A draft plan outlining the governance structure for Gaza under the leadership of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been leaked, sparking widespread debate. The proposal, known as the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita), envisions a hierarchical system dominated by an international board of billionaires and business leaders, with carefully vetted Palestinian administrators at the lower tiers. The plan has reportedly garnered support from Israel, Egypt, and the United States, with the White House backing the initiative, according to sources cited by Haaretz.
The proposed Gita would be governed by an international board with ‘supreme political and legal authority’ during the transitional period. Among the potential candidates for this board are Sigrid Kaag, the UN’s special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, and three prominent figures with significant financial and executive expertise: Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo Global Management; Naguib Sawiris, an Egyptian billionaire in telecommunications and technology; and Aryeh Lightstone, CEO of the Abraham Accords Peace Institute. Notably, none of the candidates are Palestinian, raising concerns about the lack of local representation.
Critics have highlighted the controversial backgrounds of some board candidates. Lightstone, for instance, has been involved in the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an aid distribution mechanism criticized by Doctors Without Borders as a ‘system of institutionalized starvation and dehumanization.’ Similarly, Sawiris, a billionaire with close ties to Blair, has been involved in various international projects, including rebuilding Afghanistan post-invasion. Rowan, a Wall Street financier, has been a vocal supporter of Israel, describing the conflict in Gaza as a ‘just war.’
The leaked plan has drawn criticism for its top-down approach and the exclusion of Palestinian voices in the governance structure. Sigrid Kaag, the only non-controversial figure on the list, has expressed concerns about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, describing it as a ‘stain on our collective conscience.’ The proposal’s alignment with Israel’s strategic interests has further fueled skepticism about its feasibility and fairness.
As the international community grapples with the complexities of Gaza’s future, Blair’s plan underscores the challenges of balancing geopolitical interests with the need for inclusive and sustainable governance. The leaked draft has ignited a broader conversation about the role of international actors in shaping the region’s future and the importance of ensuring that local voices are heard.