标签: North America

北美洲

  • ‘I have no recollection of anything’ – Epstein survivor says she was drugged and raped

    ‘I have no recollection of anything’ – Epstein survivor says she was drugged and raped

    In a profound and harrowing first-person account to BBC Newsnight, a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse has come forward, detailing her traumatic experience and issuing a powerful call for transparency and healing. The woman, identified pseudonymously as Nicky, described a systematic pattern of manipulation and assault that began when she was a 19-year-old model.

    Nicky’s initial encounters with the disgraced financier at his Palm Beach, Florida, mansion followed a now-notorious pattern: she was hired to provide massages. During a subsequent visit, the situation escalated violently. Epstein attempted to remove her clothing and proceeded to masturbate in front of her. To extricate herself, Nicky falsely claimed she was menstruating.

    The most disturbing part of her testimony concerns a drink of water Epstein offered her after that encounter. After consuming it, Nicky blacked out for a minimum of twelve hours. She awoke feeling disoriented and ill, with physical evidence suggesting she had been sexually assaulted while unconscious. Her attempts to retrieve the memory through psychotherapy have been unsuccessful, leaving her with what she describes as a logical, horrifying assumption of the truth.

    Epstein later confirmed her suspicions by referencing her earlier lie about her period, indicating he had intimate knowledge of her body that he could only have gained while she was incapacitated. The psychological aftermath was severe, leading Nicky to experience suicidal ideation, questioning if her children would be better off without her.

    Her decision to speak out now is driven by the courage of other survivors. Her primary demand is directed at the U.S. Department of Justice: release all remaining two million files from its Epstein investigations, but do so ethically, with proper redactions to protect victims’ identities—a failure that previously drew bipartisan criticism following earlier document dumps.

    Nicky expressed fury that full transparency required an act of Congress, the ‘Epstein Transparency Act,’ which she lambasts as a ‘complete waste’ of taxpayer money. She finds the very name of the legislation offensive, arguing it perpetuates the glorification of a ‘monster’ instead of honoring the survivors, suggesting alternatives like the ‘Survivors Act.’

    Ultimately, Nicky articulates the immense difficulty of healing when the specter of her abuser remains a constant feature in media and political discourse, reducing survivors to ‘pawns.’ Her poignant final plea is for the space and justice necessary for true recovery: ‘I would love for us to be able to heal.’

  • Houston airport wait times reach over four hours amid US travel chaos

    Houston airport wait times reach over four hours amid US travel chaos

    A severe airport security crisis is unfolding across the United States as Transportation Security Administration (TSA) staffing shortages reach critical levels during the ongoing partial government shutdown. At George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, Texas, security wait times have exceeded four hours, creating massive passenger queues during the busy spring break travel season.

    The situation has become particularly dire in Houston, where nearly 40% of TSA personnel failed to report for duty—the highest absentee rate nationwide. According to Jim Szczesniak, Director of Aviation for the Houston Airport System, the facility is operating with only one-third to half of its normal TSA checkpoint capacity while handling 100% of typical spring break passenger volume.

    Compounding the problem, Houston is preparing to host multiple major sporting events this weekend, including the Astros’ season opener, a golf tournament, and NCAA Tournament Sweet 16 matches, which are expected to bring additional travelers through the already strained airport.

    In response to the crisis, the TSA plans to deploy at least two dozen officers from its National Deployment Office to Bush Airport on Thursday. This follows Monday’s announcement that hundreds of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents had been sent to 14 airports including New York, Atlanta, and Houston to assist with security screening.

    President Donald Trump praised the ICE agents’ performance on Wednesday, stating they’re doing “an unbelievable job” and suggesting he might deploy the National Guard if necessary. The President blamed Democrats for the worker shortages, claiming they “don’t want to pay” the agents.

    The political stalemate centers around immigration policy disagreements. Democrats have refused to fund the Department of Homeland Security without implementing new restrictions on immigration agents, a position prompted by public outrage over recent shooting deaths of two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis. Republicans have rejected Democratic proposals to fund TSA separately while negotiations over ICE reforms continue.

    The human toll of the shutdown is mounting. TSA’s acting chief Ha Nguyen McNeill testified before Congress that more than 450 TSA workers have resigned since the partial shutdown began. While this represents a small fraction of the approximately 50,000 total TSA agents, the combination of resignations and widespread absences is creating unsustainable security delays.

    McNeill warned of “dire” consequences as the United States prepares to co-host the FIFA World Cup this summer, noting that new TSA hires would not be adequately trained in time for the international event. The agency is closely monitoring staff attrition rates and may need to reassess staffing strategies for World Cup venues.

    Even private sector solutions have been rejected—billionaire Elon Musk’s offer to fund TSA worker pay during the shutdown was declined by the White House on Wednesday, according to CBS News sources.

    With no resolution to the funding standoff in sight, airport officials nationwide fear conditions will continue to deteriorate until Congress reaches an agreement to end the government shutdown.

  • Rocket stocks soar on reports Musk’s SpaceX set to file for share sale

    Rocket stocks soar on reports Musk’s SpaceX set to file for share sale

    The space industry experienced a significant market surge on Wednesday as investors reacted to reports that Elon Musk’s SpaceX is preparing to file for an initial public offering. According to technology news outlet The Information, the groundbreaking space company could seek a historic market valuation of approximately $1.75 trillion, potentially marking the largest stock market debut in financial history.

    The market response was immediate and widespread across the space sector. Rocket manufacturers Firefly Aerospace and Rocket Lab both witnessed their stock prices climb more than 10%, while other space-related companies experienced even more dramatic gains. Intuitive Machines, a prominent space exploration firm, saw its shares rise nearly 15%, while Earth-imaging specialist Planet Labs enjoyed a 10% increase. Satellite manufacturer Sidus Space led the surge with an impressive 19% gain, and AST SpaceMobile shares advanced by 10%.

    SpaceX, founded in 2002 by billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk, has revolutionized space technology with its reusable rocket systems and ambitious Starlink satellite network. The company’s potential public offering could reportedly generate over $75 billion in capital, providing substantial resources for further expansion and technological development. The BBC has reached out to SpaceX for official comment regarding the listing rumors.

    Musk, who currently serves as CEO of multiple innovative companies including Tesla, social media platform X, and neurotechnology firm Neuralink, has previously expressed cautious approaches to taking SpaceX public until the company’s Mars colonization strategy becomes more established. The current market excitement reflects investor confidence in the growing commercial space industry and SpaceX’s dominant position within this emerging sector.

  • Trump’s Iran strategy is to pursue two off-ramps at once

    Trump’s Iran strategy is to pursue two off-ramps at once

    The White House has confirmed that diplomatic channels with Iran remain active despite Tehran’s public dismissal of a comprehensive 15-point peace proposal. This development occurs alongside a significant military escalation, with the Pentagon deploying over 1,000 paratroopers to the region, creating a contradictory strategy that has left allies and administration officials perplexed.

    President Donald Trump’s administration finds itself navigating increasingly complex waters as conflicting approaches emerge simultaneously. Within hours of the Pentagon’s troop mobilization order, U.S. negotiators delivered the peace plan to Iranian authorities—a document demanding Tehran abandon its nuclear program, limit ballistic missile capabilities, and reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

    The administration’s mixed messaging has raised concerns among former officials and international allies about the coherence of Trump’s exit strategy. A former senior administration official, speaking anonymously, revealed growing unease within government circles regarding the apparent lack of a concrete plan for the conflict’s resolution.

    White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt maintained a firm stance, stating: “President Trump does not bluff, and he is prepared to unleash hell. Iran should not miscalculate again.” This rhetoric contrasted sharply with earlier suggestions of diplomatic progress, particularly following Trump’s decision to suspend planned attacks citing “major progress” in negotiations.

    The strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz represents a critical challenge for the administration. With approximately 20% of global oil and gas exports passing through this waterway, continued Iranian attacks on commercial vessels have driven energy prices upward while Trump’s calls for NATO assistance have yielded limited results.

    Domestically, the conflict has exposed fractures within the Republican Party. While House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed confidence that military operations were “wrapping up,” Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) publicly opposed ground troop deployments after receiving classified briefings. This division highlights the tension between anti-interventionist MAGA supporters and party hawks backing military action.

    Iran’s response, delivered through anonymous officials on state television, emphasized Tehran’s perception of equal control over conflict dynamics. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi explicitly denied ongoing negotiations and rejected allowing Western ships through the Strait of Hormuz, stating: “There is no reason to allow the ships of our enemies and their allies to pass.”

    Military experts suggest the troop deployment might focus on securing Kharg Island, Iran’s primary oil export hub, to gain leverage over the strategic waterway. However, former defense officials caution that this escalation appears more reactive than strategic, with one describing it as resembling “a pick-up game of which units are available to me now” rather than executing a carefully considered plan.

  • Justice department to pay Trump ally Flynn in Russia probe lawsuit

    Justice department to pay Trump ally Flynn in Russia probe lawsuit

    The U.S. Department of Justice has finalized a confidential financial settlement with retired Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, resolving his wrongful prosecution lawsuit against the government. This resolution concludes years of legal battles stemming from the FBI’s Russia investigation.

    Flynn initiated the 2023 lawsuit seeking $50 million in damages, alleging the Justice Department deliberately targeted him due to his association with Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The case centered on claims of prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation into Russian election interference.

    In a significant reversal, the Justice Department now acknowledges Flynn’s prosecution as a “historic injustice.” A DOJ spokesperson stated: “Those who instigated the Russia Collusion Hoax and Crossfire Hurricane abused their power to mislead the American people and tarnish the reputations of President Trump and his supporters.”

    The settlement terms remain undisclosed, though court filings confirm both parties agreed to dismiss the case “with prejudice,” preventing future litigation on these grounds. Each side will bear its own legal costs.

    This development follows Flynn’s controversial legal journey. He initially pleaded guilty in 2017 to making false statements to FBI investigators during Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe but later sought to withdraw his plea, alleging government “bad faith, vindictiveness, and breach of the plea agreement.” The case was ultimately dropped in 2020 under Attorney General William Barr, followed by a presidential pardon from Trump.

    The settlement occurs alongside other substantial financial claims against the Justice Department from Trump allies. Most notably, former President Trump himself has filed a $230 million claim seeking compensation for federal investigations into his 2016 campaign and handling of classified documents.

  • Who wants what and why from US-Iran peace talks?

    Who wants what and why from US-Iran peace talks?

    Diplomatic efforts to resolve the escalating Gulf conflict face significant obstacles as the United States and Iran present fundamentally incompatible positions. While Washington claims productive negotiations are underway, Tehran has categorically denied any formal peace talks are occurring, creating a credibility gap that underscores the profound distrust between the nations.

    According to sources, communication between the adversaries is being maintained indirectly through intermediaries such as Pakistan, which maintains positive relations with both governments. However, this backchannel dialogue falls far short of formal negotiations, explaining why Iranian military officials have explicitly rejected characterizations of ongoing peace talks.

    The proposed US 15-point peace plan, as reported by Israel’s Channel 12 network, demands the complete termination of Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, along with an end to its support for proxy militias throughout the region. In exchange, Tehran would receive sanctions relief and limited shared control over the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz.

    Iran has countered with its own set of conditions, including war reparations payments, international recognition of its sovereign authority over the Strait of Hormuz, and security guarantees against future attacks. These demands present significant political challenges for Washington and its Gulf Arab allies.

    The conflict dynamics have shifted considerably since hostilities began on February 28. Initial expectations in Washington and Jerusalem that overwhelming military superiority would quickly collapse the Islamic Republic have proven unfounded. Instead, Iran has strengthened its strategic position by establishing de facto control over the Strait of Hormuz, providing significant leverage over global energy markets.

    Regional Gulf Arab states watch with growing apprehension as the conflict evolves. Having previously maintained an uneasy accommodation with Iran, these nations now face a wounded but resilient regime that has demonstrated capability to strike neighboring territories with drones and missiles.

    The arrival of approximately 5,000 US Marines and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division potentially expands American military options, but ground operations carry significant risks of casualties and deeper entanglement in what critics describe as ‘a war of choice.’

    As the stalemate continues, Iran appears increasingly emboldened, believing time and geography favor its position. The White House’s public assertions that Tehran desperately seeks a deal have ironically made Iranian leadership less inclined to negotiate, creating a diplomatic impasse with global economic implications.

  • Trump accused of showing classified map to passengers on private flight

    Trump accused of showing classified map to passengers on private flight

    A newly disclosed congressional memo has revealed explosive allegations regarding former President Donald Trump’s handling of highly classified materials during his post-presidency period. According to the document provided to Congress, Trump reportedly displayed a classified map to passengers aboard a private aircraft in 2022 and retained another record of such sensitivity that access was restricted to merely six government officials nationwide.

    Representative Jamie Raskin, the leading Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, characterized the Justice Department memo as ‘damning’ evidence of Trump’s misconduct with classified documents. The 2023 document, originally prepared for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation, further contends that Trump deliberately withheld certain records to advance his personal business interests.

    The memo specifically identifies a classified map that prosecutors believe Trump showed to individuals onboard a private flight, with Susan Wiles—currently serving as Trump’s chief of staff—reportedly among the passengers. These allegations formed part of Smith’s federal prosecution regarding Trump’s retention of classified materials after leaving office.

    The White House has vehemently rejected these claims, with spokesperson Abigail Jackson stating that Raskin possesses ‘zero credibility’ and asserting that President Trump ‘did nothing wrong.’ The Justice Department similarly dismissed the memo’s credibility while not disputing the accuracy of Raskin’s quotations from the document.

    The legal context surrounding these allegations has evolved significantly. A federal judge previously dismissed the case against Trump due to concerns about the propriety of Smith’s appointment. Following Trump’s re-election in 2024, Smith dropped his appeal in accordance with longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.

    The Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee has launched its own investigation into Smith’s prosecution of Trump, examining what they characterize as an ‘unprecedented lawfare campaign’ against the former president. The full memo remains confidential, with only excerpts being released to congressional oversight bodies.

  • Woman charged with shooting at Rihanna’s home pleads not guilty to attempted murder

    Woman charged with shooting at Rihanna’s home pleads not guilty to attempted murder

    A 35-year-old Florida woman has entered a not guilty plea regarding multiple felony charges connected to a shooting incident at pop icon Rihanna’s Los Angeles residence. Ivanna Lisette Ortiz, a licensed speech pathologist, stands accused of firing approximately 20 rounds from an AR-style rifle at the musician’s Beverly Crest mansion on March 8th.

    The alleged attack occurred at approximately 1:15 PM local time while occupants were present both inside Rihanna’s home and adjacent properties. Remarkably, no injuries were reported despite the substantial gunfire that left visible damage to the property.

    During Wednesday’s proceedings at Los Angeles County Superior Court, prosecutors revealed disturbing details suggesting premeditation. District Attorney prosecutor Alexander Bott presented evidence indicating Ortiz possessed a wig allegedly intended as a disguise during the purported attack. The prosecution successfully opposed defense attempts to reduce the $1.875 million bail, emphasizing the severity of firing numerous rounds into an occupied dwelling.

    The court imposed additional restrictions prohibiting Ortiz from practicing speech pathology in California while the case proceeds. Law enforcement located Ortiz’s white Tesla approximately eight miles from the crime scene at a Sherman Oaks shopping center, where she was subsequently taken into custody.

    Ortiz now faces a comprehensive list of charges including attempted murder, ten felony counts of assault with a semiatuomatic firearm, and three felony counts of shooting at an inhabited dwelling. If convicted on all counts, she potentially faces life imprisonment. The case continues with a preliminary hearing scheduled for April 8th.

  • Carney says Air Canada’s English-only message after LaGuardia crash ‘lacks compassion’

    Carney says Air Canada’s English-only message after LaGuardia crash ‘lacks compassion’

    Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has publicly condemned Air Canada’s leadership for demonstrating “a lack of judgement and compassion” in its response to Sunday’s fatal collision at New York’s LaGuardia Airport. The criticism centers on CEO Michael Rousseau’s decision to issue condolence messages exclusively in English despite one of the two deceased pilots being a French-speaking Quebecer.

    The tragedy occurred when an Air Canada flight from Montreal collided with a fire truck shortly after landing, claiming the lives of 30-year-old Quebecois pilot Antoine Forest and his colleague Mackenzie Gunther. Dozens of passengers sustained injuries, with six remaining hospitalized as of Tuesday.

    Rousseau’s unilingual video statement on X platform, expressing “deepest sorrow for everyone affected,” ignited immediate backlash across Canada’s political spectrum. Although the video included subtitles in both official languages, the CEO’s spoken English-only delivery drew particular ire given the company’s statutory obligations under Canada’s Official Languages Act.

    Quebec Premier François Legault led calls for Rousseau’s resignation, stating the CEO should step down if unable to communicate in French. Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet characterized the English-only message as a “sad and gross lack of respect” toward the francophone pilot’s family.

    This incident represents the latest chapter in Rousseau’s troubled relationship with French Canada. Appointed in 2021 despite limited French proficiency, the anglophone CEO previously drew criticism for suggesting his busy schedule prevented language learning—a remark that required subsequent public apology.

    Canada’s parliamentary Committee on Official Languages has summoned Rousseau to explain his communication strategy before MPs by May 1. The committee emphasized that the airline’s approach contradicts both legal requirements and public expectations for bilingual communications.

    Meanwhile, U.S. investigators continue examining the circumstances surrounding the runway collision. National Transportation Safety Board Chair Jennifer Homendy confirmed that air traffic controller communications are under scrutiny, with preliminary evidence indicating both the aircraft and emergency vehicle had received clearance to cross the active runway.

    The controversy highlights ongoing tensions regarding French language preservation in Canada, where bilingualism rates have shown concerning declines despite legislative protections for both official languages.

  • Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction trial

    Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction trial

    In a groundbreaking legal decision with far-reaching implications for the tech industry, a Los Angeles jury has delivered a historic verdict against Meta and Google. The case centered on a 20-year-old woman identified as Kaley, who successfully argued that these tech giants intentionally designed addictive social media platforms that caused significant harm to her mental health during her childhood.

    The jury panel, after carefully considering evidence presented during the five-week trial, assigned responsibility percentages to each company. Meta was found to be 70% responsible for the plaintiff’s psychological harm, while Google’s YouTube platform was deemed 30% accountable. This verdict represents the first successful case of its kind and is expected to influence hundreds of similar lawsuits currently progressing through the U.S. court system.

    During the proceedings, internal company documents and research were presented showing that Meta was aware that young children were using its platforms despite official policies prohibiting users under age 13. Meta Chairman and CEO Mark Zuckerberg made his first-ever jury appearance in February, testifying that while he ‘always wished’ for faster progress in identifying underage users, he believed the company had eventually reached the ‘right place over time.’

    While Google was also a defendant in the case, the trial proceedings predominantly focused on Instagram and Meta’s practices. Notably, Snap and TikTok were initially named as defendants but reached confidential settlements with the plaintiff before trial.

    Meta has expressed disagreement with the verdict, stating: ‘We respectfully disagree with the verdict and are evaluating our legal options.’ The company’s legal team had previously argued that while acknowledging Kaley’s personal struggles, her use of Instagram did not cause or meaningfully contribute to those difficulties.

    This landmark decision raises critical questions about corporate responsibility in digital platform design and could potentially reshape how social media companies approach youth safety and addiction prevention measures.