In a landmark ruling with significant implications for digital privacy, India’s Supreme Court has delivered a forceful rebuke to Meta Platforms and its messaging subsidiary WhatsApp regarding their data sharing framework. The court explicitly prohibited the company from utilizing any user data for advertising purposes, demanding a legally binding commitment against such practices.
The bench characterized Meta’s data sharing approach as fundamentally unacceptable, drawing a striking parallel to ‘a sophisticated method of pilfering private information.’ Judicial authorities emphasized that citizen privacy rights cannot be compromised for corporate commercial interests, particularly those of multinational corporations.
The court further scrutinized Meta’s consent mechanism, noting that the complexity of opt-in/opt-out language creates barriers for ordinary users. Justices specifically referenced how such technical terminology would challenge the comprehension of vulnerable populations, including street vendors with limited digital literacy.
Meta has been granted until February 9 to submit a comprehensive response to the court’s concerns. This legal confrontation stems from petitions challenging substantial penalties imposed by Indian regulatory bodies, including the Competition Commission of India’s ₹2.13 billion fine and subsequent rulings from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal.
The decision represents a critical juncture in the ongoing global debate regarding technology governance, user privacy protections, and the ethical responsibilities of digital platforms operating in diverse socioeconomic environments.