标签： Africa

Benin’s government has officially confirmed the presence of approximately 200 West African soldiers within its borders following Sunday’s thwarted coup attempt. Foreign Minister Olushegun Adjadi Bakari disclosed that these regional forces, primarily from Nigeria and Ivory Coast, remain engaged in “sweep and clean-up operations” to stabilize the nation.

The failed takeover unfolded when mutineers seized a military base and state television headquarters before Nigerian fighter jets intervened decisively. This military support, coordinated through the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), enabled Beninese forces to repel the insurgents with surgical precision to minimize civilian casualties.

Minister Bakari, speaking alongside Nigerian counterpart Yusuf Maitama Tuggar in Abuja, emphasized that the coup had “already failed” before international assistance was formally requested. The collaborative response demonstrated unprecedented diplomatic and military coordination between neighboring nations.

Security operations continue as the alleged coup leader remains at large, reportedly seeking refuge in neighboring Togo. The rebels had justified their actions by criticizing President Patrice Talon’s management of security challenges in northern Benin, where jihadist insurgencies from Niger and Burkina Faso have increasingly threatened stability.

ECOWAS, facing regional pressure after multiple successful coups in West Africa, has signaled strengthened commitment to protecting democratic governance. The bloc deployed troops from Nigeria, Ghana, Sierra Leone, and Ivory Coast to secure critical infrastructure and prevent violence resurgence.

Discussions regarding the duration of regional forces’ presence remain ongoing, with Bakari noting any decisions will prioritize coordination with Beninese defense forces who demonstrated considerable bravery during the crisis. The potential continued involvement of French special forces, who reportedly assisted loyalist troops, remains unconfirmed.

President Talon, a Western ally completing his second term, is scheduled to leave office next year with elections anticipated in April.

The United States has issued a stern warning to South Sudan’s government, indicating potential significant reductions in foreign assistance due to alleged obstruction of humanitarian operations. In an official statement released Thursday by the State Department’s Bureau for African Affairs, American officials accused Juba of imposing prohibitive fees on aid organizations and creating operational barriers that violate international obligations.

Washington revealed it has channeled over $9.5 billion in assistance to South Sudan since the nation gained independence in 2011. This substantial support contrasts sharply with the approximately $25 billion in oil revenues collected by the South Sudanese government, which has reportedly failed to translate into meaningful public service development.

The humanitarian situation remains critical, with United Nations data indicating more than 70% of South Sudan’s 11 million citizens depend on external aid for basic survival needs including food and healthcare. The U.S. statement attributed this crisis directly to systemic governance failures, misappropriation of public funds, security instability fostered by national leadership, and what it termed ‘predatory rent-seeking’ behavior targeting humanitarian resources.

This diplomatic confrontation marks the latest strain in bilateral relations between the two nations. Earlier this year, the U.S. suspended visa issuances to South Sudanese citizens following a deportation-related diplomatic dispute. The South Sudanese government had not issued an immediate response to the latest allegations at the time of reporting.

A Kenyan high court has issued an interim injunction suspending the implementation of a major $2.5 billion health assistance agreement between Kenya and the United States, citing serious data privacy concerns. The ruling comes in response to a legal challenge filed by consumer rights advocates who argue the pact could enable unauthorized transfer of sensitive medical information.

The court’s decision specifically prohibits Kenyan authorities from taking any action to implement the agreement insofar as it facilitates “the transfer, sharing or dissemination of medical, epidemiological or sensitive personal health data.” This suspension will remain in effect until the case receives full judicial review, scheduled for February 12.

The health agreement, hailed as “landmark” by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio during last week’s signing ceremony, represents a significant shift in American foreign aid strategy. The Trump administration has been pursuing direct government-to-government health partnerships across Africa, moving away from traditional aid agency channels. Under this new approach, recipient countries must increase their own health spending commitments. In the Kenya arrangement, the US pledged $1.7 billion while Kenya committed $850 million with plans to gradually assume greater financial responsibility.

Despite government assurances, many Kenyans have expressed apprehension that the deal could grant US authorities access to highly personal medical records, including HIV status, tuberculosis treatment history, and vaccination data. The Consumer Federation of Kenya (Cofek), one of the petitioners, warned that external control over pharmaceuticals for emerging diseases and digital health infrastructure—including cloud storage of raw data—could compromise Kenya’s strategic control of its health systems.

President William Ruto attempted to reassure citizens, stating that the attorney-general had meticulously reviewed the agreement to ensure Kenyan data protection laws would prevail. The US government has not publicly addressed the data privacy concerns raised by the court case. Similar health agreements have been signed with Rwanda, Lesotho, Liberia, and Uganda as part of the US global health strategy overhaul.

Ghana has executed a decisive diplomatic response by deporting three Israeli citizens from Kotoka International Airport in Accra, following alleged mistreatment of Ghanaian nationals at Israel’s Ben Gurion International Airport. The move appears to be a direct reciprocal action in a growing bilateral dispute.

The tension escalated after seven Ghanaian citizens, including four official delegates attending a cybersecurity conference in Tel Aviv, were reportedly detained without explanation by Israeli authorities. According to Ghanaian officials, four members of the delegation were released after five hours of detention, while three other Ghanaian travelers faced deportation.

Ghana’s Foreign Ministry strongly condemned what it described as “humiliating treatment” of its citizens, summoning a senior Israeli diplomat in Accra to address the incident. Both nations have subsequently agreed to pursue amicable resolution measures despite the current strains.

In an official statement, the Ghanaian government expressed concern that Israeli authorities were “unfairly targeting Ghanaian travellers” and emphasized expectations that Ghanaian citizens “be treated with dignity and respect in much the same way as other governments expect Ghana to treat their nationals.”

The diplomatic friction may be connected to Ghana’s recent foreign policy positions regarding the Israel-Palestinian conflict. In September, Ghana condemned Israeli airstrikes near Qatar as “clear violation of international law,” and previously urged Israel to facilitate increased humanitarian aid to Gaza. President John Mahama further demonstrated solidarity by donating 40 tonnes of Ghanaian chocolate and cocoa products to Palestinians.

Analysts suggest these actions may have contributed to current tensions, particularly if perceived by Israel as demonstrating bias. However, Ghana maintains that its embassy in Tel Aviv remains “responsive and compliant with international law,” countering Israeli claims of non-cooperation regarding deportation procedures.

Despite the current dispute, both nations acknowledge decades of generally friendly relations, making the recent incidents particularly notable within their diplomatic history.