Global Pulse

标签： Asia

亚洲

  • How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing’s ambition

    How China fell for a lobster: What an AI assistant tells us about Beijing’s ambition

    In March 2026, an unconventional artificial intelligence tool called OpenClaw sparked a nationwide digital frenzy across China, where users have affectionately nicknamed the customizable agent a “lobster” and coined the term “raising lobsters” to describe the process of fine-tuning the tool to fit their personal and professional needs. The viral trend has laid bare China’s accelerating push to integrate artificial intelligence across every corner of its economy, while also highlighting the growing tensions between rapid innovation, regulatory oversight, and shifting labor markets.

    For many Chinese users, OpenClaw has been a revelation. The tool was originally developed by Austrian coder Peter Steinberger, and its open-source codebase gives it a unique advantage in China’s market: unlike closed, Western AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Claude that remain inaccessible to most Chinese users, OpenClaw’s code can be freely adapted to run on domestic large language models developed by Chinese tech firms. That accessibility has turned it into a grassroots AI movement that has captured the attention of everyone from casual hobbyists to major technology corporations and government policymakers.

    Wang, a young IT engineer who asked to keep his full name private due to his unregistered side business selling digital goods on TikTok — a platform banned in mainland China — is one of the millions of Chinese users who have dived into “raising lobsters” in recent months. When he first tested a custom OpenClaw build modified for his e-commerce work, he said he was stunned by its capabilities. Manually uploading new product listings to TikTok Shop is an hours-long grind: it requires editing images, writing SEO-friendly titles and product descriptions, adjusting pricing and promotional discounts, registering for marketing campaigns, and coordinating with influencer partners. Normally, Wang can only complete around 12 listings a single day. But his custom “lobster” can push out up to 200 complete listings in just two minutes, he claimed. “It is scary, but also exciting. My lobster is better than I am at this,” Wang told the BBC. “It writes better, and can instantly compare my prices with every competitor – something I would never have time to do.”

    OpenClaw had already earned significant attention in global tech circles even before its viral rise in China: Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang publicly hailed it as “the next ChatGPT”, and Steinberger, its creator, was recently recruited to join leading U.S. AI lab OpenAI. But the grassroots enthusiasm that turned it into a nationwide cultural trend is a distinctly Chinese phenomenon, according to Wendy Chang, an analyst with the Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS).

    The viral traction of OpenClaw in China is no accident. It comes on the heels of years of targeted investment in AI development, backed by top-level political support from China’s central leadership that has encouraged domestic innovation in the sector. The groundwork was laid in early 2025, when Chinese open-source AI platform DeepSeek, built by domestic engineers educated at China’s top universities, surprised global observers with its capability, proving that Chinese developers could compete in the global AI race and demonstrating strong domestic demand for open, adaptable AI tools. This set the stage for OpenClaw’s rapid adoption once it caught the attention of Chinese tech communities.

    Major domestic tech giants such as Tencent and Baidu quickly got in on the trend, releasing their own custom-built versions of OpenClaw for users. In cities ranging from Beijing to Shenzhen, hundreds of people from all age groups — from secondary school students to retired residents — lined up outside the two firms’ headquarters to claim free custom OpenClaw builds. Public figures from across China’s digital ecosystem have also embraced the trend: popular comedian and author Li Dan told his millions of Douyin followers that he was so immersed in his OpenClaw that he even talked to his “lobster” in his sleep, while Cheetah Mobile CEO Fu Sheng regularly documented his own experience “raising lobsters” on social media, cementing the phrase in the country’s online lexicon.

    Users have adapted their “lobsters” for a huge range of use cases: some stock market enthusiasts have claimed their custom OpenClaw builds can analyze market trends to identify optimal entry and exit points for trades, even executing trades automatically despite the high risk of costly errors. Other users highlight the tool’s ability to cut down on repetitive work and streamline multi-tasking for daily personal and professional tasks. Wang summed up the sentiment of many users when he called OpenClaw “the AI era’s answer for ordinary people.”

    China’s national strategy of “AI Plus”, which aims to integrate artificial intelligence across all major industries from manufacturing to services, has created a policy environment that encouraged OpenClaw’s early growth. Multiple local governments rolled out financial incentives to encourage entrepreneurs to integrate OpenClaw into their business operations. The eastern manufacturing hub of Wuxi, for example, offered rewards of up to 5 million yuan ($726,000) for OpenClaw-based applications in manufacturing such as industrial robotics.

    “Everyone in China knows that the government sets the pace, and the government tells you where the opportunities are,” said Rui Ma, founder of the Tech Buzz China newsletter. “It’s practical for most people. That’s probably a better plan, to just follow the government directive than to really try to figure it out on your own.” Since Beijing prioritized AI development, thousands of domestic startups and established tech firms have rushed into the AI sector, supported by a range of policy perks including subsidized office space, low-interest loans, and cash grants for innovation. Today, companies across almost every sector — from automotive manufacturing to healthcare, consumer electronics to logistics — are racing to integrate AI into their products and internal operations. The competition in China’s domestic AI market is already fierce: since 2023, more than 100 domestic large language models have launched in what local media have dubbed the “Hundred Model War”, and only around 10 remain major competitors today.

    Experts note that while Chinese AI platforms still lag behind leading Western models in overall capability, the gap has narrowed steadily in recent years. For Chinese policymakers, promoting the open-source OpenClaw framework is a strategic move to help close that gap further, according to analyst Jenny Xiao.

    But as the initial hype has cooled, growing challenges have emerged that have forced a shift in the narrative. First, many users have been caught off guard by the recurring cost of running custom OpenClaw agents, which require paid “tokens” for every interaction. More critically, national cybersecurity authorities have raised alarms about unregulated use of the tool. Last month, Beijing’s cybersecurity watchdog issued a public warning about major security risks linked to improperly modified and deployed OpenClaw builds, and a growing number of government agencies have since banned staff from installing the tool on work devices. Many institutions that once offered custom OpenClaw installations have now shifted to removing the tool from official systems.

    This back-and-forth is characteristic of China’s top-down policy approach to emerging technology, observers say. Local governments often rush to embrace new tools that align with central leadership’s priorities to compete for approval, then pull back when risks emerge. Ma describes this dynamic as “disorder with control”, and notes that Beijing’s regulatory intervention does not mean policymakers are turning against AI development broadly.

    In fact, policymakers see AI tools like OpenClaw as a potential partial solution to one of China’s most pressing social problems: youth unemployment, which has remained above 16% in recent months. Many government incentive programs tied to OpenClaw specifically target “one-person companies” — small, solo-run startups built with the support of AI tools — offering subsidies of up to 10 million yuan to encourage new business formation. “Who’s the most likely to build a one-person company? Probably young people who face a tough job market,” Xiao explained.

    For many Chinese workers, the rapid spread of AI tools like OpenClaw has already created widespread anxiety about job displacement. A recent commentary in state-run newspaper *People’s Daily* captured the growing national mood: “Some say that in 2026, if you don’t ‘raise lobsters’, you’ve already lost at the starting line.” Jason, an IT programmer whose team now only hires candidates with prior experience working with AI tools, called the shift “genuinely terrifying.” “It’s mostly people leaving, with very few new hires coming in,” he said.

    Wang, the e-commerce entrepreneur who built his own custom “lobster” to streamline his business, acknowledges that the rapid pace of AI change is scary, with widespread fears that many workers could be replaced by AI tools. But he remains optimistic about his own future. He expects his TikTok shop business, scaled up by his “lobster”, to become his full-time occupation, eliminating the need for his regular IT job. And if AI eventually advances enough that “lobsters” can run entire e-commerce shops on their own, squeezing him out of the market? “I’ll use AI to find another business,” he said.

  • Two protests, two elections: How Nepal’s Gen Z succeeded where Bangladesh’s stumbled

    Two protests, two elections: How Nepal’s Gen Z succeeded where Bangladesh’s stumbled

    Across South Asia, a new wave of Gen Z political activism has reshaped national politics in recent years, but two neighboring countries have seen starkly different outcomes for youth movements that both ousted sitting governments through mass public protest. Last month, as Nepal swore in former rapper Balendra Shah as prime minister — with dozens of Gen Z lawmakers filling seats in the newly elected parliament for the four-year-old Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) — Bangladeshi youth activist Umama Fatema watched from afar with a heavy heart.

    Fatema was one of thousands of Gen Z protesters who led 2024 mass demonstrations that brought down Bangladesh’s long-ruling authoritarian Awami League government, matching the grassroots energy that upended Nepal’s political establishment. But nearly two years after Bangladesh’s revolution, the nation’s youth movement has yet to claim meaningful formal political power. In the country’s first post-protest national election held in February, the long-established opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) secured a historic parliamentary majority, while the youth-led National Citizens’ Party (NCP) — which grew directly out of the student protest movement — suffered a dismal defeat, winning only six of the 30 seats it contested.

    This outcome stands in sharp contrast to Nepal’s historic election results, delivered just one month after Bangladesh’s vote. The RSP, a youth-focused upstart party, won a landslide victory, earned dozens of Gen Z seats in parliament, and paved the way for Shah’s ascension to the prime ministership via an electoral alliance. Nepal’s win marks a rare breakthrough for youth political movements across Asia, where dozens of Gen Z-led protest movements have erupted in recent years, but none have managed to convert street protest into formal governing power the way Nepal’s young activists have.

    “Personally, I felt disheartened. When I saw how effectively [the Nepalese youth] were able to organise themselves, I could not help but feel disappointed about the situation in our own country,” Fatema explained. “Bangladesh has not been able to deliver such a change… it is naturally disheartening to realise that we have not been able to organise and rebuild our country in the same way.”

    Political analysts and youth leaders on both sides have dissected the stark divergence in outcomes, pointing to a combination of structural political context, strategic decision-making, and timing that separated the two movements.

    For Nepal, RSP leaders frame their victory as a product of deep resonance with widespread public frustration. “The Gen Z protests tapped into a deep, long-standing frustration with the way things have been run,” explained KP Khanal, an RSP candidate who won a parliamentary seat in Kailali district. “At the same time, the sacrifices and voices of Gen Z stayed with the public — they haven’t been forgotten. Consistency was also a key factor. We kept raising our voices around accountability and justice, over and over, and gradually that message reached far and wide. It stopped being just a reaction to the status quo and started to feel like a genuine, credible movement that people believed in and wanted to be part of.”

    Analysts add that Nepal’s unique political landscape created a unique opening for an upstart youth party. For years, the nation’s electoral system has encouraged coalition governance, and no single party has held a parliamentary majority. Over 17 years, Nepal cycled through 14 separate governments, with a small group of established parties rotating power in a pattern critics called political musical chairs. Widespread public anger over systemic corruption left all major established parties discredited, clearing the way for the RSP’s outsider brand to win over voters.

    “In Nepal’s case, since all three established parties, none dominant, were discredited, the main beneficiary has been the youthful RSP and its leader,” noted Nitasha Kaul, director of the Centre for the Study of Democracy at the University of Westminster.

    Another strategic decision that cemented the RSP’s success was its electoral alliance with Shah, a charismatic former protest leader who lacked a formal party structure of his own. The alliance benefited both sides: the RSP provided Shah with access to its existing national organizational network and campaign resources, while Shah helped the RSP overcome a damaging embezzlement scandal surrounding party leader Rabi Lamichhane, giving voters a unifying, trusted figure to rally around.

    Nepalese political analyst Amish Mulmi explained that in South Asian politics, robust party organization is non-negotiable for electoral success, especially for first-time contenders. That lesson was not lost on 27-year-old youth activist Purushottam Suprabhat Yadav, who turned down an invitation from friends to launch a new independent youth party after Nepal’s Gen Z protests. “Winning an election is not a joke. Organising a movement and emerging victorious in an election are two different things,” Yadav told reporters. “A political party cannot be formed out of nowhere… you require a very big machinery. There were also problems of finance and organisation-building, which was not easily available to us at that time.”

    Yadav instead joined the RSP in December, drawn to the party’s existing national organizational network and slate of new, young candidates. The decision paid off: last week, Yadav was sworn into parliament as an RSP lawmaker via the party’s proportional representation list. Echoing the movement’s core promises, Yadav emphasized that the transition from street protest to parliamentary office has not changed the movement’s core goals. “We are now entering parliament from the streets — our place in society has changed, but not our agenda. Anti-corruption and an end to appointments on the basis of political affiliation and nepotism are our key demands. If we have to fight against our own party regarding this, we will do so.”

    Kaul noted that converting street protest power to electoral power requires long-term, intentional organizing work that many passion-driven youth movements lack. “A movement that is driven primarily by passion, frustration, anger, or the politics of purity may be better at challenging the status quo — but not necessarily at winning elections,” she said. Nepal’s success, she added, stemmed from minimal internal division, ideological flexibility without open hostility, and a lack of dominant established parties capable of co-opting the movement’s momentum — all factors that were missing in Bangladesh’s case.

    In Bangladesh, the long-ruling Awami League had suppressed all opposition for decades before it was ousted, leaving only established opposition parties well positioned to capitalize on anti-government anger after the revolution. “This meant that the second and third parties were seen as ‘victims’,” Kaul explained, noting that the BNP and Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami ended up reaping the benefits of widespread anti-establishment sentiment in the election. These established parties framed themselves as reform-minded, aligned closely with the youth movement, and ultimately were better able to absorb and channel protest energy than the new, under-resourced youth-led NCP, according to Imran Ahmed, a research fellow at the Institute of South Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore.

    The NCP’s fatal strategic misstep was its decision to enter a coalition led by the conservative, controversial Jamaat-e-Islami, which alienated its core base of young progressive supporters, particularly women. “By aligning with a regressive force in Bangladesh, the NCP became more about political power than about the Gen Z cause, squandering their golden chance to appeal to more voters,” said Rishi Gupta, assistant director of the Asia Society Policy Institute in Delhi.

    Timing also worked against Bangladesh’s youth movement. Gupta points out that a year and a half passed between the 2024 protests and the 2026 election, allowing the movement’s grassroots momentum to fade. Nepal, by contrast, held its election just six months after its mass protests, capitalizing on sustained public anger at the old establishment.

    While Bangladesh’s youth failed to win formal power, their movement did succeed in shifting the national conversation around reform. The protests forced a constitutional referendum held alongside February’s election, where a majority of voters backed sweeping changes to the constitution, parliament, and national legal system. The new BNP-led government has also released a 31-point plan for structural reform, but many young activists remain skeptical.

    “In many ways, they have followed the same conventional pattern of programmes that the Awami League used to undertake,” Fatema said, adding that the new government has failed to prioritize expanded economic and job opportunities for Bangladesh’s large youth population. A growing sense of disillusionment has spread among young Bangladeshis, she added, with more and more young people seeking work opportunities abroad and turning away from domestic politics entirely.

    “The tendency among young people to look abroad has grown to an alarming level… even those who once intended to remain in the country are no longer thinking that way,” Fatema said. “With young people no longer seeing their future within this country, how will they find a place for themselves within the political landscape? It has become a major problem.”

    Still, some young Bangladeshi activists hold out hope for the future. The NCP, which now holds a small foothold in parliament, will contest upcoming local city elections independently, without any coalition alliances. Local NCP leader and Gen Z protester Rahat Hossain argues that running alone will help the party rebuild trust with its core base. “I think the people will accept the party more than they did in the national elections,” Hossain said. “If the NCP continues to stand with the people on the streets, fighting alongside them and upholding its promises, then it can achieve better outcomes in the future.”

    For youth activists across both nations, the fight for systemic reform remains ongoing. Nepal’s new Gen Z lawmakers have pledged to hold their own government accountable to the high expectations of a public hungry for change, while Bangladeshi youth warn they will return to the streets if the new government fails to deliver on the promised constitutional reforms. Fatema says even if current activists remain sidelined, the next generation will carry the movement forward. “Those who are 10 years younger than us will eventually organise movements of their own,” she said. “The next phase of protests in Bangladesh will likely be led by Generation Alpha.”

  • Hire house help in 15 minutes in India. But is the system fair?

    Hire house help in 15 minutes in India. But is the system fair?

    On a busy Tuesday afternoon in Noida, a satellite city bordering India’s capital New Delhi, domestic cleaner Seema Kumari steps through the door of a client’s home in a faded purple T-shirt and gets straight to work. In just 55 minutes, she wipes down sticky kitchen counters, scrubs years of grime from the balcony railing, straightens rumpled bedsheets, and mops every last corner of the floor, leaving the space spotless before heading to her next scheduled booking. Like millions of domestic workers across India, Seema now works through Urban Company, one of a new wave of home-service startups that let urban customers book everything from deep cleaning to beauty treatments on demand, often with as little as 15 minutes’ notice.

    For generations, domestic work in India has operated almost entirely through informal word-of-mouth networks, with workers hired off the books and paid exclusively in cash. Today, a growing cohort of digital startups is moving this centuries-old sector online, rolling out on-demand short-task booking services across major Indian cities. These platforms are entering a massive, nearly entirely unregulated market: industry estimates place the total number of domestic workers in India at roughly 30 million, the vast majority of whom are women with limited access to formal, steady employment options. One of the newest entrants, Pronto, launched just last year, has already scaled to 15,000 daily bookings within 10 months of operation, with peak demand concentrated in Delhi and its surrounding suburbs, followed by Mumbai and Bengaluru.

    For decades, domestic work in India has been defined by low wages, job insecurity, and near-total lack of regulation, in large part because it takes place behind closed doors in private residences. Platforms like Urban Company and Pronto frame their entry into the market as a force for good, arguing that they can formalize the sector by offering standardized worker training, transparent fixed pricing, and traceable digital wage payments. For workers like Seema, the shift has brought tangible new economic opportunities — but it has also introduced unprecedented pressures and algorithmic control that did not exist in the old informal system.

    Before joining Urban Company, Seema worked 12-hour shifts at a local garment factory, earning just 10,000 to 14,000 Indian rupees (approximately $108 to $151) per month. She quit the role last year after hearing the platform was hiring new cleaners, drawn by the promise of higher, more consistent earnings. “I now make around 20,000 rupees a month,” she says, explaining that the increased income lets her cover school fees and basic needs for her two children. While her monthly earning potential is listed as 25,000 rupees on the platform, she takes home far less after automatic fines for booking cancellations, low client ratings, and late arrivals. “I have made the full amount only once, when I did not take any leave and worked for at least eight hours every day,” she notes.

    Unlike the flexible informal arrangements of the past, platform-based domestic work is fully governed by algorithmic systems that assign jobs, track worker performance, and automatically impose penalties for rule violations. Even delays entirely outside a worker’s control can result in fines, Seema explains: “We often have to walk from one location to another. Sometimes security guards hold us up at the gate while they verify our entry into the building. That makes us late and then we are penalized — even if it is by five minutes.”

    This experience is not unique. An anonymous household client in Gurgaon shared that her app-based cleaner arrived a few minutes late and was automatically fined 10 rupees by the platform, a penalty the worker showed her directly on the app. The BBC reached out to Urban Company for comment on its penalty policy but received no response; Pronto stated it does not fine workers for late arrivals.

    Client ratings add another constant layer of stress for workers. One cleaner who accidentally broke a curtain rod during a job begged her client not to leave a negative review, explaining that a poor score would drastically reduce her future booking opportunities. Labour rights activists argue that the strict time and performance expectations imposed by platforms are often unworkable and dehumanizing. “It is inhuman to expect that someone can simply be summoned within 15 minutes,” says activist Akriti Bhatia. “These are people, not automated systems.”

    Beyond performance pressure, algorithmic governance also creates unpredictable earnings. Most platforms use either per-task payment models with performance-based incentives or variable fixed pay structures, meaning a worker’s monthly income is entirely shaped by their ratings and algorithmic allocation, rather than a set contracted wage. Pronto founder Anjali Sardana argues that the platform’s model delivers meaningful progress for workers, pointing to direct bank deposits and optional health and accident insurance as key steps toward formalization. But critics remain deeply skeptical. Bhatia notes that while digital payments have brought a small degree of formality to the sector, workers still lack core labor protections including paid leave, pensions, and minimum wage guarantees. With almost no unionization among platform domestic workers, most have little to no bargaining power to push for better conditions. Platforms counter that they offer internal grievance redressal systems and emergency support for workers who face hostile situations with clients, but activists say these measures do little to address the daily struggles of on-demand work.

    The relentless pace of back-to-back bookings has also taken a toll on workers’ basic well-being. In Hyderabad, domestic cleaner Amrutha says she declines offers of water during shifts because she cannot be sure she will have access to a public restroom between bookings, a common issue given that many private households still bar domestic workers from using their in-home bathrooms. While platforms state they operate service hubs with public restrooms for workers between shifts, many workers report not knowing these facilities exist, and instead wait for their next booking in public parks, building stairwells, or bus stops. What was once unstructured downtime to rest, eat, or travel between jobs has shrunk dramatically as demand for on-demand services has grown. “There are days when I don’t even get time to eat. It has started taking a toll on my health,” Seema says.

    This tension between expanded opportunity and increased exploitation is not a new pattern for India’s gig economy. The same trade-off played out when ride-hailing platforms like Uber and food delivery apps like Zomato first entered the Indian market. “We’ve seen this pattern before,” Bhatia explains. “Many venture-funded platforms initially offer higher pay and discounts to attract users and workers. Over time, that balance shifts” toward greater pressure and lower earnings for workers.

    While instant on-demand home services have gained rapid popularity among young, urban, middle-class households, many families remain hesitant to adopt the new model. Sushma, a long-time Delhi resident, says she was uncomfortable when her adult children booked an app-based cleaner after her regular domestic worker missed a day of work. “I do not know the person,” she says. “How do I let them into my house?” She also expressed concern about how the shift would affect her long-standing working relationship with her regular informal helper. Her hesitation reflects broader unease about how digital platforms are reshaping decades-old social and economic ties between households and domestic workers.

    As on-demand domestic services continue to grow across India, they are transforming not just how work is booked and paid for, but how the work is experienced by both workers and clients. For Seema, despite the constant pressure, the physical toll, and the unpredictable earnings, the job remains a lifeline. As she finishes her last booking of the day in Noida, another notification pops up on her phone for a new shift the next morning. “The work is tough and I am looking for other opportunities,” she says. “But for now, it helps me take care of my children, so I’ll keep going.”

  • Trump warns ‘crazy bastards’ in Iran to open ‘fuckin’ strait’ in Truth Social rant

    Trump warns ‘crazy bastards’ in Iran to open ‘fuckin’ strait’ in Truth Social rant

    In a profanity-laced outburst posted to his Truth Social platform dated April 5, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump launched a virulent verbal attack against Iranian leadership, threatening catastrophic consequences if Tehran does not immediately reopen the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz. The Strait, which carries roughly a fifth of the world’s daily oil supply and is a critical chokepoint for global energy trade, has been closed to commercial traffic since the joint U.S.-Israeli military assault on Iran launched in late February, sending shockwaves through global energy markets and straining international economies already grappling with persistent volatility.

    Trump’s inflammatory post targeted Iranian leaders as “crazy bastards,” demanding they open the “fuckin’ Strait” or face what he called “hell,” adding a threat to destroy Iran’s key energy and transportation infrastructure. In a striking and unusual closing to the aggressive message, the president ended the post with the phrase “Praise be to Allah.”

    As of Sunday, April 6, Iranian officials had not issued an immediate public response to Trump’s latest ultimatum. However, speaking to Fox News later that same day, Trump walked back some of the overt belligerence slightly, noting that ongoing negotiations are already underway and claiming he sees a “good chance” a formal agreement to reopen the waterway could be reached as early as Monday. The president reiterated his threat in the interview, stating: “If they don’t make a deal and fast, I’m considering blowing everything up and taking over the oil.”

    Reopening the Strait of Hormuz has been framed as a top policy priority for the Trump administration and the broader international community, which has faced steep economic fallout from the weeks-long closure of the critical trade route. Diplomatic efforts to de-escalate tensions and broker a deal have been led primarily by Oman, which announced Sunday that Omani and Iranian foreign ministry representatives had met to discuss a path toward reopening the strait.

    In a post on the social platform X, Oman’s state news agency confirmed the meeting, which brought together deputy foreign ministry officials and technical specialists from both sides to review potential “options” for restoring navigation through the waterway. This follows an announcement from Tehran earlier last week that Iran was drafting a peacetime maritime protocol with Oman to oversee commercial traffic through the strait, a document Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told Russian state media would go into effect once hostilities between Iran, the U.S. and Israel conclude.

    Diplomatic contacts between the U.S. and Iran have so far been indirect, mediated through Pakistani intermediaries, but Trump has ramped up his aggressive rhetoric in recent days. Just one day before his April 5 Truth Social rant, on Saturday, the president gave Tehran a 48-hour deadline to reach an agreement or face “all Hell.”

    In separate developments last week, an Iranian parliamentary committee voted to implement new shipping tolls for all vessels transiting the strait and implement a total ban on any ships flagged to or owned by the U.S. and Israel from entering the waterway.

  • People across China pay tribute to martyrs during Qingming Festival

    People across China pay tribute to martyrs during Qingming Festival

    Across China, thousands of people gathered at memorial sites, cemeteries, and public monuments on Sunday, April 5 2026, to mark this year’s Qingming Festival with solemn tributes to the country’s revolutionary and national martyrs. The annual traditional observance, also widely known as Tomb-Sweeping Day, has evolved in modern times to include formal collective ceremonies that honor the sacrifices of individuals who gave their lives for China’s national independence, social progress, and public safety.

    One of the most prominent gatherings took place at Nanjing’s Yuhuatai Martyrs Memorial Park in eastern China’s Jiangsu province, where visitors laid wreaths of white chrysanthemums, bowed in silent respect, and reflected on the legacies of the revolutionaries executed at the site during China’s mid-20th century national liberation struggles. Similar events were hosted at memorial sites spanning every region of the country, from small local community cemeteries for fallen service members to large national monuments in major urban centers.

    Many attendees brought young family members to the ceremonies, framing the tribute as an opportunity to pass down national memory and collective historical awareness to younger generations. Participants included local government officials, school groups, military personnel, veterans’ organizations, and ordinary residents from all walks of life, all united in a shared moment of national remembrance. In addition to in-person gatherings, many regions also offered online tribute platforms, allowing people who could not travel to memorial sites to leave virtual flowers and messages of gratitude to the fallen.

    Qingming Festival, a centuries-old Chinese tradition centered on honoring ancestors and deceased loved ones, has carried special national significance in modern China as a time to publicly recognize the sacrifices of martyrs who contributed to the founding and development of the country. This year’s nationwide observance continued that long-standing tradition, reinforcing collective shared memory of the contributions of the fallen across the country.

  • Trump threatens Iran with ‘hell’ amid intensified strikes

    Trump threatens Iran with ‘hell’ amid intensified strikes

    Escalating violence has sent shockwaves across the Middle East over the 2026 Easter weekend, as United States President Donald Trump issued a stark 48-hour ultimatum to Iran, threatening that “all hell will rain down” on the nation if a peace deal is not reached before his 10-day deadline for Iran to fully reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz expires.

    The inflammatory threat came as airstrikes and ground operations intensified across the region over the holiday weekend, leaving critical infrastructure including Iranian hospitals, universities and Gulf state energy facilities with heavy damage. The tit-for-tat violence has raised global alarm over nuclear safety and the risk of a full-scale regional conflict.

    In a post to his Truth Social platform on Sunday, Trump announced that U.S. military forces had completed “one of the most daring search and rescue operations in U.S. history”, retrieving a “highly respected colonel” who was now “safe and sound”. Trump stated that at his direction, dozens of U.S. military aircraft armed with the world’s most advanced lethal weaponry were deployed for the extraction mission. He confirmed the rescued service member sustained injuries but is expected to make a full recovery. The president added that this operation followed an unannounced successful rescue of a second downed pilot the previous day, which was kept secret to avoid compromising the second mission. He reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to “never leave an American warfighter behind” before closing his post with an Easter greeting to the nation.

    Iranian officials have issued a direct contradiction of Trump’s account, however. Iran’s Tasnim News Agency reported Sunday that Iranian armed forces foiled a U.S. attempt to rescue a downed pilot in a coordinated defensive operation south of the central Iranian city of Isfahan. A spokesperson for Iran’s Khatam al-Anbia Central Headquarters confirmed that Iranian military destroyed multiple U.S. aircraft during the incident, which came after U.S. forces attempted to infiltrate central Iran to extract the downed aircrew. The joint defensive operation, which included Iranian aerospace forces, ground units, volunteer Basij militias and local law enforcement, successfully intercepted and neutralized the incoming aircraft, according to the spokesperson.

    The Iranian official further accused Trump of downplaying the failed mission in his social media statement, confirming that two U.S. Black Hawk helicopters and one C-130 military transport aircraft were struck and left burning in southern Isfahan. Separately, Qatar-based Al Jazeera reported that fatal casualties occurred during search operations for a downed U.S. F-15E pilot in Iran’s Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province. Iran’s Fars News Agency clarified the death toll from that incident: five people were killed and eight wounded in an attack on the Koh Siah area of Kohgiluyeh County, while four additional fatalities were recorded in strikes on the Vazg and Kakan areas of Boyer-Ahmad County.

    The violence has also raised urgent global concerns over nuclear safety, after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed Saturday that one person was killed by projectile fragments when U.S. and Israeli strikes hit a site near Iran’s Bushehr nuclear power plant. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) announced it had struck more than 120 targets across central and western Iran over the weekend, targeting infrastructure including ballistic missile stockpiles, drone production facilities and Iranian air defense systems.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the strikes near Bushehr in a post on X, drawing a parallel to international outcry over attacks on Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. “Israel-US have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in GCC capitals, not Tehran,” Araghchi wrote, adding that attacks on Iranian petrochemical facilities also reveal the true goals of the coalition campaign. He accused U.S. media of misrepresenting Iran’s negotiating position, reiterating that Iran’s core demand is a “lasting end to the illegal war that is imposed on us”.

    World health and nuclear officials have joined the growing international outcry over the escalating violence. World Health Organization Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus wrote on X Sunday that he joined the IAEA in renewing alarm over the safety of Iranian nuclear facilities. “The latest incident involving the Bushehr nuclear power plant is a stark reminder: a strike could trigger a nuclear accident, with health impacts that would devastate generations,” Tedros said. “With every passing day of this escalating conflict, the stakes and threats are raised higher and higher. We must de-escalate now. Peace is the best medicine.” Former IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei went further, urging Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states and the United Nations to intervene to stop what he called “madman” Trump from turning the entire region into an inferno.

    In a retaliatory escalation on Sunday, Iran launched drone strikes targeting energy infrastructure across four GCC states: the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Kuwait. No official casualty counts from these attacks have been released as of press time, confirming the cycle of violence continues to accelerate just days before Trump’s deadline for a negotiated resolution.

  • China launches official website for funeral services

    China launches official website for funeral services

    BEIJING – In a move timed to align with one of China’s most important traditional memorial holidays, the Qingming Festival, a new national official online platform for funeral services launched its public operations Sunday. Developed under the direct guidance of China’s Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA), the China Funeral Network was created to address longstanding gaps in accessible, transparent funeral information for bereaved families across the country.

    Unlike scattered, unstandardized local resources that often leave grieving households navigating fragmented service options, the new platform consolidates funeral and interment service resources from every region of China into a single, centralized hub. Its core mission centers on meeting the critical information service needs of families coping with loss, by providing authoritative, up-to-date data for inquiries and consultations covering all aspects of funeral arrangements, burial services, and memorial activities.

    Xu Zesheng, a senior MCA official overseeing the initiative, noted that all of China’s provincial-level administrative regions have contributed to the platform’s development and will participate in its national promotion. This collaborative structure ensures the network can deliver comprehensive coverage that allows families to quickly locate nearby funeral service resources and access clear, unambiguous information about service pricing, eliminating much of the uncertainty and stress that often accompanies end-of-life arrangements.

    According to the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the China Funeral Network is designed for long-term evolution beyond its current core functions. Future updates will expand the platform’s scope to include targeted resources that promote environmentally friendly burial practices and encourage the adoption of modern,文明, low-impact memorial customs across the country, aligning the service with China’s broader public policy goals for sustainable cultural and social development.

  • Oman and Iran hold talks on reopening Strait of Hormuz

    Oman and Iran hold talks on reopening Strait of Hormuz

    As widespread air strikes between the U.S.-Israeli coalition and Iran fuel a sharp escalation of conflict across the Middle East, Omani authorities have confirmed that senior diplomatic discussions with Iran are now focused on potential pathways to reopen the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz. According to Oman’s official state news agency, the talks brought together deputy foreign ministry officials and technical specialists from both nations, who have begun exploring actionable “options” to restore passage through the key waterway.

    The Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most vital chokepoint for global oil and liquefied natural gas shipments, has been effectively closed to most commercial traffic since large-scale U.S.-Israeli air assaults on Iran began in February. Oman shares a direct border with the strait, placing the small sultanate on the frontline of the regional crisis and giving it unique stakes in de-escalation and the reopening of the key waterway.

    The announcement of these diplomatic efforts comes as air operations continue to intensify across the region, with mounting civilian and military casualties reported on multiple sides. In Iran’s southwestern Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad province, recent U.S. strikes have left at least nine people dead and eight others injured. Israeli military officials confirmed that over the past 24 hours alone, their forces have targeted more than 120 Iranian air defense and missile systems across the country.

    A targeted strike on a major petrochemical facility in southwestern Iran killed five people and injured approximately 170 others, Iranian state media reported. Five members of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) were also confirmed killed in separate attacks on the Moghan Plain, with Iran’s official IRNA news agency referring to the slain service members as “martyrs” in an official statement.

    Escalating cross-border attacks have not been limited to Iranian territory, with impacts spreading across the Gulf and into Israel itself. Drone strikes targeting infrastructure in Kuwait caused damage to vital power and water treatment plants. In Bahrain, authorities confirmed that a fire at a facility operated by state-owned oil firm Bapco has been fully extinguished following an Iranian strike.

    In the United Arab Emirates, falling debris from an intercepted projectile sparked fires at Abu Dhabi’s major Borouge petrochemical complex, forcing operators to temporarily suspend all production at the site. The facility is one of the largest petrochemical manufacturing hubs in the Gulf.

    On the Israeli side, an Iranian rocket hit an industrial facility in southern Israel’s Neot Hovav zone near Beersheba, triggering widespread concerns over a potential hazardous chemical leak. Israeli media reported this marks the third strike on the same industrial site since the current conflict erupted. Israeli home front command issued immediate public warnings after detecting missile launches from Iran targeting both Beersheba and the key nuclear site at Dimona. Separately, rocket fire from Lebanon triggered air raid sirens across the Upper Galilee region, extending the theater of conflict to Israel’s northern border.

  • People enjoy Qingming Festival holiday across China

    People enjoy Qingming Festival holiday across China

    The digital platform operated by China Daily Information Co (CDIC) holds full intellectual property rights for all material published across its channels, a copyright protection framework that has been in place since 1994. This protection extends to every form of content hosted on the site, including written articles, photographic imagery, multimedia files and all other types of digital information.

    Under CDIC’s copyright terms, no party is permitted to republish or redistribute any content from the platform for any purpose without first obtaining explicit, written authorization from the organization. In addition to its copyright policies, the platform also includes a technical recommendation for end users: visitors are advised to use a browser set to a display resolution of 1024*768 or higher to ensure the best possible browsing experience.

    Alongside core operational documentation, the platform lists its official online multimedia publishing license number 0108263 and official registration number 130349. It also provides a clear navigation structure for site visitors looking to learn more about the organization, advertise on the platform, get in touch with the editorial and operations teams, explore open employment opportunities, or check open positions for expatriate workers, alongside links to follow the outlet across its social media channels.

  • US rescues downed fighter pilot from Iran in ‘daring’ operation

    US rescues downed fighter pilot from Iran in ‘daring’ operation

    A high-stakes, multi-day diplomatic and military drama has unfolded across the Middle East this week, after a US F-15E fighter jet was shot down over Iran’s oil-rich Khuzestan Province, triggering a daring US rescue operation and deepening the standoff between Washington and Tehran amid stalled ceasefire negotiations.

    The crash of the F-15E left two crew members stranded in Iranian territory, prompting the Pentagon to launch a large-scale recovery mission involving dozens of US aircraft fitted with the most advanced weaponry in the US arsenal, former President Donald Trump confirmed. In a public statement, Trump announced the successful extraction of both airmen, writing, “WE GOT HIM! … SAFE and SOUND!” He added that the second crew member, a serving colonel, had sustained non-life-threatening injuries and was expected to make a full recovery. Trump emphasized that no US personnel were killed or wounded in the operation, crediting what he called “overwhelming Air Dominance” for the mission’s success.

    However, Iranian state media has offered a conflicting account of the operation. Iranian outlets report that five civilians and military personnel were killed in air strikes carried out by US forces during the rescue. The IRGC, Iran’s elite military force, also claimed it destroyed a US surveillance aircraft that was tracking the downed crew near the southern city of Isfahan, though no additional details about the incident have been released to the public. The New York Times also confirmed that two US transport planes suffered mechanical failures mid-mission and were deliberately destroyed by US forces to prevent sensitive military technology from falling into Iranian hands.

    Khuzestan Province, the site of the jet crash, is a critical economic backbone for Iran, housing the country’s largest oil, gas and steel production facilities. The region has faced intense bombardment over the past week, forcing production shutdowns at key industrial sites and stoking growing fears of long-term economic damage across Iran’s already strained economy.

    Beyond the immediate military operation, the standoff between the US and Iran has deadlocked efforts to broker a ceasefire after more than a month of joint US-Israeli military operations on Iranian territory. On Friday, Iran’s Fars News Agency reported that Iranian officials had rejected a US proposal for a 48-hour bilateral ceasefire, which was submitted via an unnamed third country on Wednesday. It remains unclear whether Israel would have been party to the proposed truce.

    This rejection aligns with earlier reports of stalled mediation efforts. The Wall Street Journal confirmed Friday that Pakistani-mediated ceasefire talks have collapsed after Tehran refused to hold direct talks with US officials in Islamabad, citing what Iranian leaders call unacceptable American demands. Iran’s core conditions for any ceasefire agreement include a full US military withdrawal from all bases across the Middle East, and substantial compensation for the destruction of civilian infrastructure including schools and hospitals across the country, which have been damaged in weeks of bombardment.

    Multiple regional powers have stepped forward to explore mediation opportunities, leveraging their established diplomatic ties with the Trump administration. Turkey, Egypt and Qatar have all been approached to facilitate talks, but Qatar has so far resisted international pressure to take on the mediator role, according to WSJ sources. This deadlock comes after an earlier public dispute between Tehran and Washington, when Trump claimed Iran had requested a ceasefire, a claim Iranian officials immediately denied.

    A new US intelligence assessment, first reported by CNN Thursday, suggests Iran has prepared for a prolonged conflict. The report found that after more than a month of joint US-Israeli military strikes, Iran still retains roughly half of its pre-war missile launchers and half of its stockpile of kamikaze drones. This assessment contradicts repeated public claims from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister that Iran’s military capabilities have been nearly completely obliterated, a narrative both leaders have repeated since the opening days of the conflict and as recently as this week.