WASHINGTON — The successful military operation resulting in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro has been hailed by President Donald Trump and his administration as a significant foreign policy achievement. The action demonstrates Trump’s continued willingness to deploy U.S. military forces for high-risk missions with potentially substantial geopolitical returns.
The operation removed from power a South American leader repeatedly characterized by the Trump administration as an ‘illegitimate dictator’ and ‘narco-terrorist’ responsible for fueling drug trafficking networks affecting both the United States and Europe. President Trump described the mission as ‘a brilliant operation’ in remarks to The New York Times, later confirming on Fox & Friends that while some U.S. personnel sustained injuries, there were no fatalities.
However, the victory presents immediate challenges for the White House, including navigating the complex power vacuum in a nation already ravaged by hyperinflation, severe shortages of food and medicine, and massive brain drain despite its considerable oil reserves. The operation also raises strategic questions about how U.S. adversaries including China’s Xi Jinping and Russia’s Vladimir Putin might interpret this demonstration of American military intervention within its sphere of influence.
This action represents another consequential moment in Trump’s second-term foreign policy, following June’s strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The Venezuela operation fulfills commitments outlined in last month’s National Security Strategy to assert U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere, but has generated fresh anxiety among international partners adjusting to Trump’s unilateral approach to foreign interventions.
Retired Navy Rear Adm. Mark Montgomery of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies warned that the post-operation phase in Venezuela presents more complex challenges than previous strikes: ‘Unlike the Iran strikes where Trump did the action and then said ‘fight’s over,’ he will not have that luxury here in Venezuela.’
International reaction has been mixed. While European Commission President António Costa expressed ‘great concern,’ EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas emphasized that ‘principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected.’ France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot directly criticized the operation as infringing ‘the principle of non-use of force that underpins international law.’
Russia condemned the action as ‘armed aggression,’ while China denounced it as a violation of international law and Venezuelan sovereignty. Domestic criticism emerged immediately, with Senator Ruben Gallego calling the operation ‘illegal’ and declaring ‘we went from world cop to world bully.’
The operation culminated months of pressure within the administration led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other Maduro opponents. In South Florida—home to significant Venezuelan opposition communities—the operation was celebrated as a democratic breakthrough, with Representative Carlos Gimenez comparing Maduro’s ouster to the fall of the Berlin Wall.
With Maduro’s capture, the administration now faces critical decisions regarding Venezuela’s political future, including whether to support exiled opposition figure Edmundo González or engage with potential transitional arrangements. President Trump pledged his administration would be ‘very involved’ in ensuring Venezuela’s future leadership, stating ‘We can’t take a chance of letting somebody else run it—just take over where Maduro left off.’