What to know about Greenland’s role in nuclear defense and Trump’s ‘Golden Dome’

The vast ice-covered expanse of Greenland has emerged as a geopolitical focal point in hypothetical nuclear conflict scenarios involving global powers. Scientific analysis reveals that intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) launched between nuclear adversaries would predominantly traverse Arctic airspace, placing Greenland directly within critical flight corridors.

This strategic positioning has catalyzed unprecedented political maneuvers. Former U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly advocated for American acquisition of the autonomous Danish territory, citing imperative defense requirements. His proposed ‘Golden Dome’ missile defense initiative—a multibillion-dollar technological shield purportedly becoming operational before 2029—forms the cornerstone of this geopolitical proposition.

The Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) represents America’s northernmost early-warning installation. Its advanced AN/FPS-132 radar system possesses remarkable capabilities, scanning over 5,550 kilometers with 240-degree coverage while detecting objects as small as automobiles. This installation provides crucial response time for decision-makers contemplating nuclear engagement scenarios.

However, defense analysts question the logical consistency of acquisition arguments. The United States maintains operational control through existing bilateral agreements, with decades of uninterrupted access. French nuclear specialist Etienne Marcuz notes comparable strategic installations in allied territories like the United Kingdom’s Fylingdales radar station operate without sovereignty discussions.

Technological evolution further complicates acquisition rationale. Emerging space-based sensor systems and advanced detection technologies may gradually diminish Greenland’s strategic monopoly in missile tracking. The political landscape has also shifted markedly—where Denmark previously accommodated U.S. defense requests routinely, current relations show increased strain following acquisition proposals.

The geopolitical chessboard continues evolving as Arctic capabilities gain prominence in great power competition, with Greenland remaining both strategically vital and politically contentious in global security architecture.