作者： admin

Venezuela has formally requested urgent intervention from the United Nations Security Council following what it characterizes as unlawful military strikes by the United States and the forcible extraction of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores. The extraordinary diplomatic confrontation unfolded during an emergency session at UN headquarters in New York on Monday.

Ambassador Samuel Moncada, Venezuela’s permanent representative to the UN, presented a comprehensive condemnation of Washington’s actions over the weekend, describing them as a flagrant violation of international law and the UN Charter. The ambassador articulated three primary demands: the immediate release and safe repatriation of President Maduro and his spouse with full respect for their diplomatic immunities; an unambiguous Security Council condemnation of the use of force against Venezuela; and the reaffirmation of the principle prohibiting territorial acquisition through military means.

Moncada framed the situation as extending beyond bilateral tensions, warning that tolerance of such actions would establish a dangerous precedent undermining global security architecture. “When force is used to control resources, impose governments, or redesign states, we are faced with a logic that harks back to the worst practices of colonialism,” he stated during his address to the fifteen-member council.

The Venezuelan diplomat further asserted that the military operation constituted multiple violations of fundamental international principles, including the sovereign equality of states, the prohibition against territorial aggression, and the obligation to resolve disputes through peaceful means. He additionally cited breaches of the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols governing armed conflict.

Characterizing the situation as a critical test for multilateralism, Moncada cautioned that failure to respond adequately would signal that “law is optional, and that force is the true arbiter of international relations.” The emergency session represents one of the most significant confrontations between a Latin American nation and a permanent Security Council member in recent history, with potential implications for international norms regarding state sovereignty and great power conduct.

In a forceful address to the United Nations Security Council, South Africa’s representative delivered a scathing critique of recent United States military operations targeting Venezuela. The emergency session, convened on Monday in New York, addressed what the South African delegation characterized as unlawful cross-border enforcement actions.

The African nation’s statement condemned American unilateral strikes against Venezuelan territory and the reported abduction of President Nicolas Maduro alongside his spouse, describing these actions as flagrant violations of Venezuela’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence. The representative emphasized that such operations fundamentally contradict established international legal norms and dangerously reinforce the principle that ‘might makes right’ while simultaneously undermining diplomatic resolution mechanisms.

Citing foundational principles of international jurisprudence, the South African delegation underscored that states maintain exclusive jurisdiction over persons and conduct within their territorial boundaries. Any enforcement of domestic law—including arrest operations—by one nation within another’s territory without explicit consent constitutes an unlawful breach of sovereignty, according to the statement.

The address highlighted available recourse mechanisms under international law, including bringing cases before the International Court of Justice or seeking authorized action through the UN Security Council itself. South Africa warned that bypassing these established channels represents a dangerous regression to a pre-UN world order—one that precipitated two catastrophic world wars and fostered systemic international instability and lawlessness.

The statement concluded with a stark warning about the perils of abandoning the international legal framework, asserting that the global community cannot navigate an increasingly complex future without the stability and protection afforded by respecting international law and multilateral institutions.

In a sharply worded address to the United Nations Security Council, Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia delivered a sweeping condemnation of American actions in Venezuela during an emergency session convened on Monday, January 5, 2026. The Russian permanent representative characterized recent events in Caracas as representing a dangerous return to an era of international lawlessness and brute force domination.

Ambassador Nebenzia’s statement framed the operation against Venezuelan leadership, which reportedly resulted in numerous Venezuelan and Cuban casualties, as emblematic of a broader pattern of American coercion that continues to inflict suffering across multiple global regions. The Russian diplomat asserted that no justification could ever legitimize what he termed a ‘cynically perpetrated crime’ by United States forces.

The address contained specific allegations that abducted President Nicolas Maduro and his spouse are currently being held in United States custody, with their location identified as New York as of the meeting date. Russia’s UN delegation formally demanded the immediate release of what they described as the ‘legitimately elected president of an independent state’ and his wife, characterizing their detention as a violation of international legal standards.

Nebenzia’s rhetoric emphasized Moscow’s firm condemnation of American military action against Venezuela, which he characterized as constituting ‘armed aggression’ in breach of established international norms. The statement positioned Russia as a defender of state sovereignty against what it perceives as American overreach, reflecting escalating tensions between permanent Security Council members regarding appropriate intervention protocols.

In a dramatic escalation of the Venezuela crisis, Delcy Rodríguez was inaugurated as the nation’s interim president following a parliamentary session dominated by outrage over the U.S. military capture of former leader Nicolás Maduro. The 56-year-old former vice president decried what she termed the ‘kidnapping’ of Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores during a Saturday night raid by U.S. forces.

The political upheaval unfolded alongside a remarkable courtroom spectacle in New York where Maduro, appearing in shackles, pleaded not guilty to four charges including narco-terrorism conspiracy and weapons offenses. During the 30-minute hearing, Maduro defiantly declared himself ‘a decent man’ and ‘still president of my country,’ while being confronted by a Spanish-speaking protester who shouted that he would ‘pay’ for his actions.

International tensions flared at an emergency UN Security Council session where Venezuelan ambassador Samuel Moncada condemned the ‘illegitimate armed attack lacking any legal justification.’ U.S. ambassador Mike Waltz countered that Maduro represented an ‘illegitimate so-called president’ and defended the operation as a ‘surgical law enforcement action’ necessary to apprehend a ‘fugitive from justice.’

The operation itself involved over 150 aircraft and 200 personnel according to reports, drawing mixed reactions from U.S. leadership. While House Speaker Mike Johnson described the mission as ‘decisive and justified,’ Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer emerged from a classified briefing criticizing the subsequent plan for Venezuela as ‘vague, based on wishful thinking, and unsatisfying.’

Meanwhile, thousands of Venezuelans gathered outside the Federal Legislative Palace in Caracas to show support for Maduro and the new interim government. Rodríguez struck a conciliatory tone in her first cabinet meeting, inviting ‘the U.S. government to collaborate with us on an agenda of co-operation orientated towards shared development within the framework of international law’—a stark contrast to Trump’s warning that she could ‘pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro’ if she didn’t ‘do what’s right.’

The interim president vowed to guarantee ‘the spiritual tranquillity of our people, the economic and social tranquillity of our people’ despite the circumstances of her ascension. Maduro’s case continues with a next court hearing scheduled for March 17.