece Robson told reporters ahead of Saturday’s session that the squad has built-in contingencies for both scenarios, but that Moses himself is certain he will be ready. “Whatever happens, we’ve got plans in place for either outcome,” Robson said. “Mitch is confident he’ll be right, so we’re giving him every opportunity to get up to speed before kickoff. Even if he doesn’t get a full week of training in, most of us have played hundreds of reps alongside him at the club and representative level. When Ethan came in for Origin I with barely 24 hours notice, he stepped in and performed brilliantly, so we know we can adapt no matter what.”

    Prop Mitch Barnett echoed that confidence, saying he has no doubts Moses will take the field on Wednesday. “He’s straight up about how he’s feeling, and he’s 100% confident he’ll play,” Barnett said. “He’s out there running with us today, and I don’t have a single shadow of a doubt he’ll be good to go.”

    Off the field, the Blues have thrown their support behind Origin II referee Ashley Klein after reports emerged this week that the top NRL official previously battled a severe gambling addiction that saw him lose more than $400,000 on horse and greyhound racing. Klein has publicly stated that his past gambling never involved rugby league and never impacted his work as an on-field official, and Blues players say the former struggle is a personal matter that should not affect his appointment to Wednesday’s game.

    Barnett said he supports Klein and hopes he continues to receive any support he needs. “That’s a personal issue for him, and as someone who cares about other people, I hope he’s doing well and has all the help he needs,” Barnett said. “It doesn’t have any bearing on this game for me.” Robson echoed that sentiment, praising Klein’s long record of strong performance at the sport’s highest level. “He’s a great referee who has delivered on the biggest stage for years, that’s why he keeps getting these big appointments,” Robson said. “The other stuff is a personal issue he’s worked through, and I’m sure he has all the support he needs around him.”

  • Palestinian football chief denied entry to US in latest case of World Cup travel restrictions

    Palestinian football chief denied entry to US in latest case of World Cup travel restrictions

    The 2026 FIFA World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, opened on Thursday to widespread controversy, as sweeping visa denials, entry bans and controversial security measures imposed by U.S. authorities have barred dozens of accredited football delegates, sports officials, journalists and fans from accessing matches, drawing accusations of politically motivated discrimination against the global football community.

    The most high-profile case involves Jibril Rajoub, president of the Palestinian Football Association, who holds official FIFA accreditation to attend the tournament. Though the Palestinian men’s national team did not qualify for this year’s World Cup, Rajoub planned to join fellow global football governing body delegates to watch matches in the U.S. Instead, U.S. consular officials rejected his visa application, leaving him stuck in Mexico City, where he watched the tournament’s opening fixture between Mexico and South Africa earlier this week.

    Rajoub has framed the visa refusal as a politically motivated attack on the fundamental right of global football representatives to participate in the world’s biggest sporting event. He highlighted the stark double standard between this tournament and the 2018 World Cup in Russia, where he traveled and attended matches without any diplomatic barriers. “I don’t believe that it’s fair to use or to abuse and deny the right of all footballers all over the world to attend,” he said, adding the restriction is fundamentally unfair.

    The refusal comes just one month after Rajoub declined a public request from FIFA President Gianni Infantino to shake hands with the head of the Israeli Football Association. Rajoub explained at the time that such a symbolic gesture would merely serve to whitewash Israel’s widely condemned unlawful actions in Palestinian territories.

    Rajoub is far from the only accredited World Cup stakeholder blocked from entering the U.S. The visa issues have already touched nearly every corner of the global football community, from top referees to national team delegations, working journalists, and ordinary ticket-holding fans.

    In one recent high-profile incident, Omar Abdulkadir Artan, named 2025 African Referee of the Year, was denied entry to the U.S. even though he held a fully valid visa issued by the U.S. Department of State. Members of Iraq’s official national delegation, including star striker Aymen Hussein and the team’s official photographer, were held for seven hours of detention at Chicago O’Hare International Airport. While Hussein was ultimately granted entry after extended questioning, the photographer was turned away and deported.

    The International Sports Press Association has confirmed that dozens of journalists from African nations and Iran have also been blocked from obtaining the multi-entry visas required to travel between all three co-host nations to cover matches. Even fans with confirmed match tickets have not been spared: fans from Scotland and Morocco have seen their pre-approved travel authorizations revoked or their visa applications rejected at the last minute, just days before they were set to travel for the tournament. Iran’s government additionally confirmed that the 8 percent ticket allocation allocated to official Iranian fans was revoked just days before the tournament kicked off, leaving hundreds of Iranian supporters who had already booked flights and accommodation stranded with no way to attend.

    Compounding growing tensions over access to the tournament, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security recently confirmed that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) enforcement agents will be deployed inside World Cup stadiums hosted on U.S. soil as part of the tournament’s security plan. More than 120 U.S. and international civil rights organizations have condemned the decision, warning that the presence of uniformed immigration enforcement agents inside venues will undermine the personal safety of both international visitors and stadium staff, particularly for fans and workers from immigrant backgrounds.

    In response to widespread criticism of the visa restrictions and disruptions, FIFA issued a formal statement asserting that the governing body does not intervene in the domestic immigration and visa adjudication processes of the tournament’s host nations. This neutral stance has already drawn comparisons to FIFA’s 2023 decision to strip Indonesia of the right to host the Under-20 World Cup, after Indonesian local government officials objected to Israel’s participation in the tournament.

    This independent reporting was originally produced by Middle East Eye, a global outlet focused on in-depth coverage of the Middle East and North Africa region.

  • Paramount Skydance merger with Warner Bros. Discovery won’t harm competition, consumers, DOJ says

    Paramount Skydance merger with Warner Bros. Discovery won’t harm competition, consumers, DOJ says

    The U.S. Department of Justice has closed its antitrust investigation into Paramount Skydance’s proposed $81 billion acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery, announcing Friday that the blockbuster Hollywood media consolidation will not harm industry competition or harm consumer interests — a major win for the deal’s backers that still leaves the merger facing ongoing regulatory checks across the U.S. and around the globe.

    DOJ’s Antitrust Division concluded its probe with a final finding that the union will actually strengthen competition across the broader media and entertainment ecosystem, delivering tangible benefits for both U.S. consumers and industry workers. The planned combination was first announced in late February, after months of tense negotiations that saw Paramount Skydance outcompete a rival bid from streaming giant Netflix to secure the deal. The transaction follows Skydance’s acquisition of Paramount last year, bringing two of Hollywood’s biggest studio brands under single ownership.

    Executives behind the merger have long argued that combining the two companies will unlock sustainable industry growth, expand consumer access to premium content, and create a stronger market player by merging the extensive content libraries of HBO Max and Paramount+ to compete with larger streaming incumbents. But the proposal has drawn fierce pushback from across the industry and political sphere: thousands of actors, directors, writers and other entertainment professionals signed an open letter voicing unequivocal opposition, warning that further consolidation in a market already dominated by a handful of major players will trigger mass layoffs, reduce creative options for filmmakers, and limit content choices for audiences. Multiple lawmakers have also raised concerns about the deal’s anticompetitive risks.

    In its assessment, DOJ regulators closely examined the merger’s potential impact on multiple key market segments, starting with consumer video streaming. The agency found the combined entity would actually boost competition by offering a more robust, viable alternative to the sector’s largest existing streaming platforms. Regulators also addressed the role of social video platforms including YouTube and TikTok, noting that while these services compete for general consumer attention, they do not qualify as direct competitive substitutes for premium streaming services under long-standing antitrust legal precedents.

    The review also found no credible risk of reduced competition in linear television, pointing to the crowded, highly competitive market for live programming that would remain intact post-merger. For theatrical film production and distribution, regulators concluded that combining the two major studio operations would not weaken competition in development, production or theatrical distribution. Instead, the department found existing industry competition is already extensive, has driven increased output and greater diversity in film offerings, and this dynamic will remain unchanged after the merger.

    Despite the DOJ’s approval, the merger is far from cleared to close. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has publicly confirmed his state is conducting its own independent investigation into the transaction. Internationally, both European Union and U.K. regulators have launched their own probes: the European Commission has set a tentative July 7 deadline for its review, while the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority aims to issue an initial decision by early August.

    Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison has sought to ease concerns, promising to operate Paramount and Warner Bros. as separate standalone movie studios and committing to release 30 theatrical films annually from the combined entity. Company leadership has also acknowledged that the merger will lead to significant job cuts to eliminate overlapping roles and operational duplication.

    The two companies have targeted the third quarter of this year to complete the acquisition, and the timeline is already winding down. Per the merger agreement, Paramount will be required to pay shareholders a 25-cent per share “ticking fee” every quarter if the deal fails to close by September 30. The agreement also includes a $7 billion termination fee that would be paid if regulators ultimately block the transaction.