3 reasons China wants green leadership – and 2 reasons it doesn’t

As global delegates convened for the UN’s COP30 climate summit, China positioned itself to assume a revitalized leadership role in international climate governance—a strategic vacuum created by diminished U.S. engagement following the Trump administration. Beijing’s climate diplomacy, however, reveals a complex interplay of ambitions and deliberate limitations.

China presented itself as a clean-technology superpower, reframing climate discussions around technological innovation and trade dynamics. The nation’s renewable energy capacity has tripled over the past decade, reaching 1,876,646 megawatts by 2024, with solar generation growing twentyfold since 2015. With $290 billion invested in renewable energy during 2024—$80 billion more than the combined total of the EU, UK, and US—China demonstrated substantial commitment to low-carbon transition.

Economic priorities significantly influence China’s climate strategy. The export of green technologies—including batteries, solar components, electric vehicles, and wind-power systems approaching $1 trillion since 2018—represents a crucial growth vector. Facing industrial overcapacity and new trade barriers in Western markets, China aggressively pursued emerging markets in Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia and India, using climate forums to oppose trade restrictions and advocate for free movement of clean technologies.

Geopolitical considerations further shape China’s approach. Through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative and the China-Pacific Island Countries Climate Change Cooperation Center established in 2022, Beijing leverages climate cooperation to strengthen strategic partnerships and security alliances, particularly in the Pacific region where it competes with traditional Western powers.

Despite this apparent leadership push, China maintains significant constraints. The nation struggles to meet existing emission reduction pledges, with analyses indicating insufficient commitments and slow progress amid economic challenges including weak industrial output, high youth unemployment, and substantial local government debt. China explicitly rejects historical responsibility for climate change, noting that while its cumulative emissions since 1850 have surpassed EU nations, they remain below US levels.

Beijing declined to commit to the $1.3 trillion annual climate finance goal from developed economies, opposed fossil fuel phase-out roadmaps, and abstained from supporting Brazil’s tropical forest preservation fund. China maintains its developing nation status while selectively advancing climate agendas that align with its economic and geopolitical interests, indicating a leadership model based on technological and trade advantages rather than comprehensive emission reduction commitments.