作者: admin

  • US to send 5,000 more troops to Poland, Trump says

    US to send 5,000 more troops to Poland, Trump says

    In a sudden reversal of a recent Pentagon decision, U.S. President Donald Trump announced Thursday that the United States will deploy an extra 5,000 troops to Poland. The announcement comes just seven days after the Department of Defense scrapped a planned deployment of 4,000 troops to the Eastern European nation, leaving defense analysts and European allies scrambling to interpret the shift in U.S. military posture on the continent.

    Breaking the news via his social platform Truth Social, Trump framed the new deployment as a gesture rooted in his close personal and political alignment with Polish President Karol Nawrocki. Trump endorsed Nawrocki during Poland’s 2025 presidential election, and the Polish leader has repeatedly positioned himself as one of Trump’s most vocal European supporters. The U.S. president offered no additional clarity on whether the 5,000 additional troops represent an expansion of the original canceled deployment, a revised iteration of that plan, or an entirely separate military operation.

    The revised troop plan arrives amid a broader restructuring of U.S. military presence across Europe, driven by the Trump administration’s signature “America First” policy agenda that has prioritized reducing overall U.S. defense commitments overseas. Earlier this month, Trump followed through on a threat to withdraw 5,000 U.S. troops from Germany amid a heated public dispute with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over Washington’s approach to the ongoing conflict with Iran. Trump lashed out at Merz after the German leader suggested that U.S. negotiators had been “humiliated” during talks with Iranian officials, and the withdrawal moved forward quickly despite bipartisan pushback in Washington.

    To date, it remains unconfirmed whether the troops bound for Poland are the same forces being drawn down from Germany, or an entirely new contingent. Beyond tensions with Germany, Trump has openly criticized fellow NATO allies for refusing to back the U.S. in escalating pressure on Iran over shipping access through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global energy chokepoint.

    The announcement comes ahead of a high-stakes NATO foreign ministers summit kicking off Friday in Stockholm, where U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will lead the American delegation. Top of the agenda for Rubio is expected to be renewed demands for NATO member states to increase their own defense spending and share more of the alliance’s collective defense burden, a longstanding priority for the Trump administration.

    Ahead of the summit, BBC reporters pressed Rubio on unconfirmed intelligence reports suggesting the U.S. plans to reduce its total available troop commitments for collective defense in the event of an attack on any NATO member. Rubio would not confirm the reports, but confirmed that “some of those issues” would be on the summit’s negotiating table, adding that Trump remains “very upset and disappointed” with the alliance over its failure to meet U.S. demands for greater burden sharing.

    The U.S. Defense Department’s initial cancellation of the 4,000-troop deployment to Poland last week sparked widespread confusion across European capitals about U.S. security commitments. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later sought to calm those fears, framing the cancellation as nothing more than “a temporary delay” and reaffirming that the U.S. remains committed to maintaining a robust and credible military posture across Eastern Europe.

    Nawrocki, who secured Poland’s presidency with Trump’s public backing, has long positioned himself as a staunch ally of both Trump and U.S. security goals in Europe. In a January interview with BBC Radio 4’s *Today* programme, Nawrocki argued that Trump is the only global leader with the ability to confront Russian President Vladimir Putin and negotiate an end to the ongoing war in Ukraine. Despite Trump’s repeated public criticism of the NATO alliance and his fractious relationships with other European leaders, Nawrocki has consistently maintained that the United States remains the primary guarantor of collective security across Europe.

    Even within Trump’s own party, the administration’s shift on European troop deployments has drawn criticism. Multiple congressional Republicans have already spoken out against the planned withdrawal of 5,000 troops from Germany, warning that the drawdown risks sending a dangerous signal of weakened U.S. resolve to the Kremlin, which continues to maintain aggressive military posturing along NATO’s eastern border.

    Currently, the United States maintains its largest European military footprint in Germany, hosting more than 36,000 active-duty troops across the country. By comparison, the U.S. has roughly 12,000 troops deployed in Italy and an additional 10,000 across the United Kingdom.

  • Leading NGOs slam ‘Board of Peace’ for ‘failing’ to deliver Gaza aid pledges

    Leading NGOs slam ‘Board of Peace’ for ‘failing’ to deliver Gaza aid pledges

    On Thursday, three of the world’s most prominent international aid organizations issued a scathing rebuke of U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Board of Peace” for Gaza, declaring the initiative a clear failure due to ongoing, widespread Israeli obstruction of humanitarian aid deliveries into the besieged enclave. Speaking at a press briefing at United Nations headquarters in New York, leaders from Oxfam, Refugees International, and Save the Children US outlined the gaping chasm between the ceasefire agreement’s promises and the grim reality on the ground six months into the deal’s implementation.

  • Maree Vermont death: Accused killer Timothy Loosemore argues fatal fire was tragedy, not murder

    Maree Vermont death: Accused killer Timothy Loosemore argues fatal fire was tragedy, not murder

    A high-profile murder trial has gotten underway in Victoria’s Supreme Court, where a 62-year-old British national accused of killing his Airbnb host after she rejected his romantic advances has firmly maintained his innocence, framing her 2023 death in a devastating house fire as an unforeseen tragedy rather than intentional murder.

    The defendant, Timothy Loosemore, entered a formal not guilty plea to one count of murder for the death of 60-year-old Maree Vermont, who died at her rural property in Goldie, a small community roughly 60 kilometers north of Melbourne, on August 5, 2023.

    Court documents and opening statements outline how the pair first crossed paths earlier that year, when Loosemore – who was undertaking a cross-country cycling trip across Australia – booked a spare room in Vermont’s home through the popular short-term rental platform Airbnb. After their initial stay, Loosemore returned to reside on the property, trading labor on Vermont’s 16-hectare plot for accommodation and meals.

    On the night of August 5, emergency responders were called to Vermont’s property after reports of a raging inferno. Vermont’s body was recovered from the burned-out home, and Loosemore was promptly charged with murder, with prosecutors alleging he killed Vermont before intentionally starting the fire to cover up the crime.

    In his opening address to the jury on Thursday, Crown prosecutor Mark Gibson laid out the prosecution’s core narrative: the killing was driven by “anger and frustration” after Loosemore was unable to accept that Vermont had rejected his desire for a romantic relationship. Gibson told jurors that Vermont had been clear about her boundaries, making her lack of interest in a relationship with Loosemore known to him, her friends, and her family. “This case in large part is about four things; rejection, ego, perverse anger and a house called the Stone House,” Gibson said. Due to the extensive damage the blaze inflicted on Vermont’s remains, coroners have been unable to formally determine an exact cause of death, a detail the prosecution has framed as a direct result of the defendant’s alleged attempt to destroy evidence.

    Responding to the prosecution’s opening the following day, defence barrister Christopher Farrington did not dispute that a devastating, terrible tragedy had taken place, but pushed back hard against the claim that the incident amounted to murder. “Mr Loosemore did not assault Maree Vermont, Mr Loosemore did not kill Maree Vermont and Mr Loosemore did not burn down her house,” Farrington told the jury.

    Farrington argued that the evidence presented over the course of the trial would raise significant, reasonable questions about both the cause of Vermont’s death and the origin of the fire, noting that multiple plausible alternative explanations exist for how the blaze ignited. He added that the prosecution’s narrative of a murder motive rooted in unrequited love is unsupported by evidence, and that the available proof cannot meet the legal standard required to prove Loosemore intended to harm Vermont.

    “The defence simply does not accept that proposition” of a murder motive built on rejected romantic advances, Farrington said.

    Prosecutors have cited key physical evidence they say links Loosemore to the crime: scratch marks on his right cheek and blood stains found on his clothing in the aftermath of the fire. The trial, which is being closely watched in Victorian legal circles, is ongoing, with further testimony and evidence expected to be presented in the coming days.

  • Turkey liquidates nearly all US Treasuries as Iran war bites economy: Report

    Turkey liquidates nearly all US Treasuries as Iran war bites economy: Report

    In a dramatic move that underscores the severe economic pressures piling up on Ankara, Turkey offloaded nearly all of its U.S. Treasury securities in March, according to estimates from Bloomberg that draw on U.S. government data. The country liquidated roughly $14 billion in U.S. sovereign debt, slashing its total holdings to just $1.6 billion – a far cry from the $80 billion peak it hit a decade ago.

    This steep sell-off is rooted in a cascade of economic shocks triggered by the ongoing US-Israeli war on Iran, which has hit Turkey’s already fragile economy on multiple interconnected fronts. As a nation that imports nearly all of its energy needs, Turkey has been squeezed first by soaring global energy prices driven by regional conflict. Before the war began, roughly 14% of Turkey’s natural gas imports came from Iran; those deliveries have halted entirely following an attack on Iran’s key South Pars gas field, creating additional supply strains and cost pressures.

    The conflict has also spurred broader global inflation concerns that have pushed U.S. Treasury yields sharply higher. For Turkey, this shift translates directly to increased borrowing costs on international markets, and has made the country’s already high-risk debt far less appealing to foreign investors.

    Selling U.S. Treasuries is a standard step for emerging economies like Turkey looking to shore up their domestic currency. Nations typically draw on their holdings of U.S. debt to raise dollars, which they can then sell on foreign exchange markets to prop up the value of their own currency. Turkey’s lira has been caught in a years-long downward spiral, paired with persistent sky-high inflation that has eroded purchasing power across the country. Since the outbreak of the war on Iran, the lira has already depreciated roughly 5% against the U.S. dollar, making dollar-denominated energy imports even more costly.

    Turkish policymakers have openly acknowledged the deep uncertainty hanging over the country’s economic trajectory. In May, the Turkish Central Bank raised its 2026 inflation target from 16% to 24%, citing persistent elevated volatility. Leading global financial institutions JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank project that Turkish inflation will climb to 30% by the end of 2024.

    Separate reporting from Reuters added another context to the $8 billion portion of the sell-off: the country tapped those reserves to stabilize the lira after a Turkish court annulled the opposition party congress that elected Özgür Özel as head of the nation’s largest opposition party, removing him from his post and sparking short-term political volatility.

    While Turkey is a relatively small holder of U.S. debt compared to other major regional players – Saudi Arabia holds roughly $150 billion in U.S. Treasuries, while the United Arab Emirates holds around $114 billion – the trend of broad liquidation carries broader global implications. If a growing number of countries follow Turkey’s lead and offload U.S. sovereign debt, yields will continue to rise, pushing up borrowing costs for both the U.S. federal government and American consumers across the board.

  • Law changes and innovations to look out for at the World Cup

    Law changes and innovations to look out for at the World Cup

    For decades, the FIFA World Cup has served as a testing ground for transformative changes to international football’s rulebook, from the 1970 introduction of yellow and red disciplinary cards to the 2018 debut of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system, and the extended stoppage time framework rolled out at the 2022 Qatar tournament. As the 2026 edition – the first World Cup co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico – draws near, a new suite of law adjustments and procedural innovations is set to reshape how the game is played and officiated.

    The most surprising shift comes in the form of universal mandatory hydration breaks, a measure never before enforced for every match in World Cup history. While brief pauses for players to rehydrate have been used in past tournaments for matches played in extreme heat, 2026 will see three-minute breaks held at the midpoint of both the first and second halves, no matter the weather conditions inside the stadium. Even matches played in cool climates or under closed retractable roofs will include the scheduled stoppages.

    FIFA’s official rationale frames the rule as a commitment to prioritizing player welfare, ensuring all competing sides operate under equal match conditions regardless of their fixture’s scheduling or venue. Critics, however, have pointed out that splitting the 90-minute regulation into four distinct segments aligns World Cup match structure with popular North American professional sports, creating natural advertising windows that benefit U.S.-based broadcast partners.

    A second major expansion of existing technology comes to the VAR system, which was originally introduced only to review clear and obvious errors surrounding goals, penalty decisions, straight red cards, and cases of mistaken player identity. The International Football Association Board (IFAB), the global body responsible for setting football’s laws, has approved expanding VAR’s remit to cover two previously excluded scenarios for the 2026 tournament: second yellow card dismissals and corner kick awards.

    Going forward, VAR will now be able to review decisions to send a player off for a second bookable offense, alongside the existing scope for reviewing straight red card calls. For corner kicks, VAR can overturn what the IFAB defines as a clearly incorrectly awarded corner, as long as the review can be completed immediately without delaying the restart of play.

    To crack down on pervasive time-wasting tactics that have dragged out match durations in recent top-level competitions, new timed countdown rules will be enforced for restarts and substitutions. Following the introduction of an eight-second time limit for goalkeepers releasing the ball from hand – which results in an opposition corner if breached – 2026 will extend this framework to goal kicks, throw-ins, and substitution procedures.

    If a match official determines a team is deliberately delaying a goal kick or throw-in, a five-second visual countdown will be displayed for all spectators and officials to see. Should the restart not be completed before the countdown expires, possession will be switched to the opposing team: a delayed goal kick becomes an opposition corner, while a delayed throw-in is handed to the other side. For substitutions, players being substituted off have 10 seconds to exit the pitch after their number is displayed on the substitution board. If they fail to leave within the window, they must still exit immediately, but their replacement cannot enter the game until the next stoppage of play, at least one minute after the original substitution was called. Injured players who require play to be stopped for treatment must also leave the pitch for a minimum of one minute before they are permitted to return to action.

    The final high-profile new rule targets unsportsmanlike and disruptive behavior that has sparked controversy in recent club and continental competitions. Last month, FIFA announced that players who cover their mouths during confrontations with opponents will now be eligible for a straight red card. The rule change follows a 2024 UEFA Champions League incident where Benfica’s Gianluca Prestianni covered his mouth while speaking to Real Madrid’s Vinicius Junior, resulting in a six-match ban for discriminatory homophobic conduct. The new rule is designed to deter players from hiding abusive language from match officials and microphone systems.

    FIFA has also added new penalties for match protests, introducing red cards for any player who leaves the pitch in protest of a refereeing decision, with the same punishment applying to any team official who incites players to abandon play. In the most serious cases, FIFA states that any team that causes a match to be abandoned through protest will in principle forfeit the fixture. This clarification comes after the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations final, where Senegal players walked off the pitch in protest of a penalty awarded to Morocco. While Senegal went on to win the match after returning, the Confederation of African Football eventually stripped them of the title for violating tournament regulations by walking off.

  • US pins hopes on mediator Pakistan in push to end Iran war

    US pins hopes on mediator Pakistan in push to end Iran war

    Nearly three months after the United States and Israel launched large-scale military strikes on Iran that opened a full-scale conflict reshaping the Middle East, Washington is pinning its latest hopes on Pakistani mediation to break a months-long negotiation deadlock and reach a lasting peace agreement.

    The conflict, which began on February 28, triggered widespread regional instability, sent global energy and commodity prices soaring, and pushed the international economy to the edge of new turmoil. A ceasefire agreed on April 8 paused large-scale open fighting, but repeated rounds of talks have failed to produce a permanent deal that can fully end the crisis. On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that Washington expected new diplomatic momentum from Pakistani mediators, who were set to travel to Tehran the same day to advance talks.

    Pakistan has already emerged as a key third-party broker in the conflict, hosting the only direct face-to-face negotiations between U.S. and Iranian officials last month that were facilitated by Pakistan’s powerful Army Chief Asim Munir. Those high-stakes talks ultimately collapsed after Iran rejected what it called Washington’s “excessive demands.” In a sign of continued diplomatic push, Pakistani Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi — a figure widely seen as close to Munir — made his second visit to Tehran in as many weeks on Wednesday. Iranian state media has cited anonymous sources suggesting Munir could travel to the Iranian capital as soon as Thursday, though Pakistani officials have so far offered no confirmation of the army chief’s travel plans.

    Beyond Pakistan’s mediation, China — another actor that has participated in regional efforts to end the war — announced Saturday that Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif will visit Beijing for discussions linked to the diplomatic process.

    The current standoff remains razor-thin, with U.S. President Donald Trump confirming Wednesday that negotiations are balanced on a “borderline” between a final deal and a resumption of full-scale attacks. “If we don’t get the right answers, it goes very quickly. We’re all ready to go,” Trump told reporters, adding that a deal could be reached “very quickly” or within days, but insisted Iran must provide “100 percent good answers” to U.S. demands to avoid renewed hostilities.

    Trump’s fresh pressure on Iran comes as the president faces growing domestic political pressure to resolve the conflict, as U.S. consumers face soaring energy costs tied to the ongoing regional disruption. Rubio also publicly criticized U.S. NATO allies this week for declining to back the U.S.-led campaign against Iran, saying “We were very upset about that” after allies refused to take even non-military action in support of the effort.

    For its part, Iran has remained firm in its own demands and warned it will respond aggressively if hostilities resume. Iranian chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Wednesday that “The enemy’s movements, both overt and clandestine, show that despite economic and political pressure, it has not abandoned its military objectives and is seeking to start a new war,” adding that Iran would launch a “forceful response” to any new attack. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei confirmed Tehran is still reviewing latest proposals from Washington, but repeated Iran’s core demands: the full release of billions of dollars in Iranian assets frozen abroad and an end to the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian territory.

    The most critical unresolved sticking point remains the ongoing blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the strategic global waterway that carries roughly one-fifth of the world’s daily oil and liquefied natural gas supplies, and one-third of global fertilizer shipments. While the April ceasefire paused open fighting, it did not reopen the strait, which Iran closed as a retaliatory measure after the war began. Only a tiny volume of shipping has been allowed through in recent weeks under a new Iranian toll system, and Iran’s new regulatory body for the strait has claimed territorial control extending into Emirati waters — a move that drew an immediate sharp rebuke from Abu Dhabi. Tensions between Iran and the United Arab Emirates have remained severely strained since the war began, after Iran launched missile and drone strikes on Gulf states in retaliation for the U.S.-Israeli offensive.

    As global pre-war oil stockpiles continue to deplete, fears are growing that the prolonged closure will trigger further increases in energy and food prices, worsening existing strains on the world economy. In addition to the core Iran-U.S. standoff, conflict continues to simmer on a second front in Lebanon. Lebanese state media reported Thursday that an Israeli strike damaged a hospital in southern Lebanon, where Israeli forces have continued to carry out operations, demolitions and evacuation orders even after an April 17 truce. Israel says its strikes target Hezbollah, which has continued to launch its own attacks on Israeli territory in turn.

    Hezbollah entered the war after the killing of Iran’s supreme leader in U.S.-Israeli strikes, launching retaliatory rocket fire that dragged Lebanon into the broader regional conflict. Lebanon’s health ministry says Israeli attacks have killed at least 3,089 people in the country since March 2. On Thursday, the U.S. announced new sanctions targeting nine individuals with alleged links to Hezbollah, accusing them of “obstructing the peace process in Lebanon.”

  • ‘Dread’: coral scientists fear bleaching El Nino could bring

    ‘Dread’: coral scientists fear bleaching El Nino could bring

    As climate change continues to push ocean temperatures to record highs, leading coral researchers around the globe are sounding the alarm: a potentially powerful El Nino weather pattern forecast for this year could deliver a fatal blow to reef ecosystems already reeling from repeated mass bleaching.

    Meteorological forecasters have grown increasingly confident that the cyclical climate phenomenon, which emerges every two to seven years, will return in 2025 with unusual strength. El Nino disrupts established global weather patterns, triggering severe drought in some regions and catastrophic flooding in others. For coral reefs, the most dangerous impacts stem from El Nino’s tie to elevated ocean temperatures and reduced cloud cover across many tropical basins—two conditions that directly trigger mass bleaching.

    “Every single global coral bleaching event in recorded history has coincided with an El Nino year,” noted Clint Oakley, a coral biologist at Victoria University of Wellington. He shared that he feels “dread, though not surprise” at the prospect of a strong event, which he says could prove “serious and devastating for reef systems across the world.”

    To understand why warm water poses such an existential threat to corals requires looking at their symbiotic biological relationship: corals rely on tiny algae called zooxanthellae that live within their calcium carbonate structures. The algae use photosynthesis to produce nutrient-rich food for their coral hosts, and in exchange gain a stable habitat and access to the sunlight needed for photosynthesis. The algae are also responsible for the vivid, distinctive colors that make reefs so iconic. When ocean temperatures rise too far above historical averages, however, this delicate partnership breaks down. Researchers have not yet pinpointed the exact biological mechanism that triggers this collapse, but the outcome is consistent: the algae either leave the coral tissue voluntarily or are expelled by the coral itself. Without their algae symbionts, corals are left stark white, a state called bleaching, and slowly starve because they no longer receive the nutrients the algae provide.

    If ocean temperatures drop back to safe levels quickly enough, corals can survive on stored energy reserves until the algae return. Even then, surviving bleaching leaves corals weakened, malnourished, far more susceptible to disease, and unable to allocate enough energy to reproduce. If heat stress persists or reaches extreme levels, the coral will starve to death before temperatures cool, explained Jen Matthews, a coral scientist at the University of Technology Sydney.

    Occasional localised bleaching is a natural part of reef ecosystem dynamics, and can even help cull weaker corals to make space for hardier individuals. The modern crisis stems from repeated mass global bleaching events, which have become the new normal as climate change drives steady long-term ocean warming. When reefs are hit by bleaching before they have fully recovered and had time to produce new juvenile corals to replace lost individuals, the ecosystem enters an irreversible downward spiral, Oakley said.

    The most recent global mass bleaching event was officially declared in 2024, and its impacts have already been devastating. In the Caribbean, multiple key coral species are now classified as functionally extinct, meaning they can no longer reproduce enough to sustain stable populations. Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, the world’s largest reef system and the only living structure visible from space, has already lost between 15 and 40 percent of its total coral cover across different regions since 2024.

    A powerful “super El Nino” this year would add new heat stress to ocean temperatures that are already far above the safe threshold for most corals. Oakley pointed out that average global ocean temperatures over the past five years are already equal to the peak temperatures recorded during the 1998 global bleaching event, the first major mass bleaching event in modern history.

    While a small subset of coral species and individual colonies have shown natural resilience to warm water, these hardier corals are not abundant enough to replace the massive losses caused by repeated bleaching. Scientists have pursued a range of experimental interventions to protect vulnerable reefs, from nutrient gels that feed starved corals to solar shading that cools reefs during heatwaves, and even genetic engineering to breed more heat-tolerant coral strains. These innovative strategies are important, Matthews said, but ultimately they only “buy time” for reefs rather than solving the core crisis.

    Researchers emphasize that key details about this year’s El Nino remain uncertain: while an event is very likely, its exact strength and duration are still unpredictable, said Kimberley Reid, an atmospheric science research fellow at the University of Melbourne. El Nino is just one factor shaping regional ocean conditions, she added, with local ocean temperature anomalies and regional wind patterns also playing major roles in how much heat stress reefs will face.

    Even if an unusually strong El Nino does not materialise this year, the long-term outlook for global coral reefs remains grim. Roughly half of the world’s total coral cover has already been lost over the past few decades. These ecosystems are not just tourist attractions: they provide critical spawning and nursery habitat for commercial fish species that feed billions of people around the world, and act as natural sea walls that absorb storm energy and protect coastal communities from flooding and erosion.

    Matthews called the current trajectory a sobering reality. “If we don’t get our act together on climate change, then all we’re doing is buying time until our reefs, as we know them, disappear.”

  • Gibraltar monkeys eat soil in junk food detox: study

    Gibraltar monkeys eat soil in junk food detox: study

    Gibraltar’s famous colony of Barbary macaques, a top draw for international visitors to this British overseas territory on southern Spain’s border, have developed an unexpected adaptive behavior: they deliberately eat soil to counteract gastrointestinal distress caused by consuming large amounts of human junk food, according to groundbreaking new research published by an international team of biologists.

    Originating from North Africa, the population of roughly 230 macaques holds a unique status as the only free-ranging colony of wild monkeys in all of Europe, per data from the Gibraltar Ornithological and Natural History Society. For millions of tourists who flock to the territory’s iconic Rock of Gibraltar each year, seeing these charismatic primates is often the highlight of their trip. “We came here specifically for the monkeys, because this is the only place in Europe you can see wild populations of them,” 29-year-old Danish visitor Elish told Agence France-Presse. But the tourist attention comes with a hidden cost: despite repeated warnings, many visitors either feed the macaques directly or leave food waste accessible, and the animals regularly raid snacks from unaware guests.

    Local authorities have long enforced a ban on feeding the macaques, with posted warning signs across the territory and fines for violations reaching as high as £4,000 ($5,350). But enforcement remains a major challenge: thousands of tourists visit the Rock daily, and the macaques, which can grow up to 15 kilograms, are bold, independent, and skilled at snatching ice cream, cakes, crisps, chocolate and other processed treats from unguarded bags, picnic baskets and public waste bins. Over time, this steady access to unhealthy human food has drastically altered the macaques’ natural diet, which originally consists of wild fruits, leafy vegetables, seeds and native vegetation.

    The new study, conducted by researchers from the Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, Paris-Sorbonne and Gibraltar’s local environment department between August 2022 and April 2024, documents this soil-eating behavior — formally called geophagy — for the first time in this Gibraltar macaque population. The research team found that geophagy occurs at far higher rates among this colony than it does among other macaque populations around the world, and that the behavior spikes in summer, when tourist numbers to Gibraltar reach their annual peak. Critically, the behavior was not observed at all in a separate group of Gibraltar macaques that have no regular contact with tourists and do not access human junk food.

    “That is a strong argument for the direct association between soil-eating and the consumption of human food,” explained Sylvain Lemoine, co-author of the study and assistant professor of biological anthropology at the University of Cambridge. Lemoine noted that the processed junk food the macaques consume is extremely high in sugar, salt and dairy — ingredients that the primates’ digestive systems are not evolved to process properly, leading to frequent stomach discomfort and disrupted gut microbiomes.

    The research team classifies the behavior as an early form of self-medication. They hypothesize that the soil the macaques consume carries beneficial microfungi and natural microorganisms that help rebalance the disordered gut microbiome after a junk food binge, in addition to absorbing toxins to reduce gastrointestinal distress. Bethany Maxwell, technical officer at the Gibraltar Botanic Gardens, pointed out that while primate geophagy is already well-documented in scientific literature, the link to excess junk food consumption from human tourism is an entirely new finding. “We already know primates eat soil mostly to detoxify or to supplement missing nutrients, but this study shows that this behavior is also being driven here by eating too much unhealthy human food — that’s something quite novel,” Maxwell said.

  • Alberta to hold referendum on whether to remain in Canada

    Alberta to hold referendum on whether to remain in Canada

    Canada’s national unity faces its most significant test in nearly 30 years after Alberta Premier Danielle Smith announced plans for an October referendum on the province’s future within the Canadian federation, capping months of growing public pressure from separatist activists and long-simmering regional grievances against the federal government in Ottawa.

    The vote, scheduled for October 19, will ask Albertans a straightforward, constitutionally framed question: whether the province should remain part of Canada, or whether the provincial government should launch the formal legal process required under Canada’s constitution to hold a subsequent binding referendum on full separation. The announcement comes after two competing citizen-led petitions gathered massive grassroots support earlier this year: a pro-separation petition collected more than 300,000 signatures, while a counter-petition advocating for Alberta to stay in Canada drew more than 400,000 signatures.

    The independence movement in Alberta, Canada’s oil-rich western province, has gained steady traction over the past decade rooted in a widespread, long-held belief among many residents that the province’s economic interests and political priorities are consistently sidelined by federal policymakers in Ottawa. Grievances center on federal climate policies that many Albertans argue have obstructed growth of the province’s critical oil and gas sector, as well as a persistent perception that Alberta contributes more to national federal revenue than it receives in public spending and infrastructure investments.

    In a surprising twist, Premier Smith confirmed in her nationally televised announcement that she personally will vote to keep Alberta within Canada, a position shared by her governing United Conservative Party caucus and provincial cabinet. “That is how I would vote on separation in a provincial referendum,” Smith said. “It is also the position of my government and my caucus.”

    Smith justified the referendum by pointing to a recent court ruling that threw the citizen petition process into legal limbo. After Indigenous First Nations groups argued they had not been properly consulted on the pro-separation petition — a failure that they said infringed on their constitutionally protected rights — an Alberta judge dismissed the petition, halting signature verification and leaving the initiative dead in the water. Smith argued that allowing that ruling to stand would silence the voices of hundreds of thousands of engaged Albertans, a move incompatible with Canadian democratic values.

    “As Premier, I will not have a legal mistake by a single judge silence the voices of hundreds of thousands of Albertans,” Smith said Thursday. “Alberta’s future will be decided by Albertans, not the courts. Kicking the can down the road only prolongs a very emotional and important debate, and muzzling the voices of hundreds of thousands of Albertans wanting to be heard is unjustifiable in a free and democratic society.”

    The premier has faced intense pressure from separatist leaders for months, with Jeffrey Rath, a separatist lawyer, warning earlier this week that Smith’s choice on the referendum would amount to an existential decision for her premiership. Despite the growing momentum behind the separation movement, recent public opinion polling consistently shows a majority of Albertans oppose splitting from Canada.

    This referendum marks the most serious challenge to Canadian unity since two independence referendums in Quebec, the last of which in 1995 ended with a razor-thin 50.58% to 49.42% majority voting to remain in Canada. In the wake of that near-miss, the federal government passed the Clarity Act, a law that sets binding ground rules for any future provincial separation efforts. Prime Minister Mark Carney reaffirmed earlier this month that any Alberta separation process would have to comply with the law, which requires a clear referendum question approved by the federal House of Commons and a “clear majority” of voter support before federal government would enter separation negotiations.

    Even if the pro-independence side prevails in the planned final binding referendum, the path to full separation would be long, fraught with uncertainty, and marked by tense negotiations with the federal government over issues including national debt division, resource rights, border arrangements, and Indigenous land claims.

    Smith also used Thursday’s announcement to echo widespread regional frustration with federal overreach, arguing that the Liberal government in Ottawa has pushed to centralize power at the expense of provincial jurisdiction, echoing a core grievance shared by many Alberta politicians regardless of their stance on separation. “I categorically reject Ottawa’s attempts to move towards a more centralised American-style system and infringe on provincial jurisdiction,” Smith said. “I call on all provincial leaders and MPs to undo the extensive damage that centralisation of power in Ottawa has done to our country economically and with respect to national unity.”

    Federal political leaders across party lines have pushed back in favor of preserving national unity. Dominic Leblanc, Canada’s Minister of Internal Trade and a senior Liberal cabinet member, said in a social media statement that the government “strongly believes that the interests of Albertans and all Canadians are best served when we work together.”

    “As we take note of Premier Smith’s address this evening, we remain focused on building a stronger Canada for all, in full partnership with Alberta and to the benefit of all Albertans and all Canadians,” he added. Pierre Poilievre, leader of the federal Conservative Party and an Alberta native, confirmed Thursday that he supports a united Canada and will campaign across the country to unify Canadians around a shared vision of hope.

  • ‘There’s a narrative’: Daniel Atkinson rubbishes halfback theory as he welcomes Luke Metcalf’s 2027 arrival

    ‘There’s a narrative’: Daniel Atkinson rubbishes halfback theory as he welcomes Luke Metcalf’s 2027 arrival

    The currently winless St. George Illawarra Dragons of the National Rugby League (NRL) have secured one of the biggest off-season recruitment coups of 2027, locking in dynamic playmaker Luke Metcalf on a three-year contract from the New Zealand Warriors. But the high-profile addition of the 2025 standout, whose season was cut short by a career-threatening knee injury, has ignited fresh discussion over who will fill the starting halves spots when Metcalf makes his debut for the Red V.

    Metcalf’s arrival marks the latest in a string of promising off-season additions for the rebuilding club, which has also poached Scott Drinkwater, Keaon Koloamatangi and Phil Sami from rival franchises ahead of the 2027 campaign. The roster overhaul signals the Dragons’ clear ambition to climb out of their current on-field slump and re-establish themselves as title contenders in coming seasons.

    However, the signing has thrown up a tricky selection puzzle for the head coach that will replace departing mentor Shane Flanagan ahead of 2027. Current Dragons playmaker Daniel Atkinson, who joined the club from Cronulla Sharks on a three-year deal earlier this year, was initially framed as the franchise’s long-term starting halfback. But after shifting to five-eighth in 2026, he now faces stiff competition for a starting halves spot alongside Metcalf, with young gun Kade Reed and incumbent Kyle Flanagan (son of outgoing coach Shane Flanagan) also in the mix for a role.

    Appearing this week ahead of his Round 12 start at five-eighth – his first game back after sustaining a fractured hand – Atkinson pushed back on the narrative that he joined the Dragons with the sole aim of securing the starting halfback job. The versatile playmaker argued he is solely focused on turning the club’s 2026 season around rather than worrying about selection battles 12 months away.

    “Everyone here’s got to earn the number on their back, but that’s a long time away,” Atkinson told reporters. “There’s a narrative there that I came here to be a halfback. I came here to be in the halves and to play my game, which is running, kicking, and tackling well. So all I’m thinking about is how I can benefit this team at the moment. I’m not thinking (about) 2027. Obviously, it’s very exciting for him coming here, but I’ve got a job to do for this club first in 2026.”

    Having spent the early years of his professional career rotating between the bench, reserve grade and five-eighth, Atkinson said he has embraced the pressure of being a starting playmaker at one of the league’s most high-profile clubs, even amid the team’s current winless drought. Entering Round 12, the Dragons hold the worst attacking record in the NRL, but Atkinson says the playing group is not shying away from the challenge of turning their form around.

    “I love it. It’s what I signed up for,” he said. “Obviously I’m not loving the circumstances we’re in at the moment, but then again, I’ve put myself in this circumstance and I’m going to face it head-on. I want us to be the ones who get us out of here, and I’m not going to shy away from that. I’m not proud of where we are. It’s a very passionate club with passionate fans, and everyone inside those doors are trying their arses off. The coaches, everyone from the top down, the players, we don’t want to be in this circumstance. Nobody does, so you can put money that we’re trying our arses off and we’re trying to turn the tide.”

    On Saturday, Atkinson will partner Kyle Flanagan in the halves, as Flanagan looks to rebuild form following a turbulent month that saw his father Shane step down as head coach and the young playmaker temporarily dropped from the starting side in favour of Reed. Atkinson praised Flanagan’s mental toughness through the upheaval, noting his halves partner’s relentless work ethic and on-field leadership that has remained consistent despite poor team results.

    “We started the season there and played well in Vegas. Obviously, results didn’t go our way after that, but we don’t like where we are at the moment,” Atkinson said. “We obviously want to be winning games, and he’s his own harshest critic. He tries there relentlessly. He’s been training well for a couple weeks now. I think he just knew what his job was and he’s a good defender and a good communicator on the field. His effort is second to none and I think he just focused on his job, his role for the team.”

    Atkinson will be aiming to add to his five try assists from nine opening matches this weekend, as the Dragons chase their first win of the 2026 NRL season.