标签: Asia

亚洲

  • ‘Skull Chart’ math behind Trump’s climbdown on all things China

    ‘Skull Chart’ math behind Trump’s climbdown on all things China

    The latest National Defense Strategy, delivered to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, marks a significant shift in U.S. military priorities. The document, reportedly crafted by Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby, advocates for a refocus on domestic and regional missions, moving away from global adversaries like China and Russia. This pivot overturns decades of interventionist policies and signals a more restrained approach to international engagements.

    Colby, previously known for his advocacy of a robust ‘Strategy of Denial’ to counter China, has surprised many with this pragmatic stance. During his confirmation hearings, he emphasized that Taiwan, while important, is not an existential interest for the U.S. This shift raises questions about whether it stems from a realistic assessment of U.S. military capabilities or the influence of a mercurial administration.

    Meanwhile, China continues to demonstrate its military prowess, showcasing advanced weaponry in a recent parade. The rapid development of China’s defense industry, paralleling its dominance in the electric vehicle sector, underscores its technological and industrial might. With Chinese universities producing 6.7 times more engineers than their U.S. counterparts annually, the pace of innovation in China’s military sector appears unstoppable.

    In parallel, the Trump administration has extended tariff negotiations with China for another 90 days, following previous concessions in trade disputes. This ongoing economic tug-of-war highlights the complexities of U.S.-China relations and the challenges of addressing China’s growing economic and military influence.

    The new National Defense Strategy reflects a broader reckoning with the limits of U.S. power. As America grapples with domestic issues and overstretched military commitments, the strategy suggests a need to prioritize internal stability over global dominance. This shift, while controversial, may be a necessary step in adapting to a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape.

  • ‘King Charles is a secret Muslim!’: The bizarre things I heard at the Reform party conference

    ‘King Charles is a secret Muslim!’: The bizarre things I heard at the Reform party conference

    The Reform Party’s annual conference at the National Exhibition Centre in Birmingham showcased a vibrant and diverse crowd, challenging the stereotype that Nigel Farage’s supporters are predominantly older men. Attendees included young men in flamboyant suits, women in light blue dresses, and even a few ethnic minorities, though the majority were white. The atmosphere was electric, resembling a festival with attendees enjoying beer, hot dogs, and burgers, though vegetarian options were scarce. The party’s light blue color was prominently displayed in attire and decorations, with Union Jack and St George’s flags adding to the patriotic fervor. Reform, a right-wing anti-immigrant party, has been leading opinion polls and is a strong contender for the next general election. Nigel Farage, the party leader, received a hero’s welcome, with his speech outlining controversial policies such as deporting 600,000 illegal immigrants within five years and banning the Muslim Brotherhood. The event also featured Zia Yusuf, the new head of policy, who addressed the party’s stance on Israel and Gaza, avoiding direct condemnation of Israel’s actions. The conference highlighted the party’s broad appeal, with members ranging from veterans to young activists, all united by concerns over immigration and national identity. Despite the festive atmosphere, underlying tensions and controversial views on race and religion were evident, reflecting the party’s polarizing nature.

  • Parades and charades at Tiananmen

    Parades and charades at Tiananmen

    On September 3, Beijing witnessed a historic military parade where Chinese President Xi Jinping unveiled a defense system capable of countering the United States. This display marked a significant shift in global power dynamics, signaling that China is no longer a junior partner to the U.S. but a formidable global power ready to defend and expand its interests. This event, coupled with China’s growing alliances and its philosophy of non-interference in international politics, underscores its strategic rise on the world stage. The recent Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin further highlighted China’s expanding influence, with India’s presence confirming Beijing’s ability to attract new allies while the U.S. struggles to maintain its traditional partnerships. China’s re-examination of history, particularly its role in World War II, and its emphasis on regional growth through initiatives like the $1.3 billion SCO development bank, further illustrate its comprehensive strategy to reshape global narratives and economic frameworks. Meanwhile, the U.S. faces challenges in maintaining its influence in Asia, with countries like Japan and Australia potentially hedging their security strategies and relying less on American support. This evolving landscape suggests a psychological and strategic decoupling between the U.S. and China, leading to a more tense bilateral atmosphere reminiscent of Cold War II. As China continues to capitalize on American missteps, it is crafting a new world order with its own rules, independent of Western standards. This shift has profound implications for global security, trade, and diplomacy, as nations reassess their alliances and strategies in response to China’s growing assertiveness.

  • Lebanon: What will it take to disarm Hezbollah?

    Lebanon: What will it take to disarm Hezbollah?

    In a significant geopolitical shift, the Lebanese government, under mounting pressure from the United States, has escalated its efforts to disarm Hezbollah, the Shia political party and militant group often described as a ‘state within a state.’ Hezbollah, which emerged in 1982 as a resistance movement against the Israeli invasion, has maintained an armed presence in Lebanon for decades, often clashing with Israel. Tensions between the two factions reached a boiling point in September 2024, following an extensive Israeli bombing campaign in Lebanon. Despite a ceasefire agreement brokered in November 2024, Israel has continued to violate the terms with ongoing air strikes and the occupation of five Lebanese locations.

  • China’s WWII commemoration rekindles cross-strait history battle

    China’s WWII commemoration rekindles cross-strait history battle

    Eight decades after World War II concluded with Japan’s surrender to Allied forces on September 2, 1945, the conflict continues to influence East Asian geopolitics, particularly in the context of modern tensions. The recent high-profile military parade in China, commemorating what Beijing terms the ‘War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression,’ has reignited debates over historical narratives and their implications for current relations. Critics in Tokyo accuse the Chinese Communist Party of fueling anti-Japanese sentiment, while the U.S. has expressed concerns over Beijing’s emphasis on Russia’s role at the expense of America’s contributions. The narrative battle between Taipei and Beijing is particularly significant. During the war, China’s communists and nationalists formed an uneasy alliance against Japan, but after the war, the communists emerged victorious, forcing the nationalists to retreat to Taiwan. This historical backdrop fuels ongoing disputes over each side’s role in defeating Japan and the symbolism of Beijing’s military displays. A key point of contention is the fact that Japan surrendered to the National Revolutionary Army of the Kuomintang, not the communists, a detail that underscores Taiwan’s claim to historical legitimacy. The nationalist army bore the brunt of conventional warfare, while the communists relied on guerrilla tactics, leading to differing interpretations of their respective contributions. Taiwan’s status post-war adds another layer of complexity. After 50 years of Japanese colonial rule, Taiwan was handed over to the Republic of China, but the island’s local population resisted the authoritarian nationalist regime. The Cairo Declaration of 1943 further complicated matters by affirming Taiwan’s return to China, a principle both Beijing and Taipei uphold, albeit with differing interpretations of which government represents China. These conflicting narratives resurface during commemorative events, such as China’s 2015 military parade marking the 70th anniversary of Japan’s surrender. Beijing uses these occasions to assert its role in shaping the post-war world order and to promote its vision of a multipolar world. Meanwhile, Taiwan opts for more subdued commemorations, reflecting its population’s focus on contemporary issues rather than historical grievances. As tensions across the Taiwan Strait escalate, the legacy of World War II remains a potent force in shaping East Asian geopolitics.

  • The paradox behind China’s military parade

    The paradox behind China’s military parade

    China’s recent military parade, marking the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, showcased its advanced defense capabilities, including DF-41 intercontinental ballistic missiles and J-20 stealth fighters. This display of military prowess aimed to project confidence abroad and reassure domestic audiences. The event underscored China’s transformation from a nation reliant on Soviet imports to a global leader in defense manufacturing, with state-owned enterprises like AVIC, CASIC, CSSC, and CETC driving innovation in aviation, missiles, shipbuilding, and electronics. Today, China boasts the world’s largest navy, with over 370 vessels, and a modernized PLA Rocket Force and Air Force. However, this show of strength has unintended consequences. While China has achieved continental primacy, leveraging infrastructure projects and economic influence across Central Asia and Mongolia, its maritime ambitions face resistance. Regional powers like Japan, Australia, and the Philippines are bolstering their defenses and deepening ties with the U.S. to counterbalance China’s growing influence. Despite its industrial scale, China’s defense exports remain limited, and its assertive actions in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait have heightened regional anxieties. The paradox of China’s military rise is that it has inadvertently reinforced the U.S.-led security architecture in the Indo-Pacific, diminishing the geopolitical returns on its vast investments.

  • Iran’s SCO entry turning into a road to nowhere

    Iran’s SCO entry turning into a road to nowhere

    TEHRAN – Iran’s membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) was initially hailed as a strategic pivot to counter Western sanctions and bolster its economic independence. However, years after its full accession, the results paint a starkly different picture. Despite high hopes, Iran has struggled to achieve its core economic objectives through the SCO, raising questions about the organization’s effectiveness as an alternative to the Western financial system.

    One of Iran’s primary goals was to establish an alternative financial channel to bypass US dollar-based sanctions. The SCO’s ambitious ‘de-dollarization’ initiative, aimed at promoting trade in national currencies, was seen as a lifeline for Iran’s isolated banking sector. However, the lack of a unified financial messaging system or a multilateral clearing house has rendered this initiative largely symbolic. Instead of fostering a democratic basket of currencies, the initiative has inadvertently paved the way for the Chinese yuan’s dominance, offering little practical benefit to Iran.

    Another key objective was to attract vital capital for strategic infrastructure projects, particularly the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). This project, designed to connect Russia to the Indian Ocean, was expected to unlock significant financing under the SCO’s political umbrella. Yet, the reality has been far from promising. Key segments of the INSTC remain underfunded, with pledges from Russia, India, and China failing to materialize into tangible investments. Secondary sanctions and Iran’s inability to provide credible sovereign guarantees have further deterred potential financiers.

    China, despite its 25-year strategic partnership agreement with Iran, has been notably risk-averse. Chinese state-owned banks and firms have refrained from committing to major Iranian projects, prioritizing commercial viability over political rhetoric. This has left Iran reliant on opaque financial networks and grey-market oil sales, perpetuating its economic vulnerability.

    In contrast, fellow SCO member Pakistan has successfully leveraged the organization to advance its infrastructure goals through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a bilateral project with guaranteed Chinese financing. Iran’s inability to secure similar backing highlights the SCO’s limitations as a financing institution.

    Ultimately, Iran’s SCO membership has been a political victory against Western isolation but an economic disappointment. The organization has provided a seat at the regional table but failed to unlock the financial resources needed to transform Iran’s economy. As rival transit corridors gain momentum, Iran risks falling further behind in the race to become a regional logistics hub.

  • Sudan landslide erases entire village, with hundreds feared dead

    Sudan landslide erases entire village, with hundreds feared dead

    A catastrophic landslide in the Marra mountains of western Sudan has completely obliterated the village of Tarsin, leaving a trail of devastation and uncertainty. The disaster, triggered by weeks of relentless heavy rains, has claimed an estimated death toll ranging from dozens to potentially 1,000 people, according to local accounts. Rescue operations are severely hampered by ongoing landslides, which continue to threaten nearby villages perched on the mountain’s 3,000-meter summit. The region, already a refuge for thousands displaced by Sudan’s protracted civil war, now faces compounded humanitarian crises. Many of the displaced had fled from el-Fasher, the besieged capital of North Sudan, where a humanitarian catastrophe has unfolded over 500 days of conflict. The war, pitting the Sudanese army against the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, displaced 12 million people, and devastated the nation’s infrastructure. The Ummro district, where Tarsin is located, has been under the control of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Abdul Wahid faction (SLM/AW), a rebel group claiming neutrality in the conflict. International aid organizations, already struggling to access war-torn areas, now face insurmountable challenges due to the rugged terrain, inaccessible routes, and the threat of further landslides. Adam Rigal, a support worker for displaced Sudanese, reported that Tarsin’s entire population of over 1,000 people perished, with only one survivor. Hundreds remain buried under the rubble, and locals are using rudimentary tools to retrieve bodies. The situation is dire, with urgent need for emergency and humanitarian assistance, including evacuation of nearby villages. Aid workers in Darfur emphasize the compounded disaster, as the war has rendered the area nearly inaccessible. The region’s health infrastructure is in ruins, heightening risks of cholera and dengue fever. Abdul Wahid al-Nur, leader of the SLM/AW, has called for immediate international intervention to save thousands at risk from ongoing landslides. Meanwhile, Sudan’s water and irrigation ministry has warned of continued heavy rains and dangerous floods threatening over 72 locations and 230,000 people across the country. Communities are urged to remain vigilant and evacuate flood-prone areas.

  • Chinese students flock to Russia amid uncertain US visa policies

    Chinese students flock to Russia amid uncertain US visa policies

    As the United States intensifies visa scrutiny due to national security and commercial espionage concerns, Russia is rapidly becoming a favored academic hub for Chinese students. This shift is bolstered by the deepening strategic alliance between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin. During a recent visit to China, Russia’s Minister of Science and Higher Education, Valery Falkov, revealed that over 56,000 Chinese students are enrolled in Russian universities for the 2024–2025 academic year, with more than 21,000 Russian students studying in China. Falkov emphasized the mutual benefits of this educational exchange, noting that visa applications from Chinese students to Russian consulates have doubled in just two years. He highlighted the affordability, cultural affinity, and political alignment that make Russia an attractive alternative to traditional Western destinations like the US, UK, Canada, and Australia. Over 200 joint educational programs are currently active, including 115 bachelor’s and master’s degree offerings. A notable example is Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, established in 2017 through collaboration between Moscow State University and Beijing Institute of Technology. Falkov also outlined plans for a joint Institute for Fundamental Research and the finalization of intergovernmental agreements on educational cooperation and mutual recognition of diplomas. Meanwhile, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has criticized the US for its harsh treatment of Chinese students, including extended interrogations and visa revocations. Despite US President Donald Trump’s pledge to welcome 600,000 Chinese students, skepticism remains due to inconsistent policies and heightened scrutiny in sensitive fields like aerospace and AI. Observers note that while Russia offers stability and affordability, it may not fully replace the cutting-edge innovation found in Western institutions.

  • A China blockade of Taiwan may or may not work

    A China blockade of Taiwan may or may not work

    US officials have indicated that Chinese President Xi Jinping has set a 2027 deadline for the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to achieve the capability to invade Taiwan, coinciding with the centennial anniversary of the PLA’s founding. This revelation was highlighted by US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth during a security conference in Singapore in May, where he emphasized the “imminent threat” China poses to Taiwan. Over the past decade, the PLA has undergone significant modernization, building the world’s largest navy and coast guard. However, rather than outright invasion, China appears to be leaning towards a strategy of prolonged blockade to pressure Taiwan into submission. This approach, known as ‘lianhe fengkong’ (joint blockade), would involve cutting off Taiwan from external resources, leveraging coordinated air, sea, and land-based systems. A recent report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) simulated 26 war game scenarios, predicting severe consequences for Taiwan, including depletion of natural gas within ten days, coal and oil shortages within weeks, and a halt in manufacturing if electricity levels drop to 20%. Taiwan’s vulnerability stems from its heavy reliance on port calls and limited emergency reserves. While blockades are not inherently illegal under international law, they must comply with war regulations, including effectiveness, notification, and impartial enforcement. China’s potential strategies range from kinetic blockades targeting merchant ships to non-kinetic measures like encircling the island with its naval forces. Counter-blockade strategies, such as those led by the US, could involve closing critical trade routes like the Malacca Strait, though such actions risk global economic disruption. The optimal response may lie in bolstering Taiwan’s resilience through increased stockpiles and infrastructure development, alongside US naval support to break potential blockades, albeit at significant risk of escalation.