Trump says he’s sending 5,000 more troops to Poland, stirring confusion about US presence in Europe

For weeks, the Trump administration has sent conflicting, shifting signals about its planned military posture in Europe, and a sudden announcement from former President Donald Trump on Thursday has only deepened the confusion among U.S. policymakers and European allies alike. In a post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump revealed that the United States would deploy an extra 5,000 American troops to Poland, a complete reversal of the administration’s weeks of public comments committing to reduce — not expand — the U.S. military footprint across the continent.

The policy whiplash comes against a backdrop of growing transatlantic tension over defense burden-sharing and U.S. strategy amid the ongoing Ukraine war. For weeks, the Trump administration has openly stated it planned to cut approximately 5,000 troops from its European force levels. U.S. officials had already confirmed that roughly 4,000 service members slated for a rotational deployment to Poland had their orders canceled, as part of this broader drawdown plan. A planned deployment of long-range missile personnel to Germany was also halted, aligning with Trump’s earlier order to shrink the U.S. military presence in Europe. Earlier this month, Trump even told reporters that planned cuts would go “a lot further than 5,000,” reinforcing expectations of a significant drawdown.

Trump’s new announcement directly upends that trajectory, leaving NATO allies already caught off guard by previous policy shifts facing even more uncertainty. For months, the Trump administration has publicly pressured NATO member states to increase their own defense spending, criticizing many allies for failing to carry a sufficient share of collective defense costs and not doing enough to support U.S. policy amid tensions with Iran. These tensions grew after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz publicly criticized the administration’s lack of a clear strategy for the Iran conflict, saying the U.S. had been “humiliated” by Iranian leadership. In response, the administration moved forward with plans to draw down at least 5,000 troops from Germany.

In his Truth Social post, Trump framed the new troop deployment as a gesture of support for Poland’s newly elected President Karol Nawrocki, whom he had publicly endorsed during the country’s election. “Based on the successful Election of the now President of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, who I was proud to Endorse, and our relationship with him, I am pleased to announce that the United States will be sending an additional 5,000 Troops to Poland,” Trump wrote.

The conflicting announcements have sparked sharp criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the U.S. political aisle, who argue that erratic policy on European troop deployments sends a dangerous message to U.S. allies and to Russian President Vladimir Putin amid the four-year-long full-scale war in Ukraine. Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska told a congressional hearing that Polish officials had been “blindsided” by the earlier canceled deployment, calling the initial drawdown decision “reprehensible” and “an embarrassment to our country what we just did to Poland.”

Pentagon officials have attempted to clarify the situation in recent days, but their statements have done little to resolve the ambiguity. Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said Tuesday that the canceled deployment was only a “temporary delay,” not a permanent reversal, and described Poland as a “model U.S. ally.” He explained that the delay stems from the administration’s plan to reduce the number of brigade combat teams stationed in Europe from four to three, and said the Pentagon has not yet made final decisions about which units will be assigned to which forward positions.

To date, it remains unclear what Trump’s new announcement means for existing plans: it is unknown whether the previously delayed 4,000-strong brigade will now deploy to Poland, whether the extra 5,000 troops will be added on top of existing rotational deployments, or whether the planned overall drawdown of 5,000 troops from Europe will still proceed, only taking cuts from locations other than Poland. When reached for comment to clarify the policy, the Pentagon directed all inquiries to the White House, which has not yet issued a formal response to requests for clarity. This week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Defense Undersecretary Elbridge Colby have both held calls with their Polish counterparts, and Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Wednesday that he was “happy to hear Washington’s declaration that Poland will be treated as it deserves.”

As of last week, U.S. Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Europe, confirmed to reporters in Brussels that the administration’s plan remained for 5,000 troops to withdraw from Europe. Trump’s announcement comes as Secretary of State Marco Rubio travels to Sweden for meetings with NATO foreign ministers, who have already raised repeated questions about the Trump administration’s inconsistent troop policy.

Retired career diplomat Ian Kelly, who served as U.S. ambassador to Georgia during the Obama administration and first Trump term and now teaches international relations at Northwestern University, said the conflicting announcements point to a lack of deliberate policy process at the highest levels of the administration. “There seems to be no process to deliberating policies like troop withdrawals and deployments at the top,” Kelly said. He noted that Rubio will likely face a difficult task explaining the sudden policy shifts to European allies, who have repeatedly called for consistent, predictable U.S. security policy even when they disagree with specific administration decisions. “These are not well thought out decisions,” Kelly said. “These are impulsive decisions based on Trump’s whims or what his advisors think are Trump’s whims.”

Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price contributed reporting to this article.