A landmark judicial decision awaits former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol as Seoul’s Central District Court prepares to deliver its verdict Friday regarding obstruction of justice charges. The case stems from Yoon’s unprecedented December 3, 2024 declaration of martial law—the first suspension of civilian rule in over four decades—which triggered nationwide protests and parliamentary confrontations.
The prosecution alleges Yoon systematically obstructed justice by excluding cabinet members from martial law planning sessions and subsequently preventing investigators from executing an arrest warrant at his residence in January 2025. Security personnel reportedly deployed buses to block compound entrances during initial enforcement attempts before authorities eventually secured access for questioning.
Prosecutors have pursued a 10-year prison sentence, asserting Yoon violated constitutional principles. The former leader maintains his actions represented lawful exercises of presidential authority during national emergency circumstances. This verdict precedes a separate February 19 ruling on more severe insurrection charges where prosecutors demanded capital punishment for allegedly threatening democratic order.
Yoon displayed defiant courtroom demeanor throughout proceedings, smiling during prosecution arguments and insisting his emergency measures constituted legitimate constitutional powers rather than rebellion. He accused opposition parties of establishing ‘unconstitutional dictatorship’ through legislative control, claiming martial law represented the only option to protect national sovereignty.
The televised sentencing occurs amid South Korea’s ongoing reckoning with executive power boundaries, with additional trials pending regarding allegations Yoon authorized drone flights over North Korea to justify military escalation.