How crypto criminals stole $700 million from people – often using age-old tricks

The immutable transparency of blockchain technology creates a uniquely agonizing experience for cryptocurrency theft victims like Helen and Richard, a British couple who watched helplessly as $315,000 vanished into digital oblivion. Despite seven years of careful accumulation of Cardano coins and secure storage practices, hackers infiltrated their cloud storage, accessing their digital keys and executing a swift, silent transfer to anonymous wallets in February 2024.

This personal tragedy reflects a global epidemic. According to Chainalysis, crypto criminals stole over $3.4 billion in 2025, maintaining consistent theft volumes since 2020. While major exchange hacks like North Korea’s $1.5 billion Bybit heist dominate headlines, a disturbing trend emerges: individual attacks doubled from 40,000 in 2022 to 80,000 last year, accounting for $713 million in losses.

The regulatory void compounds the problem. Unlike traditional finance where institutions typically cover losses, the FCA explicitly warns that crypto remains ‘largely unregulated and high-risk’ with minimal protection schemes. This vulnerability has spawned increasingly violent ‘wrench attacks’ where criminals employ physical coercion—from home invasions to kidnappings—to access digital assets. In France, Ledger co-founder David Balland had his finger severed during an extortion attempt, while Spanish criminals shot a victim during a crypto-related kidnapping.

Sophisticated data exploitation fuels these crimes. Hackers cross-reference breached databases—like the Kering (Gucci/Balenciaga parent company) breach—to identify high-value targets. One hacker interviewed by the BBC detailed purchasing stolen data for $300,000 to target wealthy individuals, claiming to have tripled his investment rapidly through carefully researched scams.

Security experts like Matthew Jones of Haven, who himself suffered crypto theft, are developing enhanced protection features including continuous biometric verification and geofencing. Yet the fundamental paradox remains: blockchain’s transparent ledger allows victims to watch their stolen assets circulate indefinitely while offering no recovery mechanism—a digital purgatory where visibility doesn’t equate to justice.