作者: admin

  • Iran’s internet shutdown now longest in history: Monitor

    Iran’s internet shutdown now longest in history: Monitor

    Iran is currently experiencing the most prolonged nationwide internet blackout in its history, now extending beyond 20 consecutive days according to digital rights monitoring organization NetBlocks. The unprecedented disruption began following the commencement of US-Israel military operations against Iranian territory, creating the longest sustained internet shutdown ever documented within a highly connected society.

    NetBlocks Director Alp Toker revealed to Middle East Eye that Iran’s digital blackout now ranks among the top three longest internet shutdowns in recorded history, surpassed only by extended outages in Sudan and Myanmar during military coup scenarios. The Islamic Republic has established a pattern of implementing internet restrictions during periods of civil unrest, with authorities justifying these measures as necessary to combat misinformation, while critics argue they enable violent state crackdowns without external scrutiny.

    The comprehensive blackout has severely hampered communication between Iran and the global community, though some citizens have attempted to circumvent restrictions using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and alternative methods. Toker noted that conventional VPN services have largely been rendered ineffective, with authorities activating a domestic intranet that provides limited, unreliable external access primarily for technical users under increasingly tightened controls.

    Illicit Starlink satellite systems have emerged as another circumvention method, though both technologies are considered contraband and carry significant user risks amid heightened security measures. Iranian intelligence officials reported confiscating hundreds of prohibited Starlink devices nationwide through what they described as a ‘complex and extensive’ operation targeting satellite-linked systems ‘used to serve the enemy.’ The ministry emphasized that possessing or operating illegal Starlink networks constitutes a criminal offense under Iranian law, with violations during wartime conditions warranting the most severe penalties, particularly for those allegedly collaborating with adversarial nations.

    Simultaneously, Iran’s judiciary announced the execution of three individuals convicted of killing police officers and conducting operations supporting the United States and Israel during January’s anti-government protests. The executions were carried out after convictions for ‘waging war against God,’ a capital offense. While Tehran officially acknowledges approximately 3,000 fatalities during the unrest—including security personnel and bystanders—human rights organizations estimate the death toll exceeds 7,000, predominantly comprising protesters. The protests, among the largest in recent decades, were fueled by economic pressures and state repression, prompting then-US President Donald Trump to openly call for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic.

  • Lebanon says death toll from Israeli attacks tops 1,000 since March 2

    Lebanon says death toll from Israeli attacks tops 1,000 since March 2

    Lebanon faces a devastating humanitarian catastrophe as the nation’s Public Health Ministry confirmed on Thursday that Israeli military operations have resulted in 1,001 fatalities and 2,584 injuries since the conflict escalation began on March 2.

    The staggering casualty figures, released by health authorities in Beirut, represent one of the most severe tolls in recent Middle Eastern conflicts. The systematic airstrikes have targeted multiple regions across Lebanon, creating a multifaceted crisis that extends beyond immediate casualties to encompass widespread infrastructure destruction and a collapsing healthcare system.

    Medical facilities throughout Lebanon report being overwhelmed by the influx of casualties, with many operating at significantly reduced capacity due to damage from bombardments and critical shortages of medical supplies. The compounding challenges of damaged transportation networks and electricity disruptions have further hampered emergency response efforts.

    International humanitarian organizations have raised alarms about the escalating crisis, noting that the actual number of casualties may be higher due to difficulties in accessing conflict zones and documenting victims trapped under rubble. The conflict has displaced approximately 25% of Lebanon’s population, creating a secondary crisis of internal displacement amid the country’s existing economic challenges.

    The sustained military campaign represents the most severe escalation between Israel and Lebanon since the 2006 war, with diplomatic efforts to broker a ceasefire thus far proving unsuccessful. The United Nations and several European nations have called for immediate de-escalation and humanitarian access to affected populations.

  • Pentagon wants over $200 billion to fund Trump’s Iran war

    Pentagon wants over $200 billion to fund Trump’s Iran war

    The Pentagon has formally requested congressional approval for over $200 billion in supplemental funding to support military operations in Iran, according to a Washington Post report. This substantial financial request comes as the Trump administration contemplates deploying additional thousands of troops to the Middle East, signaling potential expansion of the conflict into a prolonged engagement with possible ground invasion capabilities.

    The funding figure, which represents quadruple the amount previously discussed in recent days, has encountered immediate resistance from Democratic lawmakers. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) declared the proposal “an absolute nonstarter,” emphasizing that cutting off funding represents the most effective method to conclude the conflict and restrain what he characterized as a “lawless administration.”

    Senator Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) provided historical context, noting that “at the height of combat the Iraq War cost around $140 billion per year,” suggesting the current request indicates preparation for an extended military campaign.

    The funding package faces significant legislative hurdles, requiring 60 votes for Senate passage and necessitating some Democratic support. Neither Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) nor House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) had responded to the funding request reports at the time of publication.

    This development follows reports that U.S. investigators have determined American forces were responsible for bombing an Iranian elementary school during the initial phase of the conflict, resulting in approximately 175 casualties, predominantly children.

    Simultaneously, Reuters reported the administration is considering substantial troop deployments to reinforce Middle East operations, including potential missions to secure oil tanker passage through the Strait of Hormuz and possible operations on Iran’s Kharg Island—a move described by officials as “very risky” given Iran’s missile and drone capabilities.

    Dylan Williams of the Center for International Policy observed that “we are seeing the Iran war become a quagmire in real time,” criticizing the rapidly escalating funding requests as demonstrating “a total lack of understanding or control over what he has gotten us into.”

    Foreign policy journalist Laura Rozen suggested the administration “blundered into what he thought would be a few day ‘excursion’” without adequate preparation or strategic clarity, while Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi characterized the $200 billion as merely “the tip of the iceberg” in terms of ultimate costs.

  • China urges immediate end to military action in Middle East

    China urges immediate end to military action in Middle East

    Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has issued a stark warning about the escalating Middle East conflict, emphasizing its detrimental impact on global shared interests during a high-level phone discussion with British counterpart Yvette Cooper. The diplomatic exchange occurred against the backdrop of expanding regional hostilities that threaten international stability.

    Minister Wang articulated China’s firm position that prolonged military engagement benefits no nation, asserting that an immediate cessation of hostilities reflects the collective will of the international community. He highlighted the conflict’s far-reaching consequences beyond regional security, noting its disruptive effects on critical global systems including energy markets, financial networks, trade routes, and maritime shipping operations.

    The Chinese diplomat emphasized the necessity of resolving differences through equitable dialogue mechanisms, urging all involved parties to prioritize regional peace and stability. As permanent members of the UN Security Council, both China and Britain bear special responsibility for maintaining international peace, Wang noted, calling for enhanced bilateral coordination to uphold UN Charter principles and fundamental norms of international relations.

    British Foreign Secretary Cooper presented the UK’s perspective on the Middle East situation, acknowledging the increasingly turbulent global landscape. She expressed Britain’s desire to maintain close communication channels with China to facilitate conflict resolution, promote diplomatic negotiations, and work toward sustainable long-term solutions.

    Both officials also discussed bilateral relations, agreeing to actively implement leadership consensus, strengthen exchanges, and advance their comprehensive strategic partnership. This cooperation, they concurred, could provide crucial stability and predictability during a period of global transformation and uncertainty.

  • Why Turkey is unlikely to face a gas crisis if Iran cuts supplies

    Why Turkey is unlikely to face a gas crisis if Iran cuts supplies

    A significant reduction in Iranian natural gas exports to Turkey has emerged following regional military exchanges, including an Israeli strike on Iran’s South Pars gas field and subsequent retaliatory actions. Data from Turkey’s Energy Market Regulatory Authority indicates these exports, constituting approximately 13% of Turkey’s annual gas consumption or 7 billion cubic meters (bcm), have dropped precipitously. Reports from energy specialist Olcay Aydilek confirm flows plummeted from 30-31 million cubic meters to just 7-8 million cubic meters within a single day.

    Despite the sudden shortfall, energy analysts express measured confidence in Ankara’s capacity to mitigate the impact. Muhdan Saglam, an analyst with the Ankara-based TEPAV think tank, highlighted Turkey’s substantial strategic gas reserves. The Salt Lake and Silivri storage facilities, with a combined capacity of 6.3 bcm and currently reported as full by Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar, provide a critical buffer. Saglam stated that utilizing even half of these reserves would sufficiently compensate for the lost Iranian supply.

    Further bolstering Turkey’s position are multiple alternative sourcing avenues. Analysts point to significant spare capacity in existing import pipelines from Russia and Azerbaijan. The Blue Stream and TurkStream pipelines from Russia, with a combined annual capacity of 30 bcm, delivered only 21 bcm last year, indicating ample room for increased imports. Additionally, Turkey’s nascent domestic gas production in the Black Sea, currently feeding 10 million cubic meters daily into the grid, offers another layer of security. The country could also curtail its own gas exports to Balkan nations, which amount to 3.5 bcm annually, to cover the domestic deficit.

    Long-term strategies are also contributing to energy stability. A recent 20-year agreement with trading company Mercuria will supply 4 bcm of American LNG annually starting this year. Concurrently, a structural shift towards renewable energy is gaining traction, with wind power meeting a quarter of the national demand in early January. Seasonal factors, including heavy rainfall and unseasonably mild weather, are further reducing immediate gas consumption needs, easing pressure on the system.

  • NSW to propose per capita GST model after worst-ever tax share

    NSW to propose per capita GST model after worst-ever tax share

    The New South Wales government has launched a formal campaign to dismantle Australia’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) distribution framework, labeling it fundamentally broken and unfair. This move follows the state’s receipt of its worst-ever share from the national tax pool, intensifying a long-standing fiscal feud among Australia’s states and territories.

    Treasurer Daniel Mookhey revealed that NSW would submit a proposal to the Productivity Commission advocating for a complete overhaul. The core of the NSW argument centers on the controversial 2018 Morrison government reforms, which established a GST ‘floor.’ This mechanism ensured that mineral-rich Western Australia would receive no less than 75 cents per person for every dollar of GST collected from states like NSW and Victoria. This arrangement was recently extended by the Albanese government, a decision that safeguards approximately $6 billion in revenue for WA.

    NSW contends that this system has cost its economy a staggering $8.6 billion over the past four years alone—funds it states could have allocated to employing over 14,000 teachers or 13,500 nurses. Under the most recent Commonwealth Grants Commission recommendation, Victoria received $1.4 billion more in GST revenue than NSW for the upcoming period.

    The proposed NSW solution is a shift to an equal per capita distribution of GST grants. This would see funds allocated purely based on population share, with the federal government using its own budget to provide ‘top-up’ payments to smaller jurisdictions like the Australian Capital Territory, Tasmania, and the Northern Territory, ensuring they are no worse off. Mookhey argued this would relieve NSW from ‘carrying the federation all by itself.’

    As a potential compromise, NSW has also proposed a return to a modified pre-2018 system by 2030-31 if a consensus cannot be reached on the per capita model. This modified system would feature a lower floor of 50 cents per dollar and require the Commission to provide four-year relativity forecasts for greater transparency. While every state and territory except Western Australia has reportedly criticized the current model, WA Premier Roger Cook’s government remains a staunch defender of the 2018 arrangements that have significantly benefited its budget.

  • Denmark planned to blow up Greenland runways if US invaded, reports say

    Denmark planned to blow up Greenland runways if US invaded, reports say

    In a startling revelation, Denmark’s public broadcaster DR has exposed covert military preparations made in response to former US President Donald Trump’s persistent ambitions to acquire Greenland. According to extensive reporting based on twelve high-level sources within the Danish government, military, and European allies, Danish forces were dispatched to the Arctic island in January with explicit instructions to defend against a potential American invasion.

    The operation, publicly branded as ‘Operation Arctic Endurance’—a joint military exercise—masked a grave strategic contingency plan. Elite Danish soldiers, alongside contingents from France, Germany, Norway, and Sweden, were flown to key locations including the capital Nuuk and the critical airfield at Kangerlussuaq. Their classified orders included preparations to demolish airport runways to prevent US military aircraft from landing, a desperate measure to raise the ‘cost’ of any hostile takeover. Military planners also pre-positioned blood supplies, anticipating potential casualties from armed conflict between the NATO allies.

    The geopolitical crisis escalated dramatically following a lightning US military operation in Venezuela on January 3rd, which resulted in the seizure of President Nicolás Maduro. This demonstration of unilateral force sent shockwaves through European capitals. The very next day, Trump publicly reiterated his strategic desire for Greenland, telling reporters, ‘We need Greenland from a national security situation. It’s so strategic,’ while making unsubstantiated claims about Russian and Chinese naval activity around the island.

    Fearing that the Trump administration believed it ‘could walk on water’ after Venezuela, Danish officials urgently sought and received political backing from France, Germany, and other Nordic nations. This European solidarity was manifested through the deployment of joint forces and military assets, including a French naval vessel dispatched toward the North Atlantic. French President Emmanuel Macron publicly pledged to reinforce the initial contingent, though the underlying defensive motive remained concealed.

    The tense standdown concluded on January 21st at the World Economic Forum in Davos, where Trump unexpectedly declared he would not use force to acquire Greenland, stating, ‘All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland.’ The Danish Defence Ministry has declined to comment on the reports, citing operational security, while a senior anonymous military official confirmed that knowledge of the operation’s true purpose was restricted to a very limited circle.

  • US, Israel tactics diverge on Iran as Trump’s goals still ‘fuzzy’

    US, Israel tactics diverge on Iran as Trump’s goals still ‘fuzzy’

    A discernible tactical divergence is emerging between the United States and Israel regarding their ongoing confrontation with Iran, despite public displays of unity between President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This strategic split appears rooted in fundamentally different objectives and increasingly public disagreements over military operations.

    Recent weeks have revealed contrasting approaches: Israel has conducted aggressive strikes against Iranian infrastructure, including fuel depots around Tehran that blanketed the city of 10 million in toxic smoke, while the Trump administration has expressed unease about such escalatory actions. The divergence became particularly evident when Trump explicitly instructed Netanyahu against attacking Iran’s gas fields following Israeli strikes that prompted Iranian retaliation against Qatari energy facilities.

    Analysts point to a fundamental discrepancy in end goals. Israel under Netanyahu has consistently identified Iran’s clerical government as its primary regional adversary, openly pursuing regime change or at minimum its substantial weakening. Conversely, the Trump administration’s objectives remain deliberately ambiguous, with the president expressing hope for collaboration with elements within the Islamic Republic while simultaneously celebrating tactical military successes.

    This policy disconnect occurs against different domestic backdrops. Netanyahu faces elections where his close relationship with Trump represents a political asset, while Trump confronts an American public increasingly wary of conflict, including within his own base, amid rising gasoline prices and market volatility ahead of congressional elections.

    The conflict represents a paradigm shift for Israel, marking the first time it has fought as part of an alliance rather than independently. This new dynamic creates both opportunities and vulnerabilities, particularly given Trump’s demonstrated willingness to pressure Israel into ceasefires when conflicts threaten broader US interests.

    Foreign policy experts note that while both Iran and Israel have relatively clear strategic objectives—regime collapse versus regime survival—the unpredictable variable remains President Trump himself, whose statements about the conflict’s duration and goals have shifted dramatically, sometimes within hours. This uncertainty complicates alliance coordination and long-term planning, requiring observers to analyze psychological factors as much as traditional policy analysis.

  • Australian coal set for boom on back of Iran war

    Australian coal set for boom on back of Iran war

    A significant shift in global energy dynamics, triggered by the ongoing conflict in Iran, is generating substantial financial windfalls for Australia’s major coal producers. Leading financial agency Morningstar has substantially revised its valuation forecasts for key mining corporations, anticipating a sustained period of elevated earnings driven by disrupted energy exports from the Middle East.

    Analyst Jon Mills, in a recent market assessment, detailed comprehensive upward adjustments to fair value share price estimates for prominent Australian coal operators. New Hope Corporation received an 8 percent valuation increase, Glencore’s estimate rose by 6 percent, and Whitehaven Coal gained a 3 percent uplift according to Morningstar’s revised modeling.

    The financial reassessment accompanies a fundamental recalibration of thermal coal price projections. Morningstar has elevated its price forecast through 2028, increasing from $115 to $135 per metric ton, reflecting constrained global energy supplies. The strategic closure of the Strait of Hormuz has particularly disrupted liquefied natural gas (LNG) transportation to critical Asian markets, including Japan and South Korea.

    This supply constraint is driving accelerated thermal coal procurement as nations seek alternative energy sources to meet baseline requirements. The market dynamic is further intensified by potential supply reductions from Indonesia, currently the world’s largest coal exporter, creating additional upward pressure on global coal pricing.

    While New Hope and Whitehaven shares currently present moderate undervaluation according to Morningstar’s analysis, Glencore’s market position approaches fair valuation thresholds. All three corporations maintain extensive mining operations across New South Wales and Queensland regions.

    Concurrently, the NSW government announced a significant policy revision on Thursday, confirming it will cease approval of new coal mine applications while maintaining consideration for existing mine expansion projects. This regulatory development introduces additional complexity to long-term supply considerations within the sector.

  • Global tech innovation competition concludes in Hainan

    Global tech innovation competition concludes in Hainan

    HAIKOU, HAINAN – The inaugural Global Scenario-Based Innovation Competition focused on “Digital Economy and New Consumption” reached its climactic conclusion on Thursday, March 19th, in Haikou, Hainan Province. This landmark event assembled pioneering technology startups from across the globe to demonstrate cutting-edge projects specifically aligned with the strategic industrial development goals of the Hainan Free Trade Port.

    Spanning nearly a full year, the extensive competition garnered significant international participation, receiving 103 submissions from innovators representing 16 different nations. Organizers facilitated preliminary qualification events in several world-renowned technology epicenters, including Paris, France, and Silicon Valley in the United States. After undergoing multiple rigorous evaluation rounds, 11 exceptional finalists were selected to compete in a dynamic pitch format. Their presentations showcased a diverse array of technological advancements across critical sectors such as artificial intelligence, robotics, biotechnology, advanced semiconductor packaging, and digital retail solutions.

    A distinguished panel of judges meticulously assessed each participant based on a comprehensive set of criteria, including technological innovation, demonstrated commercial viability, overall team competency, and practical applicability within current market conditions. The featured projects presented innovative solutions ranging from AI-powered cross-border e-commerce platforms and intelligent systems for pest control in tropical agriculture to sophisticated digital twin management technologies designed for pharmaceutical cold chain logistics.

    The timing of this competition is particularly strategic, following the island’s transition to special customs operations that commenced on December 18th. Hainan is actively cultivating its identity as a premier destination for digital economy investments, leveraging attractive tax incentive structures and progressive free trade policies to draw international business and technological talent.

    Asal Askari, Business Operations Lead at BrandPal Inc., expressed strong enthusiasm, stating, “The unique opportunities Hainan provides through its free trade port status and favorable tax policies are genuinely impressive.” She confirmed her company is actively considering market entry into Hainan to better serve global brands seeking expansion within the free trade port ecosystem.

    Gavenraj Sodhi, founder of the San Diego-based precision medicine firm Maddie BioGenetics, highlighted Hainan’s rapidly developing biotechnology sector and advantageous geographical position as key factors driving his interest. “Hainan holds significant strategic importance due to its prime location,” Sodhi remarked. “It presents a tremendous environment to advance scientific research, foster innovation, establish manufacturing capabilities, and subsequently distribute breakthroughs to international markets.”

    Zhou Guangqi, Vice-President of the Haikou National High-Tech Industrial Development Zone International Investment Consulting Co., detailed the substantial incentives available within the zone. These include dedicated funding for technological innovation, comprehensive talent development initiatives, and specialized support services tailored for biopharmaceutical enterprises. The zone further supports entrepreneurs through operational incubators and dedicated international service teams designed to facilitate smooth market entry and growth.