A battlefield report: Neither side is winning US-China trade war

In a significant development for American soybean farmers, China has agreed to purchase 918 million bushels of soybeans annually over the next three years. This decision, announced by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, has brought much-needed relief to the agricultural sector. President Donald Trump hailed the agreement, stating, “Our farmers will be very happy!” The deal is part of broader trade concessions from China, including commitments on rare earths and fentanyl, which Trump has framed as a victory in the ongoing US-China trade war. He described his recent meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping as “a 12 on a scale of one to 10.”

However, some analysts argue that China may have emerged as the real winner. They point to China’s retaliatory measures on soybeans and rare earths, which forced the US to back down on 100% tariffs, port fees, and stricter AI-chip export controls. Critics, including editorial writers from the Wall Street Journal, contend that the agreement largely restores the status quo that existed in May. A New York Times headline even suggested that Xi had outmaneuvered Trump, allowing him to claim a win while strengthening China’s position.

The reality, however, is more nuanced. The trade war remains unresolved, with neither side achieving its primary objectives. While the US has secured temporary concessions, China continues to face high tariffs on its exports. Similarly, China has only suspended its strict export restrictions on rare earths for a year. Both nations have demonstrated their capacity to inflict economic pain on each other, but progress toward a lasting resolution remains elusive.

For American soybean farmers, the agreement offers short-term relief but underscores their overreliance on the Chinese market. The president of the American Soybean Association noted that while the purchases are welcome, they are insufficient to restore profitability. Farmers are now seeking diversification, with potential agreements with Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam offering hope for long-term stability. These deals, if finalized, could significantly reduce the US agricultural sector’s dependence on China.

As the truce between the US and China continues, the situation remains volatile. Both nations are actively working to reduce their economic interdependence, and hostilities could resume at any moment. For now, the agreement provides a temporary reprieve, but the underlying tensions of the trade war persist.