A recent shooting at Fort Stewart, one of the largest military bases in the United States, has reignited debates over longstanding policies that restrict service members from carrying personal weapons on military installations. The incident, which left five soldiers injured, occurred on Wednesday and was swiftly addressed by soldiers who subdued the shooter before law enforcement arrived. However, the absence of firearms among the responding soldiers has sparked widespread discussion. The shooter, identified as logistics Sgt. Quornelius Radford, used a personal weapon, highlighting the limitations of current regulations. Videos circulating on social media show service members running for safety during the lockdown, raising questions about the effectiveness of existing policies. This incident adds to a growing list of violent episodes at U.S. military bases, some of which have resulted in significant casualties. Experts argue that while the strict gun policies on military bases are designed to protect national security, they may not be sufficient to prevent such incidents. The Department of Defense’s regulations, which have been in place for decades, require military personnel to store their firearms securely and only use them in designated areas. These rules leave little room for local commanders to exercise discretion, even in states like Georgia, which has some of the most lenient gun laws in the country. Robert Capovilla, a military law expert, emphasized that the heightened security measures are necessary due to the sensitive nature of military installations. However, former military prosecutor Eric Carpenter noted that these regulations mirror broader debates on gun control and do not entirely prevent service members from bringing weapons onto bases. The incident underscores the complexities of balancing security with individual rights within the military context.
标签: North America
北美洲
-

US stocks slip following the latest discouraging signal on the economy
U.S. stock indices experienced a downturn on Tuesday, reflecting growing concerns over the health of the U.S. economy. The S&P 500 dropped by 0.5%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 61 points (0.1%), and the Nasdaq composite declined by 0.7%. This movement followed a volatile period where the S&P 500 swung from its worst day since May to its best day in the same month. A weaker-than-expected report on U.S. services sector activity, encompassing industries like transportation and retail, exacerbated worries that President Donald Trump’s tariffs might be negatively impacting the economy. However, optimism surrounding potential Federal Reserve interest rate cuts and stronger-than-anticipated corporate earnings helped mitigate the losses. The S&P 500 remains within 1.4% of its record high. Edgewell Personal Care, the parent company of Schick, Playtex, and Banana Boat, saw its shares plummet by 18.8% after reporting lower-than-expected quarterly profits and revenue. CEO Rod Little attributed the decline to a weak sun care season in North America and tariff-related profit pressures. Across industries, companies have been vocal about the adverse effects of tariffs on their earnings, with trade policy emerging as a dominant theme in the latest Institute for Supply Management survey. Despite these challenges, the artificial intelligence sector continues to thrive. Palantir Technologies surged 7.8% after exceeding profit expectations and raising its full-year revenue forecast. Similarly, Axon Enterprise, known for its Tasers and body cameras, leaped 16.4% due to robust AI-driven growth. On the downside, American Eagle Outfitters fell 9.5%, partially reversing its previous day’s gains, while Yum Brands dropped 5.1% after missing earnings expectations. The S&P 500 closed at 6,299.19, the Dow at 44,111.74, and the Nasdaq at 20,916.55. Market analysts are now closely watching corporate earnings and potential Federal Reserve rate cuts in September, which could provide a boost to both stock prices and the broader economy. Treasury yields also declined, with the 10-year yield dropping to 4.19%, reflecting investor caution. Internationally, stock markets in Europe and Asia mostly rose, while India’s Sensex dipped 0.4% amid U.S.-India trade tensions.
-

US and NATO allies warn of increasing Iranian threats in Europe, North America
In a unified stance, the United States and several NATO allies have issued a stern condemnation of Iran for its increasing involvement in hostile activities across Europe and North America. A joint statement released on Thursday accused Iranian intelligence services of orchestrating assassination attempts, kidnappings, and harassment campaigns targeting dissidents, journalists, Jewish citizens, and former officials. The statement emphasized that these actions constitute a blatant violation of national sovereignty and are carried out in collaboration with international criminal organizations. Signatories to the statement include NATO members such as Albania, Belgium, Britain, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and the United States, with Austria as the sole non-NATO participant. The governments pledged to collaborate in thwarting such plots and demanded that Iran cease its illegal activities immediately. While the statement did not specify particular incidents, it highlighted longstanding concerns over Iranian-sponsored threats. British intelligence has repeatedly warned of Tehran-backed plots, with three alleged Iranian spies currently facing charges in the U.K. for surveilling and planning violence against journalists. German authorities also reported the arrest of a suspect linked to Iranian intelligence in Denmark. Despite these threats, the Trump administration recently withdrew government-funded protection for several former officials, including John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, who faced Iranian threats during the Biden administration.
-

Could Rupert Murdoch bring down Donald Trump?
In a surprising twist, media magnate Rupert Murdoch appears to be positioning himself as a counterforce to former U.S. President Donald Trump, a figure he once heavily supported. This development comes after Trump filed a lawsuit against Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal for publishing an article about a controversial hand-drawn birthday card allegedly sent by Trump to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The card, described as crude and inappropriate, has sparked outrage and legal action, further straining the already complex relationship between the two powerful figures. Murdoch’s media empire, including Fox News, has long been a staunch ally of Trump, promoting his agenda and amplifying his claims, including the debunked narrative of a stolen 2020 election. However, the recent legal battle suggests a potential shift in Murdoch’s strategy, as he navigates the delicate balance between maintaining his audience’s loyalty and distancing himself from Trump’s increasingly divisive persona. The lawsuit underscores the transactional nature of their relationship, with both men leveraging their influence for personal and political gain. As the legal drama unfolds, the broader implications for media, politics, and public perception remain uncertain, with Murdoch’s actions potentially signaling a turning point in the Republican Party’s alignment with Trump.
-

Coca-Cola confirms a cane-sugar version of its trademark cola is coming to the US
Coca-Cola announced on Tuesday that it will launch a cane-sugar version of its iconic cola in the U.S. this fall, aligning with recent remarks by former President Donald Trump. Trump had previously highlighted the company’s shift to real cane sugar in a social media post last week. This move marks a significant change for the brand, which has relied on high fructose corn syrup as its primary sweetener since the 1980s. While Coca-Cola initially remained silent on the matter, CEO James Quincey confirmed the decision during a conference call with investors, emphasizing the company’s commitment to diversifying its product offerings to meet evolving consumer demands. Quincey expressed gratitude for Trump’s enthusiasm for the brand and stated that Coca-Cola is exploring a wide range of sweetening options to cater to varied tastes. The company has already been using cane sugar in other U.S. products, such as its Simply lemonade and Honest Tea, and has sold Mexican Coca-Cola, which contains cane sugar, in the U.S. since 2005. Quincey highlighted the importance of innovation in aligning with consumer preferences, noting that the industry is experimenting with new ideas. This announcement comes as Coca-Cola faces competition from rivals like PepsiCo and Dr Pepper, which have offered cane-sugar versions of their colas since 2009. Despite challenges in certain markets, including India and Southeast Asia, Coca-Cola reported a 14% growth in case volumes for Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, reflecting a rising demand for healthier alternatives. The company also saw improved sales in North America, with Hispanic consumers returning to normal purchasing levels after a temporary decline earlier this year. Coca-Cola’s second-quarter earnings exceeded expectations, driven by a 6% global price increase, with revenue reaching $12.5 billion and net income surging 58% to $3.8 billion. The company now anticipates full-year adjusted earnings to grow by 8%, slightly below its initial forecast.
-

The corporate takeover of American housing
The 2025 US housing market presents a perplexing scenario: home sales are declining, and the number of sellers far exceeds buyers, yet prices continue to soar to unprecedented levels. Over the past decade, home values have surged nationwide, even in once-affordable Sunbelt cities. Policymakers, however, seem unprepared to address this crisis. In a July 2025 interview with the New York Times, 16 US mayors identified housing as a top concern. During her 2024 presidential campaign, former Vice President Kamala Harris proposed tax credits for first-time buyers, while President Donald Trump has renewed calls for interest rate cuts to reduce mortgage rates.
Homeownership remains a cornerstone of the American dream, with rates historically hovering around 65% from 1965 to 2025, according to Trading Economics. However, the peak was in 2004 at 69%, and despite a temporary spike during the Covid-19 pandemic, the rate has been steadily declining. Alarmingly, even among homeowners, equity is shrinking, with many owning less than half of their property’s value due to debt.
Structural issues exacerbate the crisis. Construction costs have skyrocketed, labor is scarce, and tariffs have increased material prices. Zoning laws, tax regimes, and anti-density regulations have stifled urban growth, while sprawling development faces geographic and environmental limits. Mortgage rates remain high, and the national housing shortfall, now estimated at over 4.5 million, continues to worsen.
The crisis has attracted new investors. Corporate actors are increasingly entering residential real estate, drawn by stable returns in a tightening market. Though they still own a minority of US housing, these firms are concentrated in key regions, threatening the post-World War II surge in widespread homeownership.
Large-scale corporate ownership of homes and influence over rent prices is a recent development. Before 2008, institutional investors focused on apartment buildings and urban areas, as single-family homes were seen as too dispersed and costly to manage. The housing crash changed this, with foreclosures making suburban homes available at deep discounts. Since then, major institutional financial actors have invested heavily in US single-family housing, acquiring up to 300,000 houses and renting them out.
Government-backed mortgage giant Fannie Mae began selling foreclosed homes in bulk to investors in 2012, demonstrating that single-family housing could be profitable at scale. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac expanded support for institutional buyers through favorable financing terms and lower rates. Meanwhile, homebuilding collapsed, leading to a supply shortage.
The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated this trend. Remote work drove people from cities to suburbs, and eviction moratoriums pushed small landlords to sell, opening the door for larger buyers. Digital platforms made it easier to browse, purchase, and manage properties remotely.
Blackstone, one of the world’s largest private equity firms, became a pioneer in large-scale housing acquisitions after 2008. In 2012, it helped launch Invitation Homes, now the largest owner of single-family rentals in the US. Other major firms, like Progress Residential and Amherst Holdings, have followed suit, using advanced algorithms and AI to identify and acquire homes efficiently.
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), originally designed to give everyday investors access to real estate profits, are now dominated by major institutional firms like BlackRock and Vanguard. These firms have been criticized for excessive fees, maintenance failures, and improper eviction tactics.
Corporate homebuying continues to climb. Institutional investors bought 15% of US homes for sale in the first quarter of 2021, increasing to nearly 27% by early 2025. In some markets, investors accounted for 44% of all home flips in the third quarter of 2024.
Big Tech has also become essential to the expansion of corporate housing. Tools like YieldStar, a rent pricing software developed by RealPage, use algorithms to recommend optimal prices, influencing rent markets significantly. Short-term rental platforms like Airbnb have reshaped housing, contributing to higher rents in many cities.
Addressing the issue requires public involvement and policy changes. The city of Austin is a rare success story, with median home prices falling due to increased affordable housing construction. However, without effective measures, the concentration of land in private hands will only grow, threatening affordability and public access to housing.
-

Union Pacific, Norfolk Southern discuss merger to create transcontinental railroad, AP source says
Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern are engaged in preliminary discussions to merge, potentially creating the largest railroad network in North America, spanning from the East Coast to the West Coast. These talks, which began in the first quarter of this year, involve two of the country’s six major freight railroads—Union Pacific, the largest, and Norfolk Southern, the smallest. Both companies have declined to comment on the matter. The proposed merger has sparked intense debate within the industry, particularly regarding its likelihood of approval by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). While the STB greenlit the creation of CPKC two years ago through Canadian Pacific’s $31 billion acquisition of Kansas City Southern, this would mark the first major rail merger in over two decades. The bar for such mergers was significantly raised after the problematic Union Pacific-Southern Pacific merger in 1996 and the 1999 split of Conrail, which caused widespread disruptions. Under current regulations, any major rail merger must demonstrate enhanced competition and public benefit. Union Pacific CEO Jim Vena has highlighted potential advantages, including streamlined deliveries and simplified shipping for businesses reliant on rail transport. However, concerns have been raised about reduced shipping options and the industry’s consolidation. Analysts, including Citi Research’s Ariel Rosa, warn that such a merger would face significant regulatory, political, and stakeholder pushback, making it a costly and time-intensive process. Union Pacific, headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska, reported $24.3 billion in revenue last year, while Norfolk Southern, based in Atlanta, generated $12.1 billion. Following the news, Norfolk Southern’s stock surged, reflecting investor optimism.
-

US producer prices unchanged with wholesale inflation remaining under control
In a surprising turn of events, U.S. wholesale inflation showed signs of cooling in June, despite widespread concerns that President Donald Trump’s tariffs would drive up prices for goods before they reached consumers. The Labor Department reported on Wednesday that the producer price index (PPI) remained unchanged from May, following a 0.3% increase the previous month. Year-over-year, wholesale prices rose by 2.3%, marking the smallest annual gain since September. Both figures fell short of economists’ expectations. Excluding volatile food and energy prices, core producer prices also remained flat compared to May and increased by 2.6% from June 2024. This report came a day after the Labor Department revealed that consumer prices had risen by 2.7% year-over-year in June, the largest increase since February, driven by Trump’s sweeping tariffs on goods ranging from groceries to appliances. However, consumer and producer prices do not always move in sync. Bradley Saunders, North America economist at Capital Economics, noted a 0.3% rise in core wholesale goods prices, attributing it to the impact of Trump’s tariffs. Furniture prices surged by 1% from May, while home electronics rose by 0.8%, both categories heavily reliant on imports. Interestingly, steel mill producer prices dropped by 5.5% despite Trump’s 50% tariff on imported steel. Some companies had stockpiled goods before the tariffs took effect, helping to keep prices stable, but Saunders warned that these inventories are dwindling. With new tariffs on Japanese and South Korean imports set to take effect on August 1, the situation remains precarious. Auto retailers’ profit margins also fell by 5.4%, suggesting that car dealers are absorbing the costs of Trump’s 25% tariff on imported vehicles and parts. Economists are closely monitoring wholesale prices as they provide early insights into potential consumer inflation trends. The Federal Reserve, which has been cautious this year, is also watching the inflationary impact of Trump’s trade policies. Trump’s aggressive push for rate cuts has raised concerns about the central bank’s independence.
-

S&P 500 and Nasdaq composite pull back from their all-time highs
Wall Street experienced a modest pullback on Friday, with major U.S. stock indexes closing in the red for the week. The S&P 500 fell 0.3%, retreating from its all-time high set the previous day, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite slipped 0.2%. This decline followed a week of market volatility, driven by escalating trade tensions and anticipation of the upcoming corporate earnings season. President Donald Trump’s announcement of increased tariffs on Canadian imports to 35% further strained relations with the longstanding North American ally. This move is part of the administration’s broader strategy to leverage tariff threats to secure new trade agreements globally. Despite the initial market turmoil caused by Trump’s tariff policies earlier this year, Wall Street has shown relative stability recently, with stocks reaching record highs. However, some analysts remain cautious, noting that the market’s muted response to the latest tariff escalation may not reflect underlying risks. As earnings season gains momentum, companies like Levi Strauss and PriceSmart reported strong results, boosting their shares. Meanwhile, financial and healthcare stocks weighed heavily on the market, with Visa and Gilead Sciences among the notable decliners. In other developments, T-Mobile’s shares dipped slightly after the Justice Department cleared its $4.4 billion acquisition of U.S. Cellular, and Red Cat Holdings surged following Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s orders to accelerate drone production. Bond yields rose, with the 10-year Treasury yield climbing to 4.42%. European and Asian markets also closed lower, while Bitcoin briefly surpassed $118,000, driven by bullish momentum and anticipation of regulatory developments during the U.S. Congress’ Crypto Week.
-

Wimbledon: All the early upsets could stem from a lack of experience on grass courts
LONDON (AP) — Novak Djokovic, despite his remarkable success on Wimbledon’s grass courts with 100 wins and seven of his 24 Grand Slam titles, did not grow up playing on this surface. In fact, his first encounter with grass was in 2005, during a qualifying event at Roehampton, where he secured his debut at the All England Club at 18. ‘That was actually the first year I stepped out on the grass,’ Djokovic recalled. ‘It felt very natural for me to adapt, even though I grew up on clay.’ Djokovic is set to face Alex de Minaur in the quarterfinals on Monday. The unpredictability of grass courts has been a recurring theme at Wimbledon this year, with eight top-10 seeds—four women and four men—exiting in the first round, the highest number since 2001. Elena Rybakina, the 2022 champion, noted, ‘Grass is very unpredictable.’ With Rybakina’s third-round exit and defending champion Barbora Krejcikova’s loss to Emma Navarro, the women’s singles will crown a first-time winner for the ninth consecutive year. The All England Club’s grass courts pose unique challenges, as most players grow up on hard or clay courts. Grass courts, used for only about a month each year, require significant adaptation. ‘It’s a surface that requires a lot of adapting. You have to go by feeling,’ said Lorenzo Musetti, a semifinalist last year. The slippery footing, skidding balls, and inconsistent bounces make grass a demanding surface. Tommy Paul, who grew up playing on green clay, described grass as ‘the most fun surface to play on’ despite its challenges. Many top players, like Naomi Osaka and Iga Swiatek, have struggled on grass, with Osaka citing a past injury as a source of fear. Swiatek, despite a junior Wimbledon title, has found it her least successful Slam as a pro. ‘This year on grass, I had some moments where I just felt comfortable,’ Swiatek said. ‘It was just pretty smooth.’
