标签： Asia

Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune has launched a scathing diplomatic offensive against the United Arab Emirates, accusing the Gulf nation of systematic interference in Algeria’s electoral processes and regional destabilization efforts. The allegations emerged during a state-media broadcast interview on Saturday where Tebboune conspicuously avoided direct naming of the UAE while clearly referencing their activities.

The president characterized relations with most Gulf states as “more than fraternal,” specifically praising Saudi Arabia and Kuwait’s leadership. However, his tone shifted dramatically when addressing the UAE, which he dismissed as “a state, not to say a mini-state, that is just posturing.”

This diplomatic rupture coincides with Algeria’s formal termination of the 2013 air services agreement between the nations. State media announced the cancellation without explicit justification, noting that proper procedures through diplomatic channels and ICAO notification would follow. The Emirati Civil Aviation Authority responded that flight operations remain unaffected during the mandated notice period.

The current tensions reflect years of growing antagonism. During Algeria’s 2019 Hirak movement that ousted President Bouteflika, protesters frequently targeted the UAE as a reactionary force opposing democratic reforms. Demonstrators carried signs proclaiming “No to the UAE on the land of the martyrs,” referencing Algeria’s liberation struggle against France.

Official Algerian circles have repeatedly accused UAE diplomats of “suspicious moves” and alleged the ambassador was “on a mission to destabilise” the country. President Tebboune further suggested the UAE threatens international arbitration over investments, to which he defiantly responded: “Let them go to arbitration.”

Algerian media reports indicate the crisis may deepen further. Newspaper El-Khabar, known for government proximity, suggested the UAE might be supporting the Movement for the Autonomy of Kabylia (MAK)—a separatist group designated as terrorist organization by Algeria. The publication stated that “the question of whether Algeria will sever its diplomatic relations with Abu Dhabi is being raised with increasing urgency,” describing UAE actions as “hostile” and contrary to “Arab brotherhood.”

Africa Intelligence previously reported that Algeria is systematically reducing diplomatic ties with the UAE, with President Tebboune deciding to minimize Algeria’s diplomatic representation to bare essentials. The El-Khabar report additionally indicated that the UAE ambassador has effectively become persona non grata, with Algerian entities ceasing engagement with the diplomatic mission.

Australian cities witnessed massive demonstrations on Monday as Israeli President Isaac Herzog commenced a four-day official visit, triggering nationwide protests over Israel’s military operations in Gaza. Thousands gathered in Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, chanting pro-Palestinian slogans and demanding accountability for actions in the conflict.

Herzog’s visit, intended to express solidarity with Australia’s Jewish community following December’s Bondi Beach shooting that killed 15 people, instead became a focal point for activists condemning Israel’s warfare in Gaza. Protesters carried signs reading ‘#ArrestHerzog’ and ‘#HerzogNotWelcome,’ directly challenging the Israeli leader’s presence.

The controversy intensified as the Australian government invoked special security measures, designating the visit a ‘major event’ that granted police extraordinary powers to restrict access to areas and order people to leave. The Palestine Action Group contested these measures, arguing they were improperly used to suppress legitimate protest.

Tensions escalated visibly in Sydney where footage circulated showing police detaining protesters and using pepper spray. Particularly controversial videos depicted officers confronting Muslim participants praying near Town Hall, drawing widespread criticism of police conduct on social media platforms.

The Jewish Council of Australia criticized Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s administration, accusing it of using ‘Jewish grief as a political prop’ by inviting a leader implicated in what international bodies have described as potential genocide. Amnesty International Australia echoed concerns, urging the government to honor its international legal obligations to hold perpetrators accountable.

Herzog, who maintains that all Palestinians bear responsibility for Hamas’s October 2023 attack, faces serious international scrutiny. A United Nations commission of inquiry previously found Herzog, along with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, ‘liable to prosecution for incitement to genocide’—a statement cited by the International Court of Justice in its assessment of Gaza conflict allegations.

In a significant diplomatic development, Ali Larijani, Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, announced plans to lead a high-level delegation to Oman on February 10th. The visit comes amid ongoing mediation efforts by the Gulf sultanate between Tehran and Washington regarding nuclear negotiations.

According to an official statement released through Larijani’s Telegram channel on Monday, the Iranian delegation will engage in comprehensive discussions with Omani senior officials covering the latest regional and international developments alongside bilateral cooperation across multiple domains. This diplomatic initiative follows the recent resumption of US-Iran dialogue in Oman last Friday—the first such engagement since the 12-day military confrontation between Iran and Israel in June last year, which saw limited participation from American forces.

The timing of Larijani’s visit underscores Oman’s continuing role as a crucial diplomatic intermediary in one of the world’s most volatile geopolitical relationships. The Gulf state has historically facilitated backchannel communications between Tehran and Western powers, particularly regarding Iran’s nuclear program and regional security concerns.

This diplomatic movement occurs against a backdrop of heightened regional tensions and reflects ongoing efforts to establish frameworks for de-escalation and mutual understanding. The agenda is expected to address not only bilateral cooperation but also broader security architecture in the Middle East, where both nations maintain significant strategic interests.

With Bangladesh’s parliamentary elections scheduled for February 12, the nation’s political landscape has reached a fever pitch as rival parties concluded their final day of campaigning on Monday. The electoral contest marks a historic turning point for the South Asian nation, occurring just eighteen months after the mass uprising of August 2024 that ended Sheikh Hasina’s 15-year autocratic rule.

Tens of thousands of enthusiastic supporters flooded the streets of Dhaka throughout the campaign period, waving party flags and chanting revolutionary slogans that echoed the sentiments of the 2024 pro-democracy movement. The electoral competition has centered around competing interpretations of the uprising’s legacy and divergent visions for the future of this nation of 170 million people.

The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by Tarique Rahman who returned from 17 years of exile in December, has emerged as a frontrunner in the parliamentary race. The 60-year-old leader, widely known as Tarique Zia, assumed control of the party following the December passing of his mother, former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia. At a Sunday rally in Dhaka’s Mirpur neighborhood, Rahman urged supporters to back local BNP candidate Shafiqul Islam Milton, promising representation that would genuinely serve constituents’ interests.

Meanwhile, Jamaat-e-Islami chief Shafiqur Rahman addressed packed crowds in the Dhaka-11 constituency, a significant flashpoint during the 2024 uprising. Leading a coalition of Islamist parties under the symbol of weighing scales, Rahman accused the former ruling party of systematic repression while warning that new forms of abuse had emerged following its ouster. “A section of the oppressed turned into oppressors just a day after August 5,” he asserted, alleging widespread extortion and corruption by returning political figures.

Jamaat-e-Islami, ideologically aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, has formed an alliance with the National Citizen Party (NCP) founded by student leaders who spearheaded the 2024 uprising. NCP leader Nahid Islam accused major political parties of covertly sharing what he described as “businesses of extortion and crime” for decades.

The electoral atmosphere has been charged with revolutionary fervor, with supporters repeatedly chanting “Long live the revolution!” and engaging in call-and-response cries of “Slavery or freedom?” answered by thunderous shouts of “Freedom, freedom!”

Voters expressed diverse motivations for their electoral choices. Mohammed Harun, 65, revealed he hadn’t voted in 17 years but would support the Jamaat-led alliance hoping for a “just, corruption and violence-free country.” First-time voter Abdullah-al-Rahat, a 21-year-old Dhaka University student who participated in the 2024 uprising, expressed preference for a unity government should no party secure a majority.

The Awami League, former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s party, has been banned from participating in the elections by the interim government—a move criticized by various human rights organizations. Hasina, now 78, was sentenced to death in absentia last November for crimes against humanity related to her government’s deadly crackdown on protesters during her final bid to maintain power. She remains in hiding in India.

The election represents not merely a political transition but a profound test of Bangladesh’s democratic institutions and its ability to channel revolutionary energy into sustainable governance structures.