Canadian rap superstar Drake has initiated appellate proceedings following the dismissal of his defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group (UMG) concerning Kendrick Lamar’s controversial 2024 track ‘Not Like Us.’ The legal battle stems from lyrical content within the song that labeled Drake a “certified pedophile” and suggested he be “placed on neighbourhood watch.”
The dispute originated during the peak of a highly publicized musical feud between the two artists in May 2024. Drake’s legal team contended that UMG, his longtime label partner of over a decade, knowingly promoted and distributed material containing defamatory statements that endangered his safety and damaged his global reputation.
In October 2025, U.S. District Judge Ada E. Vargas dismissed the case, ruling that the lyrics constituted artistic expression within the context of a “heated rap battle” where reasonable listeners would recognize hyperbolic rhetoric rather than factual assertions. The court emphasized the established tradition of exaggerated insults within hip-hop diss tracks.
Drake’s attorneys now argue this ruling establishes a “dangerous” precedent that effectively creates immunity for defamatory content in musical disputes. Legal representative Michael J. Gottlieb asserted that the decision implies “rap diss tracks cannot contain statements of fact,” thereby insulating them from defamation liability regardless of their damaging nature.
The appeal documents stress the particular severity of pedophilia accusations and their potential to incite violence against the accused. Drake’s team maintains that many listeners interpreted Lamar’s lyrics as factual claims rather than artistic hyperbole.
UMG’s legal counsel has until March 27 to formally respond to the appellate filing. This case continues to highlight the complex intersection of artistic expression, defamation law, and the competitive traditions of hip-hop culture.