分类: World

  • COMMENTARY: The world has gone silent on the horrors in Gaza — that is the tragedy

    COMMENTARY: The world has gone silent on the horrors in Gaza — that is the tragedy

    The world has gone silent on the horrors in Gaza — that is the tragedy

    By Sir Ronald Sanders

    I was sitting in my dentist’s chair, one of the few events in which, while my mouth was open, I could not speak.

    Even as she worked methodically, my dentist spoke close enough to my ear that her words were unmistakable. “The tragedy of Gaza,” she said, is that the world is in a state of “collapse of compassion.” Indeed, psychology and behavioural economics researchers have documented this. Simply put, suffering in others, witnessed frequently, produces a kind of immunity in the mind.

    This can be the only explanation for why people around the world are not expressing outrage vociferously at the brutal and inhumane suffering and indiscriminate deaths of people, including children, from hunger and malnutrition in the prison that the Israeli government and its military forces have created in Gaza.

    Since 17–18 March, Israeli air, land, and sea strikes—followed by expanded ground operations—have killed and wounded tens of thousands of civilians, flattened hospitals, schools and homes, and forced more than 1.9 million people (about 90 per cent of Gaza’s population) from their neighbourhoods, often several times over. Displacement orders now blanket roughly 282 km²—over four-fifths of the territory—leaving families to shelter in half-destroyed buildings or open fields with little protection.

    Humanitarian aid has all but vanished. After nearly 80 days of a siege that barred food, medicine and fuel, only a small trickle of UN and NGO trucks has been allowed in by the Israeli government and its military forces—and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) has not delivered a single shipment since 2 March.

    Of 323 planned aid convoys in June, 154 were denied, 30 impeded, and only 97 fully facilitated. As people converged on militarised distribution points in Rafah and Deir al-Balah, they faced deadly risks: by 25 June, at least 549 civilians had been killed and more than 4,000 injured simply trying to reach food. The desperation that led to this risk, even in the face of missiles and bullets, and the resulting wanton deaths, challenge humane understanding.

    In clinics overwhelmed by trauma, malnutrition has reached record highs. Between January and May 2025, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) recorded an average of 112 children admitted each day for severe malnutrition. Meanwhile, a four-month fuel ban threatens to shut down 40 per cent of Gaza’s drinking-water facilities that are still operating; without generators, these taps will run dry within weeks. Nearly half of essential medicines—heart drugs to antibiotics—are already out of stock, and another fifth will vanish within two months.

    On the ground, every day is a struggle to survive. Women and girls bear an added burden. Observers from the UN Human Rights Office describe “scenes of chaos” at the few remaining food sites, where long queues leave the elderly, the disabled and children exposed to harassment and abuse. The United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) reports that lack of food and cooking fuel has become a tool of coercion in some households. At the same time, the daily chore of fetching water or firewood exposes women to violence and exploitation.

    At the international political level, inertia and inaction rule the day, as governments jockey over their national and their allies’ national interests. The UN Security Council sees more concern and more calls for action by its non-permanent members than from the five veto powers, each of which can block united action.

    Finally, on 30 July 2025, foreign ministers gathered at UN Headquarters “with Gaza smouldering,” and Secretary-General António Guterres warned the situation was “at a breaking point” as they pledged to revive the two-State solution; that is, a recognised State of Palestine and a recognised State of Israel, both within secure borders.

    However, beyond conditional recognition pledges—from Canada, the UK, France, and other EU states that tie Palestinian statehood to a ceasefire, hostage releases and elections—there has been no sustained global pressure to open corridors, rebuild infrastructure or protect civilians. Media coverage has dwindled, diplomatic visits have waned, and headlines have shifted elsewhere.

    If the two-state vision is to be meaningful, it must be backed by deeds, not just declarations. The international community must insist on immediate, unhindered humanitarian corridors, establish a transparent reconstruction trust to fund homes, schools, and hospitals, deploy a stabilisation force to protect civilians and aid workers, and empower a reformed Palestinian Authority to restore basic services and security.

    Neither Israel nor Hamas, which continues to hold hostages, can have matters their way, and the rest of the world should collectively tell them so, fearlessly and forcefully. CARICOM Governments, collectively and to their credit, have done so.

    Silence in the face of suffering is a form of violence. The facts on the ground—documented by UNRWA, OCHA, UNICEF and OHCHR—are too stark to ignore. People are now scouring the dirt for food.

    It is a tragedy that the people in Gaza are being killed and are also dying from starvation, malnutrition and lack of medicines. But the greater and real human tragedy is that the world is in a state of “collapse of compassion”, quietly looking away. It is time for the world to speak up, or Gaza will weigh heavily and permanently on the conscience of mankind.

    (The author is the Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda to the United States and the OAS, and Dean of the OAS Ambassadors accredited to the OAS. Responses and previous commentaries: www.sirronaldsanders.com)

  • VIDEO: Roosevelt Skerrit wants hundreds of Palestinian Refugees to re-settle in Dominica

    VIDEO: Roosevelt Skerrit wants hundreds of Palestinian Refugees to re-settle in Dominica

    Dominica’s Prime Minister Roosevelt Skerrit has proposed the possible resettlement of several hundred Palestinian refugees in the country, contingent on support from international partners.

    Speaking in Parliament this week, Skerrit revealed that the government intends to engage the governments of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as well as the United States, to explore the feasibility of the initiative.

    “We’ll be working to engage the government of Qatar and the government of Saudi Arabia and the government of UAE with a view to quite possibly allowing the resettlement of a couple hundred Palestinians into Dominica,” he said.

    Skerrit said the initiative would depend on financial backing from these countries, particularly for infrastructure support. Discussions with the United States are also expected to form part of the effort.

    Highlighting the potential benefits of the move, the Prime Minister noted that Palestinian professionals could help address skills shortages in Dominica.

    “You have very talented people in this country—top-class doctors, top-class engineers—who we believe can assist us in our efforts towards growing the economy and filling the gaps where we have some skills deficiencies,” he said.

    No timeline was provided for when discussions would begin or how many refugees could ultimately be resettled.

    The proposal comes amid growing international concern for the humanitarian situation in Gaza and ongoing efforts by several nations to provide support to displaced Palestinians.

  • Nigerians among top 5 applicants buying Caribbean island properties for citizenship- Report

    Nigerians among top 5 applicants buying Caribbean island properties for citizenship- Report

    Henley & Partners (H&P), a migration consultancy has revealed that Nigerian nationals rank fifth among the top applicants buying citizenship through property investment(Citizenship by investment) in the Caribbean islands.

    The minimum cost of properties in the Caribbean islands of Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St Kitts and Nevis, and St Lucia starts at $200,000.

    In return, successful applicants will obtain a passport that grants visa-free access to up to 150 countries, including the United Kingdom (UK) and the Schengen Area. Crucially, all five CBI schemes allows applicants to retain their existing nationality.

    Reports indicates the revenues generated from this scheme now contributes between 10 percent and 30 percent of GDP in these island nations.

    American citizens make up the majority of recent applicants, followed by Ukrainian, Turkish, Nigerian, and Chinese nationals. Overall applications have risen by 12 percent since late 2024, according to H&P.

    Interest in Caribbean Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programmes surged, particularly among Americans, with estate agents reporting that political and social tensions in the United States are fuelling demand.

    Aside from buying properties, other routes to obtaining Caribbean citizenships through investment typically include a one-off donation to a national development fund or similar.

    The cost of the properties ranges from $200,000 in Dominica for a single applicant, to $250,000 for a main applicant and up to three qualifying dependents in Dominica and St Kitts. In Antigua, investors also have the option of donating $260,000 to the University of the West Indies.

    The lifestyle attraction of the region is now complemented by its tax-friendly regimes. As there are no capital gains, inheritance, or in some cases income tax, wealthy buyers find Caribbean nations an attractive prospect.

    As reported by the BBC, in Antigua, estate agents are struggling to meet demand. “Up to 70 percent of buyers are seeking citizenship”, according to Nadia Dyson of Luxury Locations.

    Interest has intensified over the past year, with Dyson adding, “Previously it was mainly lifestyle-driven. Now buyers say, ‘I want a house with citizenship’…. we’ve never seen sales like this before.”

    Regardless of the popularity of the CBI scheme, it has attracted both interest and criticism since their inception, particularly Antigua’s programme which began in 2012.

    Initially, concerns were raised over the ethical implications of offering citizenship in exchange for financial investment, with some residents fearing it compromised national identity. Leaders from non-CBI countries also criticised the practice, suggesting citizenship should not be treated as a commodity.

    International organisations, including the European Union (EU), have expressed concerns about potential misuse of these schemes, citing risks related to security and border control. Talks between the EU and Caribbean authorities remain ongoing as assessments continue.

    In response to mounting pressure, participating nations have increased transparency and tightened security measures.

    Dominica and St Lucia have defended their programmes, emphasising high standards of integrity and oversight. The five island nations have collectively pledged to adopt stricter vetting practices, including interviews and enhanced due diligence.

  • World Marks International Mangrove Conservation Day

    World Marks International Mangrove Conservation Day

    Today is International Day for the Conservation of the Mangrove Ecosystem, spotlighting the vital role mangroves play in protecting coastlines, storing carbon, and supporting marine biodiversity.

    Often dubbed nature’s coastal guardians, mangroves provide shelter and food for fish and wildlife, while their roots help prevent erosion and buffer against storms.

    With threats from development, pollution, and climate change, experts stress the urgent need to protect these ecosystems. Environmental groups worldwide are calling for stronger conservation efforts to ensure mangroves are preserved for future generations.

  • Only two Caricom countries allowing Haitians to enter without visas

    Only two Caricom countries allowing Haitians to enter without visas

    (CMC) – Grenada and Montserrat are the only Caribbean Community (Caricom) country that do not require Haitian nationals to obtain a visa to visit the country.

    The British consulting firm, Henley & Partners, has published its passport rankings for 2025 for 227 destinations based on data from the International Air Transport Association (IATA), indicating that the Haitian passport allows access to only 15 countries in the world without any visa.

    No other Caribbean country is included in the 15 countries named, with the UK-based firm saying that the figure is five less than what obtained in 2024, while Haitian passport holders can travel to various countries around the world, each with distinct visa requirements.

    It said that there are a total of 43 visa-free travel destinations –15 visa-free destinations and 28 visa-on-arrival destinations – and that all other destinations require a prior visa.

    “The list of visa-free destinations for Haitian passport holders may change from time-to-time depending on visa agreements between countries. It is advisable to check any additional requirements or temporary restrictions in your destination country based on your nationality before traveling,” Henley & Partners said.

    Henley & Partners said that the top three best passports in the Caribbean are that of Barbados with access to 163 countries and 20th in the world, the Bahamas with access to 159 countries and ranked 21st in the world and St Vincent and the Grenadines with access to 156 countries and with a ranking of 24th in the world.

  • Antigua and Barbuda welcomes ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change

    Antigua and Barbuda welcomes ICJ Advisory Opinion on Climate Change

    Antigua and Barbuda has welcomed the highly anticipated opinion that was delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the obligations of States in relation to climate change.

    The Opinion, which was delivered publicly on 23rd July 2025, at the Peace Palace in The Hague, Netherlands, marks a major development in international legal responses to the climate crisis.

    The Court, in its bold and declarative response, clarified the obligations of all states on the burning issue of climate change.

    For example, the 1.5 degree Celsius temperature goal, which the Science community agrees must be achieved to prevent irreversible climatic impacts, has been reinforced by the court as a binding obligation.

    The opinion also clarified the obligations of states on Nationally Determined Contributions, otherwise known as NDCS, which is a requirement under the Paris Agreement for all countries to spell out exactly how they will reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases. The court declared that NDCs are not merely discretionary, rather they are a binding obligation that must increase in climate ambition on each cycle.

    It further offered that rising sea levels will not affect established baselines, nor the continued presumption of the State in international law.

    Antigua & Barbuda is particularly proud of the leading role that SIDS have played in this Vanuatu-led initiative and other advisory opinions, such as the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) Advisory Opinion led by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (COSIS), which was co-chaired by Antigua and Barbuda and Tuvalu.

    Antigua and Barbuda Prime Minister the Hon. Gaston Browne called the ruling an historic and landmark moment in the unrelenting struggle for climate justice for Small Island Developing States.

    “This opinion is a landmark ruling that will be studied for decades to come. It simultaneously depicts the struggles that SIDS have been facing as a result of the climate crisis for decades; gives voice to the current tensions experienced and balance with which vulnerable communities and peoples like ours have to navigate the complicated international legal spaces,” Prime Minister Browne stated.

    “Finally, it amplifies our call, which we have been making for years, that the current climate ambition and action is nowhere near enough and without a significant change the whole world will be affected,” he further stressed.

    Antigua and Barbuda looks forward to collaborating with those on the right side of history, to make sure the decisions captured in the opinion are fully operationalised into the future and incorporated into the overarching goals of SIDS.

    The full text of the ICJ Advisory Opinion is available at https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/187/187-20250723-adv-01-00-en.pdf, with additional materials and summaries expected to follow.

  • COMMENTARY: Don’t pour the champagne just yet to celebrate the ICJ Opinion on environmental harm

    COMMENTARY: Don’t pour the champagne just yet to celebrate the ICJ Opinion on environmental harm

    On 23 July 2025, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered an advisory opinion at the request of the UN General Assembly – driven by small island States such as Antigua and Barbuda, Vanuatu, and the Maldives – declaring unequivocally that all nations “have a duty to prevent environmental harm” by limiting greenhouse‑gas emissions.

    The Court declared that existing treaties – from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Paris Agreement – require science‑based mitigation targets, robust environmental impact assessments, adaptation measures, and financial and technological cooperation with vulnerable countries. It recognized a stable climate as foundational to human rights. It held that failure to comply constitutes an “internationally wrongful act,” triggering obligations to cease, guarantee non‑repetition, and provide reparations for harm.

    Although advisory, this opinion is already being hailed as a turning point for climate accountability and is expected to shape future environmental litigation worldwide. Experts further emphasize that a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment is now enshrined as a human right, meaning that inaction may breach international law.

    The ruling also clarifies that States can now bring claims against one another for climate‑related loss and damage, paving the way, in principle, for litigation over historic emissions. Yet, as the ICJ warned, untangling which country caused what percentage of warming will be legally complex.

    The ICJ opinion went further, affirming that affected States – such as the Marshall Islands, which estimates a $9 billion adaptation shortfall – have a right to seek compensation for destroyed infrastructure and forced relocation. However, each claim will demand case‑by‑case proof of causation.

    The Court opined even further, holding that States remain responsible for the climate impacts of companies operating under their jurisdiction and that subsidizing fossil‑fuel industries or approving new oil and gas licenses may itself breach environmental obligations.

    Yet on the very same day of the issuance of the ICJ Opinion, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency unveiled a draft rule to rescind its 2009 “endangerment finding,” the legal linchpin for nearly all federal limits on vehicle and power‑plant emissions under the Clean Air Act.

    This rollback threatens to reverse years of progress by stripping away the EPA’s authority. Since 1850, the United States has produced 20.3 percent of cumulative global CO₂ emissions – a share eclipsing any other country – and although U.S. emissions peaked in 2007 and fell by just over 3 percent by 2022, those modest gains are now at risk.

    Meanwhile, the consequences of unchecked emissions are already painfully visible on American soil. In September 2022, Hurricane Ian devastated Florida and the Carolinas, killing over 100 people and inflicting nearly $60 billion in insured damages. Just this July, record‑breaking flash floods in Central Texas claimed 136 lives – well above the 30‑year average – and initially left hundreds missing amid the deluge.

    Meanwhile, an unprecedented summer of heat and drought has fuelled “hundreds of wildfires” across California, Oregon, Washington, Alaska, and Canada, blanketing entire regions in smoke. These events illustrate that rescinding the “endangerment finding” will harm American communities as surely as it imperils small states.

    Because the ICJ’s advisory opinion has no binding enforcement, small island States must now press for an immediate debate in the UN General Assembly (UNGA) under Resolution 77/276. A public plenary discussion will reveal which governments stand for “saving nations from extinction” and which prioritize short‑term economic gains over planetary survival. Such revelations will help to galvanize citizen action to protest climate change within countries and globally.

    It is worth remembering how the ICJ case began: In 2019, a group of Pacific law students conceived the idea at their university. They secured the UNGA referral to the ICJ with backing from Vanuatu, Antigua and Barbuda, the Maldives, and a team of leading international lawyers. Their initiative, born in small states at the front line of battle with the effects of climate change, reminds us that legal innovation often springs from those bearing the brunt of climate harm.

    At the same time, island States cannot afford to wait for international action. They must strengthen domestic resilience through drought‑resistant agriculture and advance early‑warning systems, especially since the Adaptation Gap Report 2023 finds that developing countries face a $194–366 billion annual shortfall in adaptation finance. They should also join the tide of strategic climate litigation: with nearly 3,000 cases filed in over 60 countries, a unified suit by affected States against the major “Carbon Majors” could compel fossil‑fuel companies to fund adaptation and cut emissions.

    This calls for a public-private partnership between governments and the private sector in victim states to bring such cases to Courts whose judgements are binding – the Caribbean Court of Justice may be one such Court. As the Center for International Environmental Law warns in its publication, “A Defining Moment for Climate Justice,” states should immediately seize domestic implementation opportunities and strengthen enforcement mechanisms to hold governments and corporations accountable.

    Finally, small island nations must forge alliances with climate‑concerned members of the OECD and G20 to resist the members of these groups who are intent on denying the existence and effects of climate change. They must use their combined voices in international fora to translate moral imperatives into enforceable commitments. The ICJ has provided moral and legal clarity. However, only the collective resolve of victim states – through public ventilation in regional and international institutions, robust adaptation plans, strategic litigation, and strong alliances- will determine whether the ICJ guidance translates into tangible protection.

    Together, these strategies can help victim States strengthen their resilience, protect communities, and preserve lands in the face of accelerating climate threats. This work is immediate; the champagne must wait.

    (The author is the Ambassador of Antigua and Barbuda to the United States and the OAS, and Dean of the OAS Ambassadors accredited to the OAS. Responses and previous commentaries:[www.sirronaldsanders.com](http://www.sirronaldsanders.com/)

  • UN Chief Calls for Global Unity and Action on Mandela Day 2025

    UN Chief Calls for Global Unity and Action on Mandela Day 2025

    Nelson Mandela’s extraordinary life showed how one person can transform oppression, struggle and subjugation into reconciliation, social justice and unity.

    Just as Madiba’s life was a triumph of the human spirit, his legacy is a call to rekindle our global commitment to peace, justice and human dignity.

    This year’s theme reminds us that the power to end poverty and inequality is in all our hands.

    Mandela believed in the power of collective, grassroots action. He knew that ordinary people could bend the arc of history, and that lasting change started not in capitals and boardrooms, but in neighbourhoods and communities.

    Mandela’s life of service and progress continues to inspire our own efforts at the United Nations, as we celebrate our 80th anniversary.

    On this important day, and every day, let us all be guided by Madiba’s lifelong commitment to freedom, justice, equality and the rights that belong to every person on earth.

  • Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda Sign Landmark Visa Waiver and Cooperation Agreements

    Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda Sign Landmark Visa Waiver and Cooperation Agreements

    Antigua and Barbuda and Rwanda have signed a visa waiver agreement along with two Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) on health and tourism, marking a new chapter in diplomatic relations.

    The agreements were signed on 17 July at Antigua and Barbuda’s Permanent Mission to the United Nations in New York by Ambassadors Walton Webson and Karoli Martin Ngoga.

    The visa waiver allows citizens of both countries to travel without entry, transit, or visitor visas, aiming to boost trade, cultural exchange, and business ties.

    The health MoU outlines cooperation in areas such as disease prevention, health insurance, and maternal and child health.

    The tourism agreement focuses on joint development and sustainability efforts in the sector.

    Both ambassadors highlighted the move as a model for South-South cooperation and a platform for strengthening Africa-Caribbean relations.

  • Implementation of the Antigua & Barbuda Agenda for Small Island Developing States through International Partnerships

    Implementation of the Antigua & Barbuda Agenda for Small Island Developing States through International Partnerships

    The implementation of Antigua and Barbuda Agenda for Small Island Developing States (ABAS) underscores the critical importance of international partnerships in addressing the unique challenges faced by Small Island Developing States (SIDS), including climate change, sustainable development, and economic resilience. As stated in ABAS “ The next ten years are critical for SIDS. A new context is emerging wherein the economic, social and environmental as well as geopolitical threats to SIDS development are so great that they can only be ameliorated by a reinvigorated enabling environment that gives meaningful effect to their sustainable development. Without the full support of the international community, SIDS will endure potentially far-reaching consequences ”.

    By fostering collaboration with international organizations, donor countries, and development partners, ABAS seeks to leverage financial resources, technical expertise, and policy support to strengthen its national capacity. These partnerships are vital in promoting sustainable livelihoods, enhancing environmental protection, and securing a green, inclusive, and resilient future for SIDS.

    In line with SDG17, the side event will showcase the EU – AOSIS partnership in implementing the Agenda with the aim to create a unified effort to build resilience and improve the quality of life for the people of SIDS, ensuring that their voices are heard and their development priorities are supported on the global stage.

    Guided by a member States driven Steering Committee, the SIDS Partnership Framework has since its launch ensured that partnerships for SIDS have remained high on the UN’s agenda, providing a multi-stakeholder platform for reviewing progress made by partnerships for SIDS, and for sharing of good practices and lessons learned among all stakeholders, on an annual basis.

    In May 2025 the Steering Committee proposed recommendations on how to strengthen the SIDS Partnership Framework and the SIDS Global Business Network and its Forum and this side event provides an opportunity to address them in detail.

    Partnership is the engine that will drive ABAS forward. Whether through financing, capacity building, or knowledge exchange, the international community must work hand-in-hand with SIDS to address their priorities — from protecting their oceans and biodiversity, to investing in sustainable livelihoods and resilient infrastructure. In this sense, the side event will also address how the Global Gateway, the EU’s strategy to boost smart, clean and secure connections in digital, energy and transport sectors, and to strengthen health, education and research systems across the world, is enforcing the EU – SIDS partnership and contributes to the implementation of ABAS.

    The EU and its member states together constitute the largest donor to the SIDS, providing more than €1.2 billion in the form of bilateral Official Development Assistance, as well as contributions channelled through multilateral organisations. Further, the EU channels billions worth of funding to the SIDS through the European Investment Bank in the form of credit lines to local credit institutions. Through Global Gateway, we are leading the shift beyond the traditional donor-recipient model to leverage the investment capacity of the private sector, by improving the business environment and investment climate, eliminating technical trade barriers, ensuring a level playing field and using financial tools to crowd in funds. Through this framework of action, the European Fund for Sustainable Development Plus (EFSD+) provides guarantees to private sector investors through development financing institutions.

    Our country-specific approach allows us to cater for vulnerability in the EU’s investments and implementation, as ODA eligibility is not the only criterion to access funding. The shift to international partnerships means that through Global Gateway we can establish partnerships with any country if we have shared policy objectives. The EU also funds a €35 million programme of support for African, Caribbean and Pacific SIDS and coastal countries, including the Bio space programme in the Caribbean, the Bio space programme in the Pacific, and support to the Critical Ecosystems Partnership Fund in the Western Indian Ocean.

    ABAS also insisted on “ the role of the United Nations system in supporting SIDS to achieve their sustainable development objectives, and requested all United Nations development system entities to contribute to the implementation of, and to integrate, the ABAS into their strategic and work plans, in accordance with their mandates”. The participation of UN in the side event will be particularly important.

    2025 is a pivotal year for the SIDS Partnership Framework and Global Business Network, and we need to propose concrete ways to make these platforms more inclusive, effective, and impact-driven.

    Programme (90 min)

    Welcoming remarks (30 min):

    • Stavros Lambrinidis, Permanent Representative of the European Union to the United Nations
    • Sanita Pavļuta-Deslandes, Permanent Representative of Latvia to the United Nations
    • Ali Naseer Mohamed, Permanent Mission of Maldives to the United Nations

    Panel and open discussion (55 min):

    • Rabab Fatima, Under Secretary-General and High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States (TBC)
    • Navid Hanif, Assistant Secretary-General for Economic Development in the Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    • Ignacio Ybáñez, Ambassador at large – EU Special Envoy on Small Island Developing States
    • Ingrid Jackson, Permanent Representative of Grenada to the United Nations
    • Viliami Va’inga Tone, Permanent Representative of the Kingdome of Tonga and the Chair of the SIDS DOCK Executive Council
    • Interventions by Member States and Other Participants

    Closing (5min)

    • Ingeborg Ter Laak, Member of European Parliament, Vice-Chair of the Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly and the Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary Assembly